89 Resolution of Surfaces Revisited
Chapter 89 of the Stacks Project, Resolution of Surfaces Revisited, Tag 0BH6: the 8 sections of its 9 with a tag that a declaration carries, one article each, in the Stacks Project's order. Their 27 tags are carried by 77 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier).
Section89.2 Modifications#
Section 89.2 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BH8. 5 tags here are carried by 14 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0AE2, an equation
Tag 0AE2 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.puncturedSpectrumSubfunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ProperModifications.lean, line 57. The attribute's comment: “the punctured spectrum as a subfunctor”.
Stacks 0AE2. The punctured spectrum of a local ring
A, as a subfunctor of the functor of points ofSpec Aon a big fppf site: a point lies in it exactly when the corresponding morphism of schemes factors through the open immersion of the punctured spectrum.
noncomputable def puncturedSpectrumSubfunctor (A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsLocalRing A]
(B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (hS : B.Contains (Spec (.of A))) :
Subfunctor (yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hS))
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsProperModification, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ProperModifications.lean, line 74. The attribute's comment: “the three defining conditions”.
Stacks 0AE2. A proper modification of a represented algebraic space
Toutside a subfunctorUof its functor of points: an algebraic space overTwhose structure morphism is proper and whose base change toUis an isomorphism.
def IsProperModification (B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (S : Scheme.{u}) (hS : B.Contains S)
(T : BigFppfOver B S hS) (U : Subfunctor (yoneda.obj T))
(X : Over (yoneda.obj T)) : Prop
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ProperModification, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ProperModifications.lean, line 82. The attribute's comment: “the category they form”.
Stacks 0AE2. The category of proper morphisms of algebraic spaces to
Spec Awhich are isomorphisms over the punctured spectrum ofA.
abbrev ProperModification (A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsLocalRing A] [IsNoetherianRing A]
(B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (hS : B.Contains (Spec (.of A)))
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isProperModification_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ProperModifications.lean, line 92. The attribute's comment: “the conditions spelled out”.
Stacks 0AE2. The three conditions defining a proper modification, spelled out: the source is an algebraic space, its structure morphism is proper, and the base change of that morphism to the subfunctor is an isomorphism.
theorem isProperModification_iff (B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (S : Scheme.{u}) (hS : B.Contains S)
(T : BigFppfOver B S hS) (U : Subfunctor (yoneda.obj T)) (X : Over (yoneda.obj T)) :
IsProperModification B S hS T U X ↔
IsAlgebraicSpace B S hS X.left ∧ IsProper B S hS X.hom ∧
IsIso (pullback.snd X.hom U.ι)
Tag 0AE3, a lemma
Tag 0AE3 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isProperModification_of_isIntegralModification, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationNormalPuncturedSurface.lean, line 169.
Stacks 0AE3. Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a two-dimensional Noetherian local domain whose punctured spectrumU = Spec A ∖ {𝔪}is a normal scheme. Then every modificationf : X → Spec Alies in the category of Stacks 0AE2:fis proper and its base changef⁻¹(U) → Uto the punctured spectrum is an isomorphism.
theorem isProperModification_of_isIntegralModification [IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A]
(hdim : ringKrullDim A = 2) [AlgebraicGeometry.IsNormal (Stacks.puncturedSpectrum A).toScheme]
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hS)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hS X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hS))
(hf : IsIntegralModification B (Spec (.of A)) hS hX
(isAlgebraicSpace_yoneda B (Spec (.of A)) hS _)
(isIntegralSpace_yoneda_baseTerminal A B hS) f) :
IsProperModification B (Spec (.of A)) hS (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hS)
(puncturedSpectrumSubfunctor A B hS) (Over.mk f)
Tag 0AGM, a lemma
Tag 0AGM in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isClosedImmersion_of_isClosedImmersion_specialFibre, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ProperModificationSpecialFibre.lean, line 198.
Stacks 0AGM. Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a Noetherian local ring and letg : X ⟶ Ybe a morphism of proper modifications ofSpec Aoutside its punctured spectrum. If the induced morphismX_κ ⟶ Y_κof special fibres — the base change ofgalong the closed pointSpec κ → Spec A— is a closed immersion, thengis a closed immersion.This is the case
Z = Spec Aof Stacks 05XA: the open subspace ofSpec Athat lemma produces contains the closed point, hence is the whole ofSpec A.
theorem isClosedImmersion_of_isClosedImmersion_specialFibre
{X Y : ProperModification A B hS} (g : X ⟶ Y)
(hg : IsClosedImmersion B (Spec (.of A)) hS
(baseChangeOverBase B (Spec (.of A)) hS g.hom.left X.1.hom Y.1.hom g.hom.w
(yoneda.map (residueSpecToBase A B hS)))) :
IsClosedImmersion B (Spec (.of A)) hS g.hom.left
Tag 0AYJ, a lemma
Tag 0AYJ in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralModification, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationSpecialFibreDimension.lean, line 140. The attribute's comment: “case (1), f a modification”.
