93.4 Finite projective modules to 93.13 Deformations of…
Section93.4 Finite projective modules#
Section 93.4 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DVN. 3 tags here are carried by 10 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0D3I, an example
Tag 0D3I in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.Family.projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveCofibered.lean, line 232.
The projection from finite projective modules to their Artinian local base algebras is cofibered in groupoids.
public theorem projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids
(𝓕 : FiniteProjectiveModule.Family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)) :
letI := 𝓕.category
IsCofiberedInGroupoids 𝓕.projection
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.specialFiber, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveModules.lean, line 158. The attribute's comment: “finite_projective_deformation_category”.
The pair
(k, V)consisting of the residue field and a finite-dimensionalk-vector space: the special-fibre object whose deformations are studied.
public noncomputable def specialFiber (V : Type t) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V] : FiniteProjectiveModule.{u, w, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.family, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveModules.lean, line 301. The attribute's comment: “finite_projective_deformation_category”.
The chosen category of finite projective modules over the algebras of
𝒞_Λ.
public noncomputable def family : Family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.deformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveModules.lean, line 307. The attribute's comment: “finite_projective_deformation_category”.
Deformations of a finite-dimensional
k-vector spaceV: the objects of the category of finite projective modules lying over the special-fibre object(k, V).
public abbrev deformationCategory (V : Type t) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V]
Tag 0DVP, a lemma
Tag 0DVP in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.Family.satisfiesRS_projection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveRimSchlessinger.lean, line 618. The attribute's comment: “Rim-Schlessinger condition”.
Finite projective modules over Artinian local algebras satisfy the Rim–Schlessinger condition: a cospan whose second base morphism is surjective is covered by the Milnor patch of the two modules over the fibre product of the base algebras.
public theorem Family.satisfiesRS_projection
(𝓕 : FiniteProjectiveModule.Family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)) :
letI := 𝓕.category
SatisfiesRS 𝓕.projection
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveRimSchlessinger.lean, line 806. The attribute's comment: “deformation category”.
Deformations of a finite-dimensional vector space form a deformation category.
public theorem isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory
(V : Type t) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] :
let 𝓕 : FiniteProjectiveModule.Family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) :=
FiniteProjectiveModule.family (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
letI := 𝓕.category
IsDeformationCategory
(objectsOverFunctor 𝓕.projection
(FiniteProjectiveModule.specialFiber (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V))
Tag 0DVQ, a lemma
Tag 0DVQ in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.subsingleton_tangentSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveTangentSpace.lean, line 489. The attribute's comment: “tangent_space_zero”.
The tangent space of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional vector space has at most one element: it is the zero vector space.
public theorem subsingleton_tangentSpace
(V : Type t) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] :
let 𝓖 := FiniteProjectiveModule.family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
letI := 𝓖.category
let p := objectsOverFunctor 𝓖.projection (specialFiber (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V)
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor p
let hD := isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory (Λ := Λ) V
let hS2 := Artin.schlessingerConditionS2_isomorphismClasses_of_isDeformationCategory 𝓕 hD
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p) := ⟨hD.predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2
(CategoryOfElements.π (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered))) := ⟨hS2⟩
let T := artinianTangentSpace Λ k (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered)
letI : AddCommGroup T := associatedTangentSpaceAddCommGroupUnlifted 𝓕
letI : Module k T := associatedTangentSpaceModuleUnlifted 𝓕
Subsingleton T
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.finiteDimensional_tangentSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/FiniteProjectiveTangentSpace.lean, line 549. The attribute's comment: “tangent_space_zero”.
The tangent space of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional vector space is finite-dimensional, being the zero vector space.
public theorem finiteDimensional_tangentSpace
(V : Type t) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] :
let 𝓖 := FiniteProjectiveModule.family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
letI := 𝓖.category
let p := objectsOverFunctor 𝓖.projection (specialFiber (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V)
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor p
let hD := isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory (Λ := Λ) V
let hS2 := Artin.schlessingerConditionS2_isomorphismClasses_of_isDeformationCategory 𝓕 hD
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p) := ⟨hD.predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2
(CategoryOfElements.π (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered))) := ⟨hS2⟩
let T := artinianTangentSpace Λ k (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered)
letI : AddCommGroup T := associatedTangentSpaceAddCommGroupUnlifted 𝓕
letI : Module k T := associatedTangentSpaceModuleUnlifted 𝓕
FiniteDimensional k T
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.infinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivEnd, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/InfinitesimalAutomorphisms/Endomorphisms.lean, line 1043. The attribute's comment: “infinitesimal_automorphisms”.
Infinitesimal automorphisms of a finite-dimensional vector space are its linear endomorphisms, with composition corresponding to addition.
public noncomputable def infinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivEnd
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(V : Type t) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] :
let 𝓖 := FiniteProjectiveModule.family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
letI := 𝓖.category
let p := objectsOverFunctor 𝓖.projection
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V)
let hD := isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V
let hp : IsPredeformationCategory p := hD.predeformation
∀ {Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : p.Fiber (residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)}
{xε : p.Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k ⟶ Aε)
(e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1) (hi : p.IsHomLift g i),
let iε : Aε ≃ₐ[Λ] DualNumber k :=
Classical.choose (Classical.choose_spec hpair)
let M := xε.1.left
let hbase : M.base = Aε := (𝓖.projection_obj xε.1.left).symm.trans xε.2
let ε : M.base := (eqToHom hbase.symm).hom (iε.symm DualNumber.eps)
let r := 𝓖.homEquiv M
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V) xε.1.hom
{ E : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi ≃*
Multiplicative (Module.End k V) //
∀ (γ : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi) (m : M.carrier),
let a := 𝓖.homEquiv M M γ.val.asIso.hom.val.left
∃ n : M.carrier,
r.linear n = (Multiplicative.toAdd (E γ)) (r.linear m) ∧
a.linear m = m + ε • n }
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismsLinearEquivEnd, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/InfinitesimalAutomorphisms/Endomorphisms.lean, line 1082. The attribute's comment: “infinitesimal_automorphisms”.
The infinitesimal automorphism group of the deformations of
Vis thek-vector spaceModule.End k V, and is in particular finite-dimensional. Thek-structure is the one of Stacks 06JV: its addition is composition of automorphisms, and multiplying bycscales the infinitesimal coordinate, which on the formulaγ(m) = m + ε·nreads(c · γ)(m) = m + ε·(cb · n)for any elementcbof the base reducing toc.
public theorem exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismsLinearEquivEnd
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(V : Type t) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] :
let 𝓖 := FiniteProjectiveModule.family.{u, w, t} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
letI := 𝓖.category
let p := objectsOverFunctor 𝓖.projection
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V)
let hD := isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V
let hp : IsPredeformationCategory p := hD.predeformation
∀ {Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : p.Fiber (residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)}
{xε : p.Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k ⟶ Aε)
(e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1) (hi : p.IsHomLift g i),
let iε : Aε ≃ₐ[Λ] DualNumber k :=
Classical.choose (Classical.choose_spec hpair)
let M := xε.1.left
let hbase : M.base = Aε := (𝓖.projection_obj xε.1.left).symm.trans xε.2
let ε : M.base := (eqToHom hbase.symm).hom (iε.symm DualNumber.eps)
let r := 𝓖.homEquiv M
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) (k := k) V) xε.1.hom
∃ A : AddCommGroup (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi),
letI := A
∃ Mo : Module k (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi),
letI := Mo
(∀ γ δ : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi, γ + δ = γ * δ) ∧
(∃ E : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi ≃ₗ[k] Module.End k V,
(∀ (γ : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi) (m : M.carrier),
∃ n : M.carrier, r.linear n = E γ (r.linear m) ∧
(𝓖.homEquiv M M γ.val.asIso.hom.val.left).linear m = m + ε • n) ∧
∀ (c : k) (cb : M.base), r.base.hom cb = c →
∀ (γ : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi)
(m n : M.carrier), r.linear n = E γ (r.linear m) →
(𝓖.homEquiv M M γ.val.asIso.hom.val.left).linear m = m + ε • n →
(𝓖.homEquiv M M (c • γ).val.asIso.hom.val.left).linear m =
m + ε • (cb • n)) ∧
FiniteDimensional k (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi)
Sources
Section93.5 Representations of a group#
Section 93.5 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DVR. 4 tags here are carried by 24 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0D3J, an example
Tag 0D3J in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/Representations.lean, line 58. The attribute's comment: “representation_category: objects”.
A finite projective representation of
Γover an Artinian localΛ-algebra with residue fieldk.
public structure FiniteProjectiveRepresentation
(Λ : Type u) (k : Type w) (Γ : Type*) [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[Group Γ]
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.Hom, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/Representations.lean, line 78. The attribute's comment: “representation_category: morphisms”.
A morphism of finite projective representations with varying coefficient ring.
public structure Hom
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[Group Γ] (X Y : FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.{u, v, w, m} Λ k Γ)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.instCategory, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/Representations.lean, line 101. The attribute's comment: “representation_category”.
The category structure on finite projective representations with varying coefficient algebra.
public instance instCategory
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[Group Γ] : Category (FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.{u, v, w, m} Λ k Γ)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.specialFiber, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/Representations.lean, line 159. The attribute's comment: “representation_deformation_category”.
The representation
(V, ρ₀)overk, viewed as the special-fibre object.
public noncomputable def specialFiber
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[Group Γ] (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) : FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.{u, w, w, m} Λ k Γ
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.deformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/Representations.lean, line 169. The attribute's comment: “representation_deformation_category”.
The category of deformations of a finite-dimensional representation of
Γ.
public abbrev deformationCategory
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[Group Γ] (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.projection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/RepresentationsCofibered.lean, line 159. The attribute's comment: “the projection”.
Forget the module and action of a finite projective representation, retaining its coefficient algebra.
public def projection :
FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.{u, v, w, m} Λ k Γ ⥤
ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, w} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/RepresentationsCofibered.lean, line 170. The attribute's comment: “cofibered in groupoids”.
The category of finite projective representations is cofibered in groupoids over the category of Artinian local coefficient algebras.
public theorem projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids
(projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ) :
FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.{u, v, w, max v m} Λ k Γ ⥤
ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, w} Λ k)
Deformation.RepresentationCategory, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Basic.lean, line 58. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_category, objects”.
A finite projective representation of
Γover an Artinian localΛ-algebra with residue fieldk.
structure RepresentationCategory.{u', v', w', m', x'}
(Λ : Type u') (k : Type w') (Γ : Type x') [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[Group Γ]
Deformation.RepresentationCategory.Hom, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Basic.lean, line 78. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_category, morphisms”.
A morphism of finite projective representations with varying coefficient ring.
structure Hom {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type x} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[Group Γ] (X Y : RepresentationCategory.{u, v, w, m, x} Λ k Γ)
Deformation.RepresentationCategory.instCategory, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Basic.lean, line 127. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_category”.
The category structure on finite projective representations with varying coefficient algebra.
instance instCategory {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type x} [CommRing Λ] [Field k]
[Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] : Category (RepresentationCategory.{u, v, w, m, x} Λ k Γ)
Deformation.representationProjection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Basic.lean, line 187. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_category”.
The coefficient algebra underlying a finite projective representation, as a functor.
def representationProjection {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type x} [CommRing Λ]
[Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] :
RepresentationCategory.{u, v, w, m, x} Λ k Γ ⥤ ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, w} Λ k
Deformation.RepresentationCategory.specialFiber, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Basic.lean, line 214. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_deformation_category”.
The representation
(V, ρ₀)over the residue fieldk, viewed as the special-fibre object of the categoryℱ.
noncomputable def specialFiber {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type x} [CommRing Λ]
[Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) :
RepresentationCategory.{u, w, w, m, x} Λ k Γ
Deformation.RepresentationCategory.deformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Basic.lean, line 224. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_deformation_category”.
The category of deformations of a finite-dimensional representation of
Γ.
abbrev deformationCategory {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type x} [CommRing Λ] [Field k]
[Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V)
Deformation.deformationCategoryProjection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Basic.lean, line 234. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_deformation_category”.
The coefficient algebra of a deformation of
ρ₀, as a functor from the deformation category ofρ₀to𝒞_Λ.
noncomputable def deformationCategoryProjection {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type x}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V]
[Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) :
RepresentationCategory.deformationCategory (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ ⥤
ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k
Deformation.RepresentationCategory.representationProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Cofibered.lean, line 260. The attribute's comment: “second presentation: representation_category”.
The category of finite projective representations is cofibered in groupoids over the category of Artinian local coefficient algebras.
theorem representationProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids
(representationProjection.{u, v, w, m, x} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
Tag 0DVS, a lemma
Tag 0DVS in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.satisfiesRS_projection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/RepresentationsRimSchlessinger.lean, line 546. The attribute's comment: “Rim-Schlessinger condition”.
Finite projective representations satisfy the Rim–Schlessinger condition.
public theorem satisfiesRS_projection
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] :
SatisfiesRS
(FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.projection.{u, v, w, max v m}
(Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/RepresentationsRimSchlessinger.lean, line 581. The attribute's comment: “deformation category”.
The deformations of a finite-dimensional representation form a deformation category.
public theorem isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ]
(V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) :
IsDeformationCategory
(objectsOverFunctor
(FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.projection.{u, w, w, m}
(Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
(FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.specialFiber (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀))
Tag 0DVT, a lemma
Tag 0DVT in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.finiteDimensional_tangentSpace_representation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Hull.lean, line 98. The attribute's comment: “clause 5: T Def_{V,ρ₀} is finite dimensional over k when Γ is finitely generated, for the canonical vector space structure of Stacks 06IH. The hypothesis Group.FG Γ is what separates this from clause 4, which holds for every Γ”.
The tangent space of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional representation of a finitely generated group is finite dimensional over
k, for the canonical vector space structure of Stacks 06IH.
theorem finiteDimensional_tangentSpace_representation (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V] [Group.FG Γ] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) :
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
let ee := tangentSpaceEquivSelfExt (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p) := ⟨ee.1⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2
(CategoryOfElements.π (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 ee.1.cofibered))) := ⟨ee.2.1⟩
FiniteDimensional k (artinianTangentSpace Λ k (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 ee.1.cofibered))
Deformation.infinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivH0, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/InfinitesimalAutomorphisms.lean, line 589. The attribute's comment: “clause 3: Inf Def_{V,ρ₀} = H⁰(Γ, End_k(V)), the infinitesimal automorphisms of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional representation ρ₀ are the Γ-invariant k-endomorphisms of V, i.e. the ψ with id + εψ an automorphism of V ⊗_k k[ε]”.
The infinitesimal automorphisms of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional representation
ρ₀are the degree-zero group cohomology of the conjugation action on its endomorphisms.
noncomputable def infinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivH0
(V : Type w) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V)
{A₀ Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).Fiber A₀}
{xε : (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).Fiber Aε}
(g : A₀ ⟶ Aε) (e : Aε ⟶ A₀) (hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hi : (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).IsHomLift g i) :
↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(deformationCategoryProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
g e hpair i hi) ≃*
Multiplicative (groupCohomology (Rep.of (Representation.linHom ρ₀ ρ₀)) 0)
Deformation.exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismsLinearEquivH0, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/InfinitesimalAutomorphisms.lean, line 659. The attribute's comment: “clause 4: Inf Def_{V,ρ₀} is ALWAYS finite dimensional over k, with no hypothesis whatsoever on Γ. Stated of Inf Def_{V,ρ₀} itself, which is a subgroup of an automorphism group and so is given here the k-vector space structure the claim needs: addition is composition of automorphisms and the clause-3 identification with H⁰(Γ, End_k(V)) is k-linear. Contrast clause 5, where Γ must be finitely generated”.
Stacks 0DVT, the finiteness clause for infinitesimal automorphisms, stated of
Inf Def_{V,ρ₀}itself: the group of infinitesimal automorphisms of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional representation carries ak-vector space structure whose addition is composition of automorphisms, for which the identification of clause 3 withH⁰(Γ, End_k(V))isk-linear, and it is always finite dimensional overk— no hypothesis whatsoever on the groupΓ.
Inf Def_{V,ρ₀}is presented as a subgroup of the automorphism group of a dual-number pushforward (Deformation.infinitesimalAutomorphisms), so it carries nok-module structure to begin with andFiniteDimensional kdoes not even typecheck on it. The structure is therefore produced here, exactly as inStacks 0DVQ's version of the same statement for finite projective modules (Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveModule.exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismsLinearEquivEnd), and it is pinned: addition is composition, which fixes the additive group, and thek-linear equivalence is required to be the group isomorphismDeformation.infinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivH0of clause 3, which fixes the scalar action. Compare Stacks 06JV (1), which puts the same structure on the tangent space at the identity of the automorphism functor of a category cofibered in groupoids satisfying (RS).Finite dimensionality is then
Deformation.finiteDimensional_groupCohomology_zero_linHomtransported along that equivalence. This is in contrast with the tangent space, whose finiteness needsΓto be finitely generated (Deformation.finiteDimensional_tangentSpace_representation).
theorem exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismsLinearEquivH0
(V : Type w) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V)
{A₀ Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).Fiber A₀}
{xε : (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).Fiber Aε}
(g : A₀ ⟶ Aε) (e : Aε ⟶ A₀) (hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hi : (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).IsHomLift g i) :
∃ A : AddCommGroup ↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(deformationCategoryProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
g e hpair i hi),
letI := A
∃ _ : Module k ↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(deformationCategoryProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
g e hpair i hi),
(∀ a b : ↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(deformationCategoryProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
g e hpair i hi), a + b = a * b) ∧
(∃ L : ↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(deformationCategoryProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
g e hpair i hi) ≃ₗ[k]
groupCohomology (Rep.of (Representation.linHom ρ₀ ρ₀)) 0,
∀ a, Multiplicative.ofAdd (L a) =
infinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivH0 (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ g e hpair i hi a) ∧
FiniteDimensional k ↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(deformationCategoryProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
g e hpair i hi)
Deformation.selfExtEquivGroupCohomologyOne, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/SelfExtGroupCohomology.lean, line 74. The attribute's comment: “clause 2: Ext¹_{k[Γ]}(V, V) = H¹(Γ, End_k(V)) for the conjugation action of Γ on End_k(V), over the k[Γ]-module attached to ρ₀ by Rep.equivalenceModuleMonoidAlgebra, which is the module clause 1 states its Ext¹ over. No hypothesis on Γ”.
Stacks 0DVT. The first self-extension group over the group algebra of a finite-dimensional representation
ρ₀ofΓonVis the first group cohomology of the conjugation action ofΓonEnd_k(V):
Ext¹_{k[Γ]}(V, V) = H¹(Γ, End_k(V)).The extension group is taken over the
k[Γ]-module attached toρ₀, which is the module over which the tangent-space clauseDeformation.tangentSpaceEquivSelfExtof the same tag is stated. No hypothesis onΓis needed.
def selfExtEquivGroupCohomologyOne (V : Type w) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) :
Abelian.Ext
((Rep.equivalenceModuleMonoidAlgebra (k := k) (G := Γ)).functor.obj (Rep.of ρ₀))
((Rep.equivalenceModuleMonoidAlgebra (k := k) (G := Γ)).functor.obj (Rep.of ρ₀)) 1 ≃ₗ[k]
(groupCohomology (Rep.of (Representation.linHom ρ₀ ρ₀)) 1 : Type w)
Deformation.tangentSpaceEquivSelfExt, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/TangentSelfExt/Linearity.lean, line 514. The attribute's comment: “clause 1: T Def_{V,ρ₀} = Ext¹_{k[Γ]}(V, V), the tangent space of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional representation ρ₀ is its first self-extension group over the group algebra. The identification of that Ext¹ with H¹(Γ, End_k(V)) is clause 2, Deformation.selfExtEquivGroupCohomologyOne”.
The canonical tangent space of a finite-dimensional representation deformation category is linearly equivalent to its first self-Ext over the group algebra.
public noncomputable def tangentSpaceEquivSelfExt
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ]
(V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) :
let p := deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor p
let M₀ := (Rep.equivalenceModuleMonoidAlgebra (k := k) (G := Γ)).functor.obj
(Rep.of ρ₀)
let E := Abelian.Ext M₀ M₀ 1
Σ' (hpre : Deformation.IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p)
(hS2 : Deformation.SchlessingerConditionS2
(CategoryOfElements.π
(Deformation.isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hpre.cofibered))),
letI : Fact (Deformation.IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p) := ⟨hpre⟩
letI : Fact (Deformation.SchlessingerConditionS2
(CategoryOfElements.π
(Deformation.isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hpre.cofibered))) := ⟨hS2⟩
letI : AddCommGroup
(Deformation.artinianTangentSpace Λ k
(Deformation.isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hpre.cofibered)) :=
Deformation.associatedTangentSpaceAddCommGroupUnlifted 𝓕
letI : Module k
(Deformation.artinianTangentSpace Λ k
(Deformation.isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hpre.cofibered)) :=
Deformation.associatedTangentSpaceModuleUnlifted 𝓕
{ L : Deformation.artinianTangentSpace Λ k
(Deformation.isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hpre.cofibered) ≃ₗ[k] E //
(∀ x : p.Fiber (Deformation.augmentedDualNumbers (Λ := Λ) (k := k)),
∃ (M : ModuleCat (MonoidAlgebra k Γ)) (f : M₀ ⟶ M) (g : M ⟶ M₀)
(hfg : f ≫ g = 0),
(ShortComplex.mk f g hfg).ShortExact ∧
IsAssociatedSelfExtension V ρ₀ x M f g) ∧
(∀ (x : p.Fiber (Deformation.augmentedDualNumbers (Λ := Λ) (k := k)))
(M : ModuleCat (MonoidAlgebra k Γ)) (f : M₀ ⟶ M) (g : M ⟶ M₀)
(hfg : f ≫ g = 0) (hexact : (ShortComplex.mk f g hfg).ShortExact),
IsAssociatedSelfExtension V ρ₀ x M f g →
L (Deformation.classOf 𝓕 hpre.cofibered x) = hexact.extClass) }
Tag 0ET1, a lemma
Tag 0ET1 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_representation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Hull.lean, line 121. The attribute's comment: “representation_hull”.
The functor of isomorphism classes of deformations of a finite-dimensional representation of a finitely generated group over a classical base has a hull: a versal formal object with bijective differential.
theorem exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_representation (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V] [Group.FG Γ] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hΛ : IsClassical Λ k) :
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀)
let hpre := (tangentSpaceEquivSelfExt (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).1
let F := isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hpre.cofibered
∃ ξ : FormalObject (CategoryOfElements.π F),
IsVersal (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered F) ξ ∧
HasBijectiveDifferential (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered F) ξ
Deformation.isProrepresentableULift_isomorphismClasses_representation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Representation/Prorepresentable.lean, line 323. The attribute's comment: “prorepresentability”.
Stacks 0ET1, prorepresentability: the functor of isomorphism classes of deformations of a finite-dimensional representation of a finitely generated group over a classical base is prorepresentable, as soon as the
Γ-equivariant endomorphisms of the representation are exactly the scalars, that isH⁰(Γ, End_k(V)) = k.Prorepresentability is stated in the universe-raised form
Deformation.IsProrepresentableULift, because the values of the functor of isomorphism classes lie in the universe of the objects of the deformation category rather than in the morphism universe of𝒞_Λ. The functor is the one whose hull isDeformation.exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_representation, the other clause of this tag.
public theorem isProrepresentableULift_isomorphismClasses_representation
(V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] [Group.FG Γ]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hΛ : IsClassical Λ k)
(h : ∀ f : IntertwiningMap ρ₀ ρ₀,
∃! a : k, (a • LinearMap.id : Module.End k V) = f.toLinearMap) :
IsProrepresentableULift (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (deformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀))
(isDeformationCategory_deformationCategoryProjection
(Λ := Λ) V ρ₀).predeformation.cofibered)
Sources
Section93.6 Continuous representations#
Section 93.6 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DVU. 4 tags here are carried by 16 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0D3K, an example
Tag 0D3K in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.continuous_representation_iff_continuousSMul, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentations.lean, line 45. The attribute's comment: “continuity_equivalence”.
