92.3 The cotangent complex of a… to 92.7 The fundamental triangle
Section92.3 The cotangent complex of a ring map#
Section 92.3 of the Stacks Project, Tag 08PL. 4 tags here are carried by 7 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier) and 2 registered declarations, quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 08PM, a definition
Tag 08PM in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.standardResolution, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/StandardResolution.lean, line 177.
Stacks Project, Tag 08PM. The standard resolution of the commutative
A-algebraB, augmented toB. Its degreenterm is the(n + 1)-fold iteration ofC ↦ A[C].
noncomputable def standardResolution (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
(B : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A) : SimplicialObject.Augmented (CommAlgCat.{max u v} A)
Tag 08PN, a definition
Tag 08PN in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.cotangentSimplicialModule, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Complex.lean, line 304. The attribute's comment: “the simplicial module”.
The canonical simplicial
B-moduleΩ[P•⁄A] ⊗[P•] B.
noncomputable def cotangentSimplicialModule (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
(B : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A) : CotangentSimplicialModuleData A B
CommAlgCat.cotangentComplex, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Complex.lean, line 335. The attribute's comment: “the associated complex”.
The cotangent complex
L_{B/A}associated to the standard resolution.
noncomputable def cotangentComplex (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
(B : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A) : CochainComplex (ModuleCat.{max u v} B) ℤ
Tag 08PP, a remark
Tag 08PP in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.existsSliceStandardEndofunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SliceStandardResolution.lean, line 245. The attribute's comment: “the standard endofunctor in the slice”.
The comonad of the lifted adjunction has a standard augmented simplicial endofunctor in the category of algebras over
B.
theorem existsSliceStandardEndofunctor :
∃ X : SimplicialObject.Augmented (Over B ⥤ Over B),
IsSliceStandardEndofunctor A B X
CommAlgCat.sliceStandardResolution_iso, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SliceStandardResolution.lean, line 320. The attribute's comment: “comparison of standard resolutions”.
Every standard simplicial endofunctor arising from the slice adjunction, evaluated on the identity of
B, gives the ordinary augmented standard resolution ofB.
theorem sliceStandardResolution_iso
(X : SimplicialObject.Augmented (Over B ⥤ Over B))
(hX : IsSliceStandardEndofunctor A B X) :
Nonempty
(((SimplicialObject.Augmented.whiskeringObj _ _ (Over.forget B)).obj
((SimplicialObject.Augmented.whiskeringObj _ _
((evaluation (Over B) (Over B)).obj (Over.mk (𝟙 B)))).obj X)) ≅
standardResolution A B)
Declarations registered for the tag:
CategoryTheory.Over.postAdjunctionRightregistered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SliceStandardResolution.lean, line 74 (StacksFrontier): “the adjunction”.CategoryTheory.Over.post_forget_eq_forget_compregistered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SliceStandardResolution.lean, line 75 (StacksFrontier): “the commutative square”. References: SGA 3 I (1.6), “more general”.
Tag 08S9, a lemma
Tag 08S9 in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.isDirectedColimitOfTypes_cotangentComplexAb, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/DirectedColimit.lean, line 1057. The attribute's comment: “degreewise”.
Let
A i → B ibe a system of ring maps over a directed index setI, withAinfthe colimit of theA iandBinfthe colimit of theB i. Then in every degree the canonical maps induced by the comparison squares exhibitL_{Binf⁄Ainf}as the directed colimit of the cotangent complexesL_{B i⁄A i}, the transition maps of the system being those induced by the squares of the system; that is,colim L_{B i⁄A i} = L_{colim B i⁄colim A i}.
theorem CommAlgCat.isDirectedColimitOfTypes_cotangentComplexAb
(hA : IsDirectedColimitOfTypes (fun _ _ h a => (sq h).base a)
(fun i a => (cocone i).base a))
(hB : IsDirectedColimitOfTypes (fun _ _ h b => (sq h).map b)
(fun i b => (cocone i).map b))
(n : ℤ) :
IsDirectedColimitOfTypes
(fun _ _ h a => (CommAlgCat.cotangentComplexAbMap (sq h)).f n a)
(fun i a => (CommAlgCat.cotangentComplexAbMap (cocone i)).f n a)
CommAlgCat.isColimit_cotangentComplexAbCocone, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/DirectedColimit.lean, line 1270. The attribute's comment: “the colimit of complexes”.
Cotangent complexes commute with directed colimits of ring maps: the cocone of canonical maps
L_{B i⁄A i} → L_{Binf⁄Ainf}on the system of canonical mapsL_{B i⁄A i} → L_{B j⁄A j}is a colimit cocone.
noncomputable def CommAlgCat.isColimit_cotangentComplexAbCocone :
IsColimit (CommAlgCat.cotangentComplexAbCocone sq cocone hA hB)
Sources
Section92.4 Simplicial resolutions and derived lower shriek#
Section 92.4 of the Stacks Project, Tag 08PQ. 8 tags here are carried by 43 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 08PR, an equation
Tag 08PR in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.polynomialSite, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 117. The attribute's comment: “the site C_{B/A}”.
Stacks 08PR. The site
C_{B/A}: the opposite of the category of polynomialA-algebras augmented toB. Its topology is the chaotic one, recorded through the ringed point below.
abbrev polynomialSite
CommAlgCat.polynomialTopology_eq_bot, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 133. The attribute's comment: “the chaotic topology on C_{B/A}”.
Stacks 08PR. The topology of
C_{B/A}is the chaotic topology: its only coverings are the maximal sieves, so every presheaf onC_{B/A}is a sheaf.
theorem polynomialTopology_eq_bot : polynomialTopology A B = ⊥
CommAlgCat.polynomialStructureSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 155. The attribute's comment: “the structure sheaf 𝒪”.
Stacks 08PR. The tautological sheaf of rings
𝒪onC_{B/A}, which sends the object(P, α)toP. It is a sheaf because the topology ofC_{B/A}is chaotic.
def polynomialStructureSheaf : Sheaf (polynomialTopology A B) CommRingCat.{u + 1}
CommAlgCat.polynomialConstantSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 163. The attribute's comment: “the constant sheaf B”.
Stacks 08PR. The constant sheaf of rings
BonC_{B/A}, written with an underline in the source. By Tag 08PF it is the inverse image alongπof the ring on the point.
def polynomialConstantSheaf : Sheaf (polynomialTopology A B) CommRingCat.{u + 1}
CommAlgCat.polynomialConstantSheafIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 188. The attribute's comment: “the constant sheaf B is constant”.
Stacks 08PR. The constant sheaf of rings
Bof Tag 08PF is the constant presheaf with valueB.
def polynomialConstantSheafIso :
(polynomialConstantSheaf A B).obj ≅ polynomialConstantPresheaf A B
CommAlgCat.polynomialAugmentation, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 219. The attribute's comment: “the augmentation 𝒪 ⟶ B”.
Stacks 08PR. The map of sheaves of rings
𝒪 → Bgiven by the augmentations.
def polynomialAugmentation :
polynomialStructureSheaf A B ⟶ polynomialConstantSheaf A B
CommAlgCat.polynomialAugmentation_app, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 228. The attribute's comment: “the augmentation is given by α”.
Stacks 08PR. On sections over the object
(P, α)ofC_{B/A}, the augmentation of sheaves of rings isα, read through the identification of the constant sheaf with the constant presheaf.
theorem polynomialAugmentation_app (X : polynomialSite A B) :
(polynomialAugmentation A B).hom.app (Opposite.op X) ≫
(polynomialConstantSheafIso A B).hom.app (Opposite.op X) =
(polynomialAugmentationPresheaf A B).app (Opposite.op X)
CommAlgCat.polynomialInclusion, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 295. The attribute's comment: “the morphism i of ringed topoi”.
Stacks 08PR. The morphism of ringed topoi
i : (Sh(C_{B/A}), B) ⟶ (Sh(C_{B/A}), 𝒪): the identity on underlying topoi, withi♯ : 𝒪 ⟶ i_*Bthe augmentation.
def polynomialInclusion :
AlgebraicGeometry.RingedToposHom (polynomialConstantRingedTopos A B)
(polynomialStructureRingedTopos A B)
CommAlgCat.polynomialInclusion_toToposHom, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 303. The attribute's comment: “i is the identity on topoi”.
Stacks 08PR. The geometric morphism underlying
iis the identity.
theorem polynomialInclusion_toToposHom :
(polynomialInclusion A B).toToposHom = polynomialIdentityTopos A B
CommAlgCat.polynomialProjection, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSite.lean, line 319. The attribute's comment: “the morphism π of ringed topoi”.
Stacks 08PR. The morphism of ringed topoi
π : (Sh(C_{B/A}), B) ⟶ (Sh(*), B), the projection of the chaotic site to its ringed point.
abbrev polynomialProjection
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialSite, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteSmall.lean, line 137. The attribute's comment: “the site C_{B/A} with the section's footnote in force, restricting the sets of variables to cardinality at most κ. The unrestricted version is CommAlgCat.polynomialSite; only this one is essentially small”.
The site
C_{B/A}cut down to the polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables: the opposite ofCommAlgCat.BoundedPolynomialAugmentation. Forκ = #Bthis is the site of the source, footnote included;CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteis the same construction with the footnote omitted.
abbrev boundedPolynomialSite
Tag 08PS, a lemma
Tag 08PS in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.exists_homotopyEquivalences_resolutionMor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterion.lean, line 377. The attribute's comment: “the hypothesis of the criterion of Tag 08Q9 for the cosimplicial object of a resolution: each Mor_C((P_•, ε), W) is homotopy equivalent to a singleton. The conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(Ab), resp. D(B), functorially in ℱ, is not asserted: the criterion as formalized asks for a small site, and CommAlgCat.polynomialSite is large — see the first implementation note”.
Stacks 08PS. Let
P_•be a simplicialA-algebra endowed with an augmentationε : P_• ⟶ B, assume everyP_nis a polynomial algebra overAand thatεis a trivial Kan fibration on underlying simplicial sets. Then for every objectW = (Q, β)of the siteC_{B/A}the simplicial setMor_{C_{B/A}}((P_•, ε), W)is homotopy equivalent to the constant simplicial set on a singleton, which is the hypothesis the criterion of Tag 08Q9 asks of the cosimplicial objectCommAlgCat.resolutionCosimplicialObjectof the resolution.
theorem exists_homotopyEquivalences_resolutionMor
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A))))
(W : polynomialSite A B) :
∃ f : (resolutionCosimplicialObject ε hP).op ⋙ yoneda.obj W ⟶
(Functor.const SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ).obj PUnit.{u + 1},
SimplicialObject.homotopyEquivalences (Type u) f
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteResolutionDerivedColimitNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionPolynomialSite.lean, line 167. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(Ab) functorially in ℱ in Ab(C_{B/A}), at CommAlgCat.polynomialSite -- the site of Tag 08PR itself, not a restriction of it -- as an isomorphism in the derived category, with π_! in its colimit presentation of Tag 08PF and the coefficients at the universe u + 1 of the site's objects”.
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)inD(Ab), functorially inℱ, at the siteC_{B/A}. Letε : P_• ⟶ Bbe a simplicialA-algebra endowed with an augmentation toB, assume everyP_nis a polynomial algebra overAand thatεis a trivial Kan fibration on underlying simplicial sets. Then the extended Moore complex of the simplicial abelian groupℱ(P_•, ε)isLπ_!(ℱ)inD(Ab), as an isomorphism of functors of the abelian sheafℱon the siteC_{B/A}of Tag 08PR -- the abelian presheaves being its abelian sheaves, the topology being chaotic.This is the abelian half of the conclusion of Tag 08PS. The hypothesis of the criterion of Tag 08Q9 is
CommAlgCat.isPointResolution_resolutionCosimplicialObject, andStacks.ChaoticSite.AbelianValued.mooreCochainNatIsoDerivedColimitOfLargeis that criterion in its derived form, natural in the coefficient presheaf and with no smallness hypothesis on the site.
def polynomialSiteResolutionDerivedColimitNatIso
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A)))) :
Stacks.ChaoticSite.GeneralValued.mooreCochainComplex'
(resolutionCosimplicialObject ε hP) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1} ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ≅
HomologicalComplex.single ((polynomialSite A B)ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0 ⋙
DerivedCategory.Q ⋙
totalDerivedColimit' (polynomialSite A B) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteResolutionModuleDerivedColimitNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionPolynomialSite.lean, line 195. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(B) functorially in ℱ in Mod(B̲), at CommAlgCat.polynomialSite -- the site of Tag 08PR itself, not a restriction of it -- as an isomorphism in the derived category, with the coefficient ring read as ULift.{u+1} B exactly as the site's own ringed point CommAlgCat.polynomialRingedPoint reads it”.
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)inD(B), functorially inℱ, at the siteC_{B/A}. Under the hypotheses of Tag 08PS, the extended Moore complex of the simplicialB-moduleℱ(P_•, ε)isLπ_!(ℱ)inD(B), as an isomorphism of functors of the sheaf ofB-modulesℱon the siteC_{B/A}of Tag 08PR -- the diagrams ofB-modules on the site being itsB̲-modules, the topology being chaotic.This is the module half of the conclusion of Tag 08PS, beside the abelian half
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteResolutionDerivedColimitNatIso: the same hypothesisCommAlgCat.isPointResolution_resolutionCosimplicialObject-- which does not mention the coefficients -- is fed toStacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainNatIsoDerivedColimitOfLarge. The coefficient ring isULift.{u + 1} B, the ring of the site's ringed pointCommAlgCat.polynomialRingedPoint.
def polynomialSiteResolutionModuleDerivedColimitNatIso
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A)))) :
Stacks.ChaoticSite.GeneralValued.mooreCochainComplex'
(resolutionCosimplicialObject ε hP)
(ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u))) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ≅
HomologicalComplex.single
((polynomialSite A B)ᵒᵖ ⥤ ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u)))
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0 ⋙
DerivedCategory.Q ⋙
totalDerivedColimit' (polynomialSite A B)
(ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u)))
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionSmallOfModules.lean, line 58. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(B) functorially in ℱ in Mod(B̲), read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site, for the same reason as recorded for the abelian half in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionSmall.lean”.
Let
ε : P_• ⟶ Bbe a resolution ofBoverAwhose terms are polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables. For every sheaf ofB-modulesℱon the small model of the restricted siteC_{B/A}, the sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(ℱ)are the degreenhomology of the Moore complex of the simplicialB-moduleℱ(P_•, ε), naturally inℱ; hereπis the point morphism of the small model.
def smallResolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A))))
(n : ℕ) :
(modulePointLowerShriek (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ)
(B : Type u)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)) ≅
sheafToPresheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ))
(ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)) ⋙
moduleCosimplicialMooreComplex (smallResolutionCosimplicialObject ε κ hPκ) ⋙
HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))
(ComplexShape.down ℕ) n
Tag 08PT, a lemma
Tag 08PT in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/CategoryTheory/Sites/Cohomology/ChaoticSite/DerivedColimitByPointResolution.lean, line 391. The attribute's comment: “derived form at module coefficients, for one module over the constant sheaf of rings: the extended Moore complex of the evaluation on a point resolution is derived lower shriek in D(B), derived lower shriek being the total left derived functor of the colimit over the index category. Not asserted natural in the coefficient module”.
The derived form of [Stacks, Tag 08PT] at module coefficients. Let
Cbe a small category with the chaotic topology,Ba ring, andU_•a cosimplicial object ofCsuch that every simplicial setMor_C(U_•, W)is homotopy equivalent to a singleton. Then for every diagramℱofB-modules onCᵒᵖ— that is, everyB̲-module on the chaotic site — the extended Moore complex of the simplicialB-moduleℱ(U_•)computes derived lower shriek:
Q(ℱ(U_•)) ≅ Lπ_!(ℱ)inD(B).Here
Lπ_!isStacks.CategoryHomology.totalDerivedColimit, the total left derived functor of the colimit overCᵒᵖ, which isπ_!on the chaotic site by [Stacks, Tag 08PF]. The proof compares the two filtrations of the double complex obtained by evaluating a projective resolution ofℱonU_•.The isomorphism depends on the chosen projective resolution and is not asserted to be natural in
ℱ; see the implementation notes of this module.
def mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit (hU : IsPointResolution U) :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj ((mooreCochainComplex U).obj F) ≅
(totalDerivedColimit C (ModuleCat.{u} B)).obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj
((HomologicalComplex.single (Cᵒᵖ ⥤ ModuleCat.{u} B) (ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0).obj F))
Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit_naturality, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/CategoryTheory/Sites/Cohomology/ChaoticSite/DerivedColimitByPointResolutionNaturality.lean, line 398. The attribute's comment: “the derived form at module coefficients is natural in the point resolution: a morphism of cosimplicial objects between two point resolutions carries the comparison at one to the comparison at the other. Still not asserted natural in the coefficient module”.
The derived form of [Stacks, Tag 08PT] at module coefficients is independent of the point resolution, compatibly with morphisms of point resolutions. For a morphism
v : U_• ⟶ V_•of cosimplicial objects ofC, both point resolutions, and a diagramℱofB-modules onCᵒᵖ, the triangle
Q(ℱ(V_•)) ⟶ Q(ℱ(U_•)) ⟶ Lπ_!(ℱ)commutes, the second arrow being
Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimitatU_•and the composite being the same isomorphism atV_•. This is the totalized form of the canonical map of [Stacks, Tag 08Q6]: the comparison of the extended Moore complex of a point resolution with derived lower shriek does not depend on the point resolution.The projective resolution of
ℱchosen byStacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimitis built fromℱalone, so one and the same resolution serves both point resolutions and the statement isStacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimitOfResolution_naturality.
theorem mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit_naturality (v : U ⟶ V) (hU : IsPointResolution U)
(hV : IsPointResolution V) (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ ModuleCat.{u} B) :
DerivedCategory.Q.map ((mooreCochainMap v).app F) ≫
(mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit U F hU).hom =
(mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit V F hV).hom
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionAbelianDerivedLowerShriekIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionDerivedLowerShriek.lean, line 343. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(Ab) functorially in ℱ in Ab(C), on the site C_{B/A} of 08PR, with coefficients in the universe above that of A and B”.
Stacks 08PT, in
D(Ab). LetA → Bbe a ring map and letε : P_• → Bbe the standard resolution ofBoverA. Letπbe as in Tag 08PR. Then
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)inD(Ab), functorially inℱinAb(C).Here
C = C_{B/A}is the site of Tag 08PR (CommAlgCat.polynomialSite), whose topology is chaotic so thatAb(C)is the category of abelian presheaves on it, with coefficients inType (u + 1), the universe in which colimits overCexist;Lπ_!isCommAlgCat.polynomialDerivedLowerShriek; andℱ(P_•, ε)is the extended Moore complex of the simplicial abelian group obtained by evaluatingℱon the cosimplicial object ofCgiven by the standard resolution. The standard resolution satisfies the hypotheses of Tag 08PS by Tag 08QI: its terms are polynomial algebras, and its augmentation is a homotopy equivalence of underlying simplicial sets (Tag 08ND), hence a quasi-isomorphism of associated complexes (Tag 08P2), hence a trivial Kan fibration (Tag 08P1).
def standardResolutionAbelianDerivedLowerShriekIso :
polynomialMooreCochain A B
(resolutionCosimplicialObject (standardResolution.{u, u} A B).hom
(standardResolution_isResolution.{u, u} A B).isPolynomialAlgebra)
AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1} ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ≅
HomologicalComplex.single ((polynomialSite A B)ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0 ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ⋙
polynomialDerivedLowerShriek A B AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionModuleDerivedLowerShriekIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionDerivedLowerShriek.lean, line 369. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(B) functorially in ℱ in Mod(B̲), on the site C_{B/A} of 08PR, with module sections in the universe above that of A and B”.
Stacks 08PT, in
D(B). LetA → Bbe a ring map and letε : P_• → Bbe the standard resolution ofBoverA. Letπbe as in Tag 08PR. Then
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)inD(B), functorially inℱinMod(B̲).Here
C = C_{B/A}is the site of Tag 08PR (CommAlgCat.polynomialSite), whose topology is chaotic so that aB̲-module is a diagram ofB-modules on it, with sections inType (u + 1), the universe in which colimits overCexist,Bbeing lifted to that universe as the ring on the point ofπis;Lπ_!isCommAlgCat.polynomialDerivedLowerShriek; andℱ(P_•, ε)is the extended Moore complex of the simplicialB-module obtained by evaluatingℱon the cosimplicial object ofCgiven by the standard resolution. The standard resolution satisfies the hypotheses of Tag 08PS by Tag 08QI, as recorded atCommAlgCat.standardResolutionAbelianDerivedLowerShriekIso.
def standardResolutionModuleDerivedLowerShriekIso :
polynomialMooreCochain A B
(resolutionCosimplicialObject (standardResolution.{u, u} A B).hom
(standardResolution_isResolution.{u, u} A B).isPolynomialAlgebra)
(ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u))) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ≅
HomologicalComplex.single
((polynomialSite A B)ᵒᵖ ⥤ ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u)))
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0 ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ⋙
polynomialDerivedLowerShriek A B (ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u)))
CommAlgCat.exists_homotopyEquivalences_standardResolutionMor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterion.lean, line 412. The attribute's comment: “the hypothesis of the criterion of Tag 08Q9 for the cosimplicial object of the standard resolution: each Mor_C((P_•, ε), W) is homotopy equivalent to a singleton. The conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(Ab), resp. D(B), functorially in ℱ, is not asserted, for the reason recorded at Tag 08PS in this file”.
Stacks 08PT. Let
A → Bbe a ring map and letε : P_• ⟶ Bbe the standard resolution ofBoverA. Then for every objectWof the siteC_{B/A}the simplicial setMor_{C_{B/A}}((P_•, ε), W)is homotopy equivalent to the constant simplicial set on a singleton, which is the hypothesis the criterion of Tag 08Q9 asks of the cosimplicial object of the standard resolution. The two hypotheses of Tag 08PS hold for it by Tag 08QI: its terms are polynomial algebras, and its augmentation is a trivial Kan fibration because it is a homotopy equivalence of underlying simplicial sets (Tag 08ND), hence a quasi-isomorphism of associated complexes (Tag 08P2), hence — being degreewise surjective — a trivial Kan fibration (Tag 08P1).
theorem exists_homotopyEquivalences_standardResolutionMor (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
(B : CommAlgCat.{u} A) (W : polynomialSite A B) :
∃ f : (resolutionCosimplicialObject (standardResolution.{u, u} A B).hom
(standardResolution_isResolution.{u, u} A B).isPolynomialAlgebra).op ⋙
yoneda.obj W ⟶ (Functor.const SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ).obj PUnit.{u + 1},
SimplicialObject.homotopyEquivalences (Type u) f
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionDerivedColimitNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionSmallDerived.lean, line 201. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(Ab) functorially in ℱ in Ab(C_{B/A}), for the standard resolution, as an isomorphism in the derived category rather than degreewise, read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site — for the reason recorded at Tag 08PS in this file”.