Stacks 0AYJ, case (1). Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a Noetherian local domain of dimension at least one and letf : X → Spec Abe a modification. Then the special fibreX_κhas dimension at mostdim(A) - 1.
theorem dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralModification [IsDomain A]
[IsNoetherianRing A] (hdim : 1 ≤ ringKrullDim A)
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hS)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hS X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hS))
(hf : IsIntegralModification B (Spec (.of A)) hS hX
(isAlgebraicSpace_yoneda B (Spec (.of A)) hS _)
(isIntegralSpace_yoneda_baseTerminal A B hS) f) :
dimension B (Spec (.of A)) hS
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hS f (residueFieldPoint A B hS))
(isAlgebraicSpace_fieldFibre hX (isAlgebraicSpace_yoneda B (Spec (.of A)) hS _) f
(residueFieldPoint A B hS)) + 1
≤ ringKrullDim A
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SpecialFibreDimension.lean, line 211. The attribute's comment: “case (4), X decent”.
Stacks 0AYJ, case (4). Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a Noetherian local domain of dimension at least one and letf : X → Spec Abe a morphism of algebraic spaces which is locally of finite type, withXdecent, such that the points of|X|lying over the generic point ofSpec Aare exactly the generic points of the irreducible components of|X|. Then the special fibreX_κhas dimension at mostdim(A) - 1.The bound is proved one point of
X_κat a time: base change identifies the dimension ofX_κat a point with the relative dimension offover the closed point there, an affine étale chart turns that into the dimension of the fibre of an affine scheme of finite type overSpec A, and the generic hypothesis transported to the chart is the hypothesis of the commutative-algebra bound on the special fibre.
theorem dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim [IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A]
(hdim : 1 ≤ ringKrullDim A)
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA))
(hf : IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f)
(hdec : IsDecentSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hgen : ∀ x : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X,
x ∈ genericPoints (points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X) ↔
pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA)
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA X f x) = genericPoint (Spec (.of A)))
(hfib : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA))) :
dimension B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA)) hfib + 1
≤ ringKrullDim A
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SpecialFibreDimension.lean, line 324. The attribute's comment: “case (3), X integral”.
Stacks 0AYJ, case (3). Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a Noetherian local domain of dimension at least one and letf : X → Spec Abe a morphism of algebraic spaces which is locally of finite type, withXintegral, such that exactly one point of|X|lies over the generic point ofSpec A. Then the special fibreX_κhas dimension at mostdim(A) - 1.This is case (4): an integral algebraic space is decent and its space of points is irreducible, so its generic points are the points whose closure is everything, and there is one of them because the points of codimension zero are dense. The image of such a point both specialises to and generalises the generic point of
Spec A, hence equals it, and uniqueness identifies it with the point lying over the generic point. Quasi-separatedness, which the source also assumes, is not needed for this reduction.
theorem dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralSpace
[IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] (hdim : 1 ≤ ringKrullDim A)
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA))
(hf : IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f)
(hint : IsIntegralSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hone : ∃! x : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X,
pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA)
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA X f x) = genericPoint (Spec (.of A)))
(hfib : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA))) :
dimension B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA)) hfib + 1
≤ ringKrullDim A
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim', a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SpecialFibreDimensionExtensions.lean, line 63. The attribute's comment: “case (4), X decent, at the source's hypotheses”.
Stacks 0AYJ, case (4), with the algebraicity of the special fibre supplied rather than assumed: it is the base change of
falong the residue-field point, soAlgebraicGeometry.Space.isAlgebraicSpace_fieldFibre_residueFieldPointprovides it andAlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDimapplies.
theorem dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim' [IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A]
(hdim : 1 ≤ ringKrullDim A)
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA))
(hf : IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f)
(hdec : IsDecentSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hgen : ∀ x : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X,
x ∈ genericPoints (points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X) ↔
pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA)
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA X f x) = genericPoint (Spec (.of A))) :
dimension B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA))
(isAlgebraicSpace_fieldFibre_residueFieldPoint A B hA hX f) + 1
≤ ringKrullDim A
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralSpace', a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SpecialFibreDimensionExtensions.lean, line 86. The attribute's comment: “case (3), X integral, at the source's hypotheses”.
Stacks 0AYJ, case (3), with the algebraicity of the special fibre supplied rather than assumed, by
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isAlgebraicSpace_fieldFibre_residueFieldPoint; this isAlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralSpacewith that witness.
theorem dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralSpace'
[IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] (hdim : 1 ≤ ringKrullDim A)
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA))
(hf : IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f)
(hint : IsIntegralSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hone : ∃! x : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X,
pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA)
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA X f x) = genericPoint (Spec (.of A))) :
dimension B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA))
(isAlgebraicSpace_fieldFibre_residueFieldPoint A B hA hX f) + 1
≤ ringKrullDim A
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isAlteration, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SpecialFibreDimensionExtensions.lean, line 115. The attribute's comment: “case (2), f an alteration”.