For a finitely generated module over a semiring, a representation is continuous into the discrete general linear group if and only if the induced action on the discrete module is continuous.
public theorem continuous_representation_iff_continuousSMul
(R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module.Finite R M]
(Γ : Type*) [Group Γ] [TopologicalSpace Γ] [IsTopologicalGroup Γ]
(ρ : Γ →* LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup R M) :
letI : TopologicalSpace (LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup R M) := ⊥
letI : TopologicalSpace M := ⊥
letI : MulAction Γ M := MulAction.compHom M ρ
Continuous ρ ↔ ContinuousSMul Γ M
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.continuousObjects, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsCofibered.lean, line 114. The attribute's comment: “continuous_representation_category”.
The objects of the category of finite projective representations of Stacks 0D3J whose representation is continuous. The category
ℱof Stacks 0D3K is the full subcategory they span.
public def continuousObjects (Λ : Type u) (k : Type w) (Γ : Type*) [CommRing Λ] [Field k]
[Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] [TopologicalSpace Γ] :
ObjectProperty (FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.{u, v, w, m} Λ k Γ)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.continuousProjection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsCofibered.lean, line 152. The attribute's comment: “continuous_representation_category”.
The functor remembering only the coefficient algebra of a continuous finite projective representation.
public def continuousProjection :
(continuousObjects.{u, v, w, m} Λ k Γ).FullSubcategory ⥤
ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, w} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.continuousProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsCofibered.lean, line 175. The attribute's comment: “continuous_representation_category”.
The category of continuous finite projective representations is cofibered in groupoids over the category of Artinian local coefficient algebras: the pushforward of a continuous representation is continuous, and fill-ins are those of the ambient category.
public theorem continuousProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids
(hp : IsCofiberedInGroupoids
(projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ) :
FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.{u, v, w, m} Λ k Γ ⥤
ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, w} Λ k)) :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids (continuousProjection.{u, v, w, m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.continuousSpecialFiber, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsCofibered.lean, line 186. The attribute's comment: “continuous_representation_deformation_category”.
The continuous representation
(V, ρ₀)over the residue fieldk, viewed as the special-fibre object(k, V, ρ₀)of the category of continuous representations.
public noncomputable def continuousSpecialFiber (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
[Module.Finite k V] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V)
(hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀) :
(continuousObjects.{u, w, w, m} Λ k Γ).FullSubcategory
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.continuousDeformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsCofibered.lean, line 195. The attribute's comment: “continuous_representation_deformation_category”.
The category of deformations of a finite-dimensional continuous representation of
Γ.
public abbrev continuousDeformationCategory (V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V]
[Module k V] [Module.Finite k V] (ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V)
(hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.isCofiberedInGroupoids_continuousProjection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsCofiberedUnconditional.lean, line 115. The attribute's comment: “continuous_representation_category: p is cofibred in groupoids”.
The functor
p : ℱ → 𝒞_Λsending a continuous finite projective representation(A, M, ρ)of the topological groupΓto its coefficient algebraAis cofibered in groupoids, for an arbitrary module universe and with no hypothesis on the ambient projection of finite projective representations.
public theorem isCofiberedInGroupoids_continuousProjection :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids (continuousProjection.{u, v, w, m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
Deformation.Examples.isContinuousRepresentation_iff_isContinuous, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsGModule.lean, line 59. The attribute's comment: “continuity_equivalence”.
The footnote of Stacks 0D3K. For a finite module over a commutative ring, a representation of a topological group is continuous into the general linear group with the discrete topology exactly when the module, with the action given by the representation, is an
A-Γ-module in the sense of Stacks 04JP.
public theorem isContinuousRepresentation_iff_isContinuous
{R : Type u} [CommRing R] {Γ : Type v} [Group Γ] [TopologicalSpace Γ]
[IsTopologicalGroup Γ] {M : Type w} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module.Finite R M]
(ρ : Representation R Γ M) :
IsContinuousRepresentation ρ ↔
(Stacks.GroupCohomology.actionOfRepresentation R Γ M ρ).IsContinuous
Tag 0DVV, a lemma
Tag 0DVV in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.satisfiesRS_continuousProjection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsRimSchlessinger.lean, line 167. The attribute's comment: “Rim-Schlessinger condition”.
Continuous finite projective representations of a topological group satisfy the Rim–Schlessinger condition.
public theorem satisfiesRS_continuousProjection {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} {Γ : Type*}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] [TopologicalSpace Γ] :
SatisfiesRS
(continuousProjection.{u, v, w, max v m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.isDeformationCategory_continuousDeformationCategory, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsRimSchlessinger.lean, line 187. The attribute's comment: “deformation category”.
The deformations of a finite-dimensional continuous representation of a topological group form a deformation category.
public theorem isDeformationCategory_continuousDeformationCategory {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w}
{Γ : Type*} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Group Γ] [TopologicalSpace Γ]
(V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀) :
IsDeformationCategory
(objectsOverFunctor
(continuousProjection.{u, w, w, m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
(continuousSpecialFiber (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀))
Tag 0DVW, a lemma
Tag 0DVW in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.continuousInfinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivH0, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsInfinitesimalAutomorphisms.lean, line 304. The attribute's comment: “Inf”.
The infinitesimal automorphisms of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional continuous representation
ρ₀of a topological group are the degree-zero cohomology of the conjugation action on its endomorphisms,H⁰(Γ, End_k(V)).
public noncomputable def continuousInfinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivH0
(V : Type w) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀)
{A₀ Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : (continuousDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).Fiber A₀}
{xε : (continuousDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).Fiber Aε}
(g : A₀ ⟶ Aε) (e : Aε ⟶ A₀) (hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hi : (continuousDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).IsHomLift g i) :
↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(continuousDeformationProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀)
g e hpair i hi) ≃*
Multiplicative (groupCohomology (Rep.of (Representation.linHom ρ₀ ρ₀)) 0)
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.finiteDimensional_continuousInfinitesimalAutomorphisms, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsInfinitesimalAutomorphisms.lean, line 341. The attribute's comment: “Inf is always finite dimensional”.
Stacks 0DVW, the clause that the infinitesimal automorphisms are always finite dimensional: the infinitesimal automorphism group of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional continuous representation
ρ₀carries ak-vector space structure whose addition is composition of automorphisms, and that vector space is finite dimensional.No hypothesis on
Γis needed. The group isH⁰(Γ, End_k(V))bycontinuousInfinitesimalAutomorphismsEquivH0, and degree-zero cohomology is the subspace ofΓ-invariants ofEnd_k(V), which is finite dimensional becauseVis.
public theorem finiteDimensional_continuousInfinitesimalAutomorphisms
(V : Type w) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀)
{A₀ Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : (continuousDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).Fiber A₀}
{xε : (continuousDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).Fiber Aε}
(g : A₀ ⟶ Aε) (e : Aε ⟶ A₀) (hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hi : (continuousDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).IsHomLift g i) :
let G := ↥(infinitesimalAutomorphisms
(continuousDeformationProjection_isCofiberedInGroupoids (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀)
g e hpair i hi)
∃ hA : AddCommGroup G,
letI := hA
∃ hM : Module k G,
letI := hM
(∀ a b : G, a + b = a * b) ∧ FiniteDimensional k G
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.finiteDimensional_continuousTangentSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsInfinitesimalAutomorphisms.lean, line 405. The attribute's comment: “the tangent space is finite dimensional”.
Stacks 0DVW, the tangent clause: for a topologically finitely generated topological group
Γthe tangent space of the deformation category of a finite-dimensional continuous representationρ₀is finite dimensional overk.Topological finite generation enters through a dense finitely generated subgroup
H ≤ Γ. A continuous deformation is locally constant, so anH-equivariant map between two of them isΓ-equivariant: the agreement locus is closed and containsH. Hence restriction of the action toHis fully faithful, so its differential is an injectivek-linear map from the tangent space into the tangent space of the deformation category ofρ₀|_H, and the latter is finite dimensional by Stacks 0DVT.
public theorem finiteDimensional_continuousTangentSpace
(V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀)
(hΓ : ∃ H : Subgroup Γ, Group.FG ↥H ∧ Dense (H : Set Γ)) :
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor (Deformation.objectsOverFunctor
(continuousProjection.{u, w, w, m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
(continuousSpecialFiber (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀))
let hD := isDeformationCategory_continuousDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀
letI : Fact (Deformation.IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p) := ⟨hD.predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (Deformation.SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π
(Deformation.isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered))) :=
⟨Deformation.Artin.schlessingerConditionS2_isomorphismClasses_of_isDeformationCategory
𝓕 hD⟩
FiniteDimensional k (Deformation.artinianTangentSpace Λ k
(Deformation.isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered))
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.tangentSpaceEquivContinuousCohomology, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsTangentSpace.lean, line 814. The attribute's comment: “tangent_space”.
Stacks 0DVW, the tangent clause. For a finite-dimensional continuous representation
ρ₀ : Γ → GL_k(V)of a topological group, the tangent space of the deformation category of Stacks 0D3K — in its naturalk-vector space structure of Stacks 06IH — is the first continuous cohomologyH¹(Γ, End_k(V))of the conjugation action on the endomorphisms ofV.The coefficient module is the dual tensor module
Vᵛ ⊗_k Vof Stacks 0DVE, and the second component of the statement identifies its representation equivariantly withRepresentation.linHom ρ₀ ρ₀, the conjugation action onEnd_k(V), so the cohomology on the right isH¹(Γ, End_k(V)).The proof is the one of Stacks 0DVT:
tangentSpaceEquivContinuousSelfExtidentifies the tangent space withExt¹ofVby itself in continuous discrete modules, and Stacks 0DVE turns thatExt¹into continuous cohomology ofVᵛ ⊗_k V.
def tangentSpaceEquivContinuousCohomology [IsTopologicalGroup Γ]
[HasDerivedCategory.{d} (Stacks.Injectives.ContinuousModule.{w, w, w} k Γ)]
[HasDerivedCategory.{d} (ModuleCat.{w} k)]
(V : Type w) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀) :
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor (continuousDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀)
let hD := isDeformationCategory_continuousDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p) := ⟨hD.predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2
(CategoryOfElements.π
(isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered))) :=
⟨Deformation.Artin.schlessingerConditionS2_isomorphismClasses_of_isDeformationCategory
𝓕 hD⟩
letI := Stacks.ContinuousCohomology.hasExt_continuousModule.{w, w, w} k Γ
let M := continuousModuleOfContinuousRepresentation V ρ₀ hρ₀
letI : Module.Finite k (M.obj.obj.V : Type w) := inferInstanceAs (Module.Finite k V)
letI : Module.Projective k (M.obj.obj.V : Type w) :=
inferInstanceAs (Module.Projective k V)
Σ' _ : artinianTangentSpace Λ k
(isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered) ≃ₗ[k]
(Stacks.ContinuousCohomology.cohomologyFunctor.{d, w, w, w} k Γ 1).obj
(Stacks.ContinuousCohomology.dualTensorContinuousModule k Γ M M),
(Stacks.ContinuousCohomology.rep k Γ
(Stacks.ContinuousCohomology.dualTensorContinuousModule k Γ M M)).Equiv
(Representation.linHom ρ₀ ρ₀)
Tag 0ET2, a lemma
Tag 0ET2 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.exists_hull_continuousIsomorphismClasses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsHull.lean, line 529. The attribute's comment: “the functor has a hull”.
Stacks 0ET2, the hull: the functor of isomorphism classes of deformations of a finite-dimensional continuous representation of a topologically finitely generated group over a classical base has a hull, that is a versal formal object with bijective differential.
Both hypotheses of Stacks 06IZ beyond the Rim–Schlessinger property are discharged: condition (S1) and (S2) come from the deformation-category property of the continuous deformations of
ρ₀, and the finite-dimensionality of the tangent space is the tangent clause of Stacks 0DVW.
public theorem exists_hull_continuousIsomorphismClasses
(V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀)
(hΛ : IsClassical Λ k)
(hΓ : ∃ H : Subgroup Γ, Group.FG ↥H ∧ Dense (H : Set Γ)) :
let 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor (objectsOverFunctor
(continuousProjection.{u, w, w, m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
(continuousSpecialFiber (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀))
let hpre := (isDeformationCategory_continuousDeformationCategory
(Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).predeformation
let F := isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hpre.cofibered
∃ ξ : FormalObject (CategoryOfElements.π F),
IsVersal (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered F) ξ ∧
HasBijectiveDifferential (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered F) ξ
Deformation.Examples.FiniteProjectiveRepresentation.isProrepresentableULift_continuousIsomorphismClasses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/ContinuousRepresentationsHull.lean, line 581. The attribute's comment: “prorepresentability”.
Stacks 0ET2, prorepresentability: the functor of isomorphism classes of deformations of a finite-dimensional continuous representation of a topologically finitely generated group over a classical base is prorepresentable, as soon as the
Γ-equivariant endomorphisms of the representation are exactly the scalars, that isH⁰(Γ, End_k(V)) = k.Prorepresentability is stated in the universe-raised form
Deformation.IsProrepresentableULift, because the values of the functor of isomorphism classes lie in the universe of the objects of the deformation category rather than in the morphism universe of𝒞_Λ.
public theorem isProrepresentableULift_continuousIsomorphismClasses
(V : Type m) [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [Module.Finite k V]
(ρ₀ : Representation k Γ V) (hρ₀ : IsContinuousRepresentation ρ₀)
(hΛ : IsClassical Λ k)
(h : ∀ f : IntertwiningMap ρ₀ ρ₀,
∃! a : k, (a • LinearMap.id : Module.End k V) = f.toLinearMap)
(hΓ : ∃ H : Subgroup Γ, Group.FG ↥H ∧ Dense (H : Set Γ)) :
IsProrepresentableULift (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (objectsOverFunctor
(continuousProjection.{u, w, w, m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Γ := Γ))
(continuousSpecialFiber (Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀)))
(isDeformationCategory_continuousDeformationCategory
(Λ := Λ) V ρ₀ hρ₀).predeformation.cofibered)
Sources
Section93.7 Graded algebras#
Section 93.7 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DVX. 4 tags here are carried by 14 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0D3L, an example
Tag 0D3L in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebras.lean, line 52. The attribute's comment: “graded_algebra_deformation_category: objects”.
A commutative graded algebra, finite projective in every degree, over an object of the category
𝒞_Λof Artinian localΛ-algebras with residue fieldk.
public structure ProjectiveGradedAlgebra (Λ : Type u) (k : Type w)
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.Hom, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebras.lean, line 74. The attribute's comment: “graded_algebra_deformation_category: morphisms”.
A base-change morphism between graded algebras over varying base algebras: a graded ring map, semilinear over a morphism of base algebras, exhibiting the target as an extension of scalars of the source.
public structure Hom {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(X Y : ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.{u, v, w, m} Λ k)
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.instCategory, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebras.lean, line 95. The attribute's comment: “graded_algebra_deformation_category: category structure”.
The category structure on graded algebras over the algebras of
𝒞_Λ.
public instance instCategory {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] :
Category (ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.{u, v, w, m} Λ k)
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebras.lean, line 142. The attribute's comment: “graded_algebra_deformation_category: projection”.
The base-algebra projection.
public def projection {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] :
ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.{u, v, w, m} Λ k ⥤ ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, w} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.specialFiber, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebras.lean, line 151. The attribute's comment: “graded_algebra_deformation_category: special fiber”.
A graded algebra over
kviewed as the distinguished special-fibre object.
public noncomputable def specialFiber {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(P : Type m) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
(grading : ℕ → Submodule k P) [GradedAlgebra grading]
[∀ d, Module.Finite k (grading d)] : ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.{u, w, w, m} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.deformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebras.lean, line 163. The attribute's comment: “graded_algebra_deformation_category”.
Deformations of a fixed graded
k-algebra.
public abbrev deformationCategory {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(P : Type m) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
(grading : ℕ → Submodule k P) [GradedAlgebra grading]
[∀ d, Module.Finite k (grading d)]
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.deformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebras.lean, line 163. The attribute's comment: “graded_algebra_deformation_category: deformation category”.
Deformations of a fixed graded
k-algebra.
public abbrev deformationCategory {Λ : Type u} {k : Type w}
[CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(P : Type m) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
(grading : ℕ → Submodule k P) [GradedAlgebra grading]
[∀ d, Module.Finite k (grading d)]
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebrasCofibered.lean, line 496.
The base-algebra projection of the category of graded algebras, finite projective in each degree, is cofibered in groupoids.
public theorem projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, v, w, max v m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Tag 0DVY, a lemma
Tag 0DVY in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.satisfiesRS_projection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebrasRimSchlessinger.lean, line 881. The attribute's comment: “Rim-Schlessinger condition”.
The category of graded algebras finite projective in each degree satisfies the Rim–Schlessinger condition.
public theorem satisfiesRS_projection
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] :
SatisfiesRS
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, v, w, max v m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebrasRimSchlessinger.lean, line 932. The attribute's comment: “deformation category”.
The deformations of a fixed graded
k-algebra, finite-dimensional in each degree, form a deformation category.
public theorem isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(P : Type (max w m)) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
(grading : ℕ → Submodule k P) [GradedAlgebra grading]
[∀ d, Module.Finite k (grading d)] :
IsDeformationCategory
(objectsOverFunctor
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, w, w, max w m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) P grading))
Tag 0DVZ, a lemma
Tag 0DVZ in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupEquivDegreeZeroDerivations, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebraDerivations.lean, line 837. The attribute's comment: “graded_inf_derivations”.
The infinitesimal automorphism group of the deformation category of a graded algebra is the additive group of degree-preserving derivations.
public noncomputable def infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupEquivDegreeZeroDerivations
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(P : Type (max w m)) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
(grading : ℕ → Submodule k P) [GradedAlgebra grading]
[∀ d, Module.Finite k (grading d)]
{Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : (objectsOverFunctor
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, w, w, max w m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) P grading)).Fiber
(residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)}
{xε : (objectsOverFunctor
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, w, w, max w m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) P grading)).Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k ⟶ Aε)
(e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hi : (objectsOverFunctor
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, w, w, max w m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) P grading)).IsHomLift g i) :
infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory P grading).predeformation
g e hpair i hi ≃*
Multiplicative (degreeZeroDerivations grading)
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.gradedAlgebra_infinitesimalAutomorphisms_finiteDimensional, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebraDerivationsFiniteDimensional.lean, line 114. The attribute's comment: “graded_inf_finite”.
Stacks 0DVZ. The infinitesimal automorphisms of the deformation category of a graded algebra of finite type over a field, with finite-dimensional graded pieces, form a finite-dimensional vector space whose addition is composition of automorphisms.
public theorem gradedAlgebra_infinitesimalAutomorphisms_finiteDimensional
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [IsNoetherianRing Λ]
[Field k] [Algebra Λ k] [Module.Finite Λ k]
(P : Type (max w m)) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
(grading : ℕ → Submodule k P) [GradedAlgebra grading]
[∀ d, Module.Finite k (grading d)] [Algebra.FiniteType k P] :
let p := objectsOverFunctor
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, w, w, max w m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) P grading)
let hp := (isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory (Λ := Λ) P grading).predeformation
∀ {Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : p.Fiber (residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)}
{xε : p.Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k ⟶ Aε)
(e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1) (hi : p.IsHomLift g i),
let G := infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi
∃ hA : AddCommGroup G,
letI := hA
∃ hM : Module k G,
letI := hM
(∀ a b : G, a + b = a * b) ∧ FiniteDimensional k G
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.finiteDimensional_tangentSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebraTangentRecord.lean, line 706. The attribute's comment: “graded_tangent_finite”.
The tangent-space half of Stacks 0DVZ. The tangent space of the deformation category of a graded
k-algebra which is finite-dimensional in each degree and of finite type overkis finite-dimensional.The proof is Stacks' own: choose a weighted graded presentation of
P(GradedAlgebra.exists_weightedGradedPresentation), attach to a lift ofPoverk[V]the class inW ⊗[k] Vof the vector of obstructions of the lifted relations, whereWis the cokernel of the graded Jacobian of the presentation (Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.tangentRecord), and feed that map, its naturality and its injectivity toDeformation.finiteDimensional_artinianTangentSpace_of_natural_injectionthroughfiniteDimensional_tangentSpace_of_gradedJacobian_natural_injection.Wis finite-dimensional because each graded piece ofPis.
theorem finiteDimensional_tangentSpace :
letI p := objectsOverFunctor
(ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.projection.{u, w, w, max w m} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(specialFiber (Λ := Λ) P grading)
letI 𝓕 := BasedCategory.ofFunctor p
letI hD := isDeformationCategory_deformationCategory (Λ := Λ) P grading
letI hS2 := Artin.schlessingerConditionS2_isomorphismClasses_of_isDeformationCategory 𝓕 hD
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory 𝓕.p) := ⟨hD.predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2
(CategoryOfElements.π (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered))) := ⟨hS2⟩
letI T := artinianTangentSpace Λ k (isomorphismClasses 𝓕 hD.predeformation.cofibered)
letI : AddCommGroup T := associatedTangentSpaceAddCommGroupUnlifted 𝓕
letI : Module k T := associatedTangentSpaceModuleUnlifted 𝓕
FiniteDimensional k T
Tag 0ET3, a lemma
Tag 0ET3 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.ProjectiveGradedAlgebra.exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_gradedAlgebra_of_finiteType, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Linear/GradedAlgebraHull.lean, line 219. The attribute's comment: “Def_P of 0D3L: finite-dimensional graded pieces define it, not an extra hypothesis”.
Stacks 0ET3. In Example 0D3L, assume
Pis a finitely generated gradedk-algebra andΛ → kis the classical case (Λa Noetherian complete local ring with residue fieldk). Then the functorA ↦ Ob(Def_P(A))/≅of isomorphism classes has a hull: a versal formal object with bijective differential.The section variable
[∀ d, Module.Finite k (grading d)]is Example 0D3L's standing condition definingDef_P. The source requiresdim_k(P_d) < ∞for alld ≥ 0before it formsx_0 = (k, P)and setsDef_P = F_{x_0}, andspecialFiberrequires the same condition to buildx_0. It is not a hypothesis added to 0ET3. The only hypotheses that 0ET3 adds to Example 0D3L are finite generation, which is[Algebra.FiniteType k P], and the classical case, which ishΛ.The proof applies
exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_gradedAlgebra. Its hypothesis on the tangent space comes fromfiniteDimensional_tangentSpace, the tangent-space clause of Stacks 0DVZ, through the comparison of the two tangent-space models.
public theorem exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_gradedAlgebra_of_finiteType
[Algebra.FiniteType k P] (hΛ : IsClassical Λ k) :
∃ ξ : FormalObject (CategoryOfElements.π (Deformation.isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (deformationProjection (Λ := Λ) P grading))
(isPredeformationCategory_deformationProjection (Λ := Λ) P grading).cofibered)),
IsVersal (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered (Deformation.isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (deformationProjection (Λ := Λ) P grading))
(isPredeformationCategory_deformationProjection (Λ := Λ) P grading).cofibered)) ξ ∧
HasBijectiveDifferential
(categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered (Deformation.isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (deformationProjection (Λ := Λ) P grading))
(isPredeformationCategory_deformationProjection (Λ := Λ) P grading).cofibered))
ξ
Sources
Section93.8 Rings#
Section 93.8 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DY0. 11 tags here are carried by 17 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier) and 5 registered declarations, quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0DY1, an example
Tag 0DY1 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.ringDeformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Rings.lean, line 182. The attribute's comment: “ring_deformation_category”.