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)inD(Ab)for the standard resolution, functorially in the abelian sheafℱon the small model of the site restricted to polynomial algebras on at mostCommAlgCat.standardResolutionVarCardinal A Bvariables.This is the abelian half of the conclusion of Tag 08PT in the derived category. The two hypotheses of Tag 08PS hold for the standard resolution by Tag 08QI — its terms are polynomial algebras and its augmentation is a trivial Kan fibration — and its terms are boundedly many variables wide by
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebraBelow, so nothing is assumed.
def standardResolutionDerivedColimitNatIso :
Stacks.ChaoticSite.AbelianValued.mooreCochainComplex
(smallResolutionCosimplicialObject (standardResolution.{u, u} A B).hom
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)
(standardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebraBelow A B)) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ≅
HomologicalComplex.single
((smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))ᵒᵖ ⥤
AddCommGrpCat.{u})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0 ⋙
DerivedCategory.Q ⋙
totalDerivedColimit (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)) AddCommGrpCat.{u}
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionModuleDerivedColimitNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionSmallDerived.lean, line 228. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(B) functorially in ℱ in Mod(B̲), for the standard resolution, as an isomorphism in the derived category rather than degreewise, read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site — for the reason recorded at Tag 08PS in this file”.
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)inD(B)for the standard resolution, functorially in the sheaf ofB-modulesℱon the small model of the site restricted to polynomial algebras on at mostCommAlgCat.standardResolutionVarCardinal A Bvariables.This is the module half of the conclusion of Tag 08PT in the derived category, beside the abelian half
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionDerivedColimitNatIso; as there, the hypotheses of Tag 08PS are discharged for the standard resolution by Tag 08QI.
def standardResolutionModuleDerivedColimitNatIso :
Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainComplex (B := (B : Type u))
(smallResolutionCosimplicialObject (standardResolution.{u, u} A B).hom
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)
(standardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebraBelow A B)) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Q ≅
HomologicalComplex.single
((smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))ᵒᵖ ⥤
ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0 ⋙
DerivedCategory.Q ⋙
totalDerivedColimit (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)) (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionSmallOfModules.lean, line 84. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε) in D(B) functorially in ℱ in Mod(B̲), for the standard resolution, read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site, for the reason recorded at Tag 08PS in this file”.
For every sheaf of
B-modulesℱon the small model of the siteC_{B/A}restricted to polynomial algebras on at mostCommAlgCat.standardResolutionVarCardinal A Bvariables, the sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(ℱ)are the degreenhomology of the Moore complex of the simplicialB-moduleℱ(P_•, ε)forP_•the standard resolution ofBoverA, naturally inℱ.
def standardResolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso (n : ℕ) :
(modulePointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))
(B : Type u)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)) ≅
sheafToPresheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)))
(ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)) ⋙
moduleCosimplicialMooreComplex
(smallResolutionCosimplicialObject (standardResolution.{u, u} A B).hom
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)
(standardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebraBelow A B)) ⋙
HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))
(ComplexShape.down ℕ) n
Tag 08PU, a lemma
Tag 08PU in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.free_kaehlerDifferential_polynomialSite, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteCotangentComplex.lean, line 383. The attribute's comment: “the step Li^Ω_{𝒪/A} = i^Ω_{𝒪/A}: each Ω_{P/A} is a free P-module, hence Ω_{𝒪/A} is flat over 𝒪”.
The differentials of each object of
C_{B/A}are free over it. Every object(P, α)of the site hasPa polynomial algebra overA, soΩ[P⁄A]is free on the variables. This is the objectwise input that lets the argument of Tag 08PU replaceLi^*byi^*; the sheaf-level statement isCommAlgCat.polynomialRelativeDifferentials_isFlat.
theorem free_kaehlerDifferential_polynomialSite (X : polynomialSite A B) :
Module.Free (X.unop.obj.left : Type u) Ω[(X.unop.obj.left : Type u)⁄A]
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionCotangentMooreComplexIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteCotangentComplex.lean, line 482. The attribute's comment: “the step Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲) = (Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲)(P_•, ε): the evaluation of i^*Ω_{𝒪/A} on the standard resolution is the simplicial module whose complex is L_{B/A}, as an isomorphism of complexes”.
The Moore complex of
(i^*Ω_{𝒪/A})(P_•, ε)is the complex ofL_{B/A}. For the standard resolution ofBoverA, the Moore complex of the simplicial abelian group obtained by evaluatingi^*Ω_{𝒪/A}on the cosimplicial object of the small model is the complex underlying the cotangent complex of Tag 08PN, namely the alternating face map complex ofCommAlgCat.cotangentSimplicialModulewith itsB-module structures forgotten.This is the heart of Tag 08PU: an isomorphism of complexes, not merely of their homology.
def standardResolutionCotangentMooreComplexIso :
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.cosimplicialMooreComplex
(standardResolutionSmallCosimplicialObject A B)).obj
(smallPolynomialCotangentSheaf A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)).obj ≅
((forget₂ (ModuleCat.{u} B) AddCommGrpCat.{u}).mapHomologicalComplex
(ComplexShape.down ℕ)).obj
((alternatingFaceMapComplex (ModuleCat.{u} B)).obj
(cotangentSimplicialModule.{u, u} A B).object)
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionLeftDerivedCotangentComplexIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteCotangentComplex.lean, line 520. The attribute's comment: “the identification L_{B/A} = Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲), for the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A} and with Lπ_! read degreewise, as the left derived functors of the π_! of Tag 08PF at abelian coefficients: the sections at the point of L_nπ_! are the degree -n cohomology of the cotangent complex of Tag 08PN. The source's isomorphism in D(B) needs the module-level Lπ_!, which is absent from this library”.
Tag 08PU at the small model of the restricted site
C_{B/A}. The sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲)are the degree-ncohomology of the cotangent complexL_{B/A}of Tag 08PN, with itsB-module structure forgotten; hereπis the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site andLπ_!is read degreewise, as the left derived functors of theπ_!of Tag 08PF.The proof is the source's: Tag 08PT computes
L_nπ_!on the standard resolution (CommAlgCat.standardResolutionLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso), the evaluation ofΩ_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲there is the simplicial module definingL_{B/A}(CommAlgCat.standardResolutionCotangentMooreComplexIso), and the cotangent complex is the reindexing of that simplicial module's alternating face map complex. The stepLi^*Ω_{𝒪/A} = i^*Ω_{𝒪/A}of the source is the flatness ofΩ_{𝒪/A}over𝒪,CommAlgCat.polynomialRelativeDifferentials_isFlat; see the implementation notes for what separates this statement from the source's isomorphism inD(B).
def standardResolutionLeftDerivedCotangentComplexIso (n : ℕ) :
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} AddCommGrpCat.{u}).obj
(((Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))).leftDerived n).obj
(smallPolynomialCotangentSheaf A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))) ≅
(forget₂ (ModuleCat.{u} B) AddCommGrpCat.{u}).obj
((cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B).homology (-(n : ℤ)))
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionModuleLeftDerivedCotangentComplexIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteModuleShriek.lean, line 162. The attribute's comment: “L_{B/A} = Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲) at linear coefficients, for the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A} and with Lπ_! read degreewise, as the left derived functors of the π_! of Tag 08PF on sheaves of B-modules: the sections at the point of L_nπ_! are the degree -n cohomology of the cotangent complex of Tag 08PN, as B-modules. The source's isomorphism in D(B) needs the derived form of Tag 08PT”.
Tag 08PU at the small model of the restricted site
C_{B/A}, withB-linear coefficients. The sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲)are the degree-ncohomology of the cotangent complexL_{B/A}of Tag 08PN, asB-modules; hereπis the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site andLπ_!is read degreewise, as the left derived functors of theπ_!of Tag 08PF on sheaves ofB-modules.The proof is the source's: Tag 08PT at linear coefficients computes
L_nπ_!on the standard resolution (CommAlgCat.standardResolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso), the evaluation ofΩ_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲there is the simplicialB-module definingL_{B/A}(CommAlgCat.standardResolutionCotangentModuleMooreComplexIso), and the cotangent complex is the reindexing of that simplicial module's alternating face map complex.
def standardResolutionModuleLeftDerivedCotangentComplexIso (n : ℕ) :
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))).obj
(((Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.modulePointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))
(B : Type u)).leftDerived n).obj
(smallPolynomialCotangentModuleSheaf A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))) ≅
(cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B).homology (-(n : ℤ))
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteModuleShriekDerived.lean, line 101. The attribute's comment: “in D(B), at module coefficients: Q(L_{B/A}) = L pi_!(Omega ⊗ B) for the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A}, with L pi_! the total left derived functor of the colimit on D(B-underline)”.
[Stacks, Tag 08PU] in
D(B), at module coefficients and on the small model of the footnote-restricted siteC_{B/A}. The cotangent complexL_{B/A}of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] is derived lower shriek of the sheaf ofB̲-modulesi^*Ω_{𝒪/A} = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲, as an object ofD(B):
Q(L_{B/A}) ≅ Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲).Here
Lπ_!isCommAlgCat.smallPolynomialModuleDerivedLowerShriek, the total left derived functor of the colimit over the index category ofB̲-modules, which is theπ_!of [Stacks, Tag 08PF].The proof is the source's. The standard resolution is a point resolution of the small model (
CommAlgCat.isPointResolution_standardResolutionSmallCosimplicialObject), so the derived form of [Stacks, Tag 08PT] at module coefficients (Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit) computesLπ_!ofi^*Ω_{𝒪/A}as the extended Moore complex of its evaluation on that resolution, and that complex is the cotangent complex. The stepLi^*Ω_{𝒪/A} = i^*Ω_{𝒪/A}of the source is the flatness ofΩ_{𝒪/A}over𝒪, which is whyi^*Ω_{𝒪/A}may be used underived.
def standardResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B) ≅
smallPolynomialCotangentDerivedLowerShriek A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionCotangentDerived.lean, line 118. The attribute's comment: “in D(B), at module coefficients, for an arbitrary resolution whose terms have at most κ variables: Q of the complex of that resolution is L pi_!(Omega ⊗ B-underline) for the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A}. Combined with the same statement at the standard resolution this is Remark 08QI, that any resolution computes L_{B/A}”.
[Stacks, Tag 08PU] in
D(B)for an arbitrary bounded resolution. Letε : P_• ⟶ Bbe a resolution ofBoverAin the sense of [Stacks, Tag 08QI] whose terms are polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables. Then the complexΩ[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•} Bof that resolution, read in cohomological degrees≤ 0, is derived lower shriek of the sheaf ofB̲-modulesi^*Ω_{𝒪/A} = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲, as an object ofD(B):
Q(Ω[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•} B) ≅ Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲).Here
Lπ_!isCommAlgCat.smallPolynomialModuleDerivedLowerShriek, the total left derived functor of the colimit over the index category ofB̲-modules, which is theπ_!of [Stacks, Tag 08PF].The proof is the source's, with the standard resolution replaced by
P_•: the resolution is a point resolution of the small model of the footnote-restricted site (CommAlgCat.isPointResolution_smallResolutionCosimplicialObject), so the derived form of [Stacks, Tag 08PT] at module coefficients (Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit) computesLπ_!ofi^*Ω_{𝒪/A}as the extended Moore complex of its evaluation onP_•, and that evaluation isΩ[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•} B. Since the right-hand side does not mention the resolution, this is also the assertion of [Stacks, Remark 08QI] that any resolution computesL_{B/A}.
def smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A)))) :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj
(((alternatingFaceMapComplex (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))).obj
(resolutionOver ε ⋙ overDifferentialsFunctor)).extend
(ComplexShape.embeddingUpIntLE (0 : ℤ))) ≅
smallPolynomialCotangentDerivedLowerShriek A B κ
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIsoOfLE, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionCotangentDerived.lean, line 162. The attribute's comment: “in D(B), at module coefficients, at an arbitrary cardinal bound κ containing the standard resolution: Q(L_{B/A}) = L pi_!(Omega ⊗ B-underline) for the point morphism of the small model of the site restricted to at most κ variables”.
[Stacks, Tag 08PU] in
D(B)at an arbitrary cardinal bound. The cotangent complexL_{B/A}of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] is derived lower shriek of the sheaf ofB̲-modulesi^*Ω_{𝒪/A} = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲on the small model of the site restricted to polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables, for any boundκcontaining the standard resolution:
Q(L_{B/A}) ≅ Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲).This is
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIsoat the standard resolution, whose complexΩ[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•} Bis the cotangent complex byCommAlgCat.standardResolutionOverDifferentialsIso. Atκ = CommAlgCat.standardResolutionVarCardinal A Bit isCommAlgCat.standardResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso; the point of the free bound is that a second resolution may need a larger one.
def standardResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIsoOfLE
(hκ : standardResolutionVarCardinal A B ≤ κ) :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B) ≅
smallPolynomialCotangentDerivedLowerShriek A B κ
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso_naturality, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionCotangentDerivedNaturality.lean, line 312. The attribute's comment: “in D(B), at module coefficients: the identification of the complex of a resolution with L pi_!(Omega ⊗ B-underline) is functorial in the resolution, so the isomorphism it gives between the complexes of two resolutions is the map induced by a morphism between them. This is the arrow-level form of Remark 08QI”.
[Stacks, Tag 08PU] in
D(B)is functorial in the resolution. Letε : P_• ⟶ Bandε' : P'_• ⟶ Bbe resolutions ofBoverAin the sense of [Stacks, Tag 08QI] whose terms are polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables, and letw : P_• ⟶ P'_•be a morphism of simplicialA-algebras overB. Then the triangle
Q(Ω[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•} B) ⟶ Q(Ω[P'_•⁄A] ⊗_{P'_•} B) ⟶ Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲)commutes: the comparison of
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIsoatε', precomposed with the mapCommAlgCat.resolutionCotangentComplexMapinduced byw, is the comparison atε.In particular the isomorphism between the complexes of two resolutions that the two instances of [Stacks, Tag 08PU] produce is the map induced by any morphism between the resolutions — which is the content of [Stacks, Remark 08QI] beyond the object-level statement, and what a comparison of two presentations consumes.
The proof is the naturality of the derived form of [Stacks, Tag 08PT] in the point resolution (
Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.mooreCochainQIsoDerivedColimit_naturality), applied atCommAlgCat.smallResolutionCosimplicialObjectMap, together withCommAlgCat.smallResolutionCotangentMooreCochainIso_naturality.
theorem smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso_naturality (w : P ⟶ P') (hw : w ≫ ε' = ε)
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A))))
(hε' : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε' (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A)))) :
DerivedCategory.Q.map (resolutionCotangentComplexMap ε ε' w hw) ≫
(smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso ε' κ hP'κ hε').hom =
(smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso ε κ hPκ hε).hom
CommAlgCat.leftDerivedColimPolynomialCotangentIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SurjectionSymmetricPowerVanishing.lean, line 119. The attribute's comment: “the identification L_{B/A} = Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲) read degreewise at LINEAR coefficients: for every n, the nth left derived functor of the colimit over the opposite of the small model of the footnote-restricted site, applied to Ω, is the degree -n cohomology of the cotangent complex of Tag 08PN, as an isomorphism of B-modules. L_n colim is Tag 08PF's definition of H_n(C_{B/A}, -); the identification with the sections at the point of L_nπ_! is Stacks.ChaoticSite.ModuleValued.moduleLeftDerivedPointLowerShriekNatIso. Proved for every ring map A → B”.
Tag 08PU at the small model of the restricted site
C_{B/A}, at linear coefficients. Thenth homology ofC_{B/A}with coefficients inΩ = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲— thenth left derived functor of the colimit over the opposite of the small model, which is Tag 08PF's definition — is the degree-ncohomology of the cotangent complexL_{B/A}of Tag 08PN, asB-modules.This is the linear-coefficient refinement of
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionLeftDerivedCotangentComplexIso, which is its image under the forgetful functor to abelian groups. The proof is the same: the module half of Tag 08Q9 computesL_n colimon the standard resolution, and the evaluation ofΩthere is the simplicial module definingL_{B/A}.
def leftDerivedColimPolynomialCotangentIso (n : ℕ) :
((colim :
((smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))ᵒᵖ ⥤
ModuleCat.{u} B) ⥤ ModuleCat.{u} B).leftDerived n).obj
(smallPolynomialCotangentModulePresheaf A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)) ≅
(cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B).homology (-(n : ℤ))
Tag 08QE, a lemma
Tag 08QE in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.atiyahModuleDerivedInverseImageCompLowerShriekIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/AtiyahClassBigSiteResolution.lean, line 170. The attribute's comment: “in D(B), at module coefficients: Lπ_!(π^{-1}M) = M at CommAlgCat.polynomialSite -- the site of Tag 08PR itself, not a restriction of it, read on its AsSmall model -- with Lπ_! the total left derived functor of the colimit on D(B̲), π^{-1} the constant diagram, and the coefficient ring read as ULift.{u+1} B exactly as the site's own ringed point CommAlgCat.polynomialRingedPoint reads it”.
[Stacks, Tag 08QE] at the site
C_{B/A}itself. Derived lower shriek of the inverse image of aB-module is that module:Lπ_!(π^{-1}M) = MinD(B), naturally inM. Hereπ^{-1}is the constant diagram andLπ_!the total left derived functor of the colimit over the index category, which is theπ_!of [Stacks, Tag 08PF]; the coefficient ring isULift B, the ring of the site's own ringed pointCommAlgCat.polynomialRingedPoint.The proof is the source's: the augmentation
A → Bis a terminal object of the site (CommAlgCat.isTerminal_atiyahBaseObj), soπ^{-1}has the exact right adjoint "sections overA → B" andStacks.ChaoticSite.derivedConstCompColimitIsoapplies with no hypothesis on the existence of the derived functor. The statement at the footnote-restricted site isCommAlgCat.smallPolynomialModuleDerivedInverseImageCompLowerShriekIso; that is a statement about different coefficients, the restriction to a full subcategory changing bothMod(B̲)andLπ_!.
def atiyahModuleDerivedInverseImageCompLowerShriekIso :
(Functor.const (atiyahSite A B)ᵒᵖ :
ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u)) ⥤ _).mapDerivedCategory ⋙
totalDerivedColimit (atiyahSite A B)
(ModuleCat.{u + 1} (ULift.{u + 1} (B : Type u))) ≅ 𝟭 _
CommAlgCat.polynomialLeftDerivedZeroLowerShriekInverseImageIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteCotangentComplex.lean, line 548. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(π^{-1}M) = M in degree zero, for the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A} at abelian coefficients”.
Tag 08QE at the small model of the restricted site
C_{B/A}, in degree zero. The sections at the point ofL_0π_!(π^{-1}M)are the sections ofM, for every abelian sheafMon the point; hereπis the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site.This is the source's proof: Tag 08PT computes
Lπ_!(π^{-1}M)by(π^{-1}M)(P_•, ε)for the standard resolution, and that is the constant simplicial object onM.
def polynomialLeftDerivedZeroLowerShriekInverseImageIso
(M : Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1})) AddCommGrpCat.{u}) :
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} AddCommGrpCat.{u}).obj
(((Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))).leftDerived 0).obj
((Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointInverseImage
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))).obj M)) ≅
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} AddCommGrpCat.{u}).obj M
CommAlgCat.isZero_polynomialLeftDerivedSuccLowerShriekInverseImage, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteCotangentComplex.lean, line 566. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(π^{-1}M) = M in positive degrees: L_nπ_!(π^{-1}M) = 0 for n > 0”.
Tag 08QE at the small model of the restricted site
C_{B/A}, in positive degrees. The sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(π^{-1}M)vanish forn > 0, so together withCommAlgCat.polynomialLeftDerivedZeroLowerShriekInverseImageIsothis is the source'sLπ_!(π^{-1}M) = M, read degreewise.
theorem isZero_polynomialLeftDerivedSuccLowerShriekInverseImage
(M : Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1})) AddCommGrpCat.{u})
(n : ℕ) :
IsZero ((Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} AddCommGrpCat.{u}).obj
(((Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))).leftDerived (n + 1)).obj
((Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointInverseImage
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B
(standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))).obj M)))
CommAlgCat.smallPolynomialModuleDerivedInverseImageCompLowerShriekIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteModuleShriek.lean, line 271. The attribute's comment: “in D(B), at module coefficients: Lπ_!(π^{-1}M) = M for the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A}, with Lπ_! the total left derived functor of the colimit on D(B̲) and π^{-1} the constant diagram”.
Tag 08QE in
D(B)at the small model of the restricted siteC_{B/A}. Derived lower shriek of the inverse image of aB-module is that module:Lπ_!(π^{-1}M) = MinD(B), naturally inM. Hereπ^{-1}is the constant diagram andLπ_!the total left derived functor of the colimit, and the proof is that the augmentationA → Bis a terminal object of the site, so thatπ^{-1}has the exact right adjoint "sections overA → B".
def smallPolynomialModuleDerivedInverseImageCompLowerShriekIso :
(Functor.const (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ)ᵒᵖ :
ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u) ⥤ _).mapDerivedCategory ⋙
Stacks.CategoryHomology.totalDerivedColimit (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ)
(ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)) ≅ 𝟭 _
Tag 08QF, a lemma
Tag 08QF in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.cotangentComplex_homologyZeroIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/HomologyZero.lean, line 345.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QF. The degree-zero homology of the cotangent complex
L_{B/A}is the module of Kähler differentialsΩ[B⁄A].
public noncomputable def cotangentComplex_homologyZeroIso :
(cotangentComplex A B).homology 0 ≅ ModuleCat.of B (KaehlerDifferential A B)
Tag 08QG, a lemma
Tag 08QG in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.polynomialEvaluationLowerShriekAdjunction, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteShriek.lean, line 137. The attribute's comment: “evaluation at B → B is a lower shriek”.
Stacks 08QG. For
Ba polynomial algebra overA, evaluation at the identity augmentationB → Bis left adjoint toπ^{-1}: it is a lower shriek.
def polynomialEvaluationLowerShriekAdjunction (hB : IsPolynomialAlgebra A B) :
Stacks.ChaoticSite.evaluationLowerShriek AddCommGrpCat.{max (u + 1) m}
(polynomialIdentityObj A B hB) (polynomialTopology A B) ⊣
polynomialAbelianInverseImage.{m} A B
CommAlgCat.polynomialAbelianLowerShriekEvaluationIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteShriek.lean, line 147. The attribute's comment: “π_! is evaluation at B → B”.
Stacks 08QG. For
Ba polynomial algebra overA, the lower shriekπ_!of Stacks 08PR is canonically evaluation at the identity augmentationB → B.
def polynomialAbelianLowerShriekEvaluationIso (hB : IsPolynomialAlgebra A B) :
polynomialAbelianLowerShriek.{m} A B ≅
Stacks.ChaoticSite.evaluationLowerShriek AddCommGrpCat.{max (u + 1) m}
(polynomialIdentityObj A B hB) (polynomialTopology A B)
CommAlgCat.polynomialAbelianLowerShriek_pointSectionsIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteShriek.lean, line 157. The attribute's comment: “π_!F = F(B → B)”.
Stacks 08QG.
π_!ℱ = ℱ(B → B): the sections ofπ_!ℱat the point are the sections ofℱover the identity augmentation, naturally inℱ.
def polynomialAbelianLowerShriek_pointSectionsIso (hB : IsPolynomialAlgebra A B) :
polynomialAbelianLowerShriek.{m} A B ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections AddCommGrpCat.{max (u + 1) m} ≅
sheafToPresheaf (polynomialTopology A B) AddCommGrpCat.{max (u + 1) m} ⋙
(evaluation (polynomialSite A B)ᵒᵖ AddCommGrpCat.{max (u + 1) m}).obj
(polynomialIdentityObj A B hB)
CommAlgCat.polynomialAbelianLowerShriek_preservesFiniteLimits, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteShriek.lean, line 170. The attribute's comment: “π_! is exact: finite limits”.