Stacks 0AYJ, case (2). Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a Noetherian local domain of dimension at least one and letf : X → Spec Abe an alteration of algebraic spaces, Stacks 0ADA. Then the special fibreX_κhas dimension at mostdim(A) - 1.This is case (3). An alteration is proper, hence locally of finite type, and its source is integral, so all that is needed is that exactly one point of
|X|lies over the generic point ofSpec A. Being an alteration,fis quasi-finite at the generic point of|X|by Stacks 0ADB, and condition (5) of Stacks 0AD5 turns that into the statement that the generic point is the only point of|X|above the generic point of|Spec A|; the comparison map from the points of the representable base toSpec Ais injective, so that is uniqueness of the point abovegenericPoint (Spec A).
theorem dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isAlteration
[IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] (hdim : 1 ≤ ringKrullDim A)
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA))
(halt : IsAlteration B (Spec (.of A)) hA f) :
dimension B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA))
(isAlgebraicSpace_fieldFibre_residueFieldPoint A B hA
(halt.isAlgebraicSpace_source B (Spec (.of A)) hA) f) + 1
≤ ringKrullDim A
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_alteration_or_generic, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SpecialFibreDimensionExtensions.lean, line 191.
Stacks 0AYJ. Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a Noetherian local domain of dimension at least one and letf : X → Spec Abe a morphism of algebraic spaces satisfying at least one of: (1)fis a modification, Stacks 0AD8; (2)fis an alteration, Stacks 0ADA; (3)fis locally of finite type,Xis integral, and exactly one point of|X|maps to the generic point ofSpec A; (4)fis locally of finite type,Xis decent, and the points of|X|mapping to the generic point ofSpec Aare the generic points of the irreducible components of|X|. Then the special fibreX_κhas dimension at mostdim(A) - 1.The source's hypothesis is this disjunction, and the four clauses are four theorems (clause (1) is
dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralModification, the others are above), so the proof is the case distinction. Clause (1) needs no decency witness:AlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsIntegralModificationderives it from the integrality it asserts. The source also assumesfquasi-separated in clause (3); that is omitted, becauseAlgebraicGeometry.Space.dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_isIntegralSpacedoes not need it.
theorem dimension_fieldFibre_add_one_le_ringKrullDim_of_alteration_or_generic
[IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] (hdim : 1 ≤ ringKrullDim A)
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA))
(hf :
IsIntegralModification B (Spec (.of A)) hA hX
(isAlgebraicSpace_yoneda B (Spec (.of A)) hA _)
(isIntegralSpace_yoneda_baseTerminal A B hA) f ∨
IsAlteration B (Spec (.of A)) hA f ∨
(IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f ∧
IsIntegralSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X ∧
∃! x : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X,
pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA)
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA X f x) = genericPoint (Spec (.of A))) ∨
(IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f ∧
IsDecentSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X ∧
∀ x : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X,
x ∈ genericPoints (points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X) ↔
pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (baseTerminal B (Spec (.of A)) hA)
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA X f x) = genericPoint (Spec (.of A)))) :
dimension B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(fieldFibre B (Spec (.of A)) hA f (residueFieldPoint A B hA))
(isAlgebraicSpace_fieldFibre_residueFieldPoint A B hA hX f) + 1
≤ ringKrullDim A
Tag 0AGN, a lemma
Tag 0AGN in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_iso_isProjective_of_isIntegralModification, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationCompleteLocalProjective.lean, line 176.
Let
(A, 𝔪, κ)be a complete Noetherian local domain of dimension2. Every modificationf : X ⟶ Spec A(Stacks 0AD8) is projective overA:Xis a schemeY, in the sense that there are a projective morphism of schemesfY : Y ⟶ Spec Aand an isomorphism ofXwith the algebraic spaceYoverSpec A.
theorem exists_iso_isProjective_of_isIntegralModification
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsLocalRing A] [IsNoetherianRing A] [IsDomain A]
[IsAdicComplete (maximalIdeal A) A] (hdim : ringKrullDim A = 2)
(B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (hS : B.Contains (Spec (.of A)))
{X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hS)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hS X)
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (baseObject A B hS))
(hf : IsIntegralModification B (Spec (.of A)) hS hX
(isAlgebraicSpace_yoneda B (Spec (.of A)) hS _)
(isIntegralSpace_yoneda_baseTerminal A B hS) f) :
∃ (Y : Scheme.{u}) (hY : B.Contains Y) (fY : Y ⟶ Spec (.of A)),
IsProjective fY ∧ IsProjectiveMorphism fY ∧
∃ e : X ≅ yoneda.obj (siteObject B (Spec (.of A)) hS hY fY),
e.hom ≫ yoneda.map (siteObjectToBase A B hS hY fY) = f
Sources
Section89.3 Strategy#
Section 89.3 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BH9. 4 tags here are carried by 17 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BHA, an equation
Tag 0BHA in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.modificationsAwayFromPoints, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 274. The attribute's comment: “the source category of the functor”.