The category of deformations of the
k-algebraP: flat algebras over Artinian local bases equipped with a base-change map to(k, P).
abbrev ringDeformationCategory (P : Type w) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
Deformation.Examples.flatAlgebraCategory_projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Rings.lean, line 189. The attribute's comment: “flat_algebra_category_cofibered”.
Base change makes the projection from flat algebras to their Artinian bases cofibered in groupoids.
theorem flatAlgebraCategory_projection_isCofiberedInGroupoids
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids (FlatAlgebraCategory.projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Declarations registered for the tag:
FlatAlgebraCategoryregistered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Rings.lean, line 271 (StacksFrontier): “flat_algebra_category”.FlatAlgebraCategory.Homregistered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Rings.lean, line 272 (StacksFrontier): “flat_algebra_category”.FlatAlgebraCategory.instCategoryregistered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Rings.lean, line 273 (StacksFrontier): “flat_algebra_category”.FlatAlgebraCategory.projectionregistered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Rings.lean, line 274 (StacksFrontier): “flat_algebra_category”.residueFieldAlgebra, declared in the repository, registered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Rings.lean, line 275 (StacksFrontier): “flat_algebra_category”.
Tag 0DY2, a lemma
Tag 0DY2 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.flatAlgebraCategory_projection_satisfiesRS, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/RimSchlessinger/FibreProduct/Deformations.lean, line 348. The attribute's comment: “Rim–Schlessinger condition”.
Flat algebras over Artinian local bases satisfy the Rim–Schlessinger condition.
theorem flatAlgebraCategory_projection_satisfiesRS
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] :
SatisfiesRS (FlatAlgebraCategory.projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Deformation.Examples.ringDeformationCategory_isDeformationCategory, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/RimSchlessinger/FibreProduct/Deformations.lean, line 357. The attribute's comment: “deformation category”.
Deformations of any
k-algebra form a deformation category.
theorem ringDeformationCategory_isDeformationCategory
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(P : Type w) [CommRing P] [Algebra k P] :
IsDeformationCategory
(objectsOverFunctor (FlatAlgebraCategory.projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(residueFieldAlgebra (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P))
Tag 0DY3, a lemma
Tag 0DY3 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupMulEquivDerivation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/RingsInfinitesimalAutomorphisms.lean, line 399. The attribute's comment: “infinitesimal automorphisms”. References: SGA 1 III (6.1), “special case”; SGA 3 VIIA (1.5), “partial”.
Stacks 0DY3. The infinitesimal automorphisms of the deformation category of a commutative
k-algebraPare thek-derivations ofPinto itself.The statement also records the coordinates in which this holds: for any point
xεof the deformation category over the dual numbers and any liftiof the constant inclusion, there is a ring isomorphismcof the flat algebra ofxεwithP[ε]compatible with the reduction toPand carrying the lift to the constant inclusion, and the derivation attached to an infinitesimal automorphism is theε-coefficient of its value on a constant. The scalar action ofkon the derivations is reflected by the existence of a unique rescaled infinitesimal automorphism.
public theorem exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupMulEquivDerivation
{Λ : Type u} {k P : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
[CommRing P] [Algebra k P] :
∃ hp : IsPredeformationCategory (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P),
∀ {Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P).Fiber (residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)}
{xε : (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P).Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k ⟶ Aε)
(e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1) (hi : (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P).IsHomLift g i),
∃ c : xε.1.left.fiber ≃+* DualNumber P,
(∀ y : xε.1.left.fiber, (c y).fst = xε.1.hom.map y) ∧
(∀ y : x₀.1.left.fiber,
c (i.left.map y) = TrivSqZeroExt.inl (x₀.1.hom.map y)) ∧
∃ E : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi ≃*
Multiplicative (Derivation k P P),
(∀ (a : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi) (y : P),
(c (a.val.asIso.hom.val.left.map (c.symm (TrivSqZeroExt.inl y)))).snd =
(Multiplicative.toAdd (E a)) y) ∧
(∀ (s : k) (a : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi),
∃! b : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi,
∀ y : P,
(c (b.val.asIso.hom.val.left.map (c.symm (TrivSqZeroExt.inl y)))).snd =
s • (c (a.val.asIso.hom.val.left.map
(c.symm (TrivSqZeroExt.inl y)))).snd)
Deformation.Examples.ringDeformationTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtOne, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/RingsTangentSpaceEquivTangent.lean, line 285. The attribute's comment: “the tangent space”. References: SGA 7 VI (4.16), “(b), special case”.
Stacks 0DY3, the tangent space. Let
kbe a field andPak-algebra. The tangent space of the deformation category ofPof Stacks 0DY1, with the canonicalk-vector-space structure of Stacks 06IH, isExt¹_P(NL_{P/k}, P):
T𝓓_P = Ext¹_P(NL_{P/k}, P).The identification is the family of extension classes
Deformation.Examples.tangentExtClass, which sends an isomorphism class of first-order flat deformations ofPoverk ⊕ Vto the class of Stacks 0GPT of the square-zero extension ofPbyP ⊗[k] Vit determines. That family is natural inV, injective byDeformation.Examples.tangentExtClass_injectiveand surjective byDeformation.Examples.surjective_tangentExtClass, soDeformation.tangentSpaceLinearEquivOfNaturalBijectionturns it into ak-linear equivalence atV = k, andDeformation.Examples.naiveCotangentExtOneTensorFunctorObjRankOnereplaces the coefficientsP ⊗[k] kbyP.The infinitesimal-automorphism clause
Inf(𝓓_P) = Der_k(P, P)of the same tag isDeformation.Examples.exists_infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupMulEquivDerivation; the two declarations together cover the tag.
public def ringDeformationTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtOne :
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P).p) :=
⟨(ringDeformationCategory_isDeformationCategory P).predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π
(isomorphismClasses (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection))) :=
⟨schlessingerConditionS2_ringDeformation Λ k P⟩
artinianTangentSpace Λ k
(isomorphismClasses (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection)
≃ₗ[k] naiveCotangentExtOne k P P
Deformation.Examples.ringDeformationTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtOne_apply, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/RingsTangentSpaceEquivTangent.lean, line 319. The attribute's comment: “the tangent space”.
The identification of Stacks 0DY3 is the classification of Stacks 0GPT. On the isomorphism class of a point of the fibre over the square-zero extension
k ⊕ kof Stacks 06IB, the tangent-space identification is the class inExt¹_P(NL_{P/k}, P ⊗[k] k)of the square-zero extension ofPthe point determines, read throughP ⊗[k] k ≅ P.This pins the identification down: no content is left in the transport of the vector-space structure of Stacks 06IH.
public theorem ringDeformationTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtOne_apply
(z : (associatedTangentSpaceSetFunctor (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection).obj (FGModuleCat.of k k)) :
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P).p) :=
⟨(ringDeformationCategory_isDeformationCategory P).predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π
(isomorphismClasses (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection))) :=
⟨schlessingerConditionS2_ringDeformation Λ k P⟩
ringDeformationTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtOne Λ k P z
= naiveCotangentExtOneTensorFunctorObjRankOne k P
(tangentExtClass (FGModuleCat.of k k) z)
Tag 0DZL, a lemma
Tag 0DZL in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.existsUnique_ringDeformationClass_artinianDualNumbers_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/RingsSmooth.lean, line 701.
Stacks 0DZL. For a smooth algebra
Pover a fieldk, the tangent space of the deformation category ofPis zero: the flat deformations ofPover the dual numbers form a single isomorphism class.
public theorem existsUnique_ringDeformationClass_artinianDualNumbers_of_smooth
[Algebra.Smooth k P] :
∃ x : Quotient (isIsomorphicSetoid
((objectsOverFunctor (FlatAlgebraCategory.projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
(residueFieldAlgebra (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P)).Fiber
(artinianDualNumbers.{u, w, w} Λ k))),
∀ y, y = x
Tag 0DY4, a lemma
Tag 0DY4 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.finiteDimensional_naiveCotangentExtOne, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/RingsTangentSpaceFinite.lean, line 524. The attribute's comment: “part (2) for the Ext group”. References: SGA 7 VI (4.14), “more general”.
Stacks 0DY4(2) for the Ext module. Let
kbe a field andPak-algebra of finite type which is smooth overkoutside a finite set of primes. Then the first Ext moduleExt¹_P(NL_{P/k}, P)of the naive cotangent complex is finite-dimensional overk, for anyk-module structure on it compatible with theP-action. Through the identification of that Ext module with the tangent spaceT𝓓_Pof the deformation category ofP, which is Tag 0DY3, this is the finite-dimensionality of the tangent space.
theorem finiteDimensional_naiveCotangentExtOne (k P : Type w) [Field k] [CommRing P]
[Algebra k P] [Algebra.FiniteType k P]
[Module k (Stacks.Deformation.naiveCotangentExtOne k P P)]
[IsScalarTower k P (Stacks.Deformation.naiveCotangentExtOne k P P)]
(hfinite : {q : PrimeSpectrum P | ¬ Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal}.Finite) :
FiniteDimensional k (Stacks.Deformation.naiveCotangentExtOne k P P)
Algebra.finiteDimensional_derivation_iff_ringKrullDim_le_zero, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/RingTheory/Derivation/FiniteDimensional.lean, line 250. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”.
Stacks 0DY4(1). For a
k-algebraPof finite type over a field, thek-derivations ofPinto itself are a finite-dimensionalk-vector space if and only ifPhas Krull dimension at most zero. Through Tag 0DY3 this is the finite-dimensionality criterion for the infinitesimal automorphisms of the deformation category ofP.
theorem finiteDimensional_derivation_iff_ringKrullDim_le_zero
(k : Type u) (P : Type v) [Field k] [CommRing P] [Algebra k P]
[Algebra.FiniteType k P] :
FiniteDimensional k (Derivation k P P) ↔ ringKrullDim P ≤ 0
Tag 0ET4, a lemma
Tag 0ET4 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_ringDeformation_of_finiteType, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/RingsHull.lean, line 172.
Let
Λ → kbe a classical base, letPbe ak-algebra of finite type, and supposeSpec(P) → Spec(k)is smooth except at a finite number of points. Then the functor of fibrewise isomorphism classes of deformations ofPhas a hull: a versal formal object with bijective differential.
public theorem exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_ringDeformation_of_finiteType
[Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(hsmooth : {q : PrimeSpectrum P | ¬ Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal}.Finite)
(hΛ : IsClassical Λ k) :
∃ ξ : FormalObject (CategoryOfElements.π (Deformation.isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P))
(isPredeformationCategory_ringDeformationProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P).cofibered)),
IsVersal (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered (Deformation.isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P))
(isPredeformationCategory_ringDeformationProjection
(Λ := Λ) (k := k) P).cofibered)) ξ ∧
HasBijectiveDifferential
(categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered (Deformation.isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P))
(isPredeformationCategory_ringDeformationProjection
(Λ := Λ) (k := k) P).cofibered))
ξ
Tag 0DYS, a lemma
Tag 0DYS in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.localizationFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Localization.lean, line 446.
Localization at
Sgives a natural functor from deformations ofPto deformations ofS⁻¹P, with the canonical localization map on every flat algebra.
noncomputable def localizationFunctor (S : Submonoid P) :
LocalizationFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S
Tag 0DYT, a lemma
Tag 0DYT in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.henselizationFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Henselization.lean, line 527.
Stacks 0DYT. For a
k-algebraPand an idealJ ⊆ P, henselization along the inverse image ofJis a functor from the deformation category ofPto that of the henselization of the pair(P, J), over the category𝒞_Λof Artinian local bases.
noncomputable def henselizationFunctor :
HenselizationFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (P := P) J
Tag 0DYU, a lemma
Tag 0DYU in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.strictHenselizationFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/StrictHenselization/Functor.lean, line 780.
Stacks 0DYU. Let
Pbe a localk-algebra and letPˢʰbe a strict henselization ofPwith respect to a separable algebraic closure of its residue field. There is a natural functor from the deformation category ofPto that ofPˢʰ, over the category𝒞_Λof Artinian local bases: strict henselize the flat algebra of each deformation.
noncomputable def strictHenselizationFunctor
(hsh : Stacks.StrictHenselization.IsStrictHenselization P κsep Psh) :
StrictHenselizationFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (P := P) Psh
Tag 0DYV, a lemma
Tag 0DYV in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.adicCompletionFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Completion.lean, line 1069.
The completion functor on deformations, Stacks 0DYV. Completion at the inverse image of
Jis a functor over𝒞_Λtogether with the identification of its fibres with the adic completions; this is one such datum, chosen from the base-compatible ones so thatDeformation.Examples.isBaseCompatible_adicCompletionFunctorholds of it.
public noncomputable def adicCompletionFunctor [IsNoetherianRing P] :
AdicCompletionFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P J
Tag 0DY5, a lemma
Tag 0DY5 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.hypersurface_finiteDimensional_infinitesimalAutomorphisms_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/RingsHypersurface.lean, line 67. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”.
Stacks 0DY5(1). Let
kbe a field,na number of variables andfa nonzero formal power series ink[[x_1, …, x_n]]lying in the square of the ideal generated by the variables, and letP = k[[x_1, …, x_n]]/(f). At any dual-number lift of any object of the deformation category ofPover the residue field, the infinitesimal automorphism group carries ak-vector-space structure whose addition is composition and which is carried by the identification of Tag 0DY3 to thek-structure ofDerivation k P P, and that vector space is finite-dimensional if and only ifn = 1.
public theorem hypersurface_finiteDimensional_infinitesimalAutomorphisms_iff
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(n : ℕ) (f : MvPowerSeries (Fin n) k) (hf : f ≠ 0)
(hord : f ∈ (Ideal.span (Set.range
(MvPowerSeries.X : Fin n → MvPowerSeries (Fin n) k))) ^ 2) :
let P := MvPowerSeries (Fin n) k ⧸ Ideal.span {f}
let hp := (ringDeformationCategory_isDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P).predeformation
∀ {Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k}
{x₀ : (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P).Fiber (residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)}
{xε : (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P).Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k ⟶ Aε)
(e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, w, w} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1) (hi : (ringDeformationProjection Λ k P).IsHomLift g i),
let G := infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi
∃ hA : AddCommGroup G,
letI := hA
∃ hM : Module k G,
letI := hM
(∀ a b : G, a + b = a * b) ∧
(∃ E : G ≃* Multiplicative (Derivation k P P), ∀ (s : k) (a : G),
Multiplicative.toAdd (E (s • a)) = s • Multiplicative.toAdd (E a)) ∧
(FiniteDimensional k G ↔ n = 1)
Deformation.Examples.hypersurface_finiteDimensional_tangentSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/RingsHypersurfaceTangentSpaceFinite.lean, line 326. The attribute's comment: “part (2)”.
Stacks 0DY5(2). Let
kbe a field,fa nonzero formal power series ink[[x_1, …, x_n]]lying in the square of the ideal generated by the variables, andP = k[[x_1, …, x_n]]/(f)the formal hypersurface it cuts out. If the Jacobian ideal(f, ∂f/∂x_1, …, ∂f/∂x_n)has radical the ideal generated by the variables, then the tangent spaceT𝓓_Pof the deformation category ofPof Stacks 0DY1 — with the canonicalk-vector-space structure of Stacks 06IH — is finite dimensional overk.The tangent space is
Ext¹_P(NL_{P/k}, P)by the tangent-space clause of Stacks 0DY3, that group is the conormal cokernel of the canonical presentation ofPby Stacks 0GPU, and the cokernel is finite dimensional byDeformation.Examples.finiteDimensional_conormalCokernel_hypersurface.
theorem hypersurface_finiteDimensional_tangentSpace {Λ : Type u} [CommRing Λ] [Algebra Λ k]
(hf : f ≠ 0)
(hord : f ∈ (Ideal.span (Set.range
(MvPowerSeries.X : Fin n → MvPowerSeries (Fin n) k))) ^ 2)
(hjac : (Ideal.span ({f} ∪ Set.range
(fun i : Fin n ↦ MvPowerSeries.pderiv (R := k) i f))).radical =
Ideal.span (Set.range (MvPowerSeries.X : Fin n → MvPowerSeries (Fin n) k))) :
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory
(ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (Hypersurface n f)).p) :=
⟨(ringDeformationCategory_isDeformationCategory (Hypersurface n f)).predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π
(isomorphismClasses (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (Hypersurface n f))
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection))) :=
⟨schlessingerConditionS2_ringDeformation Λ k (Hypersurface n f)⟩
FiniteDimensional k (artinianTangentSpace Λ k
(isomorphismClasses (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (Hypersurface n f))
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection))
Sources
Section93.9 Schemes#
Section 93.9 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DY6. 10 tags here are carried by 40 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0DY7, an example
Tag 0DY7 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.isCofiberedInGroupoids_chart, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeChartEquivalence.lean, line 242. The attribute's comment: “the deformation category of an affine open presented as a spectrum is cofibered in groupoids, transported along Tag 0DYX from the ring side; the clause for a general scheme is not covered”.
The deformation category of an affine open presented as a spectrum is cofibered in groupoids. This has no scheme-side proof in this repository: it is transported from the deformation category of the coordinate ring, which is a deformation category by Tag 0DY2.
theorem isCofiberedInGroupoids_chart :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (U.ι ≫ X.hom)))
Deformation.Examples.FlatSchemeFamily, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 78. The attribute's comment: “flat_scheme_families”.
A scheme flat over the spectrum of an object of
𝒞_Λ.
structure FlatSchemeFamily (Λ : Type u) (k : Type w) [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
Deformation.Examples.FlatSchemeFamily.Hom, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 92. The attribute's comment: “flat_scheme_families”.
A cartesian base-change arrow between flat scheme families.
structure Hom (P Q : FlatSchemeFamily.{u, v, w} Λ k)
Deformation.Examples.FlatSchemeFamily.instCategory, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 103. The attribute's comment: “flat_scheme_families”.
Flat scheme families over objects of
𝒞_Λand their base-change arrows form a category.
instance instCategory : Category (FlatSchemeFamily.{u, v, w} Λ k)
Deformation.Examples.flatSchemeFamilyProjection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 127. The attribute's comment: “flat_scheme_families”.
The canonical functor sending a flat scheme family to its object of
𝒞_Λ.
def flatSchemeFamilyProjection :
FlatSchemeFamily.{u, v, w} Λ k ⥤ ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, w} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.flatSchemeFamilyProjection_cofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 136. The attribute's comment: “cofibred_projection”.
Base change makes the projection from flat scheme families cofibered in groupoids.
theorem flatSchemeFamilyProjection_cofiberedInGroupoids
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type w} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids (flatSchemeFamilyProjection.{u, v, w} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Deformation.Examples.SchemeDeformationCategory, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 209. The attribute's comment: “scheme_deformation_category”. References: SGA 7 VI (1.1(c)).
A flat family over an object of
𝒞_Λtogether with an identification of its fibre over the closed point with a fixed scheme overk. The identification is recorded as a cartesian square.
structure SchemeDeformationCategory (X : Over (Spec (.of k)))
Deformation.Examples.SchemeDeformationCategory.Hom, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 228. The attribute's comment: “scheme_deformation_category”.
A cartesian arrow of deformations: contravariant on the schemes, covariant on the objects of
𝒞_Λ, and compatible with the two identifications of the fibre over the closed point.
structure Hom {X : Over (Spec (.of k))}
(P Q : SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X)
Deformation.Examples.SchemeDeformationCategory.instCategory, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 241. The attribute's comment: “scheme_deformation_category”. References: SGA 7 VI (1.1(c)).
Deformations of a fixed scheme over
kform a category.
instance instCategory (X : Over (Spec (.of k))) :
Category (SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X)
Deformation.Examples.schemeDeformationCategoryProjection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 269. The attribute's comment: “scheme_deformation_category”.
The canonical projection from the category of deformations of a scheme to
𝒞_Λ.
def schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (X : Over (Spec (.of k))) :
SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X ⥤ ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, u, u} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.schemeDeformationCategoryProjection_cofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesCofibered.lean, line 143. The attribute's comment: “cofibred_projection, for the deformation category of a scheme”. References: SGA 7 VI (1.1(c)), “more general”.
The deformation category of a scheme is cofibered in groupoids. A deformation can be base changed along any morphism of
𝒞_Λ(Deformation.Examples.baseChangeDeformation), and an arrow out of a deformation descends uniquely through that base change, because its component on total spaces is determined by the universal property of the fibre product.This is the lower half of the cofibered condition that
Deformation.full_of_exists_lift_of_isHomLift_idasks of the source-forgetful functor of [Stacks, Tag 0E3X].
theorem schemeDeformationCategoryProjection_cofiberedInGroupoids
(X : Over (Spec (.of k))) :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X)
Deformation.Examples.isFirstOrderThickening_specialMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpecialFibreFirstOrder.lean, line 117. The attribute's comment: “the special-fibre immersion of a deformation over the dual numbers is a first-order thickening”.
The special-fibre immersion of a first-order deformation of a scheme is a first-order thickening. It is a closed immersion by
Deformation.Examples.deformationSpecialMap_isClosedImmersion, being a base change of the closed point, and its ideal sheaf is square-zero because the maximal ideal of the base object is, byDeformation.Examples.maximalIdeal_sq_eq_bot_of_dualNumberEquiv.This is the hypothesis
i.ker ^ 2 = ⊥of [Stacks Project, Tag 0CK2], discharged for the deformations over the dual numbers to which [Stacks Project, Tag 0E3V] applies it.
theorem isFirstOrderThickening_specialMap {X : Over (Spec (CommRingCat.of k))}
(P : SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X)
(coordinate : P.base ≃ₐ[Λ] DualNumber k) :
Stacks.Thickenings.IsFirstOrderThickening P.specialMap
Tag 0DY8, a lemma
Tag 0DY8 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesDeformationCategory.lean, line 241. The attribute's comment: “the clause that the deformation category of a fixed scheme over k is a deformation category, unconditionally; condition (RS) for the category of all flat scheme families of Example 0DY7 is Deformation.Examples.satisfiesRS_flatSchemeFamilyProjection”. References: SGA 7 VI (1.1(c)), “more general”.
The deformation category of a fixed scheme
Xover the residue field is a deformation category: a predeformation category satisfying (RS).
theorem isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection
(X : Over (Spec (.of k))) :
IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection.{u} (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X)
Deformation.Examples.satisfiesRS_flatSchemeFamilyProjection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesRimSchlessingerSquares.lean, line 48. The attribute's comment: “condition (RS) for the category of flat scheme families of Example 0DY7, unconditionally. The two gluing clauses it rests on are the last assertion of Tag 07RV and the equivalence assertion of the closing paragraph of Tag 07RX, both proved in this repository: Stacks.Pushout.isPullback_of_isPushout_glued and Stacks.Pushout.isPushout_restrictions_of_flat. The pushout of spectra, the existence of the glued family, its flatness and both halves of the universal property are proved as well. The clause that the deformation category of a fixed scheme over k is a deformation category is Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection”.
The category of flat families of schemes over
𝒞_Λsatisfies the Rim-Schlessinger condition (RS).
theorem satisfiesRS_flatSchemeFamilyProjection :
SatisfiesRS (flatSchemeFamilyProjection.{u, v, w} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Tag 0DY9, a lemma
Tag 0DY9 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupTrivialDeformationChain, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesInfinitesimalAutomorphismsTrivial.lean, line 168. The attribute's comment: “first display: for a scheme X over the field k, Inf(Def_X) = Ext^0(NL_{X/k}, O_X) = Hom(Omega_{X/k}, O_X) = Der_k(O_X, O_X), as three identifications: Inf(Def_X) is the library's infinitesimal automorphism group of the deformation category of X at the trivial deformation X x_k Spec k[eps], and is isomorphic as a group to Der_k(O_X, O_X); Ext^0 out of the naive cotangent complex is additively Hom(Omega_{X/k}, O_X); and Hom(Omega_{X/k}, O_X) is k-linearly Der_k(O_X, O_X). The second display, T Def_X = Ext^1(NL_{X/k}, O_X), is registered separately”. References: SGA 1 III (6.1), “special case”; SGA 3 VIIA (2.5), “first component”; SGA 3 VIIA (6.4.3), “special case”; SGA 7 VI (4.16), “special case”.