Stacks 08QG. For
Ba polynomial algebra overA,π_!preserves finite limits. WithCommAlgCat.polynomialAbelianLowerShriek_preservesColimitsOfShapethis is the exactness ofπ_!asserted by the source.
theorem polynomialAbelianLowerShriek_preservesFiniteLimits (hB : IsPolynomialAlgebra A B) :
PreservesFiniteLimits (polynomialAbelianLowerShriek.{m} A B)
CommAlgCat.polynomialAbelianLowerShriek_preservesColimitsOfShape, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteShriek.lean, line 178. The attribute's comment: “π_! is exact: colimits”.
Stacks 08QG.
π_!preserves all colimits, being a left adjoint; no hypothesis onBis needed for this half of exactness.
instance polynomialAbelianLowerShriek_preservesColimitsOfShape {K : Type*} [Category* K] :
PreservesColimitsOfShape K (polynomialAbelianLowerShriek.{m} A B)
Tag 08QH, a lemma
Tag 08QH in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.cotangentComplex_iso_kaehlerDifferential, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebra.lean, line 285.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QH. If
Bis a polynomial algebra over the ringA, then the cotangent complexL_{B/A}is quasi-isomorphic toΩ[B⁄A][0].
public theorem cotangentComplex_iso_kaehlerDifferential (hB : Algebra.IsPolynomialAlgebra A B) :
Nonempty
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex A B) ≅
(DerivedCategory.singleFunctor (ModuleCat.{max u v} B) 0).obj
(ModuleCat.of B (KaehlerDifferential A B)))
Sources
Section92.5 Constructing a resolution#
Section 92.5 of the Stacks Project, Tag 08PV. 9 tags here are carried by 38 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 08PW, a lemma
Tag 08PW in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.finiteType_succ_of_trivialKanFibration_of_isCoskeletal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/FiniteTypeCoskeletal.lean, line 154.
Stacks 08PW. For a finite type algebra
Bover a Noetherian ringA, ann-coskeletal simplicialA-algebra overBwhose canonical augmentation is a trivial Kan fibration and whose terms through degreenare of finite type has a finite type term in degreen + 1.
theorem finiteType_succ_of_trivialKanFibration_of_isCoskeletal
[IsNoetherianRing A] [Algebra.FiniteType A B]
(P : SimplicialObject (Over (CommAlgCat.of A B))) (n : ℕ)
(_hkan : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (underlyingAugmentation A B P))
(hcosk : IsIso ((SimplicialObject.coskAdj n).unit.app P))
(hfinite : ∀ k ≤ n,
Algebra.FiniteType A (P.obj (op (SimplexCategory.mk k))).left) :
Algebra.FiniteType A (P.obj (op (SimplexCategory.mk (n + 1)))).left
Tag 08PX, a proposition
Tag 08PX in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.exists_trivialKanFibration_from_finiteType_polynomial_simplicialAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialResolution.lean, line 517.
Stacks 08PX. A finite type algebra over a Noetherian ring has a simplicial resolution by polynomial algebras of finite type whose augmentation is a trivial Kan fibration on underlying simplicial sets.
theorem exists_trivialKanFibration_from_finiteType_polynomial_simplicialAlgebra
{A B : Type u} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
[IsNoetherianRing A] [Algebra.FiniteType A B] :
∃ (P : SimplicialObject (CommAlgCat.{u} A))
(ε : P ⟶ (Functor.const _).obj (CommAlgCat.of A B)),
(∀ n : ℕ, ∃ k : ℕ,
Nonempty ((P.obj (op ⦋n⦌) : Type u) ≃ₐ[A] MvPolynomial (Fin k) A)) ∧
SSet.trivialKanFibrations
(Functor.whiskerRight ε (CategoryTheory.forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A)))
Tag 08PY, a lemma
Tag 08PY in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionLeftDerivedMooreHomologyIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/FiniteHomology.lean, line 289. The attribute's comment: “the half of the statement that says which modules the conclusion is about: the cohomology of Lπ_!(ℱ) for the point morphism of the small model of the footnote-restricted site, read degreewise at abelian coefficients, is the homology of the B-module Moore complex of ℱ(P_•, ε). The finiteness of those modules is CommAlgCat.finite_homology_smallResolutionMooreComplex”.
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)for a presheaf ofB-modules, with the module structure forgotten. The sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(ℱ)are the degreenhomology of theB-module Moore complex ofℱ(P_•, ε), read as an abelian group.This is
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso— the conclusion of Tag 08PT at the small model of the restricted site — followed by the two identifications that move the computation from abelian groups toB-modules: the Moore complex of the underlying abelian presheaf is the image of theB-module Moore complex, andforget₂preserves homology.
def smallResolutionLeftDerivedMooreHomologyIso (n : ℕ) :
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} AddCommGrpCat.{u}).obj
(((Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ)).leftDerived n).obj
(smallPolynomialModuleSheaf A B κ ℱ)) ≅
(forget₂ (ModuleCat.{u} B) AddCommGrpCat.{u}).obj
((smallResolutionMooreComplex ε κ hPκ ℱ).homology n)
CommAlgCat.finite_homology_smallResolutionMooreComplex, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/FiniteHomology.lean, line 357. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion for a resolution satisfying the cardinality bound of the small model of the footnote-restricted site, and with the cohomology of Lπ_! read as the homology of the B-module Moore complex of ℱ(P_•, ε), which is what identifies it here (CommAlgCat.smallResolutionLeftDerivedMooreHomologyIso): the module-level Lπ_! is absent from this library. The finiteness hypothesis is carried for the terms of the resolution, not for every object of the site”.
Tag 08PY for a bounded resolution. Let
Bbe Noetherian, letε : P_• ⟶ Bbe a resolution ofBoverAwhose terms are polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables, and letℱbe a presheaf ofB-modules on the small model of the restricted site whose sections on the terms of the resolution are finiteB-modules. Then the Moore homology ofℱ(P_•, ε)— which byCommAlgCat.smallResolutionLeftDerivedMooreHomologyIsois the sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(ℱ)— is a finiteB-module.
theorem finite_homology_smallResolutionMooreComplex [IsNoetherianRing (B : Type u)]
(hfin : ∀ p : SimplexCategory,
Module.Finite B (ℱ.obj (op ((smallResolutionCosimplicialObject ε κ hPκ).obj p))))
(n : ℕ) : Module.Finite B ((smallResolutionMooreComplex ε κ hPκ ℱ).homology n)
CommAlgCat.finite_moduleLeftDerivedPointLowerShriek, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialResolutionFiniteCohomology.lean, line 133. The attribute's comment: “read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site, for the reason recorded for Tag 08PS in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionSmallOfModules.lean; the cardinal bound κ of the footnote is a parameter, required only to be infinite so that the finite type resolution of Tag 08PX is an object of the site”.
Stacks 08PY. Let
Abe a Noetherian ring, letA → Bbe a finite type ring map and letπ,B̲be as in Tag 08PR. Ifℱis aB̲-module such thatℱ(P, α)is a finiteB-module for every augmentationα : P → BwhosePis of finite type overA, then every cohomology module ofLπ_!(ℱ)is a finiteB-module.By Tag 08PX there is a resolution
ε : P_• ⟶ BofBoverAall of whose terms are finite type polynomial algebras, and by the module half of Tag 08PS the sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(ℱ)are the degreenhomology of the Moore complex ofℱ(P_•, ε). Each term of that complex isℱevaluated at a finite type polynomial augmentation, hence a finiteB-module, andBis Noetherian because it is of finite type over the Noetherian ringA; so each homology module is a subquotient of a finite module over a Noetherian ring.
theorem finite_moduleLeftDerivedPointLowerShriek (κ : Cardinal.{u})
(hκ : Cardinal.aleph0.{u} ≤ κ)
(ℱ : Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ))
(ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)))
(hℱ : ∀ W : smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ,
Algebra.FiniteType A (smallBoundedPolynomialAlgebra A B κ W : Type u) →
Module.Finite (B : Type u) (ℱ.obj.obj (op W)))
(n : ℕ) :
Module.Finite (B : Type u)
(((modulePointLowerShriek (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ)
(B : Type u)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u}
(ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))).obj ℱ)
Tag 08PZ, a lemma
Tag 08PZ in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.finite_homology_cotangentComplex, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/FiniteHomology.lean, line 516.
Tag 08PZ. Let
Abe a Noetherian ring and letA → Bbe a finite type ring map. ThenH^n(L_{B/A})is a finiteB-module for everyn : ℤ.In positive degrees the cotangent complex vanishes, so there is nothing to prove; the content is
CommAlgCat.finite_homology_cotangentComplex_of_resolutionfed with the finite type resolution of Tag 08PX.
theorem finite_homology_cotangentComplex (A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsNoetherianRing A]
(B : Type u) [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [Algebra.FiniteType A B] (m : ℤ) :
Module.Finite B ((cotangentComplex.{u, u} A (CommAlgCat.of A B)).homology m)
Tag 08QI, a remark
Tag 08QI in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.IsResolution, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Resolution.lean, line 71. The attribute's comment: “resolution”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QI.
An augmentation
ε : P• ⟶ Bof a simplicial commutativeA-algebra is a resolution ofBoverAif everyPₙis a polynomial algebra overAand the underlying augmentation of simplicial sets is a trivial Kan fibration.
structure IsResolution (A : Type u) [CommRing A] (B : Type v) [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
(P : SimplicialObject (CommAlgCat.{v} A))
(ε : P ⟶ (SimplicialObject.const _).obj (CommAlgCat.of A B)) : Prop
CommAlgCat.isResolution_quasiIso_homotopyEquivalence_tfae, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Resolution.lean, line 87. The attribute's comment: “resolution_criteria”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QI.
For an augmentation
ε : P• ⟶ Bwhich is degreewise surjective and whose terms are polynomialA-algebras, the following are equivalent:εis a resolution, the induced map of associated complexes is a quasi-isomorphism, and the underlying map of simplicial sets is a homotopy equivalence.
lemma isResolution_quasiIso_homotopyEquivalence_tfae
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] (B : Type v) [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
(P : SimplicialObject (CommAlgCat.{v} A))
(ε : P ⟶ (SimplicialObject.const _).obj (CommAlgCat.of A B))
(hP : ∀ n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ, IsPolynomialAlgebra A (P.obj n))
(hε : ∀ n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ, Function.Surjective (ε.app n).hom) :
List.TFAE
[IsResolution A B P ε,
QuasiIso ((alternatingFaceMapComplex AddCommGrpCat.{v}).map
(Functor.whiskerRight ε
(forget₂ (CommAlgCat.{v} A) (AlgCat.{v} A) ⋙
forget₂ (AlgCat.{v} A) (ModuleCat.{v} A) ⋙
forget₂ (ModuleCat.{v} A) AddCommGrpCat.{v}))),
SimplicialObject.homotopyEquivalences (Type v)
(Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{v} A)))]
CommAlgCat.exists_isResolution, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionCotangentAny.lean, line 85. The attribute's comment: “existence of resolutions: every A-algebra B admits a resolution, namely the standard resolution”.
[Stacks, Remark 08QI]: resolutions exist. Every commutative
A-algebraBadmits a resolution overA: the standard resolution ofBoverAis one, byCommAlgCat.standardResolution_isResolution.
theorem exists_isResolution (A : Type u) [CommRing A] (B : Type (max u v)) [CommRing B]
[Algebra A B] :
∃ (P : SimplicialObject (CommAlgCat.{max u v} A))
(ε : P ⟶ (SimplicialObject.const (CommAlgCat.{max u v} A)).obj (CommAlgCat.of A B)),
IsResolution A B P ε
CommAlgCat.cotangentComplexIsoOfResolution, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionCotangentAny.lean, line 156. The attribute's comment: “in D(B): for an arbitrary resolution of B over A, with no bound on the number of variables, Q(L_{B/A}) = Q(Omega[P_bullet/A] ⊗_{P_bullet} B); the cardinal bound of the two instances of Tag 08PU this composes is supplied by the resolution itself”.
[Stacks, Remark 08QI]: any resolution computes the cotangent complex. Let
ε : P_• ⟶ Bbe a resolution ofBoverA— everyP_na polynomial algebra overA,εa trivial Kan fibration of the underlying simplicial sets — with no bound on the number of variables. Then the cotangent complexL_{B/A}of [Stacks, Tag 08PN], which is built from the standard resolution, is the complex of base-changed differentials ofP_•, as objects ofD(B):
Q(L_{B/A}) ≅ Q(Ω[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•, ε} B).The proof is the source's. At the cardinal
CommAlgCat.resolutionVarCardinal, which bounds the terms ofP_•and those of the standard resolution at once, both resolutions lie on the small model of the footnote-restricted site, so the two instances of [Stacks, Tag 08PU] inD(B)—CommAlgCat.standardResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIsoOfLEandCommAlgCat.smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso— identify both complexes withLπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲), which mentions no resolution.
def cotangentComplexIsoOfResolution :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (resolutionCotangentComplex.{u, u} A B P ε)
CommAlgCat.resolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionCotangentAny.lean, line 182. The attribute's comment: “the cosimplicial object of a resolution and the conclusion Lpi_!(F) = F(P_bullet, ε) in D(B) functorially in F, for an arbitrary resolution with no bound on the number of variables, read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site for the reason recorded in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionPointCriterionSmall.lean”.
Lπ_!(ℱ) = ℱ(P_•, ε)inD(B)for an arbitrary resolution. Letε : P_• ⟶ Bbe a resolution ofBoverA, with no bound on the number of variables. For every sheaf ofB-modulesℱon the small model of the siteC_{B/A}restricted to polynomial algebras on at mostCommAlgCat.resolutionVarCardinal A B hε.isPolynomialAlgebravariables — a bound the resolution supplies — the sections at the point ofL_nπ_!(ℱ)are the degreenhomology of the Moore complex of the simplicialB-moduleℱ(P_•, ε), naturally inℱ.This is
CommAlgCat.smallResolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIsoat that cardinal. A bound cannot be dispensed with altogether here, as it can inCommAlgCat.cotangentComplexIsoOfResolution: the site, and with itπ_!, is the one restricted by the bound.
def resolutionModuleLeftDerivedLowerShriekNatIso (n : ℕ) :
(modulePointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (resolutionVarCardinal A B hε.isPolynomialAlgebra))
(B : Type u)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections.{u, u + 1, u} (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)) ≅
sheafToPresheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B (resolutionVarCardinal A B hε.isPolynomialAlgebra)))
(ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u)) ⋙
moduleCosimplicialMooreComplex (smallResolutionCosimplicialObject ε
(resolutionVarCardinal A B hε.isPolynomialAlgebra)
(isPolynomialAlgebraBelow_resolutionVarCardinal A B hε.isPolynomialAlgebra)) ⋙
HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))
(ComplexShape.down ℕ) n
CommAlgCat.quasiIso_alternatingFaceMapComplex_map_of_isResolution, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionIndependence.lean, line 199. The attribute's comment: “the remark's payoff, at the arrow level: for any two resolutions of B over A and any morphism between them, the induced map of the complexes Omega[-/A] ⊗ B is a quasi-isomorphism, so any resolution computes L_{B/A} and the comparison is the induced map”.
Remark 08QI at the arrow level. Let
ε : P_• ⟶ Bandε' : P'_• ⟶ Bbe resolutions ofBoverAin the sense of [Stacks, Tag 08QI]. Every morphismψof the attached simplicial objects ofOver B— equivalently, every morphismP_• ⟶ P'_•of simplicialA-algebras compatible with the augmentations — induces a quasi-isomorphism
Ω[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•} B ⟶ Ω[P'_•⁄A] ⊗_{P'_•} B.So any resolution computes the cotangent complex, and the isomorphism is the one a morphism of resolutions induces; no cardinal bound appears, the terms of the two resolutions being bounded by a single cardinal.
theorem quasiIso_alternatingFaceMapComplex_map_of_isResolution
(hres : IsResolution A (B : Type u) P ε) (hres' : IsResolution A (B : Type u) P' ε')
(ψ : resolutionOver ε ⟶ resolutionOver ε') :
QuasiIso ((alternatingFaceMapComplex (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))).map
(Functor.whiskerRight ψ (overDifferentialsFunctor (A := A) (B := B))))
CommAlgCat.resolutionCotangentComplexIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ResolutionIndependence.lean, line 216. The attribute's comment: “the remark's payoff, at the object level: for any resolution of B over A the complex Omega[P_./A] ⊗_{P_.} B is L_{B/A} in D(B)”.
Remark 08QI at the object level. The complex
Ω[P_•⁄A] ⊗_{P_•} Bof an arbitrary resolution ofBoverA, read in cohomological degrees≤ 0, is the cotangent complexL_{B/A}inD(B). Both are identified withLπ_!(i^*Ω_{𝒪/A})by [Stacks, Tag 08PU] inD(B), read at a bound containing both the given resolution and the standard one.
def resolutionCotangentComplexIso (hres : IsResolution A (B : Type u) P ε) :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj
(((alternatingFaceMapComplex (ModuleCat.{u} (B : Type u))).obj
(resolutionOver ε ⋙ overDifferentialsFunctor)).extend
(ComplexShape.embeddingUpIntLE (0 : ℤ))) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B)
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_isResolution, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/StandardResolutionIsResolution.lean, line 120. The attribute's comment: “standard_qualifies”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QI. The standard augmented simplicial algebra of a commutative
A-algebraBis a resolution ofBoverA.
public theorem standardResolution_isResolution (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
(B : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A) :
IsResolution A B (standardResolution A B).left (standardResolution A B).hom
Tag 08QJ, a lemma
Tag 08QJ in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.isIso_derivedColimitTensorComparison_smallPolynomialAugmentation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteCoefficientChange.lean, line 1276. The attribute's comment: “for an 𝒪-module in cohomological degree zero, on the small model of the site C_{B/A}; on a chaotic site Li^*ℱ and ℱ ⊗^L_𝒪 B̲ are the same object”.
The change of coefficients of [Stacks, Tag 08QJ]. Let
A → Bbe a ring map and let𝒪,B̲andπbe as in [Stacks, Tag 08PR], read on the small model ofC_{B/A}at the cardinalCommAlgCat.standardResolutionVarCardinal A Bbounding the standard resolution. Then for every𝒪-moduleℱ, placed in cohomological degree zero, the canonical comparison
Lπ_!(ℱ) ⟶ Lπ_!(ℱ ⊗^L_𝒪 B̲)is an isomorphism in
D(Ab).The source states the right-hand side as
Lπ_!(Li^*ℱ)for the morphism of topoiiattached to the ring mapB ⟶ B; on a chaotic site that morphism is the identity on topoi, soLi^*ℱandℱ ⊗^L_𝒪 B̲are one and the same object ofD(Mod(B̲))and the two readings of the statement coincide. The comparison itself isStacks.ChaoticSite.derivedColimitTensorComparison: derived lower shriek applied to the unit of the derived change-of-coefficients adjunction, followed by the identification ofLπ_!onB̲-modules withLπ_!on their underlying𝒪-modules, which is an isomorphism because restriction of scalars does not change the underlying abelian presheaf.Both hypotheses of [Stacks, Tag 08RX] are discharged, so nothing is assumed:
CommAlgCat.isPointResolution_standardResolutionSmallCosimplicialObjectis [Stacks, Tag 08PS] at this model, andCommAlgCat.isIso_leftDerivedColimit_map_smallPolynomialAugmentationAbelianisLπ_!(𝒪) = Lπ_!(B̲)read degreewise. The dévissage from those two to an arbitrary𝒪-module isStacks.ChaoticSite.isIso_derivedColimitTensorComparison_app_single.
public theorem isIso_derivedColimitTensorComparison_smallPolynomialAugmentation
(F : PresheafOfModules.{u}
(smallPolynomialStructurePresheaf A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))) :
IsIso ((Stacks.ChaoticSite.derivedColimitTensorComparison
(smallPolynomialAugmentation A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B))).app
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj
((HomologicalComplex.single (PresheafOfModules.{u}
(smallPolynomialStructurePresheaf A B (standardResolutionVarCardinal A B)))
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0).obj F)))
Tag 08QK, a lemma
Tag 08QK in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekDifferentialsBaseChangeIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteDifferentialsBaseChangeLargeSite.lean, line 316. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲) = Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A}) in D(Ab), as the isomorphism induced by the base-change unit Ω_{𝒪/A} ⟶ Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲, for the point morphism of the site C_{B/A} of Tag 08PR itself -- not of the footnote-restricted site nor of a small model of it -- with Ω_{𝒪/A} the sheaf of relative differentials of that site and Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲ its base change along the augmentation 𝒪 ⟶ B̲ of Tag 08PR, under no hypothesis on A → B and no cardinal bound”.
Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A}) = Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲)inD(Ab)at the siteC_{B/A}itself, the last identification of [Stacks, Tag 08QK], as the isomorphism induced by the base-change unitΩ_{𝒪/A} ⟶ Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲.Here
Ω_{𝒪/A}is the sheaf of relative differentials of [Stacks, Tag 08PR]'s site, read on its underlying abelian sheaf,Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲is its base change along the augmentation𝒪 ⟶ B̲of that tag,πis the point morphism of the siteC_{B/A}-- not of a restriction of it -- andLπ_!is the total left derived functor of the colimit over the index category, which is theπ_!of [Stacks, Tag 08PF]. There is no hypothesis onA → Bbeyond its being a ring map, and no cardinal bound on the sets of variables.The two inputs are the criterion of [Stacks, Tag 08Q9] with no smallness hypothesis on the site,
Stacks.ChaoticSite.AbelianValued.isIso_totalDerivedColimit_single_map_iff_of_large, and the quasi-isomorphism of Moore complexesCommAlgCat.quasiIso_mooreCochain_polynomialSiteDifferentialsBaseChangeUnit, which is the Δ-instance of [Stacks, Tag 08RX] rather than [Stacks, Tag 08QJ].
def polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekDifferentialsBaseChangeIso :
polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekSingle A B
(polynomialSiteAbelianRelativeDifferentials A B) ≅
polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekSingle A B
(polynomialSiteAbelianDifferentialsBaseChange A B)
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekConstantIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSitePointValuesLargeSite.lean, line 259. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(B̲) = B in D(Ab), for the point morphism of the site C_{B/A} of Tag 08PR itself -- not of the footnote-restricted site nor of a small model of it -- with Lπ_! the total left derived functor of the colimit over the index category, which is the π_! of Tag 08PF, and with B read as the abelian group ULift.{u+1} B exactly as the site's own ringed point CommAlgCat.polynomialRingedPoint reads it”.
Lπ_!(B̲) = BinD(Ab)at the siteC_{B/A}itself, the second identification of [Stacks, Tag 08QK]. HereB̲is the constant sheaf of rings with valueBof [Stacks, Tag 08PR] read on its underlying abelian sheaf,πis the point morphism of the siteC_{B/A}of that tag -- not of a restriction of it -- andLπ_!is the total left derived functor of the colimit over the index category, which is theπ_!of [Stacks, Tag 08PF].The proof is the source's: the polynomial algebra on no variables, augmented by
A → B, is a terminal object of the site (CommAlgCat.isTerminal_polynomialBaseObj), soπ^{-1}is the constant diagram and has an exact right adjoint, and [Stacks, Tag 08Q7] in the formStacks.ChaoticSite.derivedConstCompColimitIso'givesLπ_! ∘ π^{-1} = id.
def polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekConstantIso :
polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekSingle A B (polynomialSiteAbelianConstantPresheaf A B) ≅
polynomialSiteBaseInDerived A B
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekStructureConstantIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSitePointValuesLargeSite.lean, line 430. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(𝒪) = Lπ_!(B̲) in D(Ab), as the isomorphism induced by the augmentation 𝒪 ⟶ B̲ of Tag 08PR, for the point morphism of the site C_{B/A} of Tag 08PR itself -- not of the footnote-restricted site nor of a small model of it”.