Stacks 0BHA. The category
C_{X, {x₁, …, xₙ}}of algebraic spaces overXwhich are unchanged overX ∖ {x₁, …, xₙ}.
abbrev modificationsAwayFromPoints
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.modificationsAt, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 279. The attribute's comment: “the factors of the target category of the functor”.
Stacks 0BHA. The category
C_{Uᵢ, uᵢ}of algebraic spaces over theith neighborhood which are unchanged overUᵢ ∖ {uᵢ}.
abbrev modificationsAt (i : Fin n)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.restrictionFunctor, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 300. The attribute's comment: “the functor given by base change”.
Stacks 0BHA. The functor
F : C_{X, {x₁, …, xₙ}} ⟶ C_{U₁, u₁} × … × C_{Uₙ, uₙ}given by base change along the chosen elementary étale neighborhoods.
def restrictionFunctor :
D.modificationsAwayFromPoints ⥤ ∀ i : Fin n, D.modificationsAt i
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.restrictionFunctorCompιIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 306. The attribute's comment: “base change computes the functor”.
Stacks 0BHA. The
ith component ofFis base change alongUᵢ ⟶ X.
def restrictionFunctorCompιIso (i : Fin n) :
D.restrictionFunctor ⋙ Pi.eval _ i ⋙
ObjectProperty.ι (IsModification B S hS (D.openAwayFromPoint i)) ≅
ObjectProperty.ι (IsModification B S hS D.openAwayFromPoints) ⋙
Over.pullback (D.toSpaceHom i).hom
Tag 0BHB, a lemma
Tag 0BHB in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isEquivalence_restrictionFunctor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationExcisionEssSurj.lean, line 97.
Stacks 0BHB. The functor
Fof Stacks 0BHA, base change of the modifications ofXaway from the chosen closed points to the chosen elementary étale neighborhoods, is an equivalence of categories.
theorem isEquivalence_restrictionFunctor : D.restrictionFunctor.IsEquivalence
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.essSurj_restrictionFunctor_of_essSurj, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsSinglePoint.lean, line 152. The attribute's comment: “essential surjectivity of the functor, granted the case n = 1 of Stacks 0BGY”.
Stacks 0BHB, the essential surjectivity of
F, granted the casen = 1. If the base-change functor of Stacks 0BGY alongUᵢ ⟶ X, taken outsideX ∖ {xᵢ}, is essentially surjective for everyi, then the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is essentially surjective.
theorem essSurj_restrictionFunctor_of_essSurj
(hES : ∀ i : Fin n,
(baseChangeFunctor B S hS (D.toSpaceHom i) (D.openAwayFromSinglePoint i)).1.EssSurj) :
D.restrictionFunctor.EssSurj
Tag 0BHC, a lemma
Tag 0BHC in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isQuasiCompact_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 379. The attribute's comment: “quasi-compactness”.
Stacks 0BHC, quasi-compactness. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is quasi-compact exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isQuasiCompact_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsQuasiCompact B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsQuasiCompact B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isQuasiSeparated_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 402. The attribute's comment: “quasi-separatedness”.
Stacks 0BHC, quasi-separatedness. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is quasi-separated exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isQuasiSeparated_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsQuasiSeparated B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsQuasiSeparated B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isSeparated_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 425. The attribute's comment: “separatedness”.
Stacks 0BHC, separatedness. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is separated exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isSeparated_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsSeparated B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsSeparated B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isLocallyOfFinitePresentation_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 453. The attribute's comment: “local finite presentation”.
Stacks 0BHC, local finite presentation. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is locally of finite presentation exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isLocallyOfFinitePresentation_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsLocallyOfFinitePresentation B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsLocallyOfFinitePresentation B S hS
((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isLocallyOfFiniteType_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 485. The attribute's comment: “local finite type”.
Stacks 0BHC, local finite type. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is locally of finite type exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isLocallyOfFiniteType_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsLocallyOfFiniteType B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsLocallyOfFiniteType B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isFiniteType_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 517. The attribute's comment: “finite type”.
Stacks 0BHC, finite type. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is of finite type exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isFiniteType_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsFiniteType B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsFiniteType B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isFinitePresentation_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 529. The attribute's comment: “finite presentation”.
Stacks 0BHC, finite presentation. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is of finite presentation exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isFinitePresentation_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsFinitePresentation B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsFinitePresentation B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isProper_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 542. The attribute's comment: “properness”.
Stacks 0BHC, properness. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is proper exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isProper_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsProper B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsProper B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isIntegralHom_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 564. The attribute's comment: “integrality”.