The first display of [Stacks Project, Tag 0DY9]. For a scheme
Xover the fieldk,
Inf(𝓓_X) = Ext⁰_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Hom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Der_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X),given as the three identifications of those four groups.
Inf(𝓓_X)is the library's infinitesimal automorphism groupDeformation.infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupof the deformation category ofX, which is a predeformation category by [Stacks Project, Tag 0DY8], formed at its canonical data: the pointXoverk, its pushforward the trivial deformationX ×_{Spec k} Spec k[ε], and the pairk → k[ε] → k. That is, the automorphisms of the trivial deformation that are the identity moduloε.
- The first identification is an isomorphism of groups: composition of such automorphisms corresponds to addition of derivations (
Deformation.Examples.infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupMulEquivDerivations, at the coordinateDeformation.Examples.artinianDualNumbersCoordinateof the dual-number object).- The second is
AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.naiveCotangentExtZeroAddEquiv:Ext⁰out of the naive cotangent complexNL_{X/k}of the structure morphism ofXis theHomout of its degree0cohomology sheaf, which isΩ_{X/k}by [Stacks Project, Tag 0D0J].- The third is
k-linear:Hom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X)carries thek-structure of sheaves of modules on a scheme overk(AlgebraicGeometry.modulesLinear), and the derivations of𝒪_Xoverkwith values in𝒪_Xthe one ofDeformation.Examples.schemeMorphismDerivationsModule; it is corepresentability of relative derivations (Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismDerivationsLinearEquiv) read through the comparisonAlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Hom.cotangentSheafIsoof the two constructions of the sheaf of relative differentials.
Der_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X)is writtenschemeMorphismDerivations (𝟙 X.left) X.hom, the derivations of𝒪_Xoverkwith values in the pushforward of𝒪_Xalong the identity ofX, which is𝒪_Xitself (Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismPushforwardStructureSheaf_id, byrfl).
def infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupTrivialDeformationChain (X : Over (Spec (CommRingCat.of k))) :
(infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) X).predeformation
(x₀ := residueTrivialFiberObj X) (xε := dualNumbersTrivialFiberObj X)
dualNumbersInclusion.{u, u, u}
(residueMorphism.{u, u, u} (artinianDualNumbers.{u, u, u} Λ k))
isCanonicalDualNumberPair_dualNumbersInclusion.{u, u, u}
(dualNumbersTrivialDeformationHom X) (dualNumbersTrivialDeformationHom_isHomLift X)
≃* Multiplicative (schemeMorphismDerivations (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (𝟙 X.left) X.hom))
× (Scheme.naiveCotangentExt X.hom (structureSheafModules X.left) 0
≃+ (Scheme.Hom.relativeDifferentials X.hom ⟶ structureSheafModules X.left))
× (letI : Module k (Scheme.Hom.relativeDifferentials X.hom ⟶ structureSheafModules X.left) :=
(modulesLinear k (Over.mk X.hom)).homModule _ _;
letI := schemeMorphismDerivationsModule (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (𝟙 X.left) X.hom
(structureSheafModules X.left);
((Scheme.Hom.relativeDifferentials X.hom ⟶ structureSheafModules X.left) ≃ₗ[k]
schemeMorphismDerivations (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (𝟙 X.left) X.hom))
Deformation.Examples.schemeTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt.lean, line 251. The attribute's comment: “second display: for a scheme X over the field k, T Def_X = Ext^1(NL_{X/k}, O_X) as k-vector spaces, from the tangent space of the deformation category of X (isomorphism classes of flat deformations of X over k[eps], with the canonical vector space structure of 06IH) onto Ext^1_{O_X}(NL_{X/k}, O_X); a deformation goes to its 08UC difference class with the trivial deformation X x_k Spec k[eps], which goes to 0. The first display, Inf(Def_X) = Ext^0(NL_{X/k}, O_X) = Der_k(O_X, O_X), is registered separately”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0DY9, second display. For a scheme
Xover the fieldk,
T𝓓_X = Ext¹_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X)as
k-vector spaces.
T𝓓_Xis the tangent space of the deformation category ofXof [Stacks Project, Tag 0DY7]: the value at the dual numbersk[ε]of its functor of isomorphism classes ([Stacks Project, Tag 06SR]), the set of isomorphism classes of flat deformations ofXoverk[ε], with the canonicalk-vector space structure of [Stacks Project, Tag 06IH].Ext¹_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X)isAlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.naiveCotangentExtof the structure morphism ofXwith coefficients𝒪_Xin degree1, ak-vector space through thek-linear structure of𝒪_X-modules.The identification is the source's proof: a flat deformation of
Xoverk[V] = k ⊕ Vis a solution of the deformation problem of [Stacks Project, Tag 08U7] forSpec k ⊂ Spec k[V]with idealf^*𝒥 = 𝒪_X ⊗_k V, and its class is the difference class of [Stacks Project, Tag 08UC] against the trivial deformationX ×_k Spec k[V](Deformation.Examples.tangentExtClassAt). These classes are bijective (Deformation.Examples.bijective_tangentExtClassAt) and natural inV(Deformation.Examples.tangentExtClassAt_naturality), so they arek-linear for the structure of Tag 06IH atV = k, where𝒪_X ⊗_k k = 𝒪_X. The trivial deformation goes to0(Deformation.Examples.schemeTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt_trivial) and the class of a deformation is its difference class (Deformation.Examples.schemeTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt_classOf).
noncomputable def schemeTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt :
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory (schemeDeformationBased (Λ := Λ) X).p) :=
⟨(isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) X).predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π
(isomorphismClasses (schemeDeformationBased (Λ := Λ) X) (schemeDeformation_cofibered X)))) :=
⟨schlessingerConditionS2_schemeDeformation X⟩
letI := schemeTangentExtModule X (structureSheafModules X.left)
schemeTangentSpace (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X ≃ₗ[k]
Scheme.naiveCotangentExt X.hom (structureSheafModules X.left) 1
Tag 0DYA, a lemma
Tag 0DYA in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.finiteDimensional_schemeTangentSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesFiniteDimensional.lean, line 116. The attribute's comment: “the tangent space clause: for X proper over k, T Def_X (isomorphism classes of flat deformations of X over k[eps], with the canonical vector space structure of 06IH) is finite dimensional over k”.
Stacks 0DYA, the tangent space. For a scheme
Xproper over the fieldk, the tangent spaceT𝓓_Xof its deformation category ([Stacks Project, Tag 0DY7]) — the isomorphism classes of flat deformations ofXoverk[ε], with the canonical vector-space structure of [Stacks Project, Tag 06IH] — is finite dimensional overk.By [Stacks Project, Tag 0DY9] it is
Ext¹_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X)(Deformation.Examples.schemeTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtRankOneandDeformation.Examples.schemeTangentExtRankOneLinearEquiv, the identification ofDeformation.Examples.schemeTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtbefore the change of model of the derived category);NL_{X/k}is inD^-_Coh(𝒪_X)by [Stacks Project, Tag 0D0K] (derivedCategoryBMinus_naiveCotangentComplex) and𝒪_XinD^+_Coh(𝒪_X), so theExtgroup is finite dimensional by [Stacks Project, Tag 0D0D].
theorem finiteDimensional_schemeTangentSpace [IsProper X.hom] :
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory (schemeDeformationBased (Λ := Λ) X).p) :=
⟨(isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) X).predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π
(isomorphismClasses (schemeDeformationBased (Λ := Λ) X) (schemeDeformation_cofibered X)))) :=
⟨schlessingerConditionS2_schemeDeformation X⟩
FiniteDimensional k (schemeTangentSpace (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X)
Deformation.Examples.finiteDimensional_localizedAutomorphismFunctorTangent_schemeDeformation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesFiniteDimensional.lean, line 253. The attribute's comment: “the infinitesimal automorphism clause: for X proper over k, Inf(Def_X) is finite dimensional over k, with the vector space structure of 06JV, at every point of the deformation category and every choice of pushforwards”.
Stacks 0DYA, the infinitesimal automorphisms. For a scheme
Xproper over the fieldk, thek-vector spaceInf(𝓓_X)of infinitesimal automorphisms of its deformation category ([Stacks Project, Tag 0DY7]) is finite dimensional.Inf(𝓓_X)is the tangent space at the identity of the automorphism functor of a pointx₀of the deformation category, with the vector-space structure of [Stacks Project, Tag 06JV] (addition is composition, the scalar action is transport alongε ↦ cε); this holds at every pointx₀and every choicePof pushforwards, in particular at the trivial deformationXoverk.The proof is the source's:
Inf(𝓓_X)embedsk-linearly inDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X)(infinitesimalAutomorphismDerivationLinearMap, injective byinjective_infinitesimalAutomorphismDerivationLinearMap), the identification of [Stacks Project, Tag 0DY9], andDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X) = Hom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X)is finite dimensional by [Stacks Project, Tag 0D0D].
theorem finiteDimensional_localizedAutomorphismFunctorTangent_schemeDeformation [IsProper X.hom]
{x₀ : SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X}
(P : ChosenPushforwardsAt (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X) x₀) :
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup P
(isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) X).satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule P
(isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) X).satisfiesRS
FiniteDimensional k (localizedAutomorphismFunctorTangent P)
Tag 0ET5, a lemma
Tag 0ET5 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_scheme, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesHull.lean, line 95. The attribute's comment: “the hull: for X proper over k and Λ a complete local ring with residue field k, the functor A ↦ Ob(Def_X(A))/≅ of isomorphism classes of deformations of X has a hull”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0ET5, the hull. Let
Xbe a proper scheme over the fieldkand letΛbe a Noetherian complete local ring with residue fieldk(the classical case). Then the functorF : 𝒞_Λ → Sets, A ↦ Ob(Def_X(A))/≅of isomorphism classes of deformations ofXhas a hull: a versal formal object ofFwhose differential is bijective.
Def_Xis a deformation category by Stacks 0DY8 and its tangent space is finite dimensional by Stacks 0DYA (Deformation.Examples.finiteDimensional_schemeTangentSpace), so Stacks 06J7 and 06IZ give the hull.
theorem exists_hull_isomorphismClasses_scheme (hΛ : IsClassical Λ k)
(X : Over (Spec (CommRingCat.of k))) [IsProper X.hom] :
let F := isomorphismClasses (schemeDeformationBased (Λ := Λ) X) (schemeDeformation_cofibered X)
∃ ξ : FormalObject (CategoryOfElements.π F),
IsHull (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered F) ξ
Deformation.Examples.isProrepresentableULift_isomorphismClasses_scheme, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesHull.lean, line 118. The attribute's comment: “prorepresentability: for X proper over k and Λ a complete local ring with residue field k, if Der_k(O_X, O_X) = 0 then the functor A ↦ Ob(Def_X(A))/≅ is prorepresentable”. References: SGA 7 X (2.27), “more general”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0ET5, prorepresentability. Let
Xbe a proper scheme over the fieldkand letΛbe a Noetherian complete local ring with residue fieldk. IfDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X) = 0, then the functorF : 𝒞_Λ → Sets, A ↦ Ob(Def_X(A))/≅is prorepresentable.By the first display of Stacks 0DY9,
Inf(Def_X) = Der_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X)vanishes (Deformation.Examples.infinitesimalAutomorphisms_schemeDeformation_eq_bot), soDef_XandFare equivalent (Stacks 06K0) andFis a deformation functor with finite-dimensional tangent space (Stacks 0DYA); Schlessinger's theorem, Stacks 06JM, applies. Prorepresentability is stated in the universe-raised formDeformation.IsProrepresentableULift, the values ofFlying one universe above the morphisms of𝒞_Λ.
theorem isProrepresentableULift_isomorphismClasses_scheme (hΛ : IsClassical Λ k)
(X : Over (Spec (CommRingCat.of k))) [IsProper X.hom]
(hDer : ∀ D : schemeMorphismDerivations (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (𝟙 X.left) X.hom, D = 0) :
IsProrepresentableULift
(isomorphismClasses (schemeDeformationBased (Λ := Λ) X) (schemeDeformation_cofibered X))
Tag 0DYW, a lemma
Tag 0DYW in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.openRestrictionFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/OpenSubschemes.lean, line 263. References: SGA 7 VI (4.1(d)).
Stacks 0DYW. Let
Xbe a scheme overkandU ⊆ Xan open subscheme. Restricting a deformation ofXto the open corresponding toUis a functor from the deformation category ofXto that ofU, over the category𝒞_Λof Artinian localΛ-algebras.
def openRestrictionFunctor (X : Over (Spec (.of k))) (U : X.left.Opens) :
BasedFunctor
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X))
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (U.ι ≫ X.hom))))
Tag 0DYX, a lemma
Tag 0DYX in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.chartEquivalenceOver, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeChartEquivalence.lean, line 212. The attribute's comment: “for an affine open presented as a spectrum by an isomorphism over Spec k, which is the form Situation 0DYY provides”.
Stacks 0DYX for an affine open presented as a spectrum. The deformation category of an open
UofXwhich is presented asSpec PoverSpec kis equivalent, over𝒞_Λ, to the deformation category of thek-algebraP: transport the deformations along the presentation and then take global sections.
def chartEquivalenceOver :
StacksRepresentableCFG.EquivalenceOver
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (U.ι ≫ X.hom)))
(Over.forget (residueFieldAlgebra (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P) ⋙
FlatAlgebraCategory.projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Deformation.Examples.SchemeRingDeformation.sectionsFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeRingDeformation.lean, line 257. The attribute's comment: “the functor sending (A, Y) to the global sections of Y”.
Stacks 0DYX. Global sections as a functor from deformations of
Spec Pto deformations ofP.
def sectionsFunctor :
SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (specOver k P) ⥤
ringDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P
Deformation.Examples.SchemeRingDeformation.equivalenceOver, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeRingDeformation.lean, line 483. The attribute's comment: “the equivalence Def_(Spec P) = Def_P; 06AD is isAffine_of_isThickening”. References: SGA 7 VI (4.1(b)).
Stacks 0DYX. For a
k-algebraP, global sections are an equivalence from the deformation category of the affine schemeSpec Pto the deformation category ofP, over the category of Artinian localΛ-algebras with residue fieldk.
def equivalenceOver :
StacksRepresentableCFG.EquivalenceOver
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (specOver k P))
(Over.forget (residueFieldAlgebra (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P) ⋙
FlatAlgebraCategory.projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Tag 0DZM, a lemma
Tag 0DZM in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.localRingDeformationFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Examples/Deformations/Schemes/LocalRing.lean, line 286. The attribute's comment: “the functor”.
Stacks 0DZM. Taking the local ring at a point of a scheme defines a functor of deformation categories over the category of Artinian local algebras.
noncomputable def localRingDeformationFunctor
{Λ k : Type u} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(X : Over (Spec (.of k))) (x : X.left) :
letI : Algebra k (X.left.presheaf.stalk x) :=
letI : Algebra k ((Spec (.of k)).presheaf.stalk (X.hom.base x)) :=
StructureSheaf.stalkAlgebra k (X.hom.base x)
((X.hom.stalkMap x).hom.comp (algebraMap k _)).toAlgebra
BasedFunctor
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X))
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(Over.forget
(residueFieldAlgebra (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (X.left.presheaf.stalk x)) ⋙
FlatAlgebraCategory.projection (Λ := Λ) (k := k)))
Deformation.Examples.localRingDeformationFunctor_fiber, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Examples/Deformations/Schemes/LocalRing.lean, line 316. The attribute's comment: “fibers”.
Stacks 0DZM. The underlying algebra of the image deformation is the stalk of the deformed scheme at the image of the chosen point.
theorem localRingDeformationFunctor_fiber
{Λ k : Type u} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(X : Over (Spec (.of k))) (x : X.left)
(P : SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X) :
letI : Algebra k (X.left.presheaf.stalk x) :=
letI : Algebra k ((Spec (.of k)).presheaf.stalk (X.hom.base x)) :=
StructureSheaf.stalkAlgebra k (X.hom.base x)
((X.hom.stalkMap x).hom.comp (algebraMap k _)).toAlgebra
((localRingDeformationFunctor X x).obj P).left.fiber =
P.scheme.presheaf.stalk (P.specialMap.base x)
Deformation.Examples.localRingDeformationFunctor_specialMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Examples/Deformations/Schemes/LocalRing.lean, line 330. The attribute's comment: “special-fiber maps”.
Stacks 0DZM. The special-fibre map of the image is the stalk map of the special-fibre embedding.
theorem localRingDeformationFunctor_specialMap
{Λ k : Type u} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(X : Over (Spec (.of k))) (x : X.left)
(P : SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X) :
letI : Algebra k (X.left.presheaf.stalk x) :=
letI : Algebra k ((Spec (.of k)).presheaf.stalk (X.hom.base x)) :=
StructureSheaf.stalkAlgebra k (X.hom.base x)
((X.hom.stalkMap x).hom.comp (algebraMap k _)).toAlgebra
HEq ((localRingDeformationFunctor X x).obj P).hom.map.hom
(P.specialMap.stalkMap x).hom
Deformation.Examples.localRingDeformationFunctor_map, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Examples/Deformations/Schemes/LocalRing.lean, line 344. The attribute's comment: “morphism maps”.
Stacks 0DZM. On morphisms, the induced algebra map is the stalk map of the morphism between the deformed schemes.
theorem localRingDeformationFunctor_map
{Λ k : Type u} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
(X : Over (Spec (.of k))) (x : X.left)
{P Q : SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X} (f : P ⟶ Q) :
letI : Algebra k (X.left.presheaf.stalk x) :=
letI : Algebra k ((Spec (.of k)).presheaf.stalk (X.hom.base x)) :=
StructureSheaf.stalkAlgebra k (X.hom.base x)
((X.hom.stalkMap x).hom.comp (algebraMap k _)).toAlgebra
HEq ((localRingDeformationFunctor X x).map f).left.map.hom
(f.map.stalkMap (Q.specialMap.base x)).hom
Tag 0DYY, a situation
Tag 0DYY in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.GluingSituation, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/Schemes.lean, line 283.
A scheme over
k, covered by two affine opens with affine intersection, together with coordinate rings for the three affine schemes.
structure GluingSituation (Λ k : Type u) [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k]
Tag 0DYZ, a lemma
Tag 0DYZ in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.twoOpenComparisonFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCover.lean, line 492. The attribute's comment: “the comparison functor Def_X ⥤ Def_{U_1} ×_{Def_{U_12}} Def_{U_2} only; it is not shown to be an equivalence (that needs the glueing quasi-inverse of the proof) and the translation into the ring deformation categories Def_{P_i} is not included”.
Let
Xbe a scheme overkwith two opensU₁andU₂. Restricting a deformation ofXtoU₁and toU₂, together with the identification of the two induced deformations ofU₁ ⊓ U₂, is a functor from the deformation category ofXto the 2-fibre productDef_{U₁} ×_{Def_{U₁ ⊓ U₂}} Def_{U₂}over𝒞_Λ.
def twoOpenComparisonFunctor (X : Over (Spec (.of k))) (U₁ U₂ : X.left.Opens) :
SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X ⥤
TwoFibreProductOver
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (U₁.ι ≫ X.hom)))
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (U₂.ι ≫ X.hom)))
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk ((U₁ ⊓ U₂).ι ≫ X.hom)))
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_left : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₁))
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_right : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₂))
Deformation.Examples.twoOpenComparisonFunctor_comp_structureFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCover.lean, line 542. The attribute's comment: “the comparison functor Def_X ⥤ Def_{U_1} ×_{Def_{U_12}} Def_{U_2} is a functor over 𝒞_Λ; it is not shown to be an equivalence and the ring deformation categories Def_{P_i} are not involved”.
The comparison functor of a two-open cover is strictly over
𝒞_Λ.
theorem twoOpenComparisonFunctor_comp_structureFunctor (X : Over (Spec (.of k)))
(U₁ U₂ : X.left.Opens) :
twoOpenComparisonFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X U₁ U₂ ⋙
TwoFibreProductOver.structureFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (U₁.ι ≫ X.hom)))
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (U₂.ι ≫ X.hom)))
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
(Over.mk ((U₁ ⊓ U₂).ι ≫ X.hom)))
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_left : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₁))
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_right : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₂)) =
schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X
Deformation.Examples.GluingSituation.comparisonFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCover.lean, line 559. The attribute's comment: “the comparison functor in Situation 0DYY; it is not shown to be an equivalence and the translation into the ring deformation categories Def_{P_i} is not included”.
The comparison functor of the two-open cover of a glueing situation.
def GluingSituation.comparisonFunctor (S : GluingSituation Λ k) :
SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S.X ⥤
TwoFibreProductOver
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (S.U₁.ι ≫ S.X.hom)))
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk (S.U₂.ι ≫ S.X.hom)))
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k)
(Over.mk ((S.U₁ ⊓ S.U₂).ι ≫ S.X.hom)))
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_left : S.U₁ ⊓ S.U₂ ≤ S.U₁))
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_right : S.U₁ ⊓ S.U₂ ≤ S.U₂))
Deformation.Examples.glueDeformation, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCover.lean, line 1014. The attribute's comment: “the glueing construction of the proof, on objects only: an object of the 2-fibre product Def_{U_1} ×_{Def_{U_12}} Def_{U_2} is glued to a deformation of X over the same object of 𝒞_Λ, flat over it, with special fibre X, and restricting to U_1 and U_2 gives the two charts back. Not shown functorial in the datum, so not yet a quasi-inverse of twoOpenComparisonFunctor; neither the equivalence nor the Def_{P_i} form is proved”.
Let
Xbe a scheme overkcovered by two opensU₁andU₂. An object of the 2-fibre productDef_{U₁} ×_{Def_{U₁ ⊓ U₂}} Def_{U₂}consists of a deformation ofU₁, a deformation ofU₂and an isomorphism of their restrictions toU₁ ⊓ U₂; glueing the two total spaces along that isomorphism gives a deformation ofXover the same object of𝒞_Λ.
def glueDeformation : SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) X
Deformation.Examples.GluingSituation.glueDeformation, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCover.lean, line 1274. The attribute's comment: “the glueing construction of the proof in Situation 0DYY, on objects only; see glueDeformation for the precise content and for what the equivalence still needs”.
In a glueing situation the two affine opens cover the scheme, and an object of the 2-fibre product of their deformation categories is glued to a deformation of the scheme itself.
def GluingSituation.glueDeformation (S : GluingSituation Λ k)
(Q : TwoOpenDeformations (Λ := Λ) S.X S.U₁ S.U₂) :
SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S.X
Deformation.Examples.comparisonGlue_w, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCoverGlue.lean, line 404. The attribute's comment: “the compatibility of the two chart isomorphisms of the glueing with the comparison isomorphism of the datum, i.e. that the two of them are one morphism of the 2-fibre product; the equivalence itself is not proved here”.