Lπ_!(𝒪) = Lπ_!(B̲)inD(Ab)at the siteC_{B/A}itself, the first identification of [Stacks, Tag 08QK], as the isomorphism induced by the augmentation𝒪 ⟶ B̲of [Stacks, Tag 08PR].The two inputs are the criterion of [Stacks, Tag 08Q9] with no smallness hypothesis on the site,
Stacks.ChaoticSite.AbelianValued.isIso_totalDerivedColimit_single_map_iff_of_large, and the quasi-isomorphism of Moore complexesCommAlgCat.quasiIso_mooreCochain_polynomialSiteAbelianAugmentation, whose own input is [Stacks, Tag 08QI].
def polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekStructureConstantIso :
polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekSingle A B (polynomialSiteAbelianStructurePresheaf A B) ≅
polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekSingle A B (polynomialSiteAbelianConstantPresheaf A B)
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekStructureIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSitePointValuesLargeSite.lean, line 448. The attribute's comment: “Lπ_!(𝒪) = B in D(Ab), for the point morphism of the site C_{B/A} of Tag 08PR itself -- not of the footnote-restricted site nor of a small model of it”.
Lπ_!(𝒪) = BinD(Ab)at the siteC_{B/A}itself, the composite of the two identificationsLπ_!(𝒪) = Lπ_!(B̲)andLπ_!(B̲) = Bof [Stacks, Tag 08QK].
def polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekStructureIso :
polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekSingle A B (polynomialSiteAbelianStructurePresheaf A B) ≅
polynomialSiteBaseInDerived A B
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekCotangentIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSitePointValuesLargeSite.lean, line 520. The attribute's comment: “L_{B/A} = Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲) in D(Ab), for the point morphism of the site C_{B/A} of Tag 08PR itself -- not of the footnote-restricted site nor of a small model of it: the cotangent complex of Tag 08PN, read in D(Ab) at the coefficient universe of the site, is Lπ_! of the sheaf i^*Ω_{𝒪/A}”.
L_{B/A} = Lπ_!(Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲)inD(Ab)at the siteC_{B/A}itself, the third identification of [Stacks, Tag 08QK]. The left-hand side is the cotangent complex of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] with itsB-module structures forgotten, read at the coefficient universe of the site; the right-hand side isLπ_!of the abelian sheafi^*Ω_{𝒪/A} = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲.The two inputs are [Stacks, Tag 08PS] at
C_{B/A}itself,CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteResolutionDerivedColimitNatIso, which computesLπ_!by the extended Moore complex of the evaluation on the standard resolution, andCommAlgCat.polynomialSiteCotangentMooreComplexIso, which is [Stacks, Tag 08PU] identifying that Moore complex with the complex ofL_{B/A}.
def polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekCotangentIso :
polynomialSiteDerivedLowerShriekSingle A B (polynomialSiteAbelianCotangentPresheaf A B) ≅
polynomialSiteCotangentInDerived A B
Tag 08SA, a lemma
Tag 08SA in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.exists_distTriang_derivedExtensionScalars_cotangentComplex, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/StandardResolutionOverPolynomialBase.lean, line 1089.
Stacks Project, Tag 08SA. Let
A → B → Cbe ring maps. IfBis a polynomial algebra overA, then there is a distinguished triangle
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C → L_{C/A} → L_{C/B} → (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1]in
D(C). This is the lemma as stated.The proof is the source's. The standard resolution
P_•ofCoverBis, read overA, also a resolution ofCoverA(CommAlgCat.standardResolution_isResolution_restrictScalars); the differentials of the towerA → B → Pₙform a split short exact sequence becausePₙis a polynomial algebra overB, and base changing it toCgives a short exact sequence of complexes ofC-modulesΩ[B⁄A] ⊗[B] C → Ω[P_•⁄A] ⊗[P_•] C → Ω[P_•⁄B] ⊗[P_•] C(CommAlgCat.restrictedCotangentComplexShortComplex_shortExact) whose distinguished triangle is the one asserted. Its last term isL_{C/B}by definition; its first term isΩ[B⁄A] ⊗[B] Cin degree0, which isL_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B Cby Tag 08QH and the projectivity ofΩ[B⁄A](CommAlgCat.nonempty_derivedExtensionScalars_cotangentComplex_iso_of_isPolynomialAlgebra); and its middle term isL_{C/A}becauseP_•and the standard resolution ofCoverAare two resolutions ofCoverA, so by Tag 08PU both compute derived lower shriek ofi^*Ω_{𝒪/A}on the siteC_{C/A}(CommAlgCat.nonempty_q_restrictedCotangentComplex_iso_cotangentComplex).The triangle is stated existentially, as in the source: the identifications of the first and middle terms are isomorphisms of objects of
D(C), which transport a distinguished triangle to one with the named objects. The three rings are taken in one universe, which is no restriction: three rings with maps between them always live in a common universe. The conditional form at two universes, with the identification of the middle term as a hypothesis, isCommAlgCat.exists_distTriang_derivedExtensionScalars_of_isPolynomialAlgebra.
public theorem exists_distTriang_derivedExtensionScalars_cotangentComplex
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] (B : Type u) [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
(C : Type u) [CommRing C] [Algebra B C] [Algebra A C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
(hB : Algebra.IsPolynomialAlgebra A B) :
∃ (f : (CochainComplex.DerivedExtensionScalars.derivedExtensionScalarsGeneral
(algebraMap B C)).functor.obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplexOfAlgebra.{u, u} A B)) ⟶
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplexOfAlgebra.{u, u} A C))
(g : DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplexOfAlgebra.{u, u} A C) ⟶
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplexOfAlgebra.{u, u} B C))
(h : DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplexOfAlgebra.{u, u} B C) ⟶
((CochainComplex.DerivedExtensionScalars.derivedExtensionScalarsGeneral
(algebraMap B C)).functor.obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplexOfAlgebra.{u, u} A B)))⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧),
Pretriangulated.Triangle.mk f g h ∈
Pretriangulated.distinguishedTriangles (C := DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} C))
Tag 09D4, an example
Tag 09D4 in the Stacks Project.
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.Degeneracies.degeneracyZero, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/Degeneracies.lean, line 81. The attribute's comment: “degeneracies”.
The first degeneracy fixes
uᵢand sendsxₜtoyₜ.
noncomputable def degeneracyZero :
DegreeOne.P1 p →ₐ[p.A] DegreeTwo.P2 p
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.Degeneracies.degeneracyOne, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/Degeneracies.lean, line 89. The attribute's comment: “degeneracies”.
The second degeneracy fixes
uᵢand sendsxₜtozₜ.
noncomputable def degeneracyOne :
DegreeOne.P1 p →ₐ[p.A] DegreeTwo.P2 p
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.Degeneracies.degeneracyZero_unique, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/Degeneracies.lean, line 98. The attribute's comment: “degeneracies”.
The first degeneracy is the unique algebra map with the displayed values on the old and relation variables.
theorem degeneracyZero_unique
(f : DegreeOne.P1 p →ₐ[p.A] DegreeTwo.P2 p)
(hu : ∀ i : p.variableIndex,
f (MvPolynomial.X (Sum.inl i)) =
MvPolynomial.X (DegreeTwo.DegreeTwoVariable.base i))
(hx : ∀ t : p.relationIndex,
f (MvPolynomial.X (Sum.inr t)) =
MvPolynomial.X (DegreeTwo.DegreeTwoVariable.y t)) :
f = degeneracyZero p
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.Degeneracies.degeneracyOne_unique, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/Degeneracies.lean, line 116. The attribute's comment: “degeneracies”.
The second degeneracy is the unique algebra map with the displayed values on the old and relation variables.
theorem degeneracyOne_unique
(f : DegreeOne.P1 p →ₐ[p.A] DegreeTwo.P2 p)
(hu : ∀ i : p.variableIndex,
f (MvPolynomial.X (Sum.inl i)) =
MvPolynomial.X (DegreeTwo.DegreeTwoVariable.base i))
(hx : ∀ t : p.relationIndex,
f (MvPolynomial.X (Sum.inr t)) =
MvPolynomial.X (DegreeTwo.DegreeTwoVariable.z t)) :
f = degeneracyOne p
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.Degeneracies.degeneracyZero_lifts, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/Degeneracies.lean, line 330. The attribute's comment: “degeneracies”.
The displayed first degeneracy lifts the first degeneracy of the one-coskeleton.
theorem degeneracyZero_lifts :
AlgCat.ofHom (degeneracyZeroLift p) ≫
DegreeTwo.degreeTwoToCoskeleton p =
(DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton p).oneIso.inv ≫
(DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton p).simplicial.σ (0 : Fin 2)
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.Degeneracies.degeneracyOne_lifts, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/Degeneracies.lean, line 344. The attribute's comment: “degeneracies”.
The displayed second degeneracy lifts the second degeneracy of the one-coskeleton.
theorem degeneracyOne_lifts :
AlgCat.ofHom (degeneracyOneLift p) ≫
DegreeTwo.degreeTwoToCoskeleton p =
(DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton p).oneIso.inv ≫
(DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton p).simplicial.σ (1 : Fin 2)
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.Degeneracies.explicitResolution, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/Degeneracies.lean, line 1526. The attribute's comment: “degeneracies”.
The displayed first three degrees extend to a polynomial simplicial resolution of
BoverA.
noncomputable def explicitResolution : ExplicitResolution p
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeOne.lean, line 377. The attribute's comment: “degree_one”.
The coskeleton of the explicit one-truncated polynomial simplicial algebra.
noncomputable def degreeOneCoskeleton : DegreeOneCoskeleton p
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeOne.range_faceZero_sub_faceOne, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeOne.lean, line 563. The attribute's comment: “degree_one”.
Exactness at
P₀ofP₁ → P₀ → B.
theorem range_faceZero_sub_faceOne :
Set.range (fun z : P1 p => faceZero p z - faceOne p z) =
{z : p.P0 | augmentationZero p z = 0}
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeOne.facePair_surjective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeOne.lean, line 606. The attribute's comment: “degree_one”.
Every compatible pair of degree-zero simplices lifts to degree one.
theorem facePair_surjective :
∀ a b : p.P0,
augmentationZero p a = augmentationZero p b →
∃ z : P1 p, faceZero p z = a ∧ faceOne p z = b
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeOne.coskeleton_trivialKanFibration, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeOne.lean, line 700. The attribute's comment: “degree_one”.
The augmentation of this degree-one coskeleton is a trivial Kan fibration.
theorem coskeleton_trivialKanFibration :
SSet.trivialKanFibrations
(Functor.whiskerRight (degreeOneCoskeleton p).augmentation
(forget (AlgCat.{max u v w x} p.A)))
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeTwo.faces_matching, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeTwo.lean, line 191. The attribute's comment: “degree_two”.
The three displayed face maps define a map to the degree-two matching object.
theorem faces_matching (q : P2 p) :
MatchingTriple p (faceZero p q) (faceOne p q) (faceTwo p q)
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeTwo.matchingEquiv, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeTwo.lean, line 878. The attribute's comment: “degree_two”.
The actual second degree of the one-coskeleton is canonically the algebra of compatible triples of degree-one elements.
noncomputable def matchingEquiv :
((DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton p).simplicial _⦋2⦌) ≃
{g : (DegreeOne.P1 p ×
DegreeOne.P1 p × DegreeOne.P1 p) //
MatchingTriple p g.1 g.2.1 g.2.2}
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeTwo.matchingEquiv_faces, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeTwo.lean, line 905. The attribute's comment: “degree_two”.
The canonical matching equivalence records exactly the three actual faces of a degree-two simplex.
theorem matchingEquiv_faces
(a : (DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton p).simplicial _⦋2⦌) :
(matchingEquiv p a).val =
(coskeletonFace p 0 a, coskeletonFace p 1 a, coskeletonFace p 2 a)
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeTwo.degreeTwoToCoskeleton, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeTwo.lean, line 1053. The attribute's comment: “degree_two”.
The algebra map from the displayed polynomial degree two to the actual degree-two object of the one-coskeleton.
noncomputable def degreeTwoToCoskeleton :
algP2 p ⟶ (DegreeOne.degreeOneCoskeleton p).simplicial _⦋2⦌
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeTwo.matchingEquiv_degreeTwoToCoskeleton, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeTwo.lean, line 1136. The attribute's comment: “degree_two”.
Under the canonical matching equivalence, the algebra map has the three displayed face maps as its components.
theorem matchingEquiv_degreeTwoToCoskeleton (q : P2 p) :
matchingEquiv p (degreeTwoToCoskeleton p (ULift.up q)) =
⟨(faceZero p q, faceOne p q, faceTwo p q), faces_matching p q⟩
Algebra.PolynomialPresentationWithKernelGenerators.DegreeTwo.degreeTwoToCoskeleton_surjective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/Degeneracies/DegreeTwo.lean, line 1518. The attribute's comment: “degree_two”.
The displayed algebra map onto the actual second coskeleton degree is surjective.
theorem degreeTwoToCoskeleton_surjective :
Function.Surjective (degreeTwoToCoskeleton p)
Sources
Section92.6 Functoriality#
Section 92.6 of the Stacks Project, Tag 08QL. 5 tags here are carried by 30 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 08QN, an equation
Tag 08QN in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.ChaoticSite.isTransport_coefficientSquareComparison, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/CategoryTheory/Sites/Cohomology/ChaoticSite/ConstantRingedSquares.lean, line 396. The attribute's comment: “change-of-coefficients square: the comparison is the canonical one”.
The comparison is the canonical one. It is the identity of the restriction functor along
C ⥤ *, not some other automorphism of it; this is what makesStacks.ChaoticSite.coefficientSquare_commutesa statement about the square rather than about a choice.
theorem isTransport_coefficientSquareComparison :
Stacks.IsTransport (coefficientSquareComparison.{w} C φ).hom
Stacks.ChaoticSite.coefficientSquare_commutes, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/CategoryTheory/Sites/Cohomology/ChaoticSite/ConstantRingedSquares.lean, line 475. The attribute's comment: “the change-of-coefficients square of constant-coefficient ringed topoi”.
The change-of-coefficients square commutes. The structure map of the one composite, transported along the adjoint mate of the canonical comparison, is the structure map of the other; see
AlgebraicGeometry.RingedToposHom.SquareCommutes, which is that equation.
theorem coefficientSquare_commutes :
SquareCommutes (X := constantRingedTopos C R')
(Y := constantRingedTopos (Discrete PUnit.{u₁ + 1}) R)
(coefficientSquareDownAcross.{w} C φ) (coefficientSquareAcrossDown.{w} C φ)
(coefficientSquareComparison.{w} C φ)
Stacks.ChaoticSite.isTransport_functorialitySquareComparison, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/CategoryTheory/Sites/Cohomology/ChaoticSite/ConstantRingedSquares.lean, line 552. The attribute's comment: “functoriality triangle: the comparison is the canonical one”.
The comparison is the canonical one, hence a transport: it is built from the identification
u ⋙ star = starof the two functors to the point and nothing else.
theorem isTransport_functorialitySquareComparison :
Stacks.IsTransport (functorialitySquareComparison.{w} C D u R).hom
Stacks.ChaoticSite.functorialitySquare_commutes, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/CategoryTheory/Sites/Cohomology/ChaoticSite/ConstantRingedSquares.lean, line 574. The attribute's comment: “the functoriality triangle of constant-coefficient ringed topoi”.
The functoriality triangle commutes. Every edge is a transport, so the structure map of
π_C ∘ gtransported along the adjoint mate of the canonical comparison is the structure map ofπ_D.
theorem functorialitySquare_commutes :
(constantRingedTopos (Discrete PUnit.{u₁ + 1}) R).forgetRing.map
(functorialitySquareAcrossDown.{w} C D u R).fSharp ≫
(((functorialitySquareAcrossDown.{w} C D u R).toToposHom.adj.ofNatIsoLeft
(functorialitySquareComparison.{w} C D u R)).rightAdjointUniq
(constantProjection.{w} D R).toToposHom.adj).hom.app
((constantRingedTopos D R).forgetRing.obj (constantRingedTopos D R).O) =
(constantRingedTopos (Discrete PUnit.{u₁ + 1}) R).forgetRing.map
(constantProjection.{w} D R).fSharp
CommAlgCat.baseChangeAugmentation_tmul, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteBaseChange.lean, line 84. The attribute's comment: “base-change augmentation on a pure tensor”.
The augmentation of
A' ⊗_A Psendsa' ⊗ ptoa' · b(α(p)).
theorem baseChangeAugmentation_tmul (X : Over B) (a' : A') (p : (X.left : Type u)) :
baseChangeAugmentation b X (a' ⊗ₜ[A] p) =
algebraMap A' (B' : Type u) a' * b (X.hom.hom p)
CommAlgCat.baseChangeMap_tmul, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteBaseChange.lean, line 96. The attribute's comment: “base change of a morphism on a pure tensor”.
Extension of scalars of a morphism
fof augmented algebras sendsa' ⊗ ptoa' ⊗ f(p).
theorem baseChangeMap_tmul {X Y : Over B} (f : X ⟶ Y) (a' : A') (p : (X.left : Type u)) :
baseChangeMap f (a' ⊗ₜ[A] p) = a' ⊗ₜ[A] f.left.hom p
CommAlgCat.isPolynomialAlgebra_baseChange, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteBaseChange.lean, line 156. The attribute's comment: “base change preserves polynomial algebras”.
Extension of scalars takes a polynomial
A-algebra to a polynomialA'-algebra:A' ⊗_A A[S] = A'[S].
theorem isPolynomialAlgebra_baseChange (P : CommAlgCat.{u} A)
(hP : IsPolynomialAlgebra A P) :
IsPolynomialAlgebra A' (baseChangeObj (A' := A') P)
CommAlgCat.polynomialBaseChange, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteBaseChange.lean, line 180. The attribute's comment: “polynomial-site base change”.
The functor of sites
C_{B/A} ⟶ C_{B'/A'}induced by a commutative square of rings, given by extension of scalars on polynomial algebras augmented toB.
def polynomialBaseChange : polynomialSite A B ⥤ polynomialSite A' B'
CommAlgCat.polynomialBaseChange_obj_hom, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteBaseChange.lean, line 186. The attribute's comment: “polynomial-site base change on objects”.
The augmentation of the image of
XunderpolynomialBaseChange bisbaseChangeAugmentation b X.
theorem polynomialBaseChange_obj_hom (X : polynomialSite A B) :
((polynomialBaseChange b).obj X).unop.obj.hom =
CommAlgCat.ofHom (baseChangeAugmentation b X.unop.obj)
CommAlgCat.polynomialBaseChange_map_left, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialAlgebraSiteBaseChange.lean, line 193. The attribute's comment: “polynomial-site base change on morphisms”.
The underlying algebra map of the image of
funderpolynomialBaseChange bisbaseChangeMap f.
theorem polynomialBaseChange_map_left {X Y : polynomialSite A B} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
((polynomialBaseChange b).map f).unop.hom.left =
CommAlgCat.ofHom (baseChangeMap f.unop.hom)
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialBaseChange, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialSiteBaseChangeShriek.lean, line 92. The attribute's comment: “polynomial-site base change, with the section's footnote in force: the functor between the sites restricted to at most κ variables. The unrestricted version is CommAlgCat.polynomialBaseChange”.
The base-change functor of sites
C_{B/A} ⟶ C_{B'/A'}, between the sites restricted to polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables.
def boundedPolynomialBaseChange :
boundedPolynomialSite A B κ ⥤ boundedPolynomialSite A' B' κ
Tag 08QP, a lemma
Tag 08QP in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.leftDerivedPointLowerShriekPolynomialBaseChangeNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialSiteBaseChangeShriek.lean, line 210. The attribute's comment: “a GENERALIZATION of the lemma: the identification Lπ_!(g^{-1}ℱ') = Lπ'_!(ℱ') under the weaker hypothesis that the base change A' ⊗_A P_• ⟶ B' of the chosen resolution is again a resolution, which is what the source's proof derives from B ⊗_A^L A' = B'. The source's own statement is CommAlgCat.leftDerivedPointLowerShriekPolynomialBaseChangeNatIsoOfTorIndependent, proved from this one. Both are read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A} and through the sections at the point”.
Let
be a commutative square of rings, letA --→ A' | | B --→ B'C_{B/A}andC_{B'/A'}be the sites of polynomial algebras augmented toB, resp. toB', of Tag 08PR, and letgbe the morphism of topoi induced by the base-change functor of Tag 08QN, so thatg^{-1}is restriction along it. Letε : P_• ⟶ Bbe a resolution ofBoverAwhose terms are polynomial algebras on at mostκvariables, and assume that the base-changed augmentationA' ⊗_A P_• ⟶ B'is again a resolution ofB'overA'. Then
Lπ_!(g^{-1}ℱ') = Lπ'_!(ℱ')in every degree
nand naturally in the abelian sheafℱ'onC_{B'/A'}, read through the sections at the point. Both sites are read at the small model of their restriction to at mostκvariables.
def leftDerivedPointLowerShriekPolynomialBaseChangeNatIso
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A))))
(hres : IsResolution A' (B' : Type u)
(simplicialBaseChange b ε) (augmentationBaseChange b ε))
(n : ℕ) :
(smallPolynomialBaseChange b κ).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u}
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ))
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A' B' κ)) ⋙
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections AddCommGrpCat.{u} ≅
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A' B' κ)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections AddCommGrpCat.{u}
CommAlgCat.leftDerivedPointLowerShriekPolynomialBaseChangeNatIsoOfTorIndependent, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/PolynomialSiteBaseChangeShriek.lean, line 254. The attribute's comment: “the lemma as stated: the identification Lπ_!(g^{-1}ℱ') = Lπ'_!(ℱ') from the source's own hypothesis that the square induce a quasi-isomorphism B ⊗_A^L A' = B', written out as vanishing of the positive Tor_i^A(A', B) together with bijectivity of A' ⊗_A B → B'. Read at the small model of the footnote-restricted site C_{B/A} and through the sections at the point; the generalization assuming only that the base-changed augmentation is a resolution is CommAlgCat.leftDerivedPointLowerShriekPolynomialBaseChangeNatIso”.