Stacks 0BHC, integrality. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is integral exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isIntegralHom_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsIntegralHom B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsIntegralHom B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isFinite_iff_forall_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 582. The attribute's comment: “finiteness”.
Stacks 0BHC, finiteness. A modification of
Xaway from{x₁, …, xₙ}is finite exactly when each of its restrictions under the functorFof Stacks 0BHA is.
theorem isFinite_iff_forall_restrictionComponent :
IsFinite B S hS M.obj.hom ↔
∀ i, IsFinite B S hS ((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom
Tag 0BHD, a lemma
Tag 0BHD in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.fibreAtPointIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ModificationsAtClosedPointsProperties.lean, line 222. The attribute's comment: “the fibres agree”.
Stacks 0BHD. If
f : Y ⟶ Xcorresponds togᵢ : Yᵢ ⟶ Uᵢunder the functorFof Stacks 0BHA, thenY_{xᵢ} ≅ (Yᵢ)_{uᵢ}as algebraic spaces: both are the fibre product offwith the monomorphismSpec κ(uᵢ) ⟶ X.
def fibreAtPointIso (M : D.modificationsAwayFromPoints) (i : Fin n) :
fibreAtPoint M i ≅ fibreAtNeighborhoodPoint M i
Sources
Section89.4 Dominating by quadratic transformations#
Section 89.4 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0AHG. 4 tags here are carried by 10 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BHE, a definition
Tag 0BHE in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsBlowupAtClosedPoint, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/BlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 187.
Stacks 0BHE. A morphism
f : Y ⟶ Xof algebraic spaces is the blowing up ofXat the closed pointzwhen there is a blowing up ofXin the reduced closed subspace supported on{z}to whichfis isomorphic overX.Being the blowing up in a closed subspace is the universal property of Stacks 085U, which is
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsBlowupAlong; it already determines the morphism up to isomorphism overX, so asking for the isomorphism here changes nothing and makesAlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsBlowupAtClosedPoint.comp_isoavailable. The centre isAlgebraicGeometry.Space.closedPointSubspace, which is thei(Spec(k))of the source byAlgebraicGeometry.Space.eq_closedPointSubspace.
def IsBlowupAtClosedPoint {X Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS} (z : points B S hS X.obj)
(hz : IsClosed ({z} : Set (points B S hS X.obj))) (f : Y ⟶ X) : Prop
Tag 0BHF, a lemma
Tag 0BHF in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.BlowupFactorization, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/BlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 397. The attribute's comment: “the condition asserted on both sides of the equivalence: a factorization of the given morphism as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over the given set of points. The equivalence itself is AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_iff.”.
A factorization of
f : Y ⟶ Xas a sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over the set of pointsT ⊆ |X|: a tower
Zₘ ⟶ Zₘ₋₁ ⟶ … ⟶ Z₁ ⟶ Z₀ = Xof blowings up at closed points, all of whose centres lie over
T, together with an identification ofYwith its topZₘunder whichfis the compositeZₘ ⟶ X.This is the condition on both sides of Stacks 0BHF, taken there with
T = {x₁, …, xₙ}for the morphism toXand withT = {uᵢ}for the morphism to theith étale neighborhood.
structure BlowupFactorization (B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (S : Scheme.{u}) (hS : B.Contains S)
{X Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS} (T : Set (points B S hS X.obj)) (f : Y ⟶ X)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.GlobalBlowupFactorization, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/BlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 491. The attribute's comment: “the condition on the morphism to X: it factors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over x₁, …, xₙ”.
Stacks 0BHF, the condition on the morphism to
X:f : Y ⟶ Xfactors as
Y = Zₘ ⟶ Zₘ₋₁ ⟶ … ⟶ Z₁ ⟶ Z₀ = Xwhere each
Z_{j+1} ⟶ Z_jis the blowing up ofZ_jat a closed pointz_jlying over{x₁, …, xₙ}.
abbrev GlobalBlowupFactorization {Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS} (f : Y ⟶ D.space)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.LocalBlowupFactorization, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/BlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 503. The attribute's comment: “the condition on the morphism to the i-th étale neighborhood: it factors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over uᵢ”.
Stacks 0BHF, the condition on the morphism to the
ith étale neighborhood:gᵢ : Yᵢ ⟶ Uᵢfactors as
Yᵢ = Z_{i, mᵢ} ⟶ … ⟶ Z_{i, 1} ⟶ Z_{i, 0} = Uᵢwhere each
Z_{i, j+1} ⟶ Z_{i, j}is the blowing up ofZ_{i, j}at a closed point lying overuᵢ.
abbrev LocalBlowupFactorization (i : Fin n) {Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS}
(g : Y ⟶ D.neighborhoodSpace i)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_localBlowupFactorization, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/BlowupTowerEtaleRestriction.lean, line 474. The attribute's comment: “the only-if direction: a factorization of f as a sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over x₁, …, xₙ gives, for each i, a factorization of its base change gᵢ as a sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over uᵢ. The if direction is AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_of_isPullback and the equivalence itself is AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_iff.”.