The two chart isomorphisms of the glued deformation are compatible with the comparison isomorphism of the datum. This is the
CategoryTheory.TwoFibreProductOver.Hom.wof the pair, that is, what makesDeformation.Examples.restrictGlueDeformationLeftandDeformation.Examples.restrictGlueDeformationRightthe two components of a single morphism of the2-fibre product. The source of Tag 0DYZ says only "we omit the verification".
theorem comparisonGlue_w :
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_left : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₁)).map
(restrictGlueDeformationLeftHom X U₁ U₂ Q hcover) ≫ Q.iso.hom =
(restrictDeformationLEIso (glueDeformation X U₁ U₂ Q hcover)
(inf_le_left : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₁) ≪≫
(restrictDeformationLEIso (glueDeformation X U₁ U₂ Q hcover)
(inf_le_right : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₂)).symm).hom ≫
(openRestrictionLEFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (inf_le_right : U₁ ⊓ U₂ ≤ U₂)).map
(restrictGlueDeformationRightHom X U₁ U₂ Q hcover)
Deformation.Examples.comparisonGlueHom, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCoverGlue.lean, line 453. The attribute's comment: “the comparison morphism from the comparison of the glued deformation to the datum, built from the two chart isomorphisms; it is an isomorphism, but only the morphism is constructed here, and the equivalence of Tag 0DYZ is not proved”.
Stacks 0DYZ, the comparison morphism out of the glueing. The two chart isomorphisms of the glued deformation are the two components of one morphism of the
2-fibre product from the comparison of the glued deformation to the datum it was glued from.
def comparisonGlueHom :
(twoOpenComparisonFunctor (Λ := Λ) X U₁ U₂).obj (glueDeformation X U₁ U₂ Q hcover) ⟶ Q
Deformation.Examples.glueDeformationHom, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCoverGlue.lean, line 779. The attribute's comment: “the glueing construction of the proof on morphisms: a morphism of the 2-fibre product into the comparison of a deformation is glued to a morphism of deformations of X; the equivalence of Tag 0DYZ is not proved here”.
Stacks 0DYZ, the glueing quasi-inverse on morphisms. A morphism of the
2-fibre product from a datumQto the comparison of a deformationPofXglues to a morphism from the deformation glued fromQtoP. The source of Tag 0DYZ says only "we omit the verification".
def glueDeformationHom : glueDeformation X U₁ U₂ Q hcover ⟶ P
Deformation.Examples.twoOpenComparisonFunctor_map_glueDeformationHom, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCoverGlue.lean, line 801. The attribute's comment: “the compatibility of the glued morphism with the comparison morphism out of the glueing; the equivalence of Tag 0DYZ is not proved here”.
The triangle of the lifting problem commutes: the comparison of the glued morphism is the comparison morphism out of the glueing followed by the given morphism.
theorem twoOpenComparisonFunctor_map_glueDeformationHom :
(twoOpenComparisonFunctor (Λ := Λ) X U₁ U₂).map (glueDeformationHom X U₁ U₂ Q hcover P g) =
comparisonGlueHom X U₁ U₂ Q hcover ≫ g
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_twoOpenComparisonBasedFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCoverGlue.lean, line 860. The attribute's comment: “smoothness of the comparison morphism Def_X ⟶ Def_{U_1} ×_{Def_{U_12}} Def_{U_2}, which is what Tag 0DZN consumes; that the comparison morphism is an equivalence — the full assertion of 0DYZ — is not proved, and neither is the translation into the ring deformation categories Def_{P_i}”.
Stacks 0DYZ in the form Tag 0DZN uses it. If the two opens cover
Xthen the comparison morphismDef_X ⟶ Def_{U₁} ×_{Def_{U₁ ⊓ U₂}} Def_{U₂}is smooth: a lifting problem is solved by glueing the datum over the smaller object of𝒞_Λto a deformation ofX, glueing the given morphism to a morphism of deformations ofX, and comparing the glued deformation with the datum by the two chart isomorphisms.
theorem isSmooth_twoOpenComparisonBasedFunctor (hcover : U₁ ⊔ U₂ = ⊤) :
IsSmooth (twoOpenComparisonBasedFunctor (Λ := Λ) X U₁ U₂)
Deformation.Examples.GluingSituation.deformationCategories_equivalence, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemesTwoOpenCoverRings.lean, line 357. The attribute's comment: “Def_X = Def_{P_1} ×_{Def_{P_12}} Def_{P_2} as an equivalence over 𝒞_Λ of deformation categories, with the ring deformation categories of Example 0DY1 and the restriction functors along U_12 ⊆ U_i”.
Stacks 0DYZ. In Situation 0DYY,
Def_XandDef_{P₁} ×_{Def_{P₁₂}} Def_{P₂}are deformation categories, and the comparison functor between them is an equivalence of categories over𝒞_Λ. HereDef_{P_i}is the deformation category of thek-algebraP_iof Example 0DY1,Def_Xthat of the schemeXof Example 0DY7, and the two legs of the 2-fibre product are the restriction functorsDef_{P_i} ⟶ Def_{P₁₂}alongU₁₂ ⊆ U_i.
theorem deformationCategories_equivalence :
IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u} (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S.X) ∧
IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u} (ringChartDeformationsProjection S) ∧
∃ e : EquivalenceOver (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S.X)
(ringChartDeformationsProjection S), e.hom.functor = ringComparisonFunctor S
Sources
Section93.10 Morphisms of Schemes#
Section 93.10 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0E3S. 6 tags here are carried by 24 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0E3T, an example
Tag 0E3T in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.SchemeMorphismFamily, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphisms.lean, line 68. The attribute's comment: “deformation_category_of_a_scheme_morphism”.
A flat family of morphisms of schemes over an object of
𝒞_Λ.
structure SchemeMorphismFamily (Λ : Type u) (k : Type v) [CommRing Λ] [Field k]
[Algebra Λ k]
Deformation.Examples.SchemeMorphismFamily.Hom, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphisms.lean, line 94. The attribute's comment: “deformation_category_of_a_scheme_morphism”.
A cartesian morphism of flat families of morphisms of schemes, directed covariantly on the bases.
structure Hom (P Q : SchemeMorphismFamily.{u, v} Λ k)
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphisms.lean, line 133. The attribute's comment: “deformation_category_of_a_scheme_morphism”.
The functor sending a flat family of morphisms of schemes to its object of
𝒞_Λ.
def schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor :
SchemeMorphismFamily.{u, v} Λ k ⥤ ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, v, v} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismDeformationCategory, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphisms.lean, line 183. The attribute's comment: “deformation_category_of_a_scheme_morphism”.
Deformations of a fixed morphism of schemes over the residue field.
abbrev schemeMorphismDeformationCategory {X Y : Scheme.{v}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(pX : X ⟶ baseSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))
(pY : Y ⟶ baseSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))
(hf : f ≫ pY = pX)
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor_cofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphisms.lean, line 298.
The category of flat families of morphisms of schemes is cofibered in groupoids over
𝒞_Λ.
theorem schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor_cofiberedInGroupoids
{Λ : Type u} {k : Type v} [CommRing Λ] [Field k] [Algebra Λ k] :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids (schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor.{u, v} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Tag 0E3U, a lemma
Tag 0E3U in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategory, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismsRimSchlessinger.lean, line 101. The attribute's comment: “the in-particular assertion only: granting (RS) for Example 0E3T as the hypothesis hRS, the deformation category Def_{X ⟶ Y} of a morphism of schemes X ⟶ Y over k is a deformation category. (RS) for Example 0E3T itself is NOT proved here”.
The second assertion of Stacks Tag 0E3U. Granting the Rim-Schlessinger condition for the category of all flat families of morphisms of schemes over
𝒞_Λ, the deformation category of a fixed morphismX ⟶ Yof schemes over the residue field is a deformation category: a predeformation category satisfying (RS).
theorem isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategory
(hRS : SatisfiesRS (schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor.{u, v} (Λ := Λ) (k := k)))
{X Y : Scheme.{v}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(pX : X ⟶ baseSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))
(pY : Y ⟶ baseSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))
(hf : f ≫ pY = pX) :
IsDeformationCategory (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf)
Deformation.Examples.satisfiesRS_schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismsRimSchlessingerSquares.lean, line 183. The attribute's comment: “condition (RS) for the category of all flat families of morphisms of schemes of Example 0E3T -- the first assertion -- with nothing assumed. The two gluing facts it rests on are the last assertion of Tag 07RV and the equivalence assertion of the closing paragraph of Tag 07RX, both proved in this repository: Stacks.Pushout.isPullback_of_isPushout_glued and Stacks.Pushout.isPushout_restrictions_of_flat. The pushout of spectra, the existence of the glued family, the flatness of its two structure morphisms and both halves of the universal property are proved as well. The in-particular assertion, that the deformation category of a fixed morphism of schemes over k is a deformation category, is Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0E3U, first assertion. The category of flat families of morphisms of schemes over
𝒞_Λof Example 0E3T satisfies the Rim-Schlessinger condition (RS), with no hypothesis.The fibre product of a cospan of families over a surjection of bases is glued twice over the one cocartesian square of spectra that the surjection produces: the sources are glued, the targets are glued, and the morphism between the two glued schemes is the descent of the two given morphisms along the pushout of the sources.
theorem satisfiesRS_schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor :
SatisfiesRS (schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor.{u, v} (Λ := Λ) (k := k))
Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismsRimSchlessingerUnconditional.lean, line 73. The attribute's comment: “the in-particular assertion, with nothing assumed: the deformation category Def_{X ⟶ Y} of a morphism of schemes X ⟶ Y over k is a deformation category, by the localization argument of Tag 06JC. Condition (RS) for the category of all flat families of morphisms of schemes of Example 0E3T -- the first assertion -- is Deformation.Examples.satisfiesRS_schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor, proved by gluing the sources and the targets over one cocartesian square of spectra”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0E3U, second assertion. The deformation category of a fixed morphism
X ⟶ Yof schemes over the residue field is a deformation category: a predeformation category satisfying the Rim-Schlessinger condition (RS), with no hypothesis.This is
Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategorywith its hypothesis supplied byDeformation.Examples.satisfiesRS_schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor.
theorem isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection {X Y : Scheme.{v}}
(f : X ⟶ Y)
(pX : X ⟶ baseSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))
(pY : Y ⟶ baseSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))
(hf : f ≫ pY = pX) :
IsDeformationCategory (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf)
Tag 0E3V, a lemma
Tag 0E3V in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismTargetForgetful, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 124. The attribute's comment: “the target-forgetting functor Def_{X ⟶ Y} ⟶ Def_Y, one half of the morphism of deformation categories Def_{X ⟶ Y} ⟶ Def_X × Def_Y of the source's proof”.
The functor from deformations of a morphism
f : X ⟶ Yof schemes over the residue field to deformations of its targetY, keeping the family that deformsYtogether with its identification of the fibre over the closed point and forgetting the family that deformsX.
def schemeMorphismTargetForgetful :
schemeMorphismDeformationCategory f pX pY hf ⥤
SchemeDeformationCategory (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismTargetForgetful_comp_projection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 163. The attribute's comment: “that the target-forgetting functor is a morphism of deformation categories over the base category”.
The target-forgetful functor commutes with the projections of the two deformation categories to
𝒞_Λ, so it is a morphism of categories over the base category.
theorem schemeMorphismTargetForgetful_comp_projection :
schemeMorphismTargetForgetful f pX pY hf ⋙
schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY) =
schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismSourceBased, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 203. The attribute's comment: “the source component of the morphism Def_{X → Y} → Def_X × Def_Y”.
The source-forgetful functor
Def_{X ⟶ Y} ⟶ Def_X, as a morphism of categories over𝒞_Λ.
def schemeMorphismSourceBased :
BasedCategory.ofFunctor (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf) ⥤ᵇ
BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX))
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismTargetBased, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 213. The attribute's comment: “the target component of the morphism Def_{X → Y} → Def_X × Def_Y”.
The target-forgetful functor
Def_{X ⟶ Y} ⟶ Def_Y, as a morphism of categories over𝒞_Λ.
def schemeMorphismTargetBased :
BasedCategory.ofFunctor (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf) ⥤ᵇ
BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY))
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 227. The attribute's comment: “the arrow Inf(Def_{X → Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y), as the pair of the maps induced on infinitesimal automorphisms by the two endpoint-forgetting 1-morphisms”.
Stacks 0E3V, the arrow
Inf(Def_{X ⟶ Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y): the pair of thek-linear maps on infinitesimal automorphisms induced by the two endpoint-forgetting morphisms of deformation categories.
def schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair
(hM : SatisfiesRS (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
(hX : SatisfiesRS (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX)))
(hY : SatisfiesRS (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)))
{x₀ : schemeMorphismDeformationCategory f pX pY hf}
(PM : ChosenPushforwardsAt (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf) x₀)
(QX : ChosenPushforwardsAt
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX))
((schemeMorphismSourceForgetful f pX pY hf).obj x₀))
(QY : ChosenPushforwardsAt
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY))
((schemeMorphismTargetForgetful f pX pY hf).obj x₀)) :
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup PM hM
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule PM hM
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup QX hX
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule QX hX
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup QY hY
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule QY hY
localizedAutomorphismFunctorTangent PM →ₗ[k]
localizedAutomorphismFunctorTangent QX × localizedAutomorphismFunctorTangent QY
Deformation.Examples.injective_schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 266. The attribute's comment: “exactness at the first spot: the arrow Inf(Def_{X → Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y) is injective”.
Stacks 0E3V, exactness at the first spot. The arrow
Inf(Def_{X ⟶ Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y)is injective, so the sequence0 → Inf(Def_{X ⟶ Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y)is exact: an infinitesimal automorphism of a deformation offis a pair of infinitesimal automorphisms of the two endpoint deformations compatible with the arrow, and such a pair determines it.
theorem injective_schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair
(hM : SatisfiesRS (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
(hX : SatisfiesRS (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX)))
(hY : SatisfiesRS (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)))
{x₀ : schemeMorphismDeformationCategory f pX pY hf}
(PM : ChosenPushforwardsAt (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf) x₀)
(QX : ChosenPushforwardsAt
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX))
((schemeMorphismSourceForgetful f pX pY hf).obj x₀))
(QY : ChosenPushforwardsAt
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY))
((schemeMorphismTargetForgetful f pX pY hf).obj x₀)) :
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup PM hM
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule PM hM
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup QX hX
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule QX hX
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup QY hY
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule QY hY
Function.Injective (schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair f pX pY hf hM hX hY PM QX QY)
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismTangentPair, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 296. The attribute's comment: “the arrow T Def_{X → Y} → T(Def_X × Def_Y), as the pair of the maps induced on tangent modules by the two endpoint-forgetting 1-morphisms”.
Stacks 0E3V, the arrow
T Def_{X ⟶ Y} → T(Def_X × Def_Y): the pair of thek-linear maps on tangent modules induced by the two endpoint-forgetting morphisms of deformation categories.
def schemeMorphismTangentPair
(hM : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
(hX : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX)))
(hY : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)))
(M : FGModuleCat.{u} k) :
↥(tangentModuleAt.{u, u, u}
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
hM M) →ₗ[k]
↥(tangentModuleAt.{u, u, u} (BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX))) hX M) ×
↥(tangentModuleAt.{u, u, u} (BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY))) hY M)
Deformation.Examples.exists_schemeMorphismTangentPair_eq_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 357. The attribute's comment: “the image of the arrow T Def_{X → Y} → T(Def_X × Def_Y): a pair of first-order deformations of X and of Y is hit exactly when f deforms along it. The identification of the obstruction with a class in Ext^1(Lf^* NL_{Y/k}, O_X) is NOT proved”.
Stacks 0E3V, the image of the arrow
T Def_{X ⟶ Y} → T(Def_X × Def_Y). A pair of first-order deformationsX_εofXandY_εofYis in the image exactly whenfdeforms along it, that is, when some first-order deformation offhas the two given deformations as its endpoints up to isomorphism in the fibre. This is the content of the last paragraph of the source's proof; the identification of the obstruction to such a deformation with a class inExt¹_{𝒪_X}(Lf^*NL_{Y/k}, 𝒪_X)is not proved here.
theorem exists_schemeMorphismTangentPair_eq_iff
(hM : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
(hX : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX)))
(hY : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)))
(M : FGModuleCat.{u} k)
(xε : (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX)).Fiber
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M))
(yε : (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)).Fiber
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M)) :
(∃ t, schemeMorphismTangentPair f pX pY hf hM hX hY M t =
(tangentClassAt.{u, u, u} (BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX))) hX M xε,
tangentClassAt.{u, u, u} (BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY))) hY M yε)) ↔
∃ mε : (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf).Fiber
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M),
IsIsomorphic ((fiberFunctor (schemeMorphismSourceBased f pX pY hf)
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M)).obj mε) xε ∧
IsIsomorphic ((fiberFunctor (schemeMorphismTargetBased f pX pY hf)
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M)).obj mε) yε
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismDeformation_endpointArrows, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismEndpoints.lean, line 421. The attribute's comment: “PARTIAL. Of the six-term exact sequence this establishes: the arrow Inf(Def_{X → Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y) and the arrow T Def_{X → Y} → T(Def_X × Def_Y), both as the pairs of the maps induced by the source- and target-forgetting 1-morphisms Def_{X → Y} → Def_X and Def_{X → Y} → Def_Y; exactness at the FIRST spot, i.e. exactness of 0 → Inf(Def_{X → Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y); and the description of the IMAGE of T Def_{X → Y} → T(Def_X × Def_Y) as the pairs of first-order deformations of X and Y along which f deforms. NOT established: the terms Der_k(O_Y, f_O_X) and Ext^1(Lf^ NL_{Y/k}, O_X), the three arrows Inf(Def_X × Def_Y) → Der_k(O_Y, f_O_X), Der_k(O_Y, f_O_X) → T Def_{X → Y} and T(Def_X × Def_Y) → Ext^1(Lf^* NL_{Y/k}, O_X), and exactness at the second, third and fourth spots. Hypotheses carried rather than proved: condition (RS) for Example 0E3T, and that Def_X and Def_Y are deformation categories”.
Stacks 0E3V, the part of the six-term exact sequence that this file establishes.
For a morphism
f : X ⟶ Yof schemes overk, the morphism of deformation categoriesDef_{X ⟶ Y} ⟶ Def_X × Def_Yof the source's proof induces two of the six arrows of the source's sequence, and the package records them together with what is proved about exactness:
- the sequence
0 → Inf(Def_{X ⟶ Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y)is exact, i.e. the arrow on infinitesimal automorphisms is injective;- the arrow on tangent spaces is the pair of the maps induced by the two forgetful morphisms;
- a pair of first-order deformations of
Xand ofYis in the image of that arrow exactly whenfdeforms along it.The three remaining arrows of the source's sequence — the two involving
Der_k(𝒪_Y, f_*𝒪_X)and the obstruction map intoExt¹_{𝒪_X}(Lf^*NL_{Y/k}, 𝒪_X)— and exactness at the second, third and fourth spots are not proved; see the implementation notes of this file.The deformation hypothesis on
Def_{X ⟶ Y}is supplied byDeformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryfrom condition (RS) for the category of all flat families of morphisms of schemes.
theorem schemeMorphismDeformation_endpointArrows
(hM : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
(hX : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX)))
(hY : IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u}
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)))
{x₀ : schemeMorphismDeformationCategory f pX pY hf}
(PM : ChosenPushforwardsAt (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf) x₀)
(QX : ChosenPushforwardsAt
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX))
((schemeMorphismSourceForgetful f pX pY hf).obj x₀))
(QY : ChosenPushforwardsAt
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY))
((schemeMorphismTargetForgetful f pX pY hf).obj x₀))
(M : FGModuleCat.{u} k) :
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup PM hM.satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule PM hM.satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup QX hX.satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule QX hX.satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup QY hY.satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule QY hY.satisfiesRS
Function.Injective (schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair f pX pY hf hM.satisfiesRS
hX.satisfiesRS hY.satisfiesRS PM QX QY) ∧
(∀ t, schemeMorphismTangentPair f pX pY hf hM hX hY M t =
(tangentMapAt.{u, u, u} hM hX (schemeMorphismSourceBased f pX pY hf) M t,
tangentMapAt.{u, u, u} hM hY (schemeMorphismTargetBased f pX pY hf) M t)) ∧
∀ (xε : (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX)).Fiber
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M))
(yε : (schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)).Fiber
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M)),
(∃ t, schemeMorphismTangentPair f pX pY hf hM hX hY M t =
(tangentClassAt.{u, u, u} (BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX))) hX M xε,
tangentClassAt.{u, u, u} (BasedCategory.ofFunctor
(schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pY)))
hY M yε)) ↔
∃ mε : (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf).Fiber
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M),
IsIsomorphic ((fiberFunctor (schemeMorphismSourceBased f pX pY hf)
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M)).obj mε) xε ∧
IsIsomorphic ((fiberFunctor (schemeMorphismTargetBased f pX pY hf)
((squareZeroExtensionArtinian.{u, u, u} Λ k).obj M)).obj mε) yε
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismDeformation_sixTermExact, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismSixTermExact.lean, line 234. The attribute's comment: “the canonical exact sequence of k-vector spaces 0 -> Inf(Def_{X -> Y}) -> Inf(Def_X x Def_Y) -> Der_k(O_Y, f_O_X) -> T Def_{X -> Y} -> T(Def_X x Def_Y) -> Ext^1_{O_X}(Lf^ NL_{Y/k}, O_X) for a morphism of schemes f : X -> Y over k: its five k-linear maps and exactness at all five spots”.