Let
be a commutative square of rings which induces a quasi-isomorphismA --→ A' | | B --→ B'B ⊗_A^L A' = B'— that is,Tor_i^A(A', B) = 0fori > 0and the canonical mapA' ⊗_A B → B'is bijective. LetC_{B/A}andC_{B'/A'}be the sites of polynomial algebras augmented toB, resp. toB', of Tag 08PR, and letgbe the morphism of topoi induced by the base-change functor of Tag 08QN, so thatg^{-1}is restriction along it. Then
Lπ_!(g^{-1}ℱ') = Lπ'_!(ℱ')in every degree
nand naturally in the abelian sheafℱ'onC_{B'/A'}, read through the sections at the point. Both sites are read at the small model of their restriction to at mostκvariables, for anyκbounding the variables of a chosen resolutionε : P_• ⟶ BofBoverA.
def leftDerivedPointLowerShriekPolynomialBaseChangeNatIsoOfTorIndependent
(hres : IsResolution A (B : Type u) P ε)
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hφ : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b))
(n : ℕ) :
(smallPolynomialBaseChange b κ).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u}
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ))
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialSite A' B' κ)) ⋙
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A B κ)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections AddCommGrpCat.{u} ≅
(Stacks.ChaoticSite.abelianPointLowerShriek
(smallBoundedPolynomialSite A' B' κ)).leftDerived n ⋙
Stacks.ChaoticSite.pointSections AddCommGrpCat.{u}
Tag 08QQ, a lemma
Tag 08QQ in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap_eq_counit, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeComplexCounit.lean, line 267. The attribute's comment: “the arrow of the lemma is the functoriality map of Tag 08PN: the adjoint map out of extension of scalars is extension of scalars of the B-linear map of Tag 08PN followed by the counit, as an equality of maps of cotangent complexes”.
The two shapes of the functoriality map agree, on the cotangent complexes. The adjoint map
L_{B/A} ⊗_B B' ⟶ L_{B'/A'}of [Stacks, Tag 08QQ] is extension of scalars alongB → B'of theB-linear mapL_{B/A} ⟶ L_{B'/A'}of [Stacks, Tag 08PN], followed by the counitB' ⊗_B L_{B'/A'} ⟶ L_{B'/A'}.This is
CommAlgCat.cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMap_eq_counittransported through the reindexing which places simplicial degreenin cohomological degree-n, byModuleCat.extendMap_comp_extendRestrictScalarsAdjCounitComplex.
theorem cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap_eq_counit :
cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap b =
((ModuleCat.extendScalars b.toRingHom).mapHomologicalComplex (ComplexShape.up ℤ)).map
(squareCotangentComplexMap.{u, u, u} (algebraSquareOfAlgHom b)) ≫
ModuleCat.extendRestrictScalarsAdjCounitComplex b.toRingHom (ComplexShape.up ℤ)
(cotangentComplex.{u, u} A' B')
CommAlgCat.overDifferentialsBaseChangeNatIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIso.lean, line 250. The attribute's comment: “the step of the proof the source performs by inspection: extension of scalars along B → B' of i^Ω_{𝒪/A} is the restriction of i^Ω_{𝒪'/A'} along the base-change functor of sites of Tag 08QN”.
i^*Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_B B' = g^{-1}(i^*Ω_{𝒪'/A'}), the step the source performs by inspection. Extension of scalars alongB → B'of theB-module of differentialsB ⊗_P Ω[P⁄A]is theB'-module of differentials of the base-changed algebraA' ⊗_A P, naturally in theA-algebraPaugmented toB.
def overDifferentialsBaseChangeNatIso :
overDifferentialsFunctor (A := A) (B := B) ⋙ ModuleCat.extendScalars b.toRingHom ≅
baseChangeOver b ⋙ overDifferentialsFunctor (A := A') (B := B')
CommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIso.lean, line 564. The attribute's comment: “on the alternating-face-map complexes, under ONE carried hypothesis: Remark 08QI as CommAlgCat.CotangentComputedByEveryResolution, which Tag 08QI discharges; the source's own hypothesis and its conclusion on THE functoriality map of Tag 08PN are kept”.
Stacks 08QQ, on the alternating-face-map complexes. If the commutative square
A → B,A → A',B → B',A' → B'induces a quasi-isomorphismB ⊗_A^L A' = B'— that is,A'andBare Tor-independent overAandA' ⊗_A B → B'is bijective — then the functoriality mapL_{B/A} ⊗_B B' ⟶ L_{B'/A'}of Tag 08PN is a quasi-isomorphism.The hypothesis
B ⊗_A^L A' = B'makes the base changeA' ⊗_A P_• ⟶ B'of the standard resolution a resolution ofB'overA', and the functoriality map is the map induced byA' ⊗_A P_• ⟶ P'_•read through the identification ofL_{B/A} ⊗_B B'with the complex ofA' ⊗_A P_•; Remark 08QI, carried asCommAlgCat.CotangentComputedByEveryResolution, inverts that map.
theorem quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMap
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b))
(hQI : CotangentComputedByEveryResolution A' B') :
QuasiIso (cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMap b)
CommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIso.lean, line 607. The attribute's comment: “on the cotangent complexes, under ONE carried hypothesis: Remark 08QI as CommAlgCat.CotangentComputedByEveryResolution, which Tag 08QI discharges; the source's own hypothesis B ⊗_A^L A' = B' and its conclusion on THE functoriality map of 08PN are kept”.
Stacks 08QQ. If the commutative square
A → B,A → A',B → B',A' → B'induces a quasi-isomorphismB ⊗_A^L A' = B', then the functoriality mapL_{B/A} ⊗_B B' ⟶ L_{B'/A'}of Tag 08PN is a quasi-isomorphism of cotangent complexes. The terms ofL_{B/A}are freeB-modules, so the left-hand side computesL_{B/A} ⊗_B^L B'.
theorem quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b))
(hQI : CotangentComputedByEveryResolution A' B') :
QuasiIso (cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap b)
CommAlgCat.isIso_Q_map_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIso.lean, line 628. The attribute's comment: “the lemma as an isomorphism in D(B'): the image of the functoriality map of Tag 08PN under the localization D(B') is invertible. Carries the same single hypothesis, Remark 08QI as CommAlgCat.CotangentComputedByEveryResolution, discharged by Tag 08QI”.
Stacks 08QQ in the derived category. Under the hypothesis
B ⊗_A^L A' = B'the functoriality map becomes an isomorphismL_{B/A} ⊗_B^L B' ⟶ L_{B'/A'}inD(B').
theorem isIso_Q_map_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b))
(hQI : CotangentComputedByEveryResolution A' B') :
IsIso (DerivedCategory.Q.map (cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap b))
CommAlgCat.cotangentBaseChangeIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIso.lean, line 643. The attribute's comment: “the base-change isomorphism itself, as data: an isomorphism in D(B') whose underlying morphism is the functoriality map of Tag 08PN. Carries the same single hypothesis, Remark 08QI as CommAlgCat.CotangentComputedByEveryResolution, discharged by Tag 08QI”.
Stacks 08QQ, the base-change isomorphism. The isomorphism
L_{B/A} ⊗_B^L B' ≅ L_{B'/A'}inD(B')whose underlying morphism is the functoriality map of the square.
def cotangentBaseChangeIso
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b))
(hQI : CotangentComputedByEveryResolution A' B') :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj
(((ModuleCat.extendScalars b.toRingHom).mapHomologicalComplex
(ComplexShape.up ℤ)).obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B)) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A' B')
CommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMap_unconditional, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIsoUnconditional.lean, line 57. The attribute's comment: “on the alternating-face-map complexes: under the source's own hypothesis and with no other, the functoriality map of Tag 08PN is a quasi-isomorphism”.
Stacks 08QQ on the Moore complexes. If the square induces
B ⊗_A^L A' = B', the functoriality map of Tag 08PN is a quasi-isomorphism of the alternating face map complexes. This isCommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMapwith Remark 08QI supplied byCommAlgCat.cotangentComputedByEveryResolution.
theorem quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMap_unconditional
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b)) :
QuasiIso (cotangentExtendScalarsMooreMap b)
CommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap_unconditional, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIsoUnconditional.lean, line 70. The attribute's comment: “on the cotangent complexes, under the source's own hypothesis B ⊗_A^L A' = B' and no other: THE functoriality map of Tag 08PN is a quasi-isomorphism”.
Stacks 08QQ. If the commutative square
A → B,A → A',B → B',A' → B'induces a quasi-isomorphismB ⊗_A^L A' = B', then the functoriality mapL_{B/A} ⊗_B B' ⟶ L_{B'/A'}of Tag 08PN is a quasi-isomorphism of cotangent complexes. This isCommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMapwith Remark 08QI supplied byCommAlgCat.cotangentComputedByEveryResolution.
theorem quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap_unconditional
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b)) :
QuasiIso (cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap b)
CommAlgCat.isIso_Q_map_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap_unconditional, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIsoUnconditional.lean, line 82. The attribute's comment: “the lemma as an isomorphism in D(B'): the image of the functoriality map of Tag 08PN under the localization D(B') is invertible, under the source's own hypothesis and no other”.
Stacks 08QQ in the derived category. Under the hypothesis
B ⊗_A^L A' = B'the functoriality map becomes an isomorphismL_{B/A} ⊗_B^L B' ⟶ L_{B'/A'}inD(B').
theorem isIso_Q_map_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap_unconditional
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b)) :
IsIso (DerivedCategory.Q.map (cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap b))
CommAlgCat.cotangentBaseChangeIsoUnconditional, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/BaseChangeQuasiIsoUnconditional.lean, line 95. The attribute's comment: “the base-change isomorphism itself, as data: an isomorphism in D(B') whose underlying morphism is the functoriality map of Tag 08PN, under the source's own hypothesis and no other”.
Stacks 08QQ, the base-change isomorphism. The isomorphism
L_{B/A} ⊗_B^L B' ≅ L_{B'/A'}inD(B')whose underlying morphism is the functoriality map of the square.
def cotangentBaseChangeIsoUnconditional
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hpush : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b)) :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj
(((ModuleCat.extendScalars b.toRingHom).mapHomologicalComplex
(ComplexShape.up ℤ)).obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B)) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A' B')
CommAlgCat.derivedCotangentComplexBaseChangeFunctorialityIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/DerivedPushoutBaseChange.lean, line 395. The attribute's comment: “the lemma, with the arrow the source names: under the source's own hypothesis that the square induce a quasi-isomorphism B ⊗_A^L A' = B' — written out as vanishing of the positive Tor_i^A(A', B) together with bijectivity of A' ⊗_A B → B' — THE functoriality map of Tag 08PN induces an isomorphism L_{B/A} ⊗^L_B B' ≅ L_{B'/A'} in D(B'), the derived tensor product being the chapter's total derived extension-of-scalars functor. That the underlying morphism is that functoriality map is CommAlgCat.derivedCotangentComplexBaseChangeFunctorialityIso_hom below. No hypothesis beyond the source's is carried: Remark 08QI is proved, not assumed (CommAlgCat.cotangentComputedByEveryResolution)”.
[Stacks, Tag 08QQ]. Let
be a commutative square of rings which induces a quasi-isomorphismA --→ A' | | B --→ B'B ⊗_A^𝐋 A' = B'— that is,Tor_i^A(A', B) = 0fori > 0and the canonical mapA' ⊗_A B → B'is bijective. Then the functoriality map induces an isomorphism
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B B' ⟶ L_{B'/A'}in
D(B'), where- ⊗^𝐋_B B'is the total derived extension-of-scalars functor ofStacksFrontier.Homology.Tor.DerivedExtensionScalars.The arrow is the source's. The cotangent complex is a bounded above complex of free modules, so
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B B'is the degreewise base changeB' ⊗_B L_{B/A}(CommAlgCat.derivedExtensionScalarsCotangentComplexIso), and on that the functoriality map of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] after extension of scalars isCommAlgCat.cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap, a quasi-isomorphism byCommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap. That the isomorphism built here is induced by the functoriality map and not merely some isomorphism between the two objects isCommAlgCat.derivedCotangentComplexBaseChangeFunctorialityIso_hom.
def derivedCotangentComplexBaseChangeFunctorialityIso
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hφ : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b)) :
(CochainComplex.DerivedExtensionScalars.derivedExtensionScalarsGeneral
b.toRingHom).functor.obj (DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A B)) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, u} A' B')
CommAlgCat.derivedCotangentComplexBaseChangeFunctorialityIso_hom, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/DerivedPushoutBaseChange.lean, line 412. The attribute's comment: “that the isomorphism is induced by THE functoriality map of Tag 08PN: its underlying morphism in D(B') is the image of the chain-level map CommAlgCat.cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap, read after the canonical identification of L_{B/A} ⊗^L_B B' with the degreewise base change”.
The isomorphism of Tag 08QQ is the one the functoriality map induces. Its underlying morphism is the image in
D(B')ofCommAlgCat.cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap— theB'-linear adjoint of theB-linear mapL_{B/A} ⟶ L_{B'/A'}of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] — read after the identification ofL_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B B'with the degreewise base changeB' ⊗_B L_{B/A}.
theorem derivedCotangentComplexBaseChangeFunctorialityIso_hom
(hTor : RingTheory.TorIndependence.TorIndependent A A' (B : Type u))
(hφ : Function.Bijective (baseChangeUnit b)) :
(derivedCotangentComplexBaseChangeFunctorialityIso b hTor hφ).hom =
(derivedExtensionScalarsCotangentComplexIso b).hom ≫
DerivedCategory.Q.map (cotangentExtendScalarsComplexMap b)
Tag 08SB, a remark
Tag 08SB in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.nonempty_homotopy_squareCotangentComplexMap_zero, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SquareFactoringThroughBase.lean, line 180. The attribute's comment: “the conclusion of the remark: the induced map on cotangent complexes is homotopic to zero. The claim of the remark itself, that the functoriality map of standard resolutions is homotopic to the composition through κ, is CommAlgCat.eqvGen_homotopy_squareResolutionRingMap_baseMap of StacksFrontier.Cotangent.SquareResolutionBaseHomotopy; the proof here does not pass through it, factoring the square through the identity of A' instead.”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08SB. Let
A → A',B → B'be a commutative square of ring maps compatible with the algebra structuresA → BandA' → B'. If there is a ring mapκ : B → A'which agrees withA → A'on the image ofAand which recoversB → B'afterA' → B', then the induced map of cotangent complexesL_{B/A} → L_{B'/A'}is homotopic to zero.
public theorem nonempty_homotopy_squareCotangentComplexMap_zero
(sq : AlgebraSquare.{u, v, u} A A' B B') (κ : B →+* A')
(hκ : ∀ a : A, κ (algebraMap A B a) = sq.base a)
(hκ' : ∀ b : B, algebraMap A' B' (κ b) = sq.map b) :
Nonempty (Homotopy (squareCotangentComplexMap.{u, v, u} sq) 0)
CommAlgCat.cotangentTermDifferential_squareResolutionRingBaseMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SquareResolutionBaseHomotopy.lean, line 295. The attribute's comment: “the remark's observation that the composition through κ induces the zero map on differentials, read degreewise on the pure differentials 1 ⊗ d p which generate the terms of the cotangent complex.”.
The composition
P_• → B → A' → P'_•lands in the image ofA', so it kills differentials: the pure differential1 ⊗ dof each of its values vanishes. This is the step by which the source passes from the homotopy below to the vanishing, up to homotopy, of the induced map on cotangent complexes.
public theorem cotangentTermDifferential_squareResolutionRingBaseMap
(sq : AlgebraSquare.{u, v, u} A A' B B') (κ : B →+* A') (n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ)
(p : (standardResolution.{u, max u v} A B).left.obj n) :
cotangentTermDifferential.{u, max u v} A' B' n
((squareResolutionRingBaseMap.{u, v} sq κ).app n p) = 0
CommAlgCat.eqvGen_homotopy_squareResolutionRingMap_baseMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/SquareResolutionBaseHomotopy.lean, line 376. The attribute's comment: “the claim of the remark: the functoriality map of standard resolutions is homotopic to the composition through κ. The consequence drawn from it, that the induced map of cotangent complexes is homotopic to zero, is CommAlgCat.nonempty_homotopy_squareCotangentComplexMap_zero.”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08SB. Let
A → A',B → B'be a commutative square of ring maps compatible with the algebra structuresA → BandA' → B', and letκ : B → A'be a ring map which agrees withA → A'on the image ofAand which recoversB → B'afterA' → B'. Then the functoriality mapP_• → P'_•of the two standard resolutions is homotopic, as a map of simplicial commutative rings, to the compositionP_• → B → A' → P'_•.
public theorem eqvGen_homotopy_squareResolutionRingMap_baseMap
(sq : AlgebraSquare.{u, v, u} A A' B B') (κ : B →+* A')
(hκ : ∀ a : A, κ (algebraMap A B a) = sq.base a)
(hκ' : ∀ b : B, algebraMap A' B' (κ b) = sq.map b) :
Relation.EqvGen
(fun f g : resolutionRing.{u, v} A B ⟶ resolutionRing.{u, v} A' B' =>
Nonempty (SimplicialObject.Homotopy f g))
(squareResolutionRingMap.{u, v} sq) (squareResolutionRingBaseMap.{u, v} sq κ)
Tag 08SC, a lemma
Tag 08SC in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.cotangentComplexProductMap, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ProductDecomposition.lean, line 460. The attribute's comment: “the canonical map L_{B×C/A} → L_{B/A} ⊕ L_{C/A} of the lemma, at chain level: the pair of the functoriality maps of the two projections, whose DerivedCategory.Q is the map in D(B × C) of the statement. That this map is an isomorphism in D(B × C) is CommAlgCat.isIso_Q_map_cotangentComplexProductMap of StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ProductDecompositionBase.lean, over an arbitrary base”.
The canonical map of [Stacks, Tag 08SC]. For ring maps
A → BandA → C, the pair of the functoriality maps of the two projectionsB × C → BandB × C → Cis a map of complexes ofB × C-modules
L_{B×C/A} → L_{B/A} ⊕ L_{C/A},the two summands being read over
B × Calong the projections. Tag 08SC asserts thatDerivedCategory.Qof this map is an isomorphism inD(B × C); that isCommAlgCat.isIso_Q_map_cotangentComplexProductMapofStacksFrontier/Cotangent/ProductDecompositionBase.lean.
public noncomputable def cotangentComplexProductMap :
cotangentComplex.{u, v} A (CommAlgCat.of A (B × C)) ⟶
(((ModuleCat.restrictScalars (productFstSquare.{u, v} A B C).map).mapHomologicalComplex
(ComplexShape.up ℤ)).obj (cotangentComplex.{u, v} A B)) ⊞
(((ModuleCat.restrictScalars (productSndSquare.{u, v} A B C).map).mapHomologicalComplex
(ComplexShape.up ℤ)).obj (cotangentComplex.{u, v} A C))
CommAlgCat.isIso_Q_map_cotangentComplexProductMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ProductDecompositionBase.lean, line 179. The attribute's comment: “the lemma: for ring maps A → B and A → C the canonical map L_{B×C/A} → L_{B/A} ⊕ L_{C/A} -- the pair of the functoriality maps of the two projections, CommAlgCat.cotangentComplexProductMap -- is an isomorphism in D(B × C), over an arbitrary base A. The chain-level form, that the map is a quasi-isomorphism, is CommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentComplexProductMap”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08SC. Let
A → BandA → Cbe ring maps. Then the canonical map
L_{B×C/A} ⟶ L_{B/A} ⊕ L_{C/A}is an isomorphism in
D(B × C).The map is
CommAlgCat.cotangentComplexProductMap, the pair of the functoriality maps of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] for the two projections; it is a quasi-isomorphism byCommAlgCat.quasiIso_cotangentComplexProductMap, and the localizationDerivedCategory.Qinverts exactly the quasi-isomorphisms.
theorem isIso_Q_map_cotangentComplexProductMap (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
(B C : CommAlgCat.{u} A) :
IsIso (DerivedCategory.Q.map (cotangentComplexProductMap.{u, u} A B C))
Sources
Section92.7 The fundamental triangle#
Section 92.7 of the Stacks Project, Tag 08QR. 8 tags here are carried by 106 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier) and 1 registered declaration, quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 08QS, an equation
Tag 08QS in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DisplayMorphisms.lean, line 143. The attribute's comment: “the first displayed morphism L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C ⟶ L_{C/A}, canonical and with no hypothesis on the two ring maps: the functoriality map of Tag 08PN for the square (1_A, B → C) after extension of scalars. It is the first morphism of the distinguished triangle of Proposition 08QX, CommAlgCat.productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished, whose third morphism is CommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QS.
The first displayed morphism
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C ⟶ L_{C/A}of the triangle, for arbitrary ring mapsA → B → C: the functoriality map of Tag 08PN for the square(𝟙_A, B → C)after extension of scalars alongB → C, read through the identification of the derived base changeL_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B Cwith the degreewise oneC ⊗_B L_{B/A}.
def fundamentalMor₁ :
fundamentalVertex₁.{u, u, u + 1, u + 1} A B C ⟶ fundamentalVertex₂.{u, u, u + 1} A C
CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DisplayMorphisms.lean, line 167. The attribute's comment: “the second displayed morphism L_{C/A} ⟶ L_{C/B}, canonical and with no hypothesis on the two ring maps: the functoriality map of Tag 08PN for the square (A → B, 1_C). It is the second morphism of the distinguished triangle of Proposition 08QX, CommAlgCat.productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished, whose third morphism is CommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QS.
The second displayed morphism
L_{C/A} ⟶ L_{C/B}of the triangle, for arbitrary ring mapsA → B → C: the functoriality map of Tag 08PN for the square(A → B, 𝟙_C), read inD(C).
def fundamentalMor₂ :
fundamentalVertex₂.{u, u, u + 1} A C ⟶ fundamentalVertex₃.{u, u, u + 1} B C
CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₁, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/FundamentalDisplay.lean, line 77. The attribute's comment: “the first vertex of the displayed triangle, L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C. The display's three morphisms are CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁, CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂ and CommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃, and that the six form a distinguished triangle is Proposition 08QX, CommAlgCat.productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QS.
The first vertex
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B Cof the displayed triangle, as an object ofD(C).
noncomputable abbrev fundamentalVertex₁ : DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{max u v} C)
CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₂, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/FundamentalDisplay.lean, line 86. The attribute's comment: “the second vertex of the displayed triangle, L_{C/A}, the target of the first displayed morphism CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁ and the source of the second, CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QS.
The second vertex
L_{C/A}of the displayed triangle, as an object ofD(C).
noncomputable abbrev fundamentalVertex₂ : DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{max u v} C)
CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₃, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/FundamentalDisplay.lean, line 95. The attribute's comment: “the third vertex of the displayed triangle, L_{C/B}, the target of the second displayed morphism CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂ and the source of the third, CommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃, which lands in (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1]”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QS.
The third vertex
L_{C/B}of the displayed triangle, as an object ofD(C).
noncomputable abbrev fundamentalVertex₃ : DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{max u v} C)
CommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/ProductDescent.lean, line 317. The attribute's comment: “the third displayed morphism L_{C/B} → (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1], for arbitrary ring maps A → B → C: the connecting morphism of the fundamental triangle of A → B → B × C base changed along B × C → C, read between the display's own two vertices. The display is a distinguished triangle on these three morphisms by CommAlgCat.productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished”.