Stacks 0BHF, the "only if" direction. Let
X, xᵢ, Uᵢ ⟶ X, uᵢbe as in Stacks 0BH9 and letf : Y ⟶ Xbe a morphism of algebraic spaces with base changegᵢ : Yᵢ ⟶ UᵢalongUᵢ ⟶ X. Ifffactors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over{x₁, …, xₙ}, thengᵢfactors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying overuᵢ.The sequence over
Uᵢis the base change of the given one, which isAlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.exists_blowupTower_of_isPullback. No hypothesis onfbeyond the cartesian square is used; in particularfneed not be an isomorphism overX ∖ {x₁, …, xₙ}, so the statement is stronger than the source's, which fixesfinC_{X, {x₁, …, xₙ}}.
theorem nonempty_localBlowupFactorization {i : Fin n} {Y Y' : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS}
{f : Y ⟶ D.space} {a : Y' ⟶ Y} {g : Y' ⟶ D.neighborhoodSpace i}
(sq : IsPullback a g f (D.toSpaceHom i)) (F : D.GlobalBlowupFactorization f) :
Nonempty (D.LocalBlowupFactorization i g)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_localBlowupFactorization_restrictionComponent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/BlowupTowerEtaleRestriction.lean, line 501. The attribute's comment: “the only-if direction at the functor F: a factorization of f as a sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over x₁, …, xₙ gives, for each i, a factorization of gᵢ = F(f)ᵢ as a sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over uᵢ. The if direction at F is nonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_restrictionComponent and the equivalence itself is AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_iff.”.
Stacks 0BHF, the "only if" direction, for the functor
Fof Stacks 0BHA. LetX, xᵢ, Uᵢ ⟶ X, uᵢbe as in Stacks 0BH9 and letf : Y ⟶ Xbe an object ofC_{X, {x₁, …, xₙ}}corresponding togᵢ : Yᵢ ⟶ UᵢunderF. Ifffactors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over{x₁, …, xₙ}, then for everyithe morphismgᵢfactors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying overuᵢ.This is
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_localBlowupFactorizationat the cartesian square ofAlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.isPullback_restrictionComponent_obj, which is what "corresponds underF" means.
theorem nonempty_localBlowupFactorization_restrictionComponent
(M : D.modificationsAwayFromPoints) (i : Fin n)
(F : D.GlobalBlowupFactorization (ObjectProperty.homMk M.obj.hom :
(⟨M.obj.left, M.property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶ D.space)) :
Nonempty (D.LocalBlowupFactorization i (ObjectProperty.homMk
((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom :
(⟨((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.left,
((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶
D.neighborhoodSpace i))
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/BlowupTowerGlobalConverse.lean, line 487.
Stacks 0BHF. Let
X, xᵢ, Uᵢ ⟶ X, uᵢbe as in Stacks 0BH9 and letf : Y ⟶ Xbe an object of the categoryC_{X, {x₁, …, xₙ}}of Stacks 0BHA. Thenffactors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying over{x₁, …, xₙ}if and only if, for everyi, the morphismgᵢ = F(f)ᵢfactors as a finite sequence of blowings up at closed points lying overuᵢ.The "only if" direction is
nonempty_localBlowupFactorization_restrictionComponentand the "if" direction isnonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_restrictionComponent.
theorem nonempty_globalBlowupFactorization_iff (M : D.modificationsAwayFromPoints) :
Nonempty (D.GlobalBlowupFactorization (ObjectProperty.homMk M.obj.hom :
(⟨M.obj.left, M.property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶ D.space)) ↔
∀ i, Nonempty (D.LocalBlowupFactorization i (ObjectProperty.homMk
((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.hom :
(⟨((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).obj.left,
((D.restrictionComponent i).obj M).property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶
D.neighborhoodSpace i))
Tag 0BHG, a lemma
Tag 0BHG in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_blowupFactorization_isPullbackDefined, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/PrincipalizationAtClosedPoints.lean, line 159. The attribute's comment: “the induction producing the sequence of blowings up, granted the existence of the blowing up of an algebraic space at a closed point (0BHE, hence 084A/084B/085Q), the algebraic-space analogue of 0809, and the local splitting of 0AGT”.
