SumBoundII to StrongPNT
TheoremSumBoundII#
For all \(t\in\mathbb{R}\) with \(|t|\geq 2\) and \(z=\sigma+it\) where \(1-\delta_t/3\leq\sigma\leq 3/2\), we have that
Proof
By Lemma DeltaRange we have that
We apply Theorem LogDerivZetaFinalBound where \(r'=2/3\), \(r=3/4\), \(R'=4/5\), and \(R=5/6\). Thus for all \(z\in\overline{\mathbb{D}_{2/3}}\setminus\mathcal{K}_f(4/5)\) we have that
where \(f(z)=\zeta(z+3/2+it)\) for \(t\in\mathbb{R}\) with \(|t|\geq 2\). Now if we let \(z=\sigma-3/2\), then \(z\in(-29/54,0)\subseteq\overline{\mathbb{D}_{2/3}}\). Additionally, \(f(z)=\zeta(\sigma+it)\), where \(\sigma+it\) lies in the zero free region given by Lemma ZeroInequality since \(\sigma\geq 1-\delta_t/3\geq 1-\delta_t\). Thus, \(z\not\in\mathcal{K}_f(4/5)\). So,
But now note that if \(\rho\in\mathcal{K}_f(3/4)\), then \(\zeta(\rho+3/2+it)=0\) and \(|\rho|\leq 3/4\) (and the argument works in reverse). Additionally, note that \(m_f(\rho)=m_\zeta(\rho+3/2+it)\). So changing variables using these facts gives us that
Lean
Formalized as SumBoundII.
Sources
Uses 7 · Used by 1
TheoremGapSize#
Let \(t\in\mathbb{R}\) with \(|t|\geq 3\) and \(z=\sigma+it\) where \(1-\delta_t/3\leq\sigma\leq 3/2\). Additionally, let \(\rho\in\mathcal{Z}_t\). Then we have that
Proof
Let \(\rho=\sigma'+it'\) and note that since \(\rho\in\mathcal{Z}_t\), we have \(t'\in(t-3/4,t+3/4)\). Thus, if \(t>1\) we have
And otherwise if \(t<-1\) we have
So by taking reciprocals and multiplying through by a constant we have that \(\delta_t\leq2\delta_{t'}\). Now note that since \(\rho\in\mathcal{Z}_t\) we know that \(\sigma'\leq 1-\delta_{t'}\) by Theorem ZeroInequality (here we use the fact that \(|t|\geq 3\) to give us that \(|t'|\geq 2\)). Thus,
Lean
Formalized as GapSize.
Sources
Uses 3 · Used by 1
TheoremLogDerivZetaUniformLogSquaredBoundStrip#
There exists a constant \(F\in(0,1/42)\) such that for all \(t\in\mathbb{R}\) with \(|t|\geq 3\) one has
where the implied constant is uniform in \(\sigma\).
Proof
Take \(F=E/3\) where \(E\) comes from Theorem ZeroInequality. Then we have that \(\sigma\geq 1-\delta_t/3\). So, we apply Lemma SumBoundII, which gives us that
Using the reverse triangle inequality and rearranging, we have that
where \(C\) is the implied constant in Lemma SumBoundII. Now applying Lemma GapSize we have that
Now let \(f(z)=\zeta(z+3/2+it)/\zeta(3/2+it)\) with \(\rho=\rho'+3/2+it\). Then if \(\rho\in\mathcal{Z}_t\) we have that
with the same multiplicity of zero, that is \(m_\zeta(\rho)=m_f(\rho')\). And also if \(\rho\in\mathcal{Z}_t\) then
Thus we change variables to have that
Now note that \(f(0)=1\) and for \(|z|\leq 5/6\) we have
by Theorems ZetaFixedLowerBound and GlobalBound. Thus by Theorem ZerosBound we have that
where \(D\) is taken to be sufficiently large. Recall, by definition that, \(\delta_t=E/\log|t|\) with \(E\) coming from Theorem ZeroInequality. By using this fact and the above, we have that
where the implied constant is taken to be bigger than \(6D/E+C\). We know that the RHS is bounded above by \(\ll\log^2|t|\); so the result follows.
Lean
Formalized as LogDerivZetaUniformLogSquaredBoundStrip.
Sources
Uses 12 · Used by 2
TheoremLogDerivZetaBdd-of-Re-ge-three-halves#
There exists a uniform constant \(C\) such that for \(z=\sigma+it\) one has
Proof
Note that
by vonMangoldtLSeriesSummable.
Lean
Formalized as LogDerivZetaBdd_of_Re_ge_three_halves.
Sources
Uses 2 · Used by 1
TheoremLogDerivZetaUniformLogSquaredBound#
There exists a constant \(F\in(0,1/42)\) such that for all \(t\in\mathbb{R}\) with \(|t|\geq 3\) one has
where the implied constant is uniform in \(\sigma\).
Proof
Put the previous two Lemmas together.
Lean
Formalized as LogDerivZetaUniformLogSquaredBound.
Sources
Uses 3 · Used by 1
TheoremStrongPNT#
We have
Proof
This follows as a corollary of Theorems GenStrengthPNT and LogDerivZetaUniformLogSquaredBound.
Lean
Formalized as StrongPNT.
Sources
Uses 7
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.