The third displayed morphism of [Stacks, Tag 08QS], for arbitrary ring maps
A → B → C. It is the connecting morphism of the fundamental triangle ofA → B → B × C, base changed along the flat ring mapB × C → Cand read between the display's own verticesL_{C/B}and(L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)⟦1⟧.
def productFundamentalMor₃ :
fundamentalVertex₃.{u, u, u + 1} B C ⟶
(fundamentalVertex₁.{u, u, u + 1, u + 1} A B C)⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧
CommAlgCat.productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/ProductDescent.lean, line 357. The attribute's comment: “the distinguishedness asserted by the display: Equation 92.7.0.1 is written as a triangle, and that the display's three objects and three arrows form a DISTINGUISHED triangle in D(C) is the remaining clause of the display, for arbitrary ring maps A → B → C with no hypothesis on them. The display's three vertices are CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₁, CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₂ and CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₃ and its three morphisms are CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁, CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂ and CommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃, each of which carries the tag for its own constituent. That the triangle is distinguished is Proposition 08QX, which this declaration also carries”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QX, and the distinguishedness asserted by the display of Tag 08QS. Let
A → B → Cbe ring maps. Then
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C ⟶ L_{C/A} ⟶ L_{C/B} ⟶ (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1]is a distinguished triangle in
D(C), on the three vertices of the display of [Stacks, Tag 08QS], with the display's own first two morphismsCommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁andCommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂— the two functoriality maps of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] for the two commutative squares of the tower — and withCommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃for its third.The display of Tag 08QS is written as a triangle, and what makes it one is exactly this statement, so the display's distinguishedness clause is registered here as well: the three objects and the three arrows of the display are named by
CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₁,CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₂,CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₃,CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁,CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂andCommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃, and that they form a triangle at all is Proposition 08QX.The proof is the one of [Stacks, Remark 08SD]: the triangle for
A → B → B × C, where the map is the split injectionb ↦ (b, f b), base changed along the flat projectionB × C → C.
theorem productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished :
Triangle.mk (fundamentalMor₁.{u} A B C) (fundamentalMor₂.{u} A B C)
(productFundamentalMor₃ A B C) ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} C))
Tag 08QT, an equation
Tag 08QT in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSite, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 247. The attribute's comment: “the site C_{C/B/A}”.
The site
C_{C/B/A}: the opposite of the category of polynomial towers(P → B, Q → C), so that an object corresponds to the commutative diagram of spectra in whichSpec C → Spec Qlies overSpec B → Spec PoverSpec A.
abbrev polynomialTowerSite
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerTopology_eq_bot, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 262. The attribute's comment: “the chaotic topology on C_{C/B/A}”.
The topology of
C_{C/B/A}is the chaotic topology: its only coverings are the maximal sieves, so every presheaf onC_{C/B/A}is a sheaf.
theorem polynomialTowerTopology_eq_bot : polynomialTowerTopology A B C = ⊥
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerFirst, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 275. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₁”.
u₁ : C_{C/B/A} ⥤ C_{B/A}, the functor(P → B, Q → C) ↦ (P → B).
def polynomialTowerFirst : polynomialTowerSite A B C ⥤ polynomialSite A (towerBaseAlgebra A B)
CommAlgCat.isPolynomialAlgebra_towerRightAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 284. The attribute's comment: “u₂ lands in C_{C/A}”.
The
A-algebraQof a polynomial tower is a polynomial algebra overA: it is a polynomial algebra over the polynomialA-algebraP, andP[κ] = A[ι][κ] = A[κ ⊕ ι]. This is what makesu₂land inC_{C/A}.
theorem isPolynomialAlgebra_towerRightAlgebra (X : PolynomialTower A B C) :
IsPolynomialAlgebra A (towerRightAlgebra X.obj)
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSecond, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 310. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₂”.
u₂ : C_{C/B/A} ⥤ C_{C/A}, the functor(P → B, Q → C) ↦ (Q → C).
def polynomialTowerSecond :
polynomialTowerSite A B C ⥤ polynomialSite A (towerTotalAlgebra A C)
CommAlgCat.isPolynomialAlgebra_towerBaseChangeAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 442. The attribute's comment: “u₃ lands in C_{C/B}”.
Q ⊗_P Bis a polynomial algebra overB: ifQ = P[κ]thenQ ⊗_P B = B[κ]. This is what makesu₃land inC_{C/B}.
theorem isPolynomialAlgebra_towerBaseChangeAlgebra (X : PolynomialTower A B C) :
IsPolynomialAlgebra B (towerBaseChangeAlgebra X.obj)
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerThird, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 496. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₃”.
u₃ : C_{C/B/A} ⥤ C_{C/B}, the functor(P → B, Q → C) ↦ (Q ⊗_P B → C).
def polynomialTowerThird :
polynomialTowerSite A B C ⥤ polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C)
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerFirstStructureSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 639. The attribute's comment: “the sheaf 𝒪₁ = g₁⁻¹𝒪”.
𝒪₁ = g₁⁻¹𝒪: the inverse image alongg₁of the tautological sheaf of rings onC_{B/A}.
def polynomialTowerFirstStructureSheaf :
Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) CommRingCat.{u + 1}
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSecondStructureSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 647. The attribute's comment: “the sheaf 𝒪₂ = g₂⁻¹𝒪”.
𝒪₂ = g₂⁻¹𝒪: the inverse image alongg₂of the tautological sheaf of rings onC_{C/A}.
def polynomialTowerSecondStructureSheaf :
Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) CommRingCat.{u + 1}
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerThirdStructureSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 655. The attribute's comment: “the sheaf 𝒪₃ = g₃⁻¹𝒪”.
𝒪₃ = g₃⁻¹𝒪: the inverse image alongg₃of the tautological sheaf of rings onC_{C/B}.
def polynomialTowerThirdStructureSheaf :
Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) CommRingCat.{u + 1}
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerFirstRinged, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 682. The attribute's comment: “the morphism g₁ of ringed topoi”.
g₁ : (Sh(C_{C/B/A}), 𝒪₁) ⟶ (Sh(C_{B/A}), 𝒪), the first morphism of ringed topoi of the fundamental triangle. Its structure map is the unit ofg₁⁻¹ ⊣ g₁_*on sheaves of commutative rings at𝒪, which is the structure map that𝒪₁ = g₁⁻¹𝒪forces.
def polynomialTowerFirstRinged :
AlgebraicGeometry.RingedToposHom (polynomialTowerFirstRingedTopos A B C)
(polynomialStructureRingedTopos A (towerBaseAlgebra A B))
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSecondRinged, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 692. The attribute's comment: “the morphism g₂ of ringed topoi”.
g₂ : (Sh(C_{C/B/A}), 𝒪₂) ⟶ (Sh(C_{C/A}), 𝒪), the second morphism of ringed topoi of the fundamental triangle.
def polynomialTowerSecondRinged :
AlgebraicGeometry.RingedToposHom (polynomialTowerSecondRingedTopos A B C)
(polynomialStructureRingedTopos A (towerTotalAlgebra A C))
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerThirdRinged, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 702. The attribute's comment: “the morphism g₃ of ringed topoi”.
g₃ : (Sh(C_{C/B/A}), 𝒪₃) ⟶ (Sh(C_{C/B}), 𝒪), the third morphism of ringed topoi of the fundamental triangle.
def polynomialTowerThirdRinged :
AlgebraicGeometry.RingedToposHom (polynomialTowerThirdRingedTopos A B C)
(polynomialStructureRingedTopos B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerProjection, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 744. The attribute's comment: “the projection π”.
π : Sh(C_{C/B/A}) ⟶ Sh(*), the projection of the chaotic siteC_{C/B/A}to the point.
abbrev polynomialTowerProjection
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_inverseImage, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 762. The attribute's comment: “π = π₁ ∘ g₁, on inverse images”.
π = π₁ ∘ g₁, on inverse images: both are restriction along the unique functor to the point, becauseu₁followed byC_{B/A} ⥤ *isC_{C/B/A} ⥤ *.
theorem polynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_inverseImage :
((polynomialTowerFirstProjection A B).comp
(polynomialTowerFirstTopos A B C)).inverseImage =
(polynomialTowerProjection A B C).inverseImage
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_inverseImage, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 769. The attribute's comment: “π = π₂ ∘ g₂, on inverse images”.
π = π₂ ∘ g₂, on inverse images.
theorem polynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_inverseImage :
((polynomialTowerSecondProjection A C).comp
(polynomialTowerSecondTopos A B C)).inverseImage =
(polynomialTowerProjection A B C).inverseImage
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_inverseImage, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 776. The attribute's comment: “π = π₃ ∘ g₃, on inverse images”.
π = π₃ ∘ g₃, on inverse images.
theorem polynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_inverseImage :
((polynomialTowerThirdProjection B C).comp
(polynomialTowerThirdTopos A B C)).inverseImage =
(polynomialTowerProjection A B C).inverseImage
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_pushforwardIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 784. The attribute's comment: “π = π₁ ∘ g₁, on direct images”.
π = π₁ ∘ g₁, on direct images: the canonical isomorphism(π₁ ∘ g₁)_* ≅ π_*between the two right adjoints of the common inverse image.
def polynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_pushforwardIso :
((polynomialTowerFirstProjection A B).comp (polynomialTowerFirstTopos A B C)).pushforward ≅
(polynomialTowerProjection A B C).pushforward
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_pushforwardIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 794. The attribute's comment: “π = π₂ ∘ g₂, on direct images”.
π = π₂ ∘ g₂, on direct images.
def polynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_pushforwardIso :
((polynomialTowerSecondProjection A C).comp (polynomialTowerSecondTopos A B C)).pushforward ≅
(polynomialTowerProjection A B C).pushforward
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_pushforwardIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSite.lean, line 804. The attribute's comment: “π = π₃ ∘ g₃, on direct images”.
π = π₃ ∘ g₃, on direct images.
def polynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_pushforwardIso :
((polynomialTowerThirdProjection B C).comp (polynomialTowerThirdTopos A B C)).pushforward ≅
(polynomialTowerProjection A B C).pushforward
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialTowerSite, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 169. The attribute's comment: “the site C_{C/B/A} with the section's footnote in force, restricting the two layers of variables to cardinality at most κ, resp. μ. The unrestricted version is CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSite; only this one is essentially small”.
Stacks 08QT with the footnote's restriction. The site
C_{C/B/A}cut down to the towers whose two polynomial layers have at mostκ, resp.μ, variables: the opposite ofCommAlgCat.BoundedPolynomialTower.CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSiteis the same construction with the footnote omitted.
abbrev boundedPolynomialTowerSite
CommAlgCat.isPolynomialAlgebraBelow_towerRightAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 374. The attribute's comment: “u₂ lands in C_{C/A}, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site: the bound on the two layers gives the bound μ + κ on the variables of Q over A”.
The
A-algebraQof a restricted polynomial tower is a polynomial algebra overAon at mostμ + κvariables: it isA[ι][τ] = A[τ ⊕ ι]with#ι ≤ κand#τ ≤ μ. This is what makesu₂land in the restricted siteC_{C/A}.
theorem isPolynomialAlgebraBelow_towerRightAlgebra (Y : BoundedPolynomialTower A B C κ μ) :
IsPolynomialAlgebraBelow A (μ + κ) (towerRightAlgebra Y.obj)
CommAlgCat.isPolynomialAlgebraBelow_towerBaseChangeAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 395. The attribute's comment: “u₃ lands in C_{C/B}, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site: the base change Q ⊗_P B has the same set of variables as Q over P, so the bound μ is kept”.
Q ⊗_P Bis a polynomial algebra overBon at mostμvariables: ifQ = P[τ]thenQ ⊗_P B = B[τ], with the same set of variables. This is what makesu₃land in the restricted siteC_{C/B}.
theorem isPolynomialAlgebraBelow_towerBaseChangeAlgebra (Y : BoundedPolynomialTower A B C κ μ) :
IsPolynomialAlgebraBelow B μ (towerBaseChangeAlgebra Y.obj)
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialTowerFirst, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 440. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₁, for the footnote-restricted tower site”.
u₁on the restricted sites.
def boundedPolynomialTowerFirst :
boundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⥤ boundedPolynomialSite A (towerBaseAlgebra A B) κ
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialTowerSecond, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 446. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₂, for the footnote-restricted tower site”.
u₂on the restricted sites.
def boundedPolynomialTowerSecond :
boundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⥤
boundedPolynomialSite A (towerTotalAlgebra A C) (μ + κ)
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialTowerThird, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 453. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₃, for the footnote-restricted tower site”.
u₃on the restricted sites.
def boundedPolynomialTowerThird :
boundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⥤ boundedPolynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C) μ
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialTowerFirst_comp_ι, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 478. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₁ of the footnote-restricted tower site is u₁”.
Read in the unrestricted sites,
u₁on the restricted sites isu₁.
theorem boundedPolynomialTowerFirst_comp_ι :
boundedPolynomialTowerFirst A B C κ μ ⋙ boundedPolynomialSiteι A (towerBaseAlgebra A B) κ =
boundedPolynomialTowerSiteι A B C κ μ ⋙ polynomialTowerFirst A B C
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialTowerSecond_comp_ι, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 484. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₂ of the footnote-restricted tower site is u₂”.
Read in the unrestricted sites,
u₂on the restricted sites isu₂.
theorem boundedPolynomialTowerSecond_comp_ι :
boundedPolynomialTowerSecond A B C κ μ ⋙
boundedPolynomialSiteι A (towerTotalAlgebra A C) (μ + κ) =
boundedPolynomialTowerSiteι A B C κ μ ⋙ polynomialTowerSecond A B C
CommAlgCat.boundedPolynomialTowerThird_comp_ι, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 491. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₃ of the footnote-restricted tower site is u₃”.
Read in the unrestricted sites,
u₃on the restricted sites isu₃.
theorem boundedPolynomialTowerThird_comp_ι :
boundedPolynomialTowerThird A B C κ μ ⋙ boundedPolynomialSiteι B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C) μ =
boundedPolynomialTowerSiteι A B C κ μ ⋙ polynomialTowerThird A B C
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirst, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 510. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₁, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
u₁ : C_{C/B/A} ⥤ C_{B/A}on the small models of the restricted sites.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirst :
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⥤
smallBoundedPolynomialSite A (towerBaseAlgebra A B) κ
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecond, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 518. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₂, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
u₂ : C_{C/B/A} ⥤ C_{C/A}on the small models of the restricted sites:u₂on the restricted sites, followed by the transport of its value into the small model ofC_{C/A}.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecond :
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⥤
smallBoundedPolynomialSite A (towerTotalAlgebra A C) (μ + κ)
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThird, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 527. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₃, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
u₃ : C_{C/B/A} ⥤ C_{C/B}on the small models of the restricted sites:u₃on the restricted sites, followed by the transport of its value into the small model ofC_{C/B}.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThird :
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⥤
smallBoundedPolynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C) μ
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirst_comp_ι, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 536. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₁ of the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site is u₁”.
The square for
u₁. Read in the unrestricted sites through the fully faithful comparisons,u₁on the small models isu₁onC_{C/B/A}.
theorem smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirst_comp_ι :
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirst A B C κ μ ⋙
smallBoundedPolynomialSiteToPolynomialSite A (towerBaseAlgebra A B) κ =
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSiteToPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⋙
polynomialTowerFirst A B C
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondCompι, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 546. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₂ of the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site is u₂”.
The square for
u₂. Read in the unrestricted sites through the fully faithful comparisons,u₂on the small models isu₂onC_{C/B/A}, up to the canonical isomorphism coming from the transport into the small model ofC_{C/A}.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondCompι :
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecond A B C κ μ ⋙
smallBoundedPolynomialSiteToPolynomialSite A (towerTotalAlgebra A C) (μ + κ) ≅
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSiteToPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⋙
polynomialTowerSecond A B C
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdCompι, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 561. The attribute's comment: “the functor u₃ of the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site is u₃”.
The square for
u₃. Read in the unrestricted sites through the fully faithful comparisons,u₃on the small models isu₃onC_{C/B/A}, up to the canonical isomorphism coming from the transport into the small model ofC_{C/B}.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdCompι :
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThird A B C κ μ ⋙
smallBoundedPolynomialSiteToPolynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C) μ ≅
smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSiteToPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ ⋙
polynomialTowerThird A B C
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerTopology_eq_bot, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 577. The attribute's comment: “the chaotic topology on C_{C/B/A}, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
The topology of the small model of the restricted site
C_{C/B/A}is the chaotic topology: its only coverings are the maximal sieves, so every presheaf on it is a sheaf.
theorem smallBoundedPolynomialTowerTopology_eq_bot :
GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ) = ⊥
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 683. The attribute's comment: “the projection π, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
π : Sh(C_{C/B/A}) ⟶ Sh(*), the projection of the small model of the restricted site to the point, with coefficients in the site's own universe.
abbrev smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection :
MorphismOfTopoi
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ)) (Type u))
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 1})) (Type u))
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_inverseImage, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 719. The attribute's comment: “π = π₁ ∘ g₁ on inverse images, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
π = π₁ ∘ g₁on inverse images: both are restriction along the unique functor to the point, becauseu₁followed byC_{B/A} ⥤ *isC_{C/B/A} ⥤ *.
theorem smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_inverseImage :
((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstProjection A B κ).comp
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstTopos A B C κ μ)).inverseImage =
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection A B C κ μ).inverseImage
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_inverseImage, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 727. The attribute's comment: “π = π₂ ∘ g₂ on inverse images, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
π = π₂ ∘ g₂on inverse images.
theorem smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_inverseImage :
((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondProjection A C κ μ).comp
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondTopos A B C κ μ)).inverseImage =
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection A B C κ μ).inverseImage
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_inverseImage, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 735. The attribute's comment: “π = π₃ ∘ g₃ on inverse images, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
π = π₃ ∘ g₃on inverse images.
theorem smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_inverseImage :
((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdProjection B C μ).comp
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdTopos A B C κ μ)).inverseImage =
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection A B C κ μ).inverseImage
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_pushforwardIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 744. The attribute's comment: “π = π₁ ∘ g₁ on direct images, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
π = π₁ ∘ g₁on direct images: the canonical isomorphism(π₁ ∘ g₁)_* ≅ π_*between the two right adjoints of the common inverse image.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstProjection_comp_pushforwardIso :
((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstProjection A B κ).comp
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerFirstTopos A B C κ μ)).pushforward ≅
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection A B C κ μ).pushforward
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_pushforwardIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 757. The attribute's comment: “π = π₂ ∘ g₂ on direct images, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
π = π₂ ∘ g₂on direct images.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondProjection_comp_pushforwardIso :
((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondProjection A C κ μ).comp
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSecondTopos A B C κ μ)).pushforward ≅
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection A B C κ μ).pushforward
CommAlgCat.smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_pushforwardIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialSiteSmall.lean, line 770. The attribute's comment: “π = π₃ ∘ g₃ on direct images, for the small model of the footnote-restricted tower site”.
π = π₃ ∘ g₃on direct images.
def smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdProjection_comp_pushforwardIso :
((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdProjection B C μ).comp
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerThirdTopos A B C κ μ)).pushforward ≅
(smallBoundedPolynomialTowerProjection A B C κ μ).pushforward
Tag 08QU, a lemma
Tag 08QU in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.towerDifferential_shortExact_extendScalars, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 230. The attribute's comment: “the objectwise split differential sequence after base change: the exactness input of the lemma, at an object of the site”.
For a tower
R → P → QwithQformally smooth overP, the differential sequence0 → Q ⊗_P Ω_{P/R} → Ω_{Q/R} → Ω_{Q/P} → 0of Algebra, Lemma 10.138.9 is split, so it stays short exact after extending scalars along an arbitrary ring mapε : Q → S. This is the objectwise input to the exactness of the sequence of Tag 08QU.
theorem towerDifferential_shortExact_extendScalars
(R P Q S : Type w) [CommRing R] [CommRing P] [CommRing Q] [CommRing S]
[Algebra R P] [Algebra P Q] [Algebra R Q] [IsScalarTower R P Q]
[Algebra.FormallySmooth P Q] (ε : Q →+* S) :
((ShortComplex.moduleCatMk (KaehlerDifferential.mapBaseChange R P Q)
(KaehlerDifferential.map R P Q Q) (by
apply LinearMap.ext
intro x
exact (KaehlerDifferential.exact_mapBaseChange_map R P Q).apply_apply_eq_zero x)).map
(ModuleCat.extendScalars ε)).ShortExact
CommAlgCat.isSheaf_polynomialTowerTopology, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 259. The attribute's comment: “exactness may be checked objectwise: every presheaf on the threefold site is a sheaf”.
Every presheaf on
C_{C/B/A}is a sheaf, because the topology of the site is chaotic.
theorem isSheaf_polynomialTowerTopology {D : Type*} [Category D]
(F : (polynomialTowerSite A B C)ᵒᵖ ⥤ D) :
Presheaf.IsSheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) F
CommAlgCat.towerFirstOmega, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 318. The attribute's comment: “the sheaf Ω₁ = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲ on C_{B/A}”.
Ω₁ = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 B̲, the sheaf ofB̲-modules onC_{B/A}.
abbrev towerFirstOmega : SheafOfModules.{u + 1} (polynomialConstantRingSheaf A
(towerBaseAlgebra A B))
CommAlgCat.towerSecondOmega, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 324. The attribute's comment: “the sheaf Ω₂ = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 C̲ on C_{C/A}”.
Ω₂ = Ω_{𝒪/A} ⊗_𝒪 C̲, the sheaf ofC̲-modules onC_{C/A}.
abbrev towerSecondOmega : SheafOfModules.{u + 1} (polynomialConstantRingSheaf A
(towerTotalAlgebra A C))
CommAlgCat.towerThirdOmega, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 330. The attribute's comment: “the sheaf Ω₃ = Ω_{𝒪/B} ⊗_𝒪 C̲ on C_{C/B}”.
Ω₃ = Ω_{𝒪/B} ⊗_𝒪 C̲, the sheaf ofC̲-modules onC_{C/B}.
abbrev towerThirdOmega : SheafOfModules.{u + 1} (polynomialConstantRingSheaf B
(towerRelativeAlgebra B C))
CommAlgCat.towerSecondTerm, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 363. The attribute's comment: “the second term g₂⁻¹Ω₂ of the sequence”.
g₂⁻¹Ω₂, a presheaf ofC̲-modules onC_{C/B/A}: the inverse image alongg₂is restriction alongu₂, and the inverse image ofC̲isC̲.
def towerSecondTerm : PresheafOfModules.{u + 1} (towerConstantRingSheaf A B C).obj
CommAlgCat.towerThirdTerm, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 369. The attribute's comment: “the third term g₃⁻¹Ω₃ of the sequence”.
g₃⁻¹Ω₃, a presheaf ofC̲-modules onC_{C/B/A}.
def towerThirdTerm : PresheafOfModules.{u + 1} (towerConstantRingSheaf A B C).obj
CommAlgCat.towerFirstTerm, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 382. The attribute's comment: “the first term g₁⁻¹Ω₁ ⊗_{B̲} C̲ of the sequence”.
g₁⁻¹Ω₁ ⊗_{B̲} C̲, a presheaf ofC̲-modules onC_{C/B/A}.
def towerFirstTerm : PresheafOfModules.{u + 1} (towerConstantRingSheaf A B C).obj
CommAlgCat.towerSections_formallySmooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 447. The attribute's comment: “the sections of 𝒪₂ are formally smooth over the sections of 𝒪₁: the formal smoothness input of the objectwise differential sequence”.
The sections of
𝒪₂are formally smooth over the sections of𝒪₁. Over the tower(P → B, Q → C)the map is the universe lift ofP → Q, andQis a polynomial algebra overPby the first condition on a polynomial tower, hence formally smooth overP; formal smoothness survives the universe lift byRingHom.FormallySmooth.ulift. This is the hypothesisAlgebra.FormallySmooththatCommAlgCat.towerDifferential_shortExact_extendScalarsneeds at the objectWofC_{C/B/A}.
theorem towerSections_formallySmooth (W : (polynomialTowerSite A B C)ᵒᵖ) :
letI := ((towerLeftToRight A B C).app W).hom.toAlgebra
Algebra.FormallySmooth ((towerLeftRingPresheaf A B C).obj W)
((towerRightRingPresheaf A B C).obj W)
CommAlgCat.towerSections_isPushout, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 466. The attribute's comment: “the pushout square of the tower on the universe-lifted sections: the input that identifies the third term of the objectwise sequence”.