Stacks 0BHG. Let
Sbe a scheme, letXbe a Noetherian algebraic space overSand letT ⊆ |X|be a finite set of closed pointsxsuch thatXis regular atxand the local ring ofXatxhas dimension2. Letℐ ⊆ 𝒪_Xbe a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals, given by the closed subspaceZ ⊆ Xit cuts out, such that𝒪_X/ℐis supported onT, that is,|Z| ⊆ T. Then there is a sequence
X_m ⟶ X_{m-1} ⟶ … ⟶ X_1 ⟶ X_0 = Xwhere
X_{j+1} ⟶ X_jis the blowing up ofX_jat a closed pointx_jlying above a point ofT, such thatℐ𝒪_{X_m}is an invertible ideal sheaf — that is, such that the inverse image ofZalong the compositeX_m ⟶ Xis an effective Cartier divisor.Along the sequence produced, every effective Cartier divisor on
Xalso has a defined pullback; that is the form in which the induction uses its own output and it is recorded in the conclusion.Three inputs are granted, since the library has them for schemes only: the existence of the blowing up of an algebraic space at a closed point (Stacks 0BHE, whose construction needs the relative
Projof Stacks 084A and 084B), the algebraic-space analogue of Stacks 0809, and the local splitting of Stacks 0AGT with respect to a colength function given as a parameter — the hypothesis which the scheme case, Stacks 0AHH, carries as well. See the module documentation.
theorem exists_blowupFactorization_isPullbackDefined
(colength : ∀ Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS,
ClosedSubspaces B S hS Y.1 → Set (points B S hS Y.1) → ℕ∞)
(blowupExists : ∀ (Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (y : points B S hS Y.1)
(hy : IsClosed ({y} : Set (points B S hS Y.1))),
∃ (Y' : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (b : Y' ⟶ Y), IsBlowupAtClosedPoint B S hS y hy b)
(pullbackOfEffectiveCartier : ∀ (Y Y' : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (y : points B S hS Y.1)
(hy : IsClosed ({y} : Set (points B S hS Y.1))) (b : Y' ⟶ Y),
IsBlowupAtClosedPoint B S hS y hy b →
∀ D : ClosedSubspaces B S hS Y.1, IsEffectiveCartierDivisor B S hS Y D →
IsPullbackDefined B S hS b D)
(splitting : ∀ (Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (T : Set (points B S hS Y.1)), T.Finite →
(∀ y ∈ T, IsClosed ({y} : Set (points B S hS Y.1))) →
(∀ y ∈ T, IsRegularAt B S hS Y.1 y) →
(∀ y ∈ T, localRingDimension B S hS y = 2) →
∀ Z : ClosedSubspaces B S hS Y.1, subspacePointSet B S hS Y.1 Z.1 ⊆ T →
∀ y ∈ subspacePointSet B S hS Y.1 Z.1,
∀ (hy : IsClosed ({y} : Set (points B S hS Y.1))) (Y' : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS)
(b : Y' ⟶ Y), IsBlowupAtClosedPoint B S hS y hy b →
∃ (E Z' : ClosedSubspaces B S hS Y'.1) (T' : Set (points B S hS Y'.1)),
preimageClosedSubspace b Z = sumClosedSubspaces B S hS Y' E Z' ∧
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor B S hS Y' E ∧
T'.Finite ∧
(∀ z ∈ T', IsClosed ({z} : Set (points B S hS Y'.1))) ∧
(∀ z ∈ T', IsRegularAt B S hS Y'.1 z) ∧
(∀ z ∈ T', localRingDimension B S hS z = 2) ∧
(∀ z ∈ T', pointsMap B S hS Y'.1 b.hom z ∈ T) ∧
subspacePointSet B S hS Y'.1 Z'.1 ⊆ T' ∧
colength Y' Z' T' < colength Y Z T)
(hterm : B.Contains (⊤_ Scheme.{u}))
(X : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (_hX : IsNoetherian B S hS hterm X.1)
(T : Set (points B S hS X.1)) (hTfinite : T.Finite)
(hTclosed : ∀ x ∈ T, IsClosed ({x} : Set (points B S hS X.1)))
(hTregular : ∀ x ∈ T, IsRegularAt B S hS X.1 x)
(hTdim : ∀ x ∈ T, localRingDimension B S hS x = 2)
(Z : ClosedSubspaces B S hS X.1)
(hZsupport : subspacePointSet B S hS X.1 Z.1 ⊆ T) :
∃ (Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (f : Y ⟶ X),
Nonempty (BlowupFactorization B S hS T f) ∧
IsPullbackDefined B S hS f Z ∧
∀ D : ClosedSubspaces B S hS X.1, IsEffectiveCartierDivisor B S hS X D →
IsPullbackDefined B S hS f D
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_blowupFactorization_isPullbackDefined_of_isNoetherian, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/PrincipalizationAtClosedPointsUnconditional.lean, line 266.