Let
f : X → Ybe a morphism of schemes overk(Example 0DY7). There is a canonical exact sequence ofk-vector spaces
0 → Inf(Def_{X → Y}) → Inf(Def_X × Def_Y) → Der_k(𝒪_Y, f_*𝒪_X) → T Def_{X → Y}→ T(Def_X × Def_Y) → Ext¹_{𝒪_X}(Lf^*NL_{Y/k}, 𝒪_X).The six terms are
localizedAutomorphismFunctorTangentof the fixed pushforwardsschemeMorphismTrivialPushforwards f pX pY hf(Inf(Def_{X → Y})), the product of those ofschemeMorphismSourcePushforwards f pX pY hfandschemeMorphismTargetPushforwards f pX pY hf(Inf(Def_X × Def_Y)),schemeMorphismDerivations f pY(Der_k(𝒪_Y, f_*𝒪_X)), the tangent module ofDef_{X → Y}overk[ε](T Def_{X → Y}), the product of the tangent modules ofDef_XandDef_Yoverk[ε](T(Def_X × Def_Y)), andschemeMorphismObstructionExt f pY(Ext¹_{𝒪_X}(Lf^*NL_{Y/k}, 𝒪_X)), each with itsk-vector space structure. The products are the source'sDef_X × Def_Y: for the 2-fibre productschemeEndpointsProduct pX pYover𝒞_Λ(a deformation category,isDeformationCategory_schemeEndpointsProduct), the projections inducek-linear equivalencesschemeEndpointsProductInfEquiv(Inf(Def\_X × Def\_Y) ≃ Inf(Def\_X) × Inf(Def\_Y)) andschemeEndpointsProductTangentEquiv(T(Def\_X × Def\_Y) ≃ T Def\_X × T Def\_Y), and the arrowsaanddbelow are the maps induced byDef_{X → Y} → Def_X × Def_Y(schemeMorphismEndpointsBased) followed by these equivalences (schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair'_canonical_eq,schemeMorphismTangentPair'_eq).The five arrows are
a = schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair'andd = schemeMorphismTangentPair', induced by the endpoint-forgetting morphisms;b = schemeMorphismSixTermConjugationArrow,(α, β) ↦the derivation by whichβ⁻¹ ∘ f' ∘ αdiffers from the trivial liftf' = f × id;c = schemeMorphismDerivationTangentLinearMap,D ↦the class ofD ⬝ f'; ande = schemeMorphismObstructionLinearMap,(X', Y') ↦ Push(Y') − Pull(X'), the obstruction of Tag 08U8. The statement:ais injective (exactness atInf(Def_{X → Y})) and the sequence is exact atInf(Def_X × Def_Y),Der_k(𝒪_Y, f_*𝒪_X),T Def_{X → Y}andT(Def_X × Def_Y).
theorem schemeMorphismDeformation_sixTermExact :
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup (schemeMorphismTrivialPushforwards f pX pY hf)
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf).satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule (schemeMorphismTrivialPushforwards f pX pY hf)
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf).satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup (schemeMorphismSourcePushforwards f pX pY
hf) (isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Over.mk pX)).satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule (schemeMorphismSourcePushforwards f pX pY
hf) (isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Over.mk pX)).satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentAddCommGroup (schemeMorphismTargetPushforwards f pX pY
hf) (isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Over.mk pY)).satisfiesRS
letI := naturalLocalizedTangentModule (schemeMorphismTargetPushforwards f pX pY
hf) (isDeformationCategory_schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Over.mk pY)).satisfiesRS
letI := schemeMorphismDerivationsModule f pY
(SheafOfModules.unit (structureSheafRing X.toRingedSpace))
letI := schemeMorphismObstructionExtModule f pY
Function.Injective (schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair' f pX pY hf
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY
hf).satisfiesRS (schemeMorphismTrivialPushforwards f pX pY hf)
(schemeMorphismSourcePushforwards f pX pY hf) (schemeMorphismTargetPushforwards f pX pY
hf)) ∧
Function.Exact (schemeMorphismInfinitesimalPair' f pX pY hf
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY
hf).satisfiesRS (schemeMorphismTrivialPushforwards f pX pY hf)
(schemeMorphismSourcePushforwards f pX pY hf) (schemeMorphismTargetPushforwards f pX
pY hf)) (schemeMorphismSixTermConjugationArrow f pX pY hf) ∧
Function.Exact (schemeMorphismSixTermConjugationArrow f pX pY hf)
(schemeMorphismDerivationTangentLinearMap f pX pY hf) ∧
Function.Exact (schemeMorphismDerivationTangentLinearMap f pX pY hf)
(schemeMorphismTangentPair' f pX pY hf
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY
hf) (FGModuleCat.of k (ULift.{u} k))) ∧
Function.Exact (schemeMorphismTangentPair' f pX pY hf
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY
hf) (FGModuleCat.of k (ULift.{u} k)))
(schemeMorphismObstructionLinearMap f pX pY hf)
Tag 0E3W, a lemma
Tag 0E3W in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.isFiniteDimensionalDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismsFiniteDimensional.lean, line 87. The attribute's comment: “for a morphism f : X -> Y of schemes over k with X and Y both proper over k, Inf(Def_{X -> Y}) and T Def_{X -> Y} are finite dimensional; stated as condition (4) of Deformation.IsFiniteDimensionalDeformationCategory: the tangent space, and the infinitesimal automorphisms at every point over k and every choice of pushforwards, are finite dimensional”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0E3W. In the setting of Tag 0E3V — a morphism
f : X → Yof schemes over the fieldk— ifXandYare both proper overk, thenInf(Def_{X → Y})andT Def_{X → Y}are finite dimensional.The statement is condition (4) of
Deformation.IsFiniteDimensionalDeformationCategoryfor the deformation categoryDef_{X → Y}of Example 0E3T: it is a deformation category, its tangent spaceT Def_{X → Y}(isomorphism classes over the dual numbers, with the vector space structure of Tag 06IH) is finite dimensional, and its infinitesimal automorphisms are finite dimensional at every point overkand every choice of pushforwards.
theorem isFiniteDimensionalDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection
[IsProper pX] [IsProper pY] :
IsFiniteDimensionalDeformationCategory
(schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf)
Tag 0ET6, a lemma
Tag 0ET6 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.exists_hull_schemeMorphismIsomorphismClasses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismsHull.lean, line 120. The attribute's comment: “the functor of isomorphism classes of Def_{X -> Y} has a hull”. References: SGA 7 VI (4.9), “(a)”.
Stacks 0ET6, the hull. Let
Λbe a complete local ring with residue fieldkand letf : X ⟶ Ybe a morphism of properk-schemes. Then the functorA ↦ Ob(Def_{X → Y}(A))/≅of isomorphism classes of deformations offhas a hull: a versal formal object whose differential is bijective.
theorem exists_hull_schemeMorphismIsomorphismClasses (hΛ : IsClassical Λ k)
[IsProper pX] [IsProper pY] :
let G := isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY
hf).predeformation.cofibered
∃ ξ : FormalObject (CategoryOfElements.π G),
IsHull (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered G) ξ
Deformation.Examples.isProrepresentableULift_schemeMorphismIsomorphismClasses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismsHull.lean, line 139. The attribute's comment: “if Der_k(O_X, O_X) = Der_k(O_Y, O_Y) = 0, the functor of isomorphism classes of Def_{X -> Y} is prorepresentable”.
Stacks 0ET6, prorepresentability. Let
Λbe a complete local ring with residue fieldkand letf : X ⟶ Ybe a morphism of properk-schemes withDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X) = Der_k(𝒪_Y, 𝒪_Y) = 0. Then the functorA ↦ Ob(Def_{X → Y}(A))/≅of isomorphism classes of deformations offis prorepresentable.
theorem isProrepresentableULift_schemeMorphismIsomorphismClasses (hΛ : IsClassical Λ k)
[IsProper pX] [IsProper pY]
(hX : ∀ D : schemeMorphismDerivations (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (𝟙 X) pX, D = 0)
(hY : ∀ D : schemeMorphismDerivations (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (𝟙 Y) pY, D = 0) :
IsProrepresentableULift (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY hf))
(isDeformationCategory_schemeMorphismDeformationCategoryProjection f pX pY
hf).predeformation.cofibered)
Tag 0E3X, a lemma
Tag 0E3X in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismSourceForgetful_comp_projection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismSource.lean, line 221. The attribute's comment: “morphism of deformation categories”.
The source-forgetful functor commutes with the projections of the two deformation categories to
𝒞_Λ, so it is a morphism of categories over the base category: this is the morphism of deformation categoriesDef_{X ⟶ Y} ⟶ Def_X.
theorem schemeMorphismSourceForgetful_comp_projection :
schemeMorphismSourceForgetful f pX pY hf ⋙
schemeDeformationCategoryProjection (Λ := Λ) (k := k) (Over.mk pX) =
Over.forget (schemeMorphismFamilySpecialFiber f pX pY hf) ⋙
schemeMorphismFamilyFunctor
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismSourceForgetful_reflectsIsomorphisms, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismSource.lean, line 232. The attribute's comment: “reflects isomorphisms”.
The source-forgetful functor reflects isomorphisms: an arrow of deformations of
fwhose source component is invertible has invertible component on bases, and an arrow of flat families over an isomorphism of bases is an isomorphism.
instance schemeMorphismSourceForgetful_reflectsIsomorphisms :
(schemeMorphismSourceForgetful f pX pY hf).ReflectsIsomorphisms
Deformation.Examples.schemeMorphismSourceForgetful_isEquivalence_of_specialFibre, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SchemeMorphismSourceEquivalence.lean, line 123.
Let
f : X ⟶ Ybe a morphism of schemes over the residue fieldksuch that the canonical map𝒪_Y ⟶ f_*𝒪_Xis an isomorphism andR¹f_*𝒪_Xvanishes. Then the functor forgetting the target of a deformation offis an equivalence from the deformation category offto the deformation category ofX.
theorem schemeMorphismSourceForgetful_isEquivalence_of_specialFibre
(h0 : IsIso (C := Y.Modules) (Scheme.Modules.unitToPushforwardUnit f))
(hR : IsZero (((Scheme.Modules.pushforward f).rightDerived 1).obj
(SheafOfModules.unit X.ringCatSheaf))) :
(schemeMorphismSourceForgetful f pX pY hf).IsEquivalence
Sources
Section93.11 Algebraic spaces#
Section 93.11 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0E3Y. 5 tags here are carried by 17 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0E3Z, an example
Tag 0E3Z in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 160. The attribute's comment: “the category ℱ: objects”.
Stacks 0E3Z. A flat family of algebraic spaces: an object of
𝒞_Λtogether with an algebraic space over its spectrum, flat over it.
public structure FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily
Deformation.Examples.FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily.Hom, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 177. The attribute's comment: “the category ℱ: morphisms”.
Stacks 0E3Z. A morphism of flat families, covariant on coefficient algebras: a morphism of the coefficient algebras together with a cartesian morphism of spaces over it.
public structure Hom (P Q : FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily B hΛ hSpec)
Deformation.Examples.FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily.instCategory, an instance in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 189. The attribute's comment: “the category ℱ”.
Stacks 0E3Z. Flat families of algebraic spaces and their cartesian morphisms form a category; composition pastes two cartesian squares.
public instance instCategory : Category (FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily B hΛ hSpec)
Deformation.Examples.flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 290. The attribute's comment: “the functor p”.
Stacks 0E3Z. Forget the space and retain the coefficient algebra.
public def flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor :
FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily B hΛ hSpec ⥤ ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, u, u} Λ k
Deformation.Examples.flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor_isCofiberedInGroupoids, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 314. The attribute's comment: “p is cofibred in groupoids”.
Stacks 0E3Z. The projection from flat families of algebraic spaces to their coefficient algebras is cofibered in groupoids: the cocartesian lift of
A ⟶ A'is the base change of the space alongSpec A' ⟶ Spec A, which is flat because flatness of morphisms of algebraic spaces is stable under base change.
public theorem flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor_isCofiberedInGroupoids :
IsCofiberedInGroupoids (flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor B hΛ hSpec)
Deformation.Examples.isFlat_of_over_residueField, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 339. The attribute's comment: “flatness of the special fibre”.
An algebraic space over the spectrum of the residue field is flat over it: the target of every étale chart is
Spec k, over which any morphism is flat, and the atlas of Stacks 025Y supplies a surjective chart, so the one-chart form of Stacks 03MJ applies.
public theorem isFlat_of_over_residueField
(X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ X)
(toK : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (spaceBaseOver B hΛ hSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))) :
Space.IsFlat B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ toK
Deformation.Examples.spaceSpecialFiber, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 364. The attribute's comment: “the object x₀”.
Stacks 0E3Z. An algebraic space
Xover the residue field, as the object(k, X)of the category of flat families.
public def spaceSpecialFiber (X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ X)
(toK : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (spaceBaseOver B hΛ hSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))) :
FlatAlgebraicSpaceFamily B hΛ hSpec
Deformation.Examples.spaceDeformationProjection, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Spaces.lean, line 378. The attribute's comment: “the deformation category of X”.
Stacks 0E3Z. The deformation category of an algebraic space
Xover the residue field, with its structure functor to𝒞_Λ: its objects are flat families equipped with a cartesian morphism to(k, X).
public abbrev spaceDeformationProjection
(X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ X)
(toK : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (spaceBaseOver B hΛ hSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))) :
Over (spaceSpecialFiber B hΛ hSpec X hX toK) ⥤ ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, u, u} Λ k
Tag 0E40, a lemma
Tag 0E40 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.satisfiesRS_flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesRimSchlessinger.lean, line 149. The attribute's comment: “condition (RS) for the category of flat families of algebraic spaces of Example 0E3Z”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0E40. The category of flat families of algebraic spaces over
𝒞_Λof Example 0E3Z satisfies the Rim-Schlessinger condition (RS).For a cospan
X₁ ⟶ X ⟵ X₂of flat families overA₁ ⟶ A ⟵ A₂withA₂ ⟶ Asurjective, the pushout of algebraic spacesX₂ ⨿_X X₁(Stacks 07VX), with its morphism to the spectrum ofA₁ ×_A A₂, is a flat family (Stacks 07W3, clause (2)) restricting toX₁andX₂(Stacks 07W0); it is a fibre product of flat families because any flat family overA₁ ×_A A₂is the pushout of its two restrictions (the counit assertion of Stacks 07W3).
theorem satisfiesRS_flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor :
SatisfiesRS (flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor B hΛ hSpec)
Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesRimSchlessinger.lean, line 382. The attribute's comment: “the in-particular clause: the deformation category of an algebraic space over k is a deformation category”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0E40, the in-particular clause. The deformation category of an algebraic space
Xover the residue fieldkis a deformation category: a predeformation category satisfying (RS).It is the category of flat families lying over the family
(k, X), which lies over the residue field, a terminal object of𝒞_Λ; condition (RS) for the category of all flat families isDeformation.Examples.satisfiesRS_flatAlgebraicSpaceFamilyFunctor.
theorem isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection
(X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ X)
(toK : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (spaceBaseOver B hΛ hSpec (residueFieldBase Λ k))) :
IsDeformationCategory.{u, u, u} (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)
Tag 0E41, a lemma
Tag 0E41 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphismGroupChain, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesInfinitesimalAutomorphisms.lean, line 97. The attribute's comment: “first display: for an algebraic space X over the field k, Inf(Def_X) = Ext^0(NL_{X/k}, O_X) = Hom(Omega_{X/k}, O_X) = Der_k(O_X, O_X), as three identifications at every point x0 over k and every pushforward x0 -> x_eps along a dual-number pair (06JS): Inf(Def_X) is isomorphic as a group to Der_k(O_X, O_X), Ext^0 out of the naive cotangent complex is k-linearly Hom(Omega_{X/k}, O_X), and Hom(Omega_{X/k}, O_X) is k-linearly Der_k(O_X, O_X), k acting through the structure morphism X -> Spec k. The second display, T Def_X = Ext^1(NL_{X/k}, O_X), is registered separately”.
The first display of [Stacks Project, Tag 0E41]. In Example 0E3Z, let
Xbe an algebraic space over the fieldk. Then
Inf(𝓓_X) = Ext⁰_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Hom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Der_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X),given as the identifications of those four groups.
Inf(𝓓_X)is the infinitesimal automorphism groupDeformation.infinitesimalAutomorphismGroupof [Stacks Project, Tag 06JS] of the deformation category ofX, a predeformation category (Deformation.Examples.isPredeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection), formed at an arbitrary pointx₀overk, an arbitrary pushforwardi : x₀ ⟶ xεof it along a dual-number pairk → k[ε] → k— the automorphisms of the deformationX'ofXoverk[ε](the trivial one,X ×_{Spec k} Spec k[ε]) which are the identity moduloε.
kacts on𝒪_X-modules, and so onExt⁰, onHom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X)and onDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X), through the pullback of functions along the structure morphismX ⟶ Spec k(Deformation.Examples.spaceResidueFieldRingHom).
- The first component identifies
Inf(𝓓_X)withDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X)as groups, composition of automorphisms corresponding to addition of derivations; through the other two it isExt⁰_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X).- The second is
Ext⁰_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Hom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X),k-linearly, fromH⁰(NL_{X/k}) = Ω_{X/k}(Stacks 0D0Y).- The third is
Hom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Der_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X),k-linearly, postcomposition with the universal derivation of Stacks 04CT, as Modules on Sites, Definition 04BN definesΩ.
def spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphismGroupChain
[HasDerivedCategory.{w} (NaiveCotangentModules B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX))]
{Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, u, u} Λ k}
{x₀ : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).Fiber
(residueFieldObject.{u, u, u} Λ k)}
{xε : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, u, u} Λ k ⟶ Aε) (e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, u, u} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e)
(i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hi : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).IsHomLift g i) :
letI := naiveCotangentModulesLinear B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (X := spaceOf B hΛ X hX)
(spaceResidueFieldRingHom B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)
letI := modulesLinearOfRingHom B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (X := spaceOf B hΛ X hX)
(spaceResidueFieldRingHom B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)
letI : Module k (SpaceDerivations B hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)) :=
derivationModuleOfRingHom B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (X := spaceOf B hΛ X hX)
(spaceResidueFieldRingHom B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)
(spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK) (spaceStructureModule B hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX))
(infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isPredeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK) g e hpair i hi ≃*
Multiplicative (SpaceDerivations B hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))) ×
(DerivedCategory.Ext (DerivedCategory.Q.obj (naiveCotangentComplex B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ
(spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)))
((DerivedCategory.singleFunctor _ 0).obj
(naiveCotangentCoefficient B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ
(spaceStructureModule B hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX)))) 0 ≃ₗ[k]
(sheafOfDifferentials B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK) ⟶
spaceStructureModule B hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX))) ×
((sheafOfDifferentials B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK) ⟶
spaceStructureModule B hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX)) ≃ₗ[k]
SpaceDerivations B hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
Deformation.Examples.spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphismGroup_linearEquivDerivations, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesInfinitesimalAutomorphismsLinear.lean, line 311. The attribute's comment: “first display, k-linear form: for an algebraic space X over the field k, Inf(Def_X) with the vector space structure of 06JV (addition is composition; c acts by pushforward along eps -> c eps, along every arrow over such a rescaling fixing the pushforward x0 -> x_eps) is k-linearly isomorphic to Der_k(O_X, O_X), k acting through the structure morphism X -> Spec k, by the first identification of the first display, at every point x0 over k and every pushforward along a dual-number pair”. References: SGA 3 II (3.14), “special case”.
The first display of [Stacks Project, Tag 0E41],
k-linearly:Inf(𝓓_X) = Der_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X)ask-vector spaces. In Example 0E3Z, letXbe an algebraic space over the fieldk. At every pointx₀of the deformation category ofXoverk, every pushforwardi : x₀ ⟶ xεof it along a dual-number pairk → k[ε] → kand every predeformation-category structure, the infinitesimal automorphism groupInf(𝓓_X)of [Stacks Project, Tag 06JS] carries thek-vector-space structure of [Stacks Project, Tag 06JV]:
- addition is composition of infinitesimal automorphisms;
- a scalar
cacts by pushforward alongε ↦ c ε: for every endomorphismsof the base which isε ↦ c εin a dual-number coordinate and every arrowj : xε ⟶ xεoversfixingi,c • ais the pushforward ofaalongj;and the first identification of the first display,
Deformation.Examples.spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphismGroupMulEquivDerivations, is ak-linear isomorphism ontoDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X),kacting on derivations through the structure morphismX ⟶ Spec k. The remaining identifications of the display,Ext⁰_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Hom_{𝒪_X}(Ω_{X/k}, 𝒪_X) = Der_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X), arek-linear byDeformation.Examples.spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphismGroupChain.
theorem spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphismGroup_linearEquivDerivations :
letI : Module k (SpaceDerivations B hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)) :=
derivationModuleOfRingHom B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (X := spaceOf B hΛ X hX)
(spaceResidueFieldRingHom B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)
(spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK) (spaceStructureModule B hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX))
∃ A : AddCommGroup (Additive (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi)),
letI := A
∃ M : Module k (Additive (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi)),
letI := M
(∀ a b : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi,
Additive.ofMul a + Additive.ofMul b = Additive.ofMul (a * b)) ∧
(∀ (c : k) (s : Aε ⟶ Aε),
(∃ φ : Aε ≃ₐ[Λ] DualNumber k,
(∀ t : Aε, (φ t).1 = Aε.residueEquiv (IsLocalRing.residue Aε t)) ∧
(∀ t : k, φ (s.hom (φ.symm (TrivSqZeroExt.inl t))) = TrivSqZeroExt.inl t) ∧
φ (s.hom (φ.symm DualNumber.eps)) = c • DualNumber.eps) →
∀ (j : xε.1 ⟶ xε.1) (hj : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).IsHomLift s j),
i ≫ j = i → ∀ a : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi,
∃ b : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi,
b.val = pushforwardAutomorphismHom hp.cofibered s j hj a.val ∧
c • Additive.ofMul a = Additive.ofMul b) ∧
∃ E : Additive (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi) ≃ₗ[k]
SpaceDerivations B hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK),
∀ a : infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi,
DFunLike.coe
(F := Additive (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup hp g e hpair i hi) ≃ₗ[k]
SpaceDerivations B hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)) E
(Additive.ofMul a) =
Multiplicative.toAdd
(spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphismGroupMulEquivDerivations B hΛ hSpec X hX toK hpair i
hp hi a)
Deformation.Examples.spaceTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt.lean, line 145. The attribute's comment: “second display: for an algebraic space X over the field k, T Def_X = Ext^1(NL_{X/k}, O_X) as k-vector spaces, from the tangent space of the deformation category of X (isomorphism classes of flat deformations of X over k[eps], with the canonical vector space structure of 06IH) onto Ext^1_{O_X}(NL_{X/k}, O_X) of the naive cotangent complex of 0D0V, k acting through the structure morphism X -> Spec k; a deformation goes to the 0GQ5 class of the extension 0 -> O_X -> O_X' -> O_X -> 0. The first display is registered separately”.
Stacks 0E41, second display. In Example 0E3Z let
Xbe an algebraic space overk. ThenT Def_X = Ext¹_{𝒪_X}(NL_{X/k}, 𝒪_X): the tangent space of the deformation categoryDef_X(the isomorphism classes of flat deformations ofXoverk[ε], with the vector-space structure of Stacks 06IH) isk-linearly isomorphic toExt¹of the naive cotangent complexNL_{X/k}of Stacks 0D0V into𝒪_X(sections raised to the universe ofNL_{X/k}, any model of the derived category),kacting through the structure morphismX ⟶ Spec k. A deformationX'goes to the class (Stacks 0GQ5) of the extension0 ⟶ 𝒪_X ⟶ 𝒪_{X'} ⟶ 𝒪_X ⟶ 0(Deformation.Examples.spaceTangentSpaceLinearEquivExtModel_apply).
def spaceTangentSpaceLinearEquivExt
[HasDerivedCategory.{w} (Space.NaiveCotangentModules B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX))] :
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)).p) :=
⟨(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX
toK).predeformation.cofibered))) :=
⟨Artin.schlessingerConditionS2_isomorphismClasses_of_isDeformationCategory
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)⟩
letI := Space.naiveCotangentModulesLinear B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ (X := spaceOf B hΛ X hX)
(spaceResidueFieldRingHom B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)
artinianTangentSpace Λ k (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX
toK).predeformation.cofibered) ≃ₗ[k]
DerivedCategory.Ext
(DerivedCategory.Q.obj (Space.naiveCotangentComplex B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ
(spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)))
((DerivedCategory.singleFunctor _ 0).obj
(Space.naiveCotangentCoefficient B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ
(spaceStructureModule B hΛ (spaceOf B hΛ X hX)))) 1
Tag 0E42, a lemma
Tag 0E42 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphisms_finiteDimensional, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesFiniteDimensional.lean, line 99. The attribute's comment: “infinitesimal automorphisms: for an algebraic space X proper over the field k, Inf(Def_X), with the vector space structure of 06JV (addition is composition; c acts by pushforward along eps -> c eps), is finite dimensional over k, at every point x0 over k and every pushforward x0 -> x_eps along a dual-number pair”.