The pushout square of a polynomial tower survives the universe lift. The sections of
𝒪₃over the tower(P → B, Q → C)areQ ⊗_P B, so the squareP → B,P → Q,B → Q ⊗_P B,Q → Q ⊗_P Bof the tower is a pushout square of rings;Algebra.IsPushout.ulift_tensorProducttransports that to the universe lifts, which is the form in which the sections of the three structure sheaves carry it. This is the hypothesisAlgebra.IsPushoutthatKaehlerDifferential.tensorKaehlerEquivneeds in order to identifyΩ_{𝒪₃/B̲}with𝒪₃ ⊗_{𝒪₂} Ω_{𝒪₂/𝒪₁}on sections.
theorem towerSections_isPushout (W : (polynomialTowerSite A B C)ᵒᵖ) :
Algebra.IsPushout (ULift.{u + 1} ↑(towerLeftAlgebra W.unop.unop.obj)) (ULift.{u + 1} B)
(ULift.{u + 1} ↑(towerRightAlgebra W.unop.unop.obj))
(ULift.{u + 1} ↑(towerBaseChangeAlgebra W.unop.unop.obj))
CommAlgCat.towerFirstSequenceMap, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 852. The attribute's comment: “the first map g₁⁻¹Ω₁ ⊗_{B̲} C̲ ⟶ g₂⁻¹Ω₂ of the sequence”.
The first map
g₁⁻¹Ω₁ ⊗_{B̲} C̲ ⟶ g₂⁻¹Ω₂of the sequence of Tag 08QU. Both source and target are base changes of presheaves of relative differentials, so by the change-of-rings adjunction of Tag 03CU and the universal property of the presheaf of differentials the map is the same datum asCommAlgCat.towerFirstDerivation, namelyc ⊗ b ⊗ d p ↦ c·b ⊗ d p.
def towerFirstSequenceMap : towerFirstTerm A B C ⟶ towerSecondTerm A B C
CommAlgCat.towerSecondSequenceMap, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 861. The attribute's comment: “the second map g₂⁻¹Ω₂ ⟶ g₃⁻¹Ω₃ of the sequence”.
The second map
g₂⁻¹Ω₂ ⟶ g₃⁻¹Ω₃of the sequence of Tag 08QU, the datum ofCommAlgCat.towerSecondDerivationunder the change-of-rings adjunction of Tag 03CU and the universal property of the presheaf of differentials:c ⊗ d q ↦ c ⊗ d(1 ⊗ q).
def towerSecondSequenceMap : towerSecondTerm A B C ⟶ towerThirdTerm A B C
CommAlgCat.towerSequenceMap_comp, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 871. The attribute's comment: “the two maps of the sequence compose to zero”.
The composite of the two maps of the sequence of Tag 08QU vanishes. By the universal properties the composite is the map attached to the derivation
p ↦ 1 ⊗ d(1 ⊗ image of p)of𝒪₁with values ing₃⁻¹Ω₃, and that derivation is zero: by the pushout square on sections (CommAlgCat.towerRightToPushout_app_towerLeftToRight) the image ofpin𝒪₃comes fromB̲, anddkills the image of the base sheaf of rings.
theorem towerSequenceMap_comp :
towerFirstSequenceMap A B C ≫ towerSecondSequenceMap A B C = 0
CommAlgCat.towerShortComplex, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 929. The attribute's comment: “the sequence 0 ⟶ g₁⁻¹Ω₁ ⊗_{B̲} C̲ ⟶ g₂⁻¹Ω₂ ⟶ g₃⁻¹Ω₃ ⟶ 0 of sheaves of C̲-modules on C_{C/B/A}; its short exactness is not asserted here”.
The sequence of Tag 08QU as a short complex of sheaves of
C̲-modules onC_{C/B/A}, the image ofCommAlgCat.towerShortComplexPresheafunder the equivalenceCommAlgCat.towerPresheafToSheaf: every presheaf on the chaotic site is a sheaf.
def towerShortComplex : ShortComplex (SheafOfModules.{u + 1} (towerConstantRingSheaf A B C))
CommAlgCat.towerShortComplexPresheaf_shortExact_obj, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 1026. The attribute's comment: “the sequence of sections over a polynomial tower is short exact: the objectwise form of the short exactness”.
The sequence of Tag 08QU is short exact over every object of
C_{C/B/A}. Over the polynomial tower(P → B, Q → C), withT = Q ⊗_P Band every ring replaced by its universe lift, the three modules of sections areC̲(W) ⊗_{B̲(W)} (B̲(W) ⊗_P Ω_{P/A}),C̲(W) ⊗_Q Ω_{Q/A}andC̲(W) ⊗_T Ω_{T/B}, and the sequence they form is the split sequence ofCommAlgCat.towerDifferential_shortExact_extendScalarsfor the towerA → P → Qbase changed along the augmentationQ → C̲(W). The middle terms agree on the nose (CommAlgCat.towerSecondTerm_obj); the first terms are identified by cancelling the base change twice throughC̲(W) ⊗_P Ω_{P/A}, and the third ones byKaehlerDifferential.tensorKaehlerEquiv, available becauseCommAlgCat.towerSections_isPushoutmakesTthe pushout ofB ← P → Q. Both squares are checked on the generators1 ⊗ 1 ⊗ d pand1 ⊗ d q, where the two maps of the sequence are computed by the change-of-rings adjunction of Tag 03CU.
theorem towerShortComplexPresheaf_shortExact_obj (W : (polynomialTowerSite A B C)ᵒᵖ) :
((towerShortComplexPresheaf A B C).map
(PresheafOfModules.evaluation (towerConstantRingSheaf A B C).obj W)).ShortExact
CommAlgCat.towerShortComplex_shortExact, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldDifferentialSequence.lean, line 1345. The attribute's comment: “the sequence of sheaves of C-modules on C_{C/B/A} is short exact”.
Tag 08QU: the sequence of sheaves of
C̲-modules onC_{C/B/A}0 → g₁⁻¹Ω₁ ⊗_{B̲} C̲ → g₂⁻¹Ω₂ → g₃⁻¹Ω₃ → 0is short exact. ByCommAlgCat.towerShortComplex_shortExact_of_objectwisethis is the objectwise statementCommAlgCat.towerShortComplexPresheaf_shortExact_obj: a short complex of presheaves ofC̲-modules on the chaotic siteC_{C/B/A}is short exact as soon as its sequence of sections over every polynomial tower is, and there the sequence is the split differential sequence of Algebra, Lemma 10.138.9 forA → P → Qbase changed along the augmentationQ → C̲.
theorem towerShortComplex_shortExact : (towerShortComplex A B C).ShortExact
Tag 08QV, a lemma
Tag 08QV in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.leftDerivedColimitThirdInverseImageZeroIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialOnTop/SmallModel.lean, line 310. The attribute's comment: “the degree-zero half of Lπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = Lπ_{3,!}ℱ = π_{3,!}ℱ, read at the small models of the footnote-restricted sites of Tag 08QT, with π_! the colimit over the index category of Tag 08PF and κ, μ the bounds on the two layers of variables; the vanishing in positive degrees is CommAlgCat.isZero_leftDerivedColimitThirdInverseImage_succ”.
Stacks 08QV, in degree zero. With notation as in Tag 08QT, suppose
C = B[E]is a polynomial algebra overB. Thenπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = π_{3,!}ℱfor every abelian presheafℱon the small model of the restricted siteC_{C/B}: both sides are the sections ofℱat the identity augmentationC → C.
def leftDerivedColimitThirdInverseImageZeroIso
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A))))
(F : (smallBoundedPolynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C) μ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u}) :
((colim : ((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u}) ⥤
AddCommGrpCat.{u}).leftDerived 0).obj
((smallTowerThirdInverseImage A B C κ μ).obj F) ≅
colimit F
CommAlgCat.isZero_leftDerivedColimitThirdInverseImage_succ, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialOnTop/SmallModel.lean, line 331. The attribute's comment: “the positive-degree half of Lπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = Lπ_{3,!}ℱ = π_{3,!}ℱ, read at the small models of the footnote-restricted sites of Tag 08QT: Lπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) is concentrated in degree zero, where it is π_{3,!}ℱ by CommAlgCat.leftDerivedColimitThirdInverseImageZeroIso”.
Stacks 08QV, in positive degrees. With notation as in Tag 08QT, suppose
C = B[E]is a polynomial algebra overB. ThenL_nπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = 0forn > 0: the simplicial abelian group(g₃^{-1}ℱ)(U_•)is constant.
theorem isZero_leftDerivedColimitThirdInverseImage_succ
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight ε (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} A))))
(F : (smallBoundedPolynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C) μ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u})
(n : ℕ) :
IsZero (((colim : ((smallBoundedPolynomialTowerSite A B C κ μ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u}) ⥤
AddCommGrpCat.{u}).leftDerived (n + 1)).obj
((smallTowerThirdInverseImage A B C κ μ).obj F))
CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerDerivedColimitThirdInverseImageIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialOnTopLargeSite.lean, line 268. The attribute's comment: “the first equality Lπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = Lπ_{3,!}ℱ in D(Ab), at the sites of Tag 08QT and Tag 08PR themselves -- CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerSite and CommAlgCat.polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C), not restrictions of them -- with Lπ_! and Lπ_{3,!} the total left derived functors of the colimits over the index categories of Tag 08PF and the coefficients at the universe u + 1 of the sites' objects. The second equality Lπ_{3,!}ℱ = π_{3,!}ℱ is CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteDerivedColimitThirdIso”.
Stacks 08QV, the first equality
Lπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = Lπ_{3,!}ℱ, at the sites themselves. With notation as in Tag 08QT, supposeC = B[E]is a polynomial algebra overB. Then
Lπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = Lπ_{3,!}ℱin
D(Ab), for every abelian sheafℱonC_{C/B}-- the abelian presheaves being the abelian sheaves, the topology being chaotic.Both sides are the extended Moore complex of
ℱ(u₃(U_•))for the cosimplicial objectU_•of the towers(P_n → B, P_n[E] → C): on the left by the criterion of Tag 08Q9 applied toU_•onC_{C/B/A}, on the right by that criterion applied to the constant cosimplicial object at the identity augmentationC → ConC_{C/B}, whichu₃(U_•)is. No hypothesis on a resolution survives: the resolution ofBoverAis the standard one of Tag 08PM, whose terms are polynomial algebras and whose augmentation is a trivial Kan fibration by Tag 08QI.
def polynomialTowerDerivedColimitThirdInverseImageIso
(F : (polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) :
(totalDerivedColimit' (polynomialTowerSite A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}).obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj
((HomologicalComplex.single ((polynomialTowerSite A B C)ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0).obj ((towerThirdInverseImage A B C).obj F))) ≅
(totalDerivedColimit' (polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))
AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}).obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj
((HomologicalComplex.single
((polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0).obj F))
CommAlgCat.polynomialSiteDerivedColimitThirdIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldPolynomialOnTopLargeSite.lean, line 304. The attribute's comment: “the second equality Lπ_{3,!}ℱ = π_{3,!}ℱ in D(Ab), at the site C_{C/B} of Tag 08PR itself -- CommAlgCat.polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C), not a restriction of it -- with Lπ_{3,!} the total left derived functor of the colimit over its index category and π_{3,!}ℱ that colimit, as in Tag 08PF. The first equality Lπ_!(g₃^{-1}ℱ) = Lπ_{3,!}ℱ is CommAlgCat.polynomialTowerDerivedColimitThirdInverseImageIso”.
Stacks 08QV, the second equality
Lπ_{3,!}ℱ = π_{3,!}ℱ, at the siteC_{C/B}itself. With notation as in Tag 08QT, supposeC = B[E]is a polynomial algebra overB. Then
Lπ_{3,!}ℱ = π_{3,!}ℱin
D(Ab), for every abelian sheafℱonC_{C/B}: the left side is the complex concentrated in degree zero onπ_{3,!}ℱ, the colimit ofℱover the index category of Tag 08PF.This is where
C = B[E]is used onC_{C/B}itself: it makes the identity augmentationC → Can object of that site, and that object is initial there, soπ_{3,!}is an evaluation and hence exact.
def polynomialSiteDerivedColimitThirdIso
(F : (polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) :
(totalDerivedColimit' (polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))
AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}).obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj
((HomologicalComplex.single
((polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))ᵒᵖ ⥤ AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0).obj F)) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj
((HomologicalComplex.single AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1} (ComplexShape.up ℤ) 0).obj
(colimit F))
Tag 08QW, a lemma
Tag 08QW in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.derivedLowerShriek_comp_inverseImage_polynomialTower, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/ThreefoldLowerShriekComparison.lean, line 308.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QW. With notation as in Tag 08QT,
Lg_{i,!} ∘ g_i⁻¹ = idfori = 1, 2, 3, and hence alsoLπ_! ∘ g_i⁻¹ = Lπ_{i,!}fori = 1, 2, 3.Here
g₁,g₂,g₃are the morphisms of topoi fromC_{C/B/A}toC_{B/A},C_{C/A}andC_{C/B}induced byu₁,u₂,u₃, andπ,π₁,π₂,π₃the projections of the four sites to the point; all four sites carry the chaotic topology. The statement is about abelian sheaves on the unbounded derived categories, for every left derived functor of each lower shriek and every derived functor of each inverse image, so it does not depend on choices. The six parts areCommAlgCat.derivedLowerShriekFirstInverseImageIso,CommAlgCat.derivedLowerShriekSecondInverseImageIso,CommAlgCat.derivedLowerShriekThirdInverseImageIso,CommAlgCat.derivedLowerShriekProjectionFirstIso,CommAlgCat.derivedLowerShriekProjectionSecondIsoandCommAlgCat.derivedLowerShriekProjectionThirdIso.
theorem derivedLowerShriek_comp_inverseImage_polynomialTower :
(∀ (L : DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L ⟶
((polynomialTowerFirst A B C).sheafPullback AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) (ComplexShape.up ℤ))]
(G : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(_ : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ G ≅
((polynomialTowerFirst A B C).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh),
Nonempty (G ⋙ L ≅ 𝟭 _)) ∧
(∀ (L : DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L ⟶
((polynomialTowerSecond A B C).sheafPullback AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) (ComplexShape.up ℤ))]
(G : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(_ : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ G ≅
((polynomialTowerSecond A B C).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh),
Nonempty (G ⋙ L ≅ 𝟭 _)) ∧
(∀ (L : DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L ⟶
((polynomialTowerThird A B C).sheafPullback AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) (ComplexShape.up ℤ))]
(G : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(_ : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ G ≅
((polynomialTowerThird A B C).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh),
Nonempty (G ⋙ L ≅ 𝟭 _)) ∧
(∀ (G : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(_ : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ G ≅
((polynomialTowerFirst A B C).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
(L : DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2})) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L ⟶
((Functor.star (polynomialTowerSite A B C)).sheafPullback AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2}))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) (ComplexShape.up ℤ))]
(L' : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2})) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α' : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L' ⟶
((Functor.star (polynomialSite A (towerBaseAlgebra A B))).sheafPullback
AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1} (polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B))
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2}))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L'.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α' (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerBaseAlgebra A B)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ))],
Nonempty (G ⋙ L ≅ L')) ∧
(∀ (G : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(_ : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ G ≅
((polynomialTowerSecond A B C).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
(L : DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2})) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L ⟶
((Functor.star (polynomialTowerSite A B C)).sheafPullback AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2}))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) (ComplexShape.up ℤ))]
(L' : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2})) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α' : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L' ⟶
((Functor.star (polynomialSite A (towerTotalAlgebra A C))).sheafPullback
AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1} (polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C))
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2}))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L'.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α' (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology A (towerTotalAlgebra A C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ))],
Nonempty (G ⋙ L ≅ L')) ∧
(∀ (G : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(_ : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ G ≅
((polynomialTowerThird A B C).sheafPushforwardContinuous AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
(L : DerivedCategory (Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2})) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L ⟶
((Functor.star (polynomialTowerSite A B C)).sheafPullback AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}
(polynomialTowerTopology A B C)
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2}))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTowerTopology A B C) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) (ComplexShape.up ℤ))]
(L' : DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}) ⥤
DerivedCategory
(Sheaf (GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2})) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1}))
(α' : DerivedCategory.Qh ⋙ L' ⟶
((Functor.star (polynomialSite B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))).sheafPullback
AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1} (polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C))
(GrothendieckTopology.trivial (Discrete PUnit.{u + 2}))).mapHomotopyCategory
(ComplexShape.up ℤ) ⋙ DerivedCategory.Qh)
[L'.IsLeftDerivedFunctor α' (HomotopyCategory.quasiIso
(Sheaf (polynomialTopology B (towerRelativeAlgebra B C)) AddCommGrpCat.{u + 1})
(ComplexShape.up ℤ))],
Nonempty (G ⋙ L ≅ L'))
Tag 08QX, a proposition
Tag 08QX in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.exists_distTriang_fundamentalVertex_of_isResolution, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/Fundamental.lean, line 159. The attribute's comment: “the triangle on the three vertices of the display of Tag 08QS, under TWO carried hypotheses the source lacks: B → C injective, as in Tag 08SD, whose removal needs the product decomposition of Tag 08SC; and the key fact of Tag 08SD, that the base-changed resolution Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B is a resolution of C over B, which rests on Tag 08RX. Neither tag is proved in this library”.
The fundamental triangle of the cotangent complex. Let
A → B → Cbe ring maps. Then there is a distinguished triangle
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C ⟶ L_{C/A} ⟶ L_{C/B} ⟶ (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1]in
D(C), on the three vertices of the display of Tag 08QS.Two hypotheses the source does not have are carried:
B → Cis injective, as in Tag 08SD, and the base-changed resolutionQ̄_• = Q_• ⊗_{P_•} Bof Tag 08SD is a resolution ofCoverB— its terms are polynomial algebras overBand its augmentation toCis a trivial Kan fibration on underlying simplicial sets.
theorem exists_distTriang_fundamentalVertex_of_isResolution
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] (B : Type u) [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
(C : Type u) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
(hf : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C))
(hP : ∀ n, IsPolynomialAlgebra B
((baseChangedStandardResolution A (towerHom A B C)).left.obj n))
(hε : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight
(baseChangedStandardResolution A (towerHom A B C)).hom (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} B)))) :
∃ (α : fundamentalVertex₁.{u, u, u + 1, u + 1} A B C ⟶ fundamentalVertex₂.{u, u, u + 1} A C)
(β : fundamentalVertex₂.{u, u, u + 1} A C ⟶ fundamentalVertex₃.{u, u, u + 1} B C)
(δ : fundamentalVertex₃.{u, u, u + 1} B C ⟶
(fundamentalVertex₁.{u, u, u + 1, u + 1} A B C)⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧),
Triangle.mk α β δ ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} C))
CommAlgCat.productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/ProductDescent.lean, line 357. The attribute's comment: “the proposition: for ring maps A → B → C the display of Tag 08QS is a distinguished triangle in D(C), on the display's own three vertices and with the display's own three morphisms. The third of them is CommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08QX, and the distinguishedness asserted by the display of Tag 08QS. Let
A → B → Cbe ring maps. Then
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C ⟶ L_{C/A} ⟶ L_{C/B} ⟶ (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1]is a distinguished triangle in
D(C), on the three vertices of the display of [Stacks, Tag 08QS], with the display's own first two morphismsCommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁andCommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂— the two functoriality maps of [Stacks, Tag 08PN] for the two commutative squares of the tower — and withCommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃for its third.The display of Tag 08QS is written as a triangle, and what makes it one is exactly this statement, so the display's distinguishedness clause is registered here as well: the three objects and the three arrows of the display are named by
CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₁,CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₂,CommAlgCat.fundamentalVertex₃,CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₁,CommAlgCat.fundamentalMor₂andCommAlgCat.productFundamentalMor₃, and that they form a triangle at all is Proposition 08QX.The proof is the one of [Stacks, Remark 08SD]: the triangle for
A → B → B × C, where the map is the split injectionb ↦ (b, f b), base changed along the flat projectionB × C → C.
theorem productFundamentalTriangle_distinguished :
Triangle.mk (fundamentalMor₁.{u} A B C) (fundamentalMor₂.{u} A B C)
(productFundamentalMor₃ A B C) ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} C))
Tag 08SD, a remark
Tag 08SD in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.baseChangedStandardResolution, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChange.lean, line 56. The attribute's comment: “base_changed_standard_resolution”.
The standard resolution of
CoverA, base changed along the standard resolution ofBto give an augmented simplicialB-algebra.
noncomputable def baseChangedStandardResolution
(A : Type u) [CommRing A]
{B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C) :
SimplicialObject.Augmented (CommAlgCat.{max u v} B)
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChange.lean, line 189. The attribute's comment: “polynomiality”.
Every term of the standard resolution of
Cis a polynomial algebra over the corresponding term of the standard resolution ofB, whenB → Cis injective.
theorem standardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebra
(A : Type u) [CommRing A]
{B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom) (n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :
let P := (standardResolution A B).left.obj n
let Q := (standardResolution A C).left.obj n
letI : Algebra P Q :=
(((standardResolutionFunctor A).map f).left.app n).hom.toAlgebra
IsPolynomialAlgebra P (CommAlgCat.of P Q)
CommAlgCat.fundamentalTriangle_of_injective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangedResolutionTriangle.lean, line 132. The attribute's comment: “the first paragraph of the remark, for A → B → C with B → C injective: Q_n is polynomial over P_n; Q̄_• = Q_• ⊗_{P_•} B is a resolution of C over B; the sequence of differentials is short exact; and its triangle is the fundamental triangle, with the canonical first two morphisms, on the vertices L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C, L_{C/A}, L_{C/B}”.
Stacks Project, Remark 08SD, first paragraph. Let
A → B → Cbe ring maps withB → Cinjective, letP_• → Bbe the standard resolution ofBoverA,Q_• → Cthat ofCoverA, andQ̄_• = Q_• ⊗_{P_•} B. Then
- every
Q_nis a polynomial algebra overP_n;Q̄_• → Cis a resolution ofCoverB(the key fact);- the sequence of complexes of
C-modules0 → Ω_{P_•/A} ⊗_{P_•} C → Ω_{Q_•/A} ⊗_{Q_•} C → Ω_{Q̄_•/B} ⊗_{Q̄_•} C → 0is short exact;- the distinguished triangle associated to that short exact sequence is isomorphic to the fundamental triangle
L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C → L_{C/A} → L_{C/B} → (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1]with its canonical first two morphisms, which is therefore distinguished inD(C).
theorem fundamentalTriangle_of_injective (hf : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) :
(∀ n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ,
letI : Algebra ((standardResolution A (CommAlgCat.of A B)).left.obj n)
((standardResolution A (CommAlgCat.of A C)).left.obj n) :=
(((standardResolutionFunctor A).map (towerHom A B C)).left.app n).hom.toAlgebra
IsPolynomialAlgebra ((standardResolution A (CommAlgCat.of A B)).left.obj n)
(CommAlgCat.of ((standardResolution A (CommAlgCat.of A B)).left.obj n)
((standardResolution A (CommAlgCat.of A C)).left.obj n))) ∧
@IsResolution ↥(CommAlgCat.of A B) (CommAlgCat.of A B).commRing
↥(algebraOver (towerHom A B C)) (algebraOver (towerHom A B C)).commRing
(algebraOver (towerHom A B C)).algebra
(baseChangedStandardResolution A (towerHom A B C)).left
(baseChangedStandardResolution A (towerHom A B C)).hom ∧
(cotangentDifferentialComplexes A (towerHom A B C)).ShortExact ∧
Nonempty (cotangentTriangle A (towerHom A B C)
(show Function.Injective (towerHom A B C).hom from hf) ≅
Triangle.mk (fundamentalMor₁.{u} A B C) (fundamentalMor₂.{u} A B C)
(fundamentalMor₃ A B C hf)) ∧
Triangle.mk (fundamentalMor₁.{u} A B C) (fundamentalMor₂.{u} A B C)
(fundamentalMor₃ A B C hf) ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} C))
CommAlgCat.fundamentalTriangle_of_productDescent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangedResolutionTriangle.lean, line 191. The attribute's comment: “the second paragraph of the remark, for arbitrary A → B → C: B → B × C is injective, the base change along the flat B × C → C of the fundamental triangle of A → B → B × C is distinguished in D(C) and, by Tag 08SC, isomorphic to the fundamental triangle of A → B → C with its canonical first two morphisms”.