Stacks 0E42, the infinitesimal automorphisms. In Example 0E3Z, let
Xbe an algebraic space over the fieldkwhich is proper overk. ThenInf(𝓓_X)is a finite-dimensionalk-vector space: at every pointx₀of𝓓_Xoverkand every pushforwardi : x₀ ⟶ xεof it along a dual-number pairk → Aε → k, the infinitesimal automorphism group of Stacks 06JS carries ak-vector-space structure
- whose addition is composition of infinitesimal automorphisms, and
- in which a scalar
cacts by pushforward alongε ↦ c ε: for every endomorphismsofAεwhich isε ↦ c εin a dual-number coordinate ofAε(and the identity on the residue field) and every arrowj : xε ⟶ xεoversfixingi,c • ais the pushforward ofaalongj,and this vector space is finite dimensional. The predeformation-category structure of
𝓓_Xis that of Stacks 0E40 (Deformation.Examples.isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection).
theorem spaceInfinitesimalAutomorphisms_finiteDimensional
(hproper : Space.IsProper B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ toK)
{Aε : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, u, u} Λ k}
{x₀ : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).Fiber
(residueFieldObject.{u, u, u} Λ k)}
{xε : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).Fiber Aε}
(g : residueFieldObject.{u, u, u} Λ k ⟶ Aε) (e : Aε ⟶ residueFieldObject.{u, u, u} Λ k)
(hpair : IsCanonicalDualNumberPair g e) (i : x₀.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hi : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).IsHomLift g i) :
∃ hA : AddCommGroup (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation g e
hpair i hi),
letI := hA
∃ hM : Module k (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation g e
hpair i hi),
letI := hM
(∀ a b : (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation g e
hpair i hi), a + b = a * b) ∧
(∀ (c : k) (s : Aε ⟶ Aε),
IsDualNumberScaling c s →
s ≫ e = e →
∀ (j : xε.1 ⟶ xε.1)
(hj : (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).IsHomLift s j),
i ≫ j = i → ∀ a : (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation g e
hpair i hi),
∃ b : (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation g e
hpair i hi),
b.val = pushforwardAutomorphismHom
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX
toK).predeformation.cofibered s j hj a.val ∧ c • a = b) ∧
FiniteDimensional k (infinitesimalAutomorphismGroup
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation g e
hpair i hi)
Deformation.Examples.spaceTangentSpace_finiteDimensional, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesTangentSpaceFinite.lean, line 55. The attribute's comment: “tangent space: for an algebraic space X proper over the field k, the tangent space T Def_X of its deformation category (isomorphism classes of flat deformations over k[eps], with the canonical vector space structure of 06IH) is finite dimensional over k. The clause on Inf(Def_X) is registered separately”.
Stacks 0E42, the tangent space. In Lemma 0E41, if the algebraic space
Xis proper overk, thenT Def_X(with the vector-space structure of Stacks 06IH) is finite dimensional overk.
theorem spaceTangentSpace_finiteDimensional (hproper : Space.IsProper B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ toK) :
letI : Fact (IsPredeformationCategory
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)).p) :=
⟨(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK).predeformation⟩
letI : Fact (SchlessingerConditionS2 (CategoryOfElements.π (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX
toK).predeformation.cofibered))) :=
⟨Artin.schlessingerConditionS2_isomorphismClasses_of_isDeformationCategory
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK)⟩
FiniteDimensional k (artinianTangentSpace Λ k (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX
toK).predeformation.cofibered))
Tag 0ET7, a lemma
Tag 0ET7 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.exists_hull_spaceIsomorphismClasses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesHull.lean, line 102. The attribute's comment: “for a proper algebraic space X over k and Λ complete local with residue field k, the functor of isomorphism classes of Def_X has a hull”.
Stacks 0ET7, the hull. Let
Λbe a complete local ring with residue fieldkand letXbe a proper algebraic space overk. Then the functorA ↦ Ob(Def_X(A))/≅of isomorphism classes of deformations ofXhas a hull: a versal formal object whose differential is bijective.
public theorem exists_hull_spaceIsomorphismClasses (hcl : IsClassical Λ k)
(hproper : Space.IsProper B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ toK) :
let G := isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX
toK).predeformation.cofibered
∃ ξ : FormalObject (CategoryOfElements.π G),
IsHull (categoryOfElements_projection_isCofibered G) ξ
Deformation.Examples.isProrepresentableULift_spaceIsomorphismClasses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/SpacesHull.lean, line 120. The attribute's comment: “if Der_k(O_X, O_X) = 0, the functor of isomorphism classes of Def_X is prorepresentable”.
Stacks 0ET7, prorepresentability. Let
Λbe a complete local ring with residue fieldkand letXbe a proper algebraic space overkwithDer_k(𝒪_X, 𝒪_X) = 0. Then the functorA ↦ Ob(Def_X(A))/≅of isomorphism classes of deformations ofXis prorepresentable.
public theorem isProrepresentableULift_spaceIsomorphismClasses (hcl : IsClassical Λ k)
(hproper : Space.IsProper B (Spec (.of Λ)) hΛ toK)
(hDer : ∀ D : SpaceDerivations B hΛ (spaceStructureMap B hΛ hSpec X hX toK), D = 0) :
IsProrepresentableULift (isomorphismClasses
(BasedCategory.ofFunctor (spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX toK))
(isDeformationCategory_spaceDeformationProjection B hΛ hSpec X hX
toK).predeformation.cofibered)
Sources
Section93.12 Deformations of completions#
Section 93.12 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DZ0. 5 tags here are carried by 12 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0DZ1, a lemma
Tag 0DZ1 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.DerivedLift.exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_derived_lift, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Homology/Tor/BaseChangeIndependence/DerivedLift.lean, line 481.
Over a nilpotent surjection, an
A-flat module lifts flatly if and only if it admits a bounded-above derived lift.
public theorem exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_derived_lift
(A' A P' : Type u) [CommRing A'] [CommRing A] [CommRing P']
[Algebra A' A] [Algebra A' P']
(hsurj : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A' A))
(hnil : IsNilpotent (RingHom.ker (algebraMap A' A)))
[Module.Flat A' P']
(M : Type v) [AddCommGroup M] [Module (TensorProduct A' P' A) M]
[Module A M] [IsScalarTower A (TensorProduct A' P' A) M]
[Module.Flat A M] :
(∃ (M' : Type (max u v)) (_ : AddCommGroup M')
(_ : Module P' M') (_ : Module A' M') (_ : IsScalarTower A' P' M'),
Module.Flat A' M' ∧
Nonempty
((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, max u v}
(algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A))).obj
(ModuleCat.of.{max u v, u} P' M') ≅
ModuleCat.of.{max u v, u} (TensorProduct A' P' A) (ULift.{u} M))) ↔
∃ (K : DerivedCategory.Minus (ModuleCat.{max u v} P')),
Nonempty
((CochainComplex.DerivedExtensionScalars.derivedExtensionScalarsGeneral.{u, v, u}
(algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A))).functor.obj K.obj ≅
(DerivedCategory.Q
(C := ModuleCat.{max u v} (TensorProduct A' P' A))).obj
((CochainComplex.singleFunctor
(ModuleCat.{max u v} (TensorProduct A' P' A)) 0).obj
(ModuleCat.of.{max u v, u} (TensorProduct A' P' A)
(ULift.{u} M))))
Tag 0DZ2, a lemma
Tag 0DZ2 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.HasFlatModuleLift.baseChange, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/FlatModuleLift.lean, line 280. The attribute's comment: “the implication (1) => (2) of 0DZ2, in full, at the source's hypotheses and with no hypothesis added. This is what the tag asserts in this library: the converse is FALSE at the source's hypotheses, a Stacks ERRATUM. The biconditional is refuted, at every universe, by Deformation.Examples.ArtinSchreier.not_flatModuleLiftBaseChangeStatement, and in the form that writes out every one of the source's hypotheses by Deformation.Examples.ArtinSchreier.not_flatModuleLiftBaseChangeStatementFaithful. Inside the forward implication nothing is restricted: it carries the source's own nilpotence hypothesis on the kernel of P' → P and is more general than the source in needing neither the Noetherian hypotheses, nor finiteness of M, nor the ideal J', nor the local liftability hypothesis, and every binder it does carry is used. A restricted converse — a finite M under a square-zero thickening P' → P — is proved in StacksFrontier.Deformation.FlatModuleLiftLocalization, whose clause records why the dévissage to the source's nilpotent thickening is not merely unavailable from 0DZ2's hypotheses but closed: the step it needs is Deformation.ObstructionIndependentOfLift and that statement is unsatisfiable, by Deformation.not_obstructionIndependentOfLift”.
Stacks 0DZ2, forward implication. In a commuting square of ring maps
P' → Q',P' → P,Q' → Q,P → Qwhose left vertical mappis surjective with nilpotent kernel and whose top mapP' → Q'is flat, a flat module lift of aP-moduleMbase-changes to a flat module lift ofQ ⊗[P] M.By Nakayama the lift
Nis generated overP'by a family indexed byM, soQ' ⊗[P'] Nis a quotient ofM →₀ Q'and can be presented in the universe ofQ'andM, which is whatHasFlatModuleLiftdemands of the witness.This direction of Stacks 0DZ2 carries the source's own hypothesis on the kernel of
P' → P— nilpotent, not square-zero — and uses none of the obstruction calculus, so it is faithful and in fact more general than the source: neither the Noetherian hypotheses, nor finiteness ofM, nor the idealJ', nor the local liftability hypothesis is needed. The converse is the obstruction-theoretic half, and isexists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift_of_isNilpotent_kerinStacksFrontier.Deformation.FlatModuleLiftLocalization.
public theorem HasFlatModuleLift.baseChange
{A' : Type u₁} {P' : Type u₃} {P : Type u₄} {Q' : Type u₅} {Q : Type u₆}
[CommRing A'] [CommRing P'] [CommRing P] [CommRing Q'] [CommRing Q]
[Algebra A' P'] [Algebra P' Q'] [Algebra P Q]
{p : P' →+* P} {q : Q' →+* Q}
(hcomm : (algebraMap P Q).comp p = q.comp (algebraMap P' Q'))
(hflat : Module.Flat P' Q')
(hp : Function.Surjective p) (hnp : IsNilpotent (RingHom.ker p))
(M : Type v) [AddCommGroup M] [Module P M]
(h : HasFlatModuleLift (algebraMap A' P') p M) :
HasFlatModuleLift ((algebraMap P' Q').comp (algebraMap A' P')) q (Q ⊗[P] M)
Deformation.exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift_of_isNilpotent_ker, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/FlatModuleLiftLocalization.lean, line 584. The attribute's comment: “a RESTRICTED form of 0DZ2, restricted by exactly two hypotheses: hzeroP, which asks the thickening P' → P to be square-zero rather than merely nilpotent, and Module.Finite P M, which asks M to be finite over P. NEITHER IS REMOVABLE, because the UNRESTRICTED statement is FALSE — a Stacks ERRATUM — so what 0DZ2 asserts in this library is the implication (1) => (2), registered on Deformation.HasFlatModuleLift.baseChange. It is refuted, at every universe, by Deformation.Examples.ArtinSchreier.not_flatModuleLiftBaseChangeStatement, and in the form that writes out every one of the source's hypotheses by Deformation.Examples.ArtinSchreier.not_flatModuleLiftBaseChangeStatementFaithful. That witness satisfies both of the hypotheses whose removal is at issue in the other direction: its ker(A' → A) = (t) has t³ = 0 and t² ≠ 0, so it is nilpotent and not square-zero, and its M IS finite over P. What follows is why each restriction is there. Corrected: M is assumed finite over P. The source's statement omits it, its own proof uses it — here we use that P is Noetherian and M finite, when invoking Stacks 0A6A to commute Ext² with the flat base change P → Q — and that step is FALSE without it, not merely unproved: for k countable, P = k[x, y], Q = k[[x, y]], A' = k[ε]/(ε²), J' = (x, y) and the non-finite A-flat module M = ⨁ₙ P/(xⁿ, yⁿ), the comparison Ext²_P(M, M ⊗_P IP) ⊗_P Q → Ext²_Q(M ⊗_P Q, (M ⊗_P Q) ⊗_Q IQ) is the multiplication map T ⊗_P Q → T of a copy of Q sitting inside the infinite product T that Ext out of an infinite direct sum produces, and Q ⊗_P Q → Q has a nonzero kernel. Nothing weaker will do either: over the Noetherian P that 0DZ2 assumes, the (-3)-pseudo-coherence that Stacks 087Q needs in degree 2 is equivalent to finiteness. The computation, and the Mayer–Vietoris identification of what a finiteness-free proof would still owe, are in the implementation notes of this file; the equivalence itself is not refuted for a non-finite M, only the source's proof of it. Also: the thickening P' → P is assumed square-zero rather than merely nilpotent, which is what the obstruction calculus of Stacks 0DYR needs in order to have an obstruction class at all. Those are the only two deviations: the kernel of A' → A itself is assumed only nilpotent, as in the source, and squareness of the second thickening Q' → Q is derived rather than assumed, by Deformation.sq_ker_algebraMap_tensorProduct_eq_bot_of_tower; so this statement is strictly stronger than the one registered on Deformation.exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift. The dévissage from the square-zero thickening to the source's nilpotent one is NOT available from 0DZ2's own hypotheses. The source's reduction is details omitted; with A'' = A'/I^{n-1} every hypothesis of the lemma transports to the stage A'' → A, including local liftability, which reduces along the already-proved forward direction, so the induction produces an A''-flat P''-lift M'' of M — and then needs the obstruction class of the square-zero step A' → A'' to be independent of which A''-flat P''-lift of M it is evaluated on. Grant that and the induction closes; it is false already for I³ = 0. All of this is now a Lean object rather than a paragraph: the tower of quotients is Deformation.squareZero_devissage, a lift across one step of it is a lift across the composite by Deformation.hasFlatModuleLift_comp, the generic step of the induction with its missing input named is Deformation.hasFlatModuleLift_of_obstructionIndependentOfLift, that input is Deformation.ObstructionIndependentOfLift, and it is UNSATISFIABLE — Deformation.not_obstructionIndependentOfLift, at every universe, by the elementary witness A' = ℤ/8, Q' = A'[ε]/(ε²), where the two lifts Q''/(ε) and Q''/(ε − 2) over Q'' = Q'/4Q' have the same reduction and only the first lifts. So the source's route to the nilpotent case is closed, not untried. In the shape the source's own k would take it: over A' = k[t]/(t³), P' = k[t, x]/(t³, x²), the module M = k has the A'-flat P'-lift P'/(x), while its A''-flat P''-lift P''/(x - t) has none, the two obstructions differing by the Yoneda square of the separating class in Ext¹_{k[x]/(x²)}(k, k); and that is a legitimate instance of 0DZ2, with Q' = P' and J' = P'. Selecting M'' instead by Q'' ⊗ M'' ≅ N'' would need base change to be surjective on isomorphism classes of lifts, i.e. Ext¹_P(M, M ⊗_P ĪP) to be J'-power torsion by Stacks 0A6A and 05EC, which fails already for a hypersurface M = P/(f). Full diagnosis in the implementation notes of this file”.
Stacks 0DZ2 with the source's local liftability hypothesis, at the source's nilpotence hypothesis. Let
A' → Abe a surjection of commutative rings with nilpotent kernel whose thickeningP' → Pis square-zero, letP'andQ'be flatA'-algebras withP' → Q'flat, letP = P' ⊗_{A'} AandQ = Q' ⊗_{A'} AwithPNoetherian andP/J'P ≅ Q/J'Qfor an idealJ'ofP', and letNbe the base change toQof aP-moduleMfinite overPand flat overA. If for everyg ∈ J'the base change ofMto the localization ofPat the image ofghas anA'-flat module lift over(P')_g, thenMhas anA'-flat lift to aP'-module if and only ifNhas anA'-flat lift to aQ'-module.This is
exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLiftwith the hypothesisker(A' → A)² = ⊥dropped, so that the kernel ofA' → Acarries only the nilpotence the source assumes; what remains square-zero is the single thickeningP' → P, squareness ofQ' → Qbeing derived from it byDeformation.sq_ker_algebraMap_tensorProduct_eq_bot_of_tower.Flatness of
NoverAis not assumed, in either form:Nis isomorphic toQ ⊗_P MandMisA-flat, soflat_base_of_baseChangeEquivsupplies it. The source does not assume it either.The localization of
Pat the image ofgis realized as(P')_g ⊗_{A'} A, whichIsLocalization.Away.tensorBaseChangeidentifies with it.
theorem exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift_of_isNilpotent_ker
(A' A P' Q' : Type u) [CommRing A'] [CommRing A] [CommRing P'] [CommRing Q']
[Algebra A' A] [Algebra A' P'] [Algebra A' Q'] [Algebra P' Q'] [IsScalarTower A' P' Q']
[Module.Flat A' P'] [Module.Flat P' Q']
(hsurjA : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A' A))
(hnilA : IsNilpotent (RingHom.ker (algebraMap A' A)))
(hzeroP : (RingHom.ker (algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A))) ^ 2 = ⊥)
[Algebra (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)]
[IsNoetherianRing (TensorProduct A' P' A)]
(hcomm : (algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)).comp
(algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A)) =
(algebraMap Q' (TensorProduct A' Q' A)).comp (algebraMap P' Q'))
(hflatPQ : Module.Flat (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A))
(J' : Ideal P')
(hquot : Function.Bijective (Ideal.quotientMap
((J'.map (algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A))).map
(algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)))
(algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)) Ideal.le_comap_map))
(M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module (TensorProduct A' P' A) M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower A (TensorProduct A' P' A) M] [Module.Flat A M]
[Module.Finite (TensorProduct A' P' A) M]
(N : Type u) [AddCommGroup N] [Module (TensorProduct A' Q' A) N] [Module A N]
[IsScalarTower A (TensorProduct A' Q' A) N]
(hN : Nonempty ((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u}
(algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A))).obj
(ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' P' A) (ULift.{u} M)) ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' Q' A) (ULift.{u} N)))
(K : DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} (TensorProduct A' P' A)))
(hK : (DerivedCategory.TStructure.t
(C := ModuleCat.{u} (TensorProduct A' P' A))).minus K)
(eK : K ≅ DerivedCategory.Q.obj ((CochainComplex.singleFunctor
(ModuleCat.{u} (TensorProduct A' P' A)) 0).obj
(ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' P' A) (ULift.{u} M))))
(hlocal : ∀ g ∈ J',
letI : Algebra (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A) :=
(Algebra.TensorProduct.map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A' P' (Localization.Away g))
(AlgHom.id A' A)).toRingHom.toAlgebra
∃ (L : Type u) (_ : AddCommGroup L) (_ : Module (Localization.Away g) L)
(_ : Module A' L) (_ : IsScalarTower A' (Localization.Away g) L),
Module.Flat A' L ∧ Nonempty
((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u} (algebraMap (Localization.Away g)
(TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A))).obj
(ModuleCat.of (Localization.Away g) L) ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A)
(ULift.{u} (TensorProduct (TensorProduct A' P' A)
(TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A) (ULift.{u} M))))) :
(∃ (M' : Type u) (_ : AddCommGroup M') (_ : Module P' M') (_ : Module A' M')
(_ : IsScalarTower A' P' M'), Module.Flat A' M' ∧
Nonempty ((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u}
(algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A))).obj (ModuleCat.of P' M') ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' P' A) (ULift.{u} M))) ↔
(∃ (N' : Type u) (_ : AddCommGroup N') (_ : Module Q' N') (_ : Module A' N')
(_ : IsScalarTower A' Q' N'), Module.Flat A' N' ∧
Nonempty ((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u}
(algebraMap Q' (TensorProduct A' Q' A))).obj (ModuleCat.of Q' N') ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' Q' A) (ULift.{u} N)))
Deformation.exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/FlatModuleLiftLocalization.lean, line 716. The attribute's comment: “a RESTRICTED form of 0DZ2, restricted by hzeroA — the kernel of A' → A is assumed square-zero rather than merely nilpotent — and by Module.Finite P M. NEITHER IS REMOVABLE: the UNRESTRICTED statement is FALSE — a Stacks ERRATUM — so what 0DZ2 asserts in this library is the implication (1) => (2), registered on Deformation.HasFlatModuleLift.baseChange. It is refuted at every universe by Deformation.Examples.ArtinSchreier.not_flatModuleLiftBaseChangeStatement and, with every source hypothesis written out, by Deformation.Examples.ArtinSchreier.not_flatModuleLiftBaseChangeStatementFaithful, whose witness has a nilpotent non-square-zero ker(A' → A) and a finite M. Why each restriction is there: M is assumed finite over P — the source's statement omits it, its own proof uses it when invoking Stacks 0A6A to commute Ext² with the flat base change P → Q, and that step is false without it, by the counterexample written out in the implementation notes of this file; and the kernel of A' → A is assumed square-zero rather than merely nilpotent, which is what makes both the nilpotence of that kernel and squareness of the thickening P' → P theorems here rather than hypotheses. This is the weaker of the two registrations: exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift_of_isNilpotent_ker carries the source's nilpotence on that kernel and asks squareness only of the thickening P' → P, and the clause there records why the dévissage to the source's nilpotent thickening is not available from 0DZ2's own hypotheses”.
Stacks 0DZ2 with the source's local liftability hypothesis. Let
A' → Abe a surjection of commutative rings with square-zero kernel, letP'andQ'be flatA'-algebras withP' → Q'flat, letP = P' ⊗_{A'} AandQ = Q' ⊗_{A'} AwithPNoetherian andP/J'P ≅ Q/J'Qfor an idealJ'ofP', and letNbe the base change toQof aP-moduleMfinite overPand flat overA. If for everyg ∈ J'the base change ofMto the localization ofPat the image ofghas anA'-flat module lift over(P')_g, thenMhas anA'-flat lift to aP'-module if and only ifNhas anA'-flat lift to aQ'-module.Flatness of
NoverAis not assumed here either; seeexists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift_of_isNilpotent_ker.The localization of
Pat the image ofgis realized as(P')_g ⊗_{A'} A, whichIsLocalization.Away.tensorBaseChangeidentifies with it.
theorem exists_flat_lift_iff_exists_flat_lift_baseChange_of_localizationLift
(A' A P' Q' : Type u) [CommRing A'] [CommRing A] [CommRing P'] [CommRing Q']
[Algebra A' A] [Algebra A' P'] [Algebra A' Q'] [Algebra P' Q'] [IsScalarTower A' P' Q']
[Module.Flat A' P'] [Module.Flat P' Q']
(hsurjA : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A' A))
(hzeroA : (RingHom.ker (algebraMap A' A)) ^ 2 = ⊥)
[Algebra (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)]
[IsNoetherianRing (TensorProduct A' P' A)]
(hcomm : (algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)).comp
(algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A)) =
(algebraMap Q' (TensorProduct A' Q' A)).comp (algebraMap P' Q'))
(hflatPQ : Module.Flat (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A))
(J' : Ideal P')
(hquot : Function.Bijective (Ideal.quotientMap
((J'.map (algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A))).map
(algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)))
(algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A)) Ideal.le_comap_map))
(M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module (TensorProduct A' P' A) M] [Module A M]
[IsScalarTower A (TensorProduct A' P' A) M] [Module.Flat A M]
[Module.Finite (TensorProduct A' P' A) M]
(N : Type u) [AddCommGroup N] [Module (TensorProduct A' Q' A) N] [Module A N]
[IsScalarTower A (TensorProduct A' Q' A) N]
(hN : Nonempty ((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u}
(algebraMap (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' Q' A))).obj
(ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' P' A) (ULift.{u} M)) ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' Q' A) (ULift.{u} N)))
(K : DerivedCategory (ModuleCat.{u} (TensorProduct A' P' A)))
(hK : (DerivedCategory.TStructure.t
(C := ModuleCat.{u} (TensorProduct A' P' A))).minus K)
(eK : K ≅ DerivedCategory.Q.obj ((CochainComplex.singleFunctor
(ModuleCat.{u} (TensorProduct A' P' A)) 0).obj
(ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' P' A) (ULift.{u} M))))
(hlocal : ∀ g ∈ J',
letI : Algebra (TensorProduct A' P' A) (TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A) :=
(Algebra.TensorProduct.map (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A' P' (Localization.Away g))
(AlgHom.id A' A)).toRingHom.toAlgebra
∃ (L : Type u) (_ : AddCommGroup L) (_ : Module (Localization.Away g) L)
(_ : Module A' L) (_ : IsScalarTower A' (Localization.Away g) L),
Module.Flat A' L ∧ Nonempty
((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u} (algebraMap (Localization.Away g)
(TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A))).obj
(ModuleCat.of (Localization.Away g) L) ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A)
(ULift.{u} (TensorProduct (TensorProduct A' P' A)
(TensorProduct A' (Localization.Away g) A) (ULift.{u} M))))) :
(∃ (M' : Type u) (_ : AddCommGroup M') (_ : Module P' M') (_ : Module A' M')
(_ : IsScalarTower A' P' M'), Module.Flat A' M' ∧
Nonempty ((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u}
(algebraMap P' (TensorProduct A' P' A))).obj (ModuleCat.of P' M') ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' P' A) (ULift.{u} M))) ↔
(∃ (N' : Type u) (_ : AddCommGroup N') (_ : Module Q' N') (_ : Module A' N')
(_ : IsScalarTower A' Q' N'), Module.Flat A' N' ∧
Nonempty ((ModuleCat.extendScalars.{u, u, u}
(algebraMap Q' (TensorProduct A' Q' A))).obj (ModuleCat.of Q' N') ≅
ModuleCat.of (TensorProduct A' Q' A) (ULift.{u} N)))
Tag 0DZ3, a lemma
Tag 0DZ3 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.hasFlatAlgebraLift_iff_hasFlatAlgebraLift_adicCompletion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/FlatAlgebraLiftCompletionNilpotent.lean, line 348. The attribute's comment: “Spec(B) → Spec(A) being syntomic on the complement of V(𝔟) is read pointwise and affinely: for every prime 𝔮 not containing 𝔟 there is g ∉ 𝔮 with A → B_g syntomic, the characterization of Stacks 00SY and 01UE. B^∧ is AdicCompletion 𝔟 B. The published proof rests on Stacks 0DZ2, which is false at a nilpotent kernel; the proof here approximates a flat lift over the completed presentation by relation solutions over the polynomial presentation and corrects them one power of the kernel at a time (Artin-Rees plus Stacks 07M8 at every level). See the module docstring.”.