Stacks Project, Remark 08SD, second paragraph. Let
A → B → Cbe arbitrary ring maps. ThenB → B × C,b ↦ (b, f b), is injective, so the first paragraph gives the fundamental triangle ofA → B → B × C; its base change along the flat ring mapB × C → Cis a distinguished triangle inD(C), and by Tag 08SC it is isomorphic to the fundamental triangleL_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C → L_{C/A} → L_{C/B} → (L_{B/A} ⊗^𝐋_B C)[1]with its canonical first two morphisms, which is therefore distinguished.
theorem fundamentalTriangle_of_productDescent :
Function.Injective (algebraMap B (B × C)) ∧
productDescentTriangle A B C ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} C)) ∧
Nonempty (productDescentTriangle A B C ≅
Triangle.mk (fundamentalMor₁.{u} A B C) (fundamentalMor₂.{u} A B C)
(productFundamentalMor₃ A B C)) ∧
Triangle.mk (fundamentalMor₁.{u} A B C) (fundamentalMor₂.{u} A B C)
(productFundamentalMor₃ A B C) ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} C))
CommAlgCat.exists_distinguished_derivedBaseChange_cotangentTriangle, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DerivedFirstVertex.lean, line 167. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence triangle, derived first vertex”.
Stacks Project, Tag 08SD, with the derived base change as first vertex.
For an injective map
f : B ⟶ CofA-algebras there is a distinguished triangle inD(ModuleCat C)L_{B/A} ⊗ᴸ_B C → L_{C/A} → (third vertex of CommAlgCat.cotangentTriangle) → (L_{B/A} ⊗ᴸ_B C)[1]whose first vertex is literally the derived base change ofL_{B/A}alongf, whose second vertex isL_{C/A}and whose third vertex is the third vertex ofCommAlgCat.cotangentTriangle, the complex of the base-changed relative differentials.This statement leaves the third vertex as the complex of base-changed relative differentials. Its identification with
L_{C/B}, and the passage to arbitraryA → B → CthroughB × Cand Tag 08SC, are the two paragraphs of Remark 08SD stated whole inStacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangedResolutionTriangle.lean:CommAlgCat.fundamentalTriangle_of_injectiveandCommAlgCat.fundamentalTriangle_of_productDescent.
theorem exists_distinguished_derivedBaseChange_cotangentTriangle (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
{B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} [HasDerivedCategory.{wB} (ModuleCat.{max u v} B)]
[HasDerivedCategory.{wC} (ModuleCat.{max u v} C)]
(f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
∃ (α : (CochainComplex.DerivedExtensionScalars.derivedExtensionScalarsGeneral
f.hom.toRingHom).functor.obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, v} A B)) ⟶
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, v} A C))
(β : DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, v} A C) ⟶
(cotangentTriangle A f hf).obj₃)
(δ : (cotangentTriangle A f hf).obj₃ ⟶
((CochainComplex.DerivedExtensionScalars.derivedExtensionScalarsGeneral
f.hom.toRingHom).functor.obj
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex.{u, v} A B)))⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧),
Triangle.mk α β δ ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{max u v} C))
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionDifferentialSequence, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 880. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence construction”.
The specific canonical differential short complex for
A → B → C.
noncomputable def standardResolutionDifferentialSequence
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C) :
DifferentialSequenceData A f
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_differentials_shortExact, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 926. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence”.
The canonical differential complex is short exact.
theorem standardResolution_differentials_shortExact
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
(standardResolutionDifferentialSequence A f).complex.ShortExact
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_differentials_firstMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 1004. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence first map”.
The first map sends a differential to the differential of its image.
theorem standardResolution_differentials_firstMap
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
(n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) (p : (standardResolution A B).left.obj n) :
let D := standardResolutionDifferentialSequence A f
((D.firstIso.inv.app n) ≫ (D.complex.f.app n) ≫ (D.secondIso.hom.app n))
((1 : C) ⊗ₜ[B] cotangentTermDifferential A B n p) =
cotangentTermDifferential A C n
(((standardResolutionFunctor A).map f).left.app n p)
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_differentials_secondMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 1016. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence second map”.
The second map is the canonical map to base-changed relative differentials.
theorem standardResolution_differentials_secondMap
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
(n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) (q : (standardResolution A C).left.obj n) :
let D := standardResolutionDifferentialSequence A f
let R := baseChangedStandardResolution A f
let T := R.left.obj n
letI : Algebra T C := ((R.hom.app n).hom.toRingHom).toAlgebra
((D.secondIso.inv.app n) ≫ (D.complex.g.app n) ≫ (D.thirdIso n).hom)
(cotangentTermDifferential A C n q) =
((1 : C) ⊗ₜ[T] KaehlerDifferential.D B T (D.toBaseChange n q))
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_differentials_third_naturality, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 1030. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence naturality”.
The identification of the third term respects every simplicial map.
theorem standardResolution_differentials_third_naturality
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
{i j : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (h : i ⟶ j)
(t : (baseChangedStandardResolution A f).left.obj
i) :
let D := standardResolutionDifferentialSequence A f
let R := baseChangedStandardResolution A f
let Ti := R.left.obj i
let Tj := R.left.obj j
letI : Algebra Ti C := ((R.hom.app i).hom.toRingHom).toAlgebra
letI : Algebra Tj C := ((R.hom.app j).hom.toRingHom).toAlgebra
((D.thirdIso i).inv ≫ D.complex.X₃.map h ≫ (D.thirdIso j).hom)
((1 : C) ⊗ₜ[Ti] KaehlerDifferential.D B Ti t) =
((1 : C) ⊗ₜ[Tj] KaehlerDifferential.D B Tj (R.left.map h t))
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_differentials_pushout, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 1048. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence base change”.
The map to the base-changed resolution is its canonical pushout leg.
theorem standardResolution_differentials_pushout
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
(n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :
let D := standardResolutionDifferentialSequence A f
let R := baseChangedStandardResolution A f
CategoryTheory.IsPushout
(CommRingCat.ofHom
(((standardResolutionFunctor A).map f).left.app n).hom.toRingHom)
(CommRingCat.ofHom (standardResolutionAugmentationHom A B n))
(CommRingCat.ofHom (D.toBaseChange n))
(CommRingCat.ofHom (algebraMap B (R.left.obj n)))
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_differentials_toBaseChange_naturality, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 1063. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence base change naturality”.
The pushout leg is simplicially natural.
theorem standardResolution_differentials_toBaseChange_naturality
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
{i j : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (h : i ⟶ j)
(q : (standardResolution A C).left.obj i) :
let D := standardResolutionDifferentialSequence A f
let R := baseChangedStandardResolution A f
R.left.map h (D.toBaseChange i q) =
D.toBaseChange j ((standardResolution A C).left.map h q)
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_differentials_toBaseChange_augmentation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/DifferentialSequence.lean, line 1075. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence augmentation”.
The pushout leg is compatible with augmentation to
C.
theorem standardResolution_differentials_toBaseChange_augmentation
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] {B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C)
(n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :
let D := standardResolutionDifferentialSequence A f
let R := baseChangedStandardResolution A f
((R.hom.app n).hom.toRingHom).comp (D.toBaseChange n) =
standardResolutionAugmentationHom A C n
CommAlgCat.cotangentDifferentialComplexes_shortExact, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/Distinguished.lean, line 142. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence complexes”.
For an injective map
f : B ⟶ CofA-algebras, the differential short complex of cochain complexes ofC-modules is short exact.
theorem cotangentDifferentialComplexes_shortExact (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
{B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} (f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
(cotangentDifferentialComplexes A f).ShortExact
CommAlgCat.cotangentTriangle, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/Distinguished.lean, line 151. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence triangle”.
The triangle in
D(ModuleCat C)attached to the differential short exact sequence of the standard resolutions ofA → B → C, forf : B ⟶ Cinjective.
noncomputable def cotangentTriangle (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
{B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} [HasDerivedCategory.{t} (ModuleCat.{max u v} C)]
(f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
Triangle (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{max u v} C))
CommAlgCat.cotangentTriangle_distinguished, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/Distinguished.lean, line 159. The attribute's comment: “differential_sequence triangle distinguished”.
The triangle attached to the differential sequence is distinguished.
theorem cotangentTriangle_distinguished (A : Type u) [CommRing A]
{B C : CommAlgCat.{max u v} A} [HasDerivedCategory.{t} (ModuleCat.{max u v} C)]
(f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
cotangentTriangle A f hf ∈ distTriang (DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{max u v} C))
Tag 08SE, a remark
Tag 08SE in the Stacks Project.
CommAlgCat.relativeBaseChangeLeg, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 209. The attribute's comment: “the first arrow of the comparison, R_bullet ⟶ R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B”.
The canonical map
R_• ⟶ R̄_•of Remark 08SE: degreewise the pushout leg out of the standard resolution ofCoverB.
noncomputable def relativeBaseChangeLeg (f : B ⟶ C) :
(standardResolution ↥B (algebraOver f)).left ⟶ (relativeBaseChange f).left
CommAlgCat.standardResolutionSquareMap_baseRingSquare_comm, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 315. The attribute's comment: “the commutative diagram of standard resolutions from which the canonical map Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B ⟶ R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B is obtained”.
The commutative diagram of Remark 08SE. The square
Q_• ⟶ R_• ↑ ↑ P_• ⟶ S_•commutes, the vertical maps being the functoriality of the standard resolution in the algebra and the horizontal ones the change of base ring from
AtoB.
theorem standardResolutionSquareMap_baseRingSquare_comm (f : B ⟶ C) (n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :
(standardResolutionSquareMap.{u, u, u} (baseRingSquareTop f) n).comp
((((standardResolutionFunctor.{u, u} A).map f).left.app n).hom.toRingHom) =
((((standardResolutionFunctor.{u, u} ↥B).map (overBase f)).left.app n).hom.toRingHom).comp
(standardResolutionSquareMap.{u, u, u} (baseRingSquareBot B) n)
CommAlgCat.baseChangedComparison, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 415. The attribute's comment: “the canonical map Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B ⟶ R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B obtained from the commutative diagram”.
The canonical map
Q̄_• ⟶ R̄_•of Remark 08SE, obtained from the commutative diagram of standard resolutions by the pushout property ofQ̄_•.
noncomputable def baseChangedComparison (f : B ⟶ C) :
(baseChangedStandardResolution A f).left ⟶ (relativeBaseChange f).left
CommAlgCat.baseChangedStandardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 588. The attribute's comment: “the degreewise polynomiality of a base-changed standard resolution, applied in the remark both to Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B and to R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B; this is where the injectivity of B → C is used”.
Every term of the base-changed standard resolution
Q̄_• = Q_• ⊗_{P_•} Bis a polynomial algebra overB, whenB → Cis injective.This is the elementary half of the "key fact" of Tag 08SD. Injectivity enters through the polynomiality of Tag 08SD,
CommAlgCat.standardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebra, which presentsQ_nas a polynomial algebra overP_n; the base change of that presentation along the augmentationP_n → BpresentsQ̄_nas a polynomial algebra overBon the same variables.
theorem baseChangedStandardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebra (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom) (n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :
IsPolynomialAlgebra ↥B ((baseChangedStandardResolution A f).left.obj n)
CommAlgCat.relativeBaseChange_isPolynomialAlgebra, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 603. The attribute's comment: “R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B is a simplicial polynomial algebra over B, because B → C is injective”.
Every term of
R̄_• = R_• ⊗_{S_•} Bis a polynomial algebra overB, whenB → Cis injective: the functoriality mapS_• → R_•presentsR_nas a polynomial algebra overS_n, so this isCommAlgCat.baseChangedStandardResolution_isPolynomialAlgebraat the base ringB.
theorem relativeBaseChange_isPolynomialAlgebra (f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom)
(n : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) :
IsPolynomialAlgebra ↥B ((relativeBaseChange f).left.obj n)
CommAlgCat.relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 649. The attribute's comment: “the induced map L_{C/B} = Omega[R_bullet/B] ⊗ C ⟶ Omega[R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C”.
The first arrow of the comparison of Remark 08SE, the map
L_{C/B} = Ω[R_•⁄B] ⊗_{R_•} C ⟶ Ω[R̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{R̄_•} Cinduced byR_• ⟶ R̄_•.
noncomputable def relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg (f : B ⟶ C) :
cotangentComplex ↥B (algebraOver f) ⟶
augmentedCotangentCochainComplex (relativeBaseChange f).hom
CommAlgCat.baseChangedCotangentComparison, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 660. The attribute's comment: “the induced map Omega[Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C ⟶ Omega[R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C”.
The second arrow of the comparison of Remark 08SE, the map
Ω[Q̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{Q̄_•} C ⟶ Ω[R̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{R̄_•} Cinduced byQ̄_• ⟶ R̄_•.
noncomputable def baseChangedCotangentComparison (f : B ⟶ C) :
augmentedCotangentCochainComplex (baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom ⟶
augmentedCotangentCochainComplex (relativeBaseChange f).hom
CommAlgCat.isIso_q_relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 698. The attribute's comment: “the first of the two maps is a quasi-isomorphism. CARRIED as the hypothesis hεR: that the augmentation of R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B to C is a trivial Kan fibration, the half of the source's appeal to Cohomology on Sites, Lemma 21.39.12 (Tag 08RX) that this library lacks. Degreewise polynomiality is NOT carried: it is proved from B → C injective”.
The first arrow of the comparison is a quasi-isomorphism.
Both
R_•andR̄_•are resolutions ofCoverB, so by Tag 08PU each of their complexes isLπ_!(i^*Ω_{𝒪/B})inD(C), compatibly with the morphismR_• ⟶ R̄_•between them (CommAlgCat.smallResolutionCotangentDerivedLowerShriekIso_naturality).That
R̄_•is a resolution is used twice over: its degreewise polynomiality isCommAlgCat.relativeBaseChange_isPolynomialAlgebra, which consumes the injectivity ofB → C, while the trivial Kan fibration conditionhεRis carried.
theorem isIso_q_relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg (f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom)
(hεR : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight (relativeBaseChange f).hom
(forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B)))) :
IsIso (DerivedCategory.Q.map (relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg f))
CommAlgCat.isIso_q_baseChangedCotangentComparison, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 727. The attribute's comment: “the second of the two maps is a quasi-isomorphism. CARRIED as the hypotheses hεQ and hεR: that the augmentations of Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B and R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B to C are trivial Kan fibrations, the half of Tag 08RX this library lacks. Degreewise polynomiality of both is NOT carried: it is proved from B → C injective”.
The second arrow of the comparison is a quasi-isomorphism, by Tag 08PU at the two resolutions
Q̄_•andR̄_•ofCoverBand its functoriality in the resolution.
theorem isIso_q_baseChangedCotangentComparison (f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom)
(hεQ : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight
(baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B))))
(hεR : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight (relativeBaseChange f).hom
(forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B)))) :
IsIso (DerivedCategory.Q.map (baseChangedCotangentComparison f))
CommAlgCat.baseChangedCotangentComplexIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 757. The attribute's comment: “the canonical identification of Omega[Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C with L_{C/B}: the second arrow of the comparison followed by the inverse of the first. CARRIED as the hypotheses hεQ and hεR, the trivial-Kan-fibration halves of Tag 08RX, which this library lacks. The remark's hypothesis that B → C be injective is NOT carried but consumed”.
Remark 08SE. The canonical identification of
Ω[Q̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{Q̄_•} CwithL_{C/B} = Ω[R_•⁄B] ⊗_{R_•} CinD(C): the second arrow of the comparison composed with the inverse of the first.It is characterised by
CommAlgCat.baseChangedCotangentComplexIso_hom_compandCommAlgCat.eq_baseChangedCotangentComplexIso.
noncomputable def baseChangedCotangentComplexIso (f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom)
(hεQ : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight
(baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B))))
(hεR : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight (relativeBaseChange f).hom
(forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B)))) :
DerivedCategory.Q.obj
(augmentedCotangentCochainComplex (baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex ↥B (algebraOver f))
CommAlgCat.baseChangedCotangentComplexIso_hom_comp, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 779. The attribute's comment: “the characterising property of the identification: composed with the first arrow of the comparison it is the second, which is what 'composing one with the inverse of the other' means. Same two carried hypotheses as the identification itself”.
The identification of Remark 08SE commutes with the two arrows of the comparison.
theorem baseChangedCotangentComplexIso_hom_comp (f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom)
(hεQ : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight
(baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B))))
(hεR : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight (relativeBaseChange f).hom
(forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B)))) :
(baseChangedCotangentComplexIso f hf hεQ hεR).hom ≫
DerivedCategory.Q.map (relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg f) =
DerivedCategory.Q.map (baseChangedCotangentComparison f)
CommAlgCat.eq_baseChangedCotangentComplexIso, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparison.lean, line 802. The attribute's comment: “uniqueness of the identification: it is the ONLY isomorphism whose composite with the first arrow of the comparison is the second. Same two carried hypotheses as the identification itself”.
The identification of Remark 08SE is the unique isomorphism commuting with the two arrows of the comparison. This is what pins it down: the first arrow is an isomorphism in
D(C), so the commutation determines the identification outright.
theorem eq_baseChangedCotangentComplexIso (f : B ⟶ C) (hf : Function.Injective f.hom)
(hεQ : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight
(baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom (forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B))))
(hεR : SSet.trivialKanFibrations (Functor.whiskerRight (relativeBaseChange f).hom
(forget (CommAlgCat.{u} ↥B))))
(e : DerivedCategory.Q.obj
(augmentedCotangentCochainComplex (baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex ↥B (algebraOver f)))
(he : e.hom ≫ DerivedCategory.Q.map (relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg f) =
DerivedCategory.Q.map (baseChangedCotangentComparison f)) :
e = baseChangedCotangentComplexIso f hf hεQ hεR
CommAlgCat.isResolution_relativeBaseChange_of_injective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparisonOfInjective.lean, line 71. The attribute's comment: “R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B is a simplicial polynomial algebra over B and R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B → C is a resolution, for B → C injective”.
R̄_• = R_• ⊗_{S_•} Bis a resolution ofCoverBwhenB → Cis injective: eachR̄_nis a polynomial algebra overBand the augmentationR̄_• → Cis a trivial Kan fibration.R̄_•is the base-changed standard resolution at the base ringBand the mapCommAlgCat.overBase f, so this isCommAlgCat.isResolution_baseChangedStandardResolution_of_injectivethere.
theorem isResolution_relativeBaseChange_of_injective (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
@IsResolution ↥B B.commRing ↥(relativeBaseChange f).right
(relativeBaseChange f).right.commRing (relativeBaseChange f).right.algebra
(relativeBaseChange f).left (relativeBaseChange f).hom
CommAlgCat.isIso_q_relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg_of_injective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparisonOfInjective.lean, line 83. The attribute's comment: “the map L_{C/B} = Omega[R_bullet/B] ⊗ C ⟶ Omega[R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C is a quasi-isomorphism, for B → C injective”.
The first map of Remark 08SE is a quasi-isomorphism:
L_{C/B} = Ω[R_•⁄B] ⊗_{R_•} C ⟶ Ω[R̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{R̄_•} Cbecomes an isomorphism inD(C)forB → Cinjective.
theorem isIso_q_relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg_of_injective (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
IsIso (DerivedCategory.Q.map (relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg f))
CommAlgCat.isIso_q_baseChangedCotangentComparison_of_injective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparisonOfInjective.lean, line 94. The attribute's comment: “the map Omega[Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C ⟶ Omega[R_bullet ⊗_{S_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C is a quasi-isomorphism, for B → C injective”.
The second map of Remark 08SE is a quasi-isomorphism:
Ω[Q̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{Q̄_•} C ⟶ Ω[R̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{R̄_•} Cbecomes an isomorphism inD(C)forB → Cinjective.
theorem isIso_q_baseChangedCotangentComparison_of_injective (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
IsIso (DerivedCategory.Q.map (baseChangedCotangentComparison f))
CommAlgCat.baseChangedCotangentComplexIsoOfInjective_hom_comp, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparisonOfInjective.lean, line 110. The attribute's comment: “the identification composed with the first map of the comparison is the second, for B → C injective”.
The identification of Remark 08SE is the second map composed with the inverse of the first: followed by the first map it is the second.
theorem baseChangedCotangentComplexIsoOfInjective_hom_comp (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom) :
(baseChangedCotangentComplexIsoOfInjective f hf).hom ≫
DerivedCategory.Q.map (relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg f) =
DerivedCategory.Q.map (baseChangedCotangentComparison f)
CommAlgCat.eq_baseChangedCotangentComplexIsoOfInjective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparisonOfInjective.lean, line 122. The attribute's comment: “uniqueness of the identification: the only isomorphism whose composite with the first map of the comparison is the second, for B → C injective”.
The identification of Remark 08SE is canonical: it is the only isomorphism
Ω[Q̄_•⁄B] ⊗_{Q̄_•} C ≅ L_{C/B}inD(C)whose composite with the first map of the comparison is the second.
theorem eq_baseChangedCotangentComplexIsoOfInjective (f : B ⟶ C)
(hf : Function.Injective f.hom)
(e : DerivedCategory.Q.obj
(augmentedCotangentCochainComplex (baseChangedStandardResolution A f).hom) ≅
DerivedCategory.Q.obj (cotangentComplex ↥B (algebraOver f)))
(he : e.hom ≫ DerivedCategory.Q.map (relativeBaseChangeCotangentLeg f) =
DerivedCategory.Q.map (baseChangedCotangentComparison f)) :
e = baseChangedCotangentComplexIsoOfInjective f hf
Declarations registered for the tag:
CommAlgCat.baseChangedCotangentComplexIsoOfInjective, declared in the repository, registered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Cotangent/Triangle/BaseChangeComparisonOfInjective.lean, line 101 (StacksFrontier): “the canonical identification of Omega[Q_bullet ⊗_{P_bullet} B / B] ⊗ C with L_{C/B} = Omega[R_bullet/B] ⊗ C in D(C), for B → C injective: the second map of the comparison followed by the inverse of the first”.
Sources
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.