Stacks 0DZ3. Let
A' → Abe a surjective map of Noetherian rings with nilpotent kernel, letA → Bbe a finite type flat ring map and let𝔟 ⊆ Bbe an ideal such thatSpec(B) → Spec(A)is syntomic on the complement ofV(𝔟). ThenBhas a flat lift toA'if and only if the𝔟-adic completionB^∧has a flat lift toA'.
Spec(B) → Spec(A)is syntomic at the point𝔮exactly whenA → B_gis syntomic for someg ∉ 𝔮(Stacks 00SY, 01UE); that is how the hypothesishsynreads the source's condition at every point𝔮of the complement ofV(𝔟). The proof does not go through Stacks 0DZ2 (which is false at a nilpotent kernel); see the module documentation.
public theorem hasFlatAlgebraLift_iff_hasFlatAlgebraLift_adicCompletion
(A' A B : Type u) [CommRing A'] [CommRing A] [CommRing B]
[IsNoetherianRing A'] [IsNoetherianRing A] [Algebra A' A] [Algebra A B]
(hsurjA : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A' A))
(hnilA : IsNilpotent (RingHom.ker (algebraMap A' A)))
[Algebra.FiniteType A B] [Module.Flat A B] (b : Ideal B)
(hsyn : ∀ q : Ideal B, q.IsPrime → ¬ b ≤ q →
∃ g ∉ q, Algebra.Syntomic A (Localization.Away g)) :
HasFlatAlgebraLift A' A B ↔ HasFlatAlgebraLift A' A (AdicCompletion b B)
Tag 0DZ4, a lemma
Tag 0DZ4 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.exists_squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesCompletionEquiv, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/CompletionFirstOrder.lean, line 1035.
Stacks 0DZ4. For a finite type algebra
Bover a fieldkwhich is smooth overkoutside the zero set of an idealJ, and a finiteB-moduleN, completion alongJis a bijection from the isomorphism classes of square-zero extensions ofBbyNto those ofB^byN^, matching a class with its image exactly when the two extensions admit ak-algebra map of middle rings overB → B^and overN → N^.
public theorem exists_squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesCompletionEquiv
(k : Type uk) (B : Type uB) [Field k] [CommRing B] [Algebra k B]
[Algebra.FiniteType k B] (J : Ideal B)
(hsm : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum B, ¬ J ≤ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal)
(N : Type uN) [AddCommGroup N] [Module B N] [Module.Finite B N] :
∃ e : SquareZeroExtensionProblem.CompatibleExtension.IsomorphismClasses.{uk, uk, uB, uN,
max uB uN} (algebraExtensionProblem k B N) ≃
SquareZeroExtensionProblem.CompatibleExtension.IsomorphismClasses.{uk, uk, uB, uN,
max uB uN} (algebraExtensionProblem k (AdicCompletion J B) (AdicCompletion J N)),
∀ (X : (algebraExtensionProblem k B N).CompatibleExtension.{max uB uN})
(Y : (algebraExtensionProblem k (AdicCompletion J B)
(AdicCompletion J N)).CompatibleExtension.{max uB uN}),
(∃ h : X.B' →ₐ[k] Y.B',
(∀ z : X.B', Y.toB (h z) = algebraMap B (AdicCompletion J B) (X.toB z)) ∧
∀ n : N, h (kernelInclusion X n) =
kernelInclusion Y (AdicCompletion.of J N n)) ↔
e ⟦X⟧ = ⟦Y⟧
Tag 0DZ5, a lemma
Tag 0DZ5 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctorData_unconditional, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/CompletionSmooth.lean, line 457. The attribute's comment: “the first conclusion, smoothness, over an arbitrary base-compatible completion functor datum, and unconditionally: no hypothesis stands for Stacks 0DZ2, because only the square-zero case of Stacks 0DZ3 is consumed and that case is proved in StacksFrontier.Deformation.FlatModuleLiftBaseChangeAbstract. The second conclusion, the isomorphism on tangent spaces, is Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorData over the same data. RESTRICTED in the same way as that declaration, to a datum satisfying Deformation.Examples.AdicCompletionFunctorData.IsBaseCompatible; at the canonical choice the conclusion is Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctor”. References: SGA 7 VI (4.13), “(a), special case”.
Stacks 0DZ5, the smoothness conclusion. Let
kbe a field,Pa finite typek-algebra,J ⊆ Pan ideal such thatSpec(P) → Spec(k)is smooth outsideV(J), andP^theJ-adic completion. The completion functor𝓓_P ⟶ 𝓓_{P^}of Stacks 0DYV is smooth.The criterion of Stacks 0DYP reduces this to surjectivity of the differential, which is
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorData, and to the correspondence of liftability, which isDeformation.Examples.lifts_adicCompletionFunctorData_unconditional.
theorem isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctorData_unconditional [Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(F : AdicCompletionFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P J) (hF : F.IsBaseCompatible)
(hsm : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, ¬ J ≤ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
IsSmooth F.functor
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/CompletionSmooth.lean, line 512. The attribute's comment: “the second conclusion only: the functor induces an isomorphism on tangent spaces. The first conclusion, smoothness, is Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctor”.
Stacks 0DZ5, the tangent-space conclusion. This is
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorDataspecialized to the completion functorDeformation.Examples.adicCompletionFunctorof Stacks 0DYV, whose base-compatibility isDeformation.Examples.isBaseCompatible_adicCompletionFunctor; so no hypothesis on the functor remains.
theorem bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctor [Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(hsm : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, ¬ J ≤ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
letI : IsNoetherianRing P := Algebra.FiniteType.isNoetherianRing k P
Function.Bijective (differential (𝓕 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
(𝓖 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (AdicCompletion J P))
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
(adicCompletionFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P J).functor)
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/CompletionSmooth.lean, line 532. The attribute's comment: “the first conclusion, smoothness. The second conclusion, the isomorphism on tangent spaces, is Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctor”.
Stacks 0DZ5, the smoothness conclusion. This is
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctorData_unconditionalspecialized to the completion functorDeformation.Examples.adicCompletionFunctorof Stacks 0DYV, whose base-compatibility isDeformation.Examples.isBaseCompatible_adicCompletionFunctor; so no hypothesis on the functor remains.
theorem isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctor [Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(hsm : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, ¬ J ≤ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
letI : IsNoetherianRing P := Algebra.FiniteType.isNoetherianRing k P
IsSmooth (adicCompletionFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P J).functor
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_baseCompatibleAdicCompletionFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/CompletionSmooth.lean, line 568. The attribute's comment: “the second conclusion only: the functor induces an isomorphism on tangent spaces. Stated at the canonical base-compatible completion functor datum Deformation.Examples.baseCompatibleAdicCompletionFunctor rather than over an arbitrary datum, so there is no hypothesis on the functor; it is still RESTRICTED to a base-compatible datum. The first conclusion, smoothness, is proved over an arbitrary base-compatible datum by Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctorData_unconditional, and at Deformation.Examples.adicCompletionFunctor by Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctor”.
Stacks 0DZ5, the tangent-space conclusion, at the canonical base-compatible completion functor. This is
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorDataspecialized toDeformation.Examples.baseCompatibleAdicCompletionFunctor, whose base-compatibility is its own second component; so no hypothesis on the functor remains.
theorem bijective_differential_baseCompatibleAdicCompletionFunctor
[Algebra.FiniteType k P] [IsNoetherianRing P]
(hsm : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, ¬ J ≤ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
Function.Bijective (differential (𝓕 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
(𝓖 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (AdicCompletion J P))
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
(baseCompatibleAdicCompletionFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P J).1.functor)
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorData, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/CompletionTangentSpace.lean, line 360. The attribute's comment: “the second conclusion only: the functor induces an isomorphism on tangent spaces. The first conclusion, smoothness, is not proved here; granted the correspondence of liftability it is Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctorData_of_lifts. RESTRICTED: the statement is for any completion functor datum of Stacks 0DYV which in addition satisfies Deformation.Examples.AdicCompletionFunctorData.IsBaseCompatible, and such data exist by Deformation.Examples.nonempty_isBaseCompatible_adicCompletionFunctorData; it is not for the arbitrary choice Deformation.Examples.adicCompletionFunctor, which satisfies only the clauses recorded in Stacks 0DYV. See the implementation notes”.
Stacks 0DZ5, the tangent-space conclusion. Let
kbe a field,Pa finite typek-algebra,J ⊆ Pan ideal such thatSpec(P) → Spec(k)is smooth outsideV(J), andP^theJ-adic completion. The completion functor𝓓_P ⟶ 𝓓_{P^}of Stacks 0DYV induces a bijection on tangent spaces.The proof is the source's: the family of extension classes of Stacks 0DY3 is a bijection of each tangent space with a first Ext group of the naive cotangent complex, by
Deformation.Examples.bijective_tangentExtClass; the functor is compatible with those classes through the two comparison maps of Stacks 0GPV, byDeformation.Examples.squareZeroFiberExtClass_completion; and both comparison maps are bijective by Stacks 0DZ4.
public theorem bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorData
[Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(F : AdicCompletionFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P J) (hF : F.IsBaseCompatible)
(hsm : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, ¬ J ≤ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
Function.Bijective (differential (𝓕 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
(𝓖 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (AdicCompletion J P))
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection F.functor)
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctorData_of_lifts, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/CompletionTangentSpace.lean, line 435. The attribute's comment: “the first conclusion, smoothness, GRANTED the hypothesis hlifts: that a deformation lifts along a small extension of its Artinian base whenever its completion does. That correspondence of liftability is the deformation-category reading of Stacks 0DZ3 and is NOT proved here, so this declaration is not the conclusion of the tag. The tag's other input, surjectivity of the differential, is supplied in full from Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorData, and the reduction to the two inputs is Stacks 0DYP. RESTRICTED in the same way as that declaration, to a base-compatible completion functor datum. See the implementation notes”.
Stacks 0DZ5, the smoothness conclusion, granted the correspondence of liftability. Under the hypotheses of Stacks 0DZ5, the completion functor
𝓓_P ⟶ 𝓓_{P^}is smooth as soon as liftability of a deformation along a small extension of the Artinian base is implied by liftability of its completion.That implication is the deformation-category reading of Stacks 0DZ3 and is the only input missing: the other half of the criterion of Stacks 0DYP, surjectivity of the differential, is
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_adicCompletionFunctorData.
public theorem isSmooth_adicCompletionFunctorData_of_lifts
[Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(F : AdicCompletionFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) P J) (hF : F.IsBaseCompatible)
(hsm : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, ¬ J ≤ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal)
(hlifts : ∀ ⦃B A : ArtinianLocalAlgCat.{u, w, w} Λ k⦄ (f : B ⟶ A),
InfinitesimalLifting.IsSmallExtension (CommRingCat.ofHom f.hom.toRingHom) →
∀ x : (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P).p.Fiber A,
(∃ (y' : (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (AdicCompletion J P)).obj)
(g : y' ⟶ F.functor.obj x.1),
(ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (AdicCompletion J P)).p.IsHomLift f g) →
∃ (x' : (ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P).obj) (h : x' ⟶ x.1),
(ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P).p.IsHomLift f h) :
IsSmooth F.functor
Sources
Section93.13 Deformations of localizations#
Section 93.13 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0DZ6. 3 tags here are carried by 8 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0DZ7, a lemma
Tag 0DZ7 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.hasFlatAlgebraLift_iff_hasFlatAlgebraLift_localization, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/FlatAlgebraLiftLocalizationNilpotent.lean, line 335. The attribute's comment: “S⁻¹B is any C with IsLocalization S C. Spec(B) → Spec(A) being syntomic at the point 𝔮 is read affinely as ∃ g ∉ 𝔮, A → B_g syntomic, the characterization of Stacks 00SY and 01UE; S ∩ 𝔮 = ∅ is ∀ s ∈ S, s ∉ 𝔮. The published proof rests on Stacks 0DZ2, which is false; the proof here approximates a flat lift over the localized presentation by relation solutions over the polynomial presentation and corrects them one power of the kernel at a time (Artin-Rees plus Stacks 07M8 at every level). See the module docstring.”.
Stacks 0DZ7. Let
A' → Abe a surjective map of Noetherian rings with nilpotent kernel, letA → Bbe a finite type flat ring map and letS ⊆ Bbe a multiplicative subset such that ifSpec(B) → Spec(A)is not syntomic at𝔮, thenS ∩ 𝔮 = ∅. ThenBhas a flat lift toA'if and only ifS⁻¹Bhas a flat lift toA'.
Spec(B) → Spec(A)is syntomic at the point𝔮exactly whenA → B_gis syntomic for someg ∉ 𝔮(Stacks 00SY, 01UE); that is how the hypothesishSreads the source's condition. The proof does not go through Stacks 0DZ2 (which is false); see the module documentation.
public theorem hasFlatAlgebraLift_iff_hasFlatAlgebraLift_localization
(A' A B : Type u) [CommRing A'] [CommRing A] [CommRing B]
[IsNoetherianRing A'] [IsNoetherianRing A] [Algebra A' A] [Algebra A B]
(hsurjA : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A' A))
(hnilA : IsNilpotent (RingHom.ker (algebraMap A' A)))
[Algebra.FiniteType A B] [Module.Flat A B] (S : Submonoid B)
(hS : ∀ q : Ideal B, q.IsPrime →
(¬ ∃ g ∉ q, Algebra.Syntomic A (Localization.Away g)) → ∀ s ∈ S, s ∉ q)
(C : Type u) [CommRing C] [Algebra B C] [IsLocalization S C] [Algebra A C]
[IsScalarTower A B C] :
HasFlatAlgebraLift A' A B ↔ HasFlatAlgebraLift A' A C
Tag 0DZ8, a lemma
Tag 0DZ8 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesLocalizationEquiv, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/LocalizationFirstOrder/ClassesLocalizationEquiv.lean, line 546. The attribute's comment: “localization equivalence”.
Stacks 0DZ8. If a multiplicative subset
Sof a finite type algebraBover a fieldkis disjoint from every prime in the non-smooth locus ofB, then localization atSis a bijection from the isomorphism classes of square-zero extensions ofBbyNto those of square-zero extensions ofS⁻¹BbyS⁻¹N.The companion lemma
Deformation.Examples.squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesLocalizationEquiv_applyidentifies the forward map with localization.
noncomputable def squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesLocalizationEquiv
(k : Type uk) (B : Type uB) [Field k] [CommRing B] [Algebra k B]
[Algebra.FiniteType k B] (S : Submonoid B)
(hS : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum B,
¬ Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal →
Disjoint (S : Set B) (q.asIdeal : Set B))
(N : Type uN) [AddCommGroup N] [Module B N] :
SquareZeroExtensionProblem.CompatibleExtension.IsomorphismClasses.{uk, uk, uB, uN,
max uk (max uB uN)} (algebraExtensionProblem k B N) ≃
SquareZeroExtensionProblem.CompatibleExtension.IsomorphismClasses.{uk, uk, uB,
max uB uN, max uk (max uB uN)}
(algebraExtensionProblem k (Localization S) (LocalizedModule S N))
Deformation.Examples.squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesLocalizationEquiv_apply, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/LocalizationFirstOrder/ClassesLocalizationEquiv.lean, line 589. The attribute's comment: “forward map is localization”.
Stacks 0DZ8. The forward map of
Deformation.Examples.squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesLocalizationEquivis localization of an extension at the inverse image ofSin its middle ring.
theorem squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesLocalizationEquiv_apply
(k : Type uk) (B : Type uB) [Field k] [CommRing B] [Algebra k B]
[Algebra.FiniteType k B] (S : Submonoid B)
(hS : ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum B,
¬ Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal →
Disjoint (S : Set B) (q.asIdeal : Set B))
(N : Type uN) [AddCommGroup N] [Module B N]
(X : (algebraExtensionProblem k B N).CompatibleExtension.{max uk (max uB uN)}) :
∃ Y : (algebraExtensionProblem k (Localization S)
(LocalizedModule S N)).CompatibleExtension.{max uk (max uB uN)},
squareZeroAlgebraExtensionClassesLocalizationEquiv k B S hS N
(Quotient.mk
(SquareZeroExtensionProblem.CompatibleExtension.isomorphicSetoid
(algebraExtensionProblem k B N)) X) =
Quotient.mk
(SquareZeroExtensionProblem.CompatibleExtension.isomorphicSetoid
(algebraExtensionProblem k (Localization S)
(LocalizedModule S N))) Y ∧
IsLocalizedExtension k B S N X Y
Deformation.Examples.IsLocalizedExtension, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/LocalizationFirstOrder/LocalizedExtension.lean, line 346. The attribute's comment: “the localization relation between two extensions”.
Stacks 0DZ8. The extension
YofS⁻¹Bis obtained from the extensionXofBby localizing its middle ring at the inverse image ofS: there is a map of the two middle rings which is such a localization, and which is compatible both with the quotient maps down toBandS⁻¹Band with the identifications of the two kernels withNandS⁻¹N.
def IsLocalizedExtension
(k : Type uk) (B : Type uB) [Field k] [CommRing B] [Algebra k B]
(S : Submonoid B) (N : Type uN) [AddCommGroup N] [Module B N]
(X : (algebraExtensionProblem k B N).CompatibleExtension.{max uk (max uB uN)})
(Y : (algebraExtensionProblem k (Localization S)
(LocalizedModule S N)).CompatibleExtension.{max uk (max uB uN)}) : Prop
Tag 0DZ9, a lemma
Tag 0DZ9 in the Stacks Project.
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_localizationFunctorData, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/LocalizationSmooth.lean, line 268. The attribute's comment: “the first conclusion, smoothness: the functor of Stacks 0DYS is smooth. Under the tag's own hypotheses: (1) is Algebra.FiniteType k P and (2) is hsm, smoothness of Spec(P) → Spec(k) at every point of V(g) for every g of S. Stated for an arbitrary functor datum of Stacks 0DYS, with no extra hypothesis on the datum. The criterion of Stacks 0DYP reduces it to surjectivity of the differential, which is Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_localizationFunctorData, and to the correspondence of liftability, which is proved here in Deformation.Examples.lifts_localizationFunctorData”.
Stacks 0DZ9, the smoothness conclusion. Let
kbe a field,Pa finite typek-algebra andS ⊆ Pa multiplicative subset such thatSpec(P) → Spec(k)is smooth at every point ofV(g)for everyg ∈ S. The localization functor𝓓_P ⟶ 𝓓_{S⁻¹P}of Stacks 0DYS is smooth.
theorem isSmooth_localizationFunctorData [Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(F : LocalizationFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S)
(hsm : ∀ g ∈ S, ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, g ∈ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
IsSmooth F.functor
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_localizationFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/LocalizationSmooth.lean, line 285. The attribute's comment: “the first conclusion, smoothness, at the canonical localization functor Deformation.Examples.localizationFunctor of Stacks 0DYS. Under the tag's own hypotheses”.
Stacks 0DZ9, the smoothness conclusion, at the canonical localization functor. This is
Deformation.Examples.isSmooth_localizationFunctorDataspecialized toDeformation.Examples.localizationFunctor, the functor datum built in the proof of Stacks 0DYS.
theorem isSmooth_localizationFunctor [Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(hsm : ∀ g ∈ S, ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, g ∈ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
IsSmooth (localizationFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S).functor
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_localizationFunctorData, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/LocalizationTangentSpace.lean, line 273. The attribute's comment: “the tangent-space assertion: the functor of Stacks 0DYS induces an isomorphism on tangent spaces. Under the tag's own hypotheses: (1) is Algebra.FiniteType k P and (2) is hsm, smoothness of Spec(P) → Spec(k) at every point of V(g) for every g of S. Stated for an arbitrary functor datum of Stacks 0DYS, with no extra hypothesis on the datum”.
Let
kbe a field,Pa finite typek-algebra andS ⊆ Pa multiplicative subset such thatSpec(P) → Spec(k)is smooth at every point ofV(g)for everyg ∈ S. Then the localization functor𝓓_P ⟶ 𝓓_{S⁻¹P}of Stacks 0DYS, given by anyLocalizationFunctorData, induces a bijection on tangent spaces.The proof is the source's: the family of extension classes of Stacks 0DY3 is a bijection of each tangent space with a first Ext group of the naive cotangent complex, by
Deformation.Examples.bijective_tangentExtClass; the functor is compatible with those classes through the two comparison maps of Stacks 0GPV, byDeformation.Examples.squareZeroFiberExtClass_localization; the bijection of Stacks 0DZ8 is compatible with the same two maps, byDeformation.Examples.naiveCotangentExtOneMap_localizationCoefficientMap; and restriction alongP → S⁻¹Pis injective, byStacks.Deformation.injective_naiveCotangentExtOneTowerMap_isLocalization.
public theorem bijective_differential_localizationFunctorData
[Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(F : LocalizationFunctorData (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S)
(hsm : ∀ g ∈ S, ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, g ∈ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
Function.Bijective (differential (𝓕 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
(𝓖 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (Localization S))
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection F.functor)
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_localizationFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Deformation/Examples/Geometric/LocalizationTangentSpace.lean, line 332. The attribute's comment: “the tangent-space assertion: the functor induces an isomorphism on tangent spaces, at the canonical localization functor Deformation.Examples.localizationFunctor of Stacks 0DYS. Under the tag's own hypotheses”.
Under the hypotheses of
Deformation.Examples.bijective_differential_localizationFunctorData, the canonical localization functorDeformation.Examples.localizationFunctor, the functor datum built in the proof of Stacks 0DYS, induces a bijection on tangent spaces.
public theorem bijective_differential_localizationFunctor [Algebra.FiniteType k P]
(hsm : ∀ g ∈ S, ∀ q : PrimeSpectrum P, g ∈ q.asIdeal → Algebra.IsSmoothAt k q.asIdeal) :
Function.Bijective (differential (𝓕 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k P)
(𝓖 := ringDeformationBasedCategory Λ k (Localization S))
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
isCofiberedInGroupoids_ringDeformationProjection
(localizationFunctor (Λ := Λ) (k := k) S).functor)
Sources
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.