Let
Sbe a scheme, letXbe a Noetherian algebraic space overSand letT ⊆ |X|be a finite set of closed pointsxsuch thatXis regular atxand the local ring ofXatxhas dimension2. Letℐ ⊆ 𝒪_Xbe a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals, given by the closed subspaceZ ⊆ Xit cuts out, such that𝒪_X/ℐis supported onT, that is,|Z| ⊆ T. Then there is a sequence
X_m ⟶ X_{m-1} ⟶ … ⟶ X_1 ⟶ X_0 = Xwhere
X_{j+1} ⟶ X_jis the blowing up ofX_jat a closed pointx_jlying above a point ofT, such thatℐ𝒪_{X_m}is an invertible ideal sheaf — that is, such that the inverse image ofZalong the compositeX_m ⟶ Xis an effective Cartier divisor.
theorem exists_blowupFactorization_isPullbackDefined_of_isNoetherian
(hterm : B.Contains (⊤_ Scheme.{u}))
(X : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (hX : IsNoetherian B S hS hterm X.1)
(T : Set (points B S hS X.1)) (hTfinite : T.Finite)
(hTclosed : ∀ x ∈ T, IsClosed ({x} : Set (points B S hS X.1)))
(hTregular : ∀ x ∈ T, IsRegularAt B S hS X.1 x)
(hTdim : ∀ x ∈ T, localRingDimension B S hS x = 2)
(Z : ClosedSubspaces B S hS X.1)
(hZsupport : subspacePointSet B S hS X.1 Z.1 ⊆ T) :
∃ (Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (f : Y ⟶ X),
Nonempty (BlowupFactorization B S hS T f) ∧ IsPullbackDefined B S hS f Z
Tag 0BHH, a lemma
Tag 0BHH in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_blowupFactorization_factors_of_isProper, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/DominationByPointBlowups.lean, line 91.
Dominating a modification by blowing up closed points. Let
Sbe a scheme, letXbe a Noetherian algebraic space overSand letT ⊆ |X|be a finite set of closed pointsxsuch thatXis regular atxand the local ring ofXatxhas dimension2. Letf : Y ⟶ Xbe a proper morphism of algebraic spaces which is an isomorphism overU = X ∖ T. Then there exist a sequence
X_n ⟶ X_{n-1} ⟶ … ⟶ X_1 ⟶ X_0 = Xwhere
X_{i+1} ⟶ X_iis the blowing up ofX_iat a closed pointx_ilying above a point ofT, and a factorizationX_n ⟶ Y ⟶ Xof the composition.
theorem exists_blowupFactorization_factors_of_isProper
(hterm : B.Contains (⊤_ Scheme.{u}))
(X : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (hX : IsNoetherian B S hS hterm X.1)
(T : Set (points B S hS X.1)) (hTfinite : T.Finite)
(hTclosed : ∀ x ∈ T, IsClosed ({x} : Set (points B S hS X.1)))
(hTregular : ∀ x ∈ T, IsRegularAt B S hS X.1 x)
(hTdim : ∀ x ∈ T, localRingDimension B S hS x = 2)
(Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : IsProper B S hS f.hom)
(hfU : IsIso (pullback.snd f.hom (openSubspaceOfPoints B S hS X.1 Tᶜ).ι)) :
∃ (X' : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (b : X' ⟶ X),
Nonempty (BlowupFactorization B S hS T b) ∧ ∃ h : X' ⟶ Y, h ≫ f = b
Sources
Section89.5 Dominating by normalized blowups#
Section 89.5 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BHI. 4 tags here are carried by 9 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BHJ, a definition
Tag 0BHJ in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsNormalizedBlowupAtClosedPoint, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 185.
Stacks 0BHJ. A morphism
f : X'' ⟶ Xof algebraic spaces is the normalized blowing up ofXat the closed pointzwhen it is the composition of the normalization of a blowing up ofXatzwith that blowing up: there are an algebraic spaceX', a blowing upb : X' ⟶ XofXatz, normalization data onX', and an identification ofX''with the normalization carryingfto the normalization morphism followed byb.The blowing up at
zisAlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsBlowupAtClosedPoint, and the normalization is the datumAlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizationData. The decency hypothesis and the finiteness condition of Stacks 0BB1 are those of the source.
def IsNormalizedBlowupAtClosedPoint {X Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS}
(_hX : IsDecentSpace B S hS X.obj)
(_hXfin : HasLocallyFiniteIrreducibleComponents B S hS X.obj)
(z : points B S hS X.obj) (hz : IsClosed ({z} : Set (points B S hS X.obj)))
(f : Y ⟶ X) : Prop
Tag 0BHK, a lemma
Tag 0BHK in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizedBlowupAtClosedPoint.isNormal_and_isNagata_and_isProper, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupAtClosedPoint.lean, line 221. The attribute's comment: “all four assertions — the normalized blowing up is an algebraic space, it is normal, it is Nagata, and it is proper over X — with properness of the blowing up X' ⟶ X itself, which is Stacks 085Z, as the named hypothesis hproperBlowup”.
Stacks 0BHK. If
Xis Nagata, then the normalized blowing up ofXat a closed pointzis a normal Nagata algebraic space proper overX.All four assertions of the source are listed:
X''is an algebraic space overS, it is normal, it is Nagata, and the normalized blowing upX'' ⟶ Xis proper.The hypothesis
hproperBlowupis properness of the blowing upX' ⟶ X, which is Stacks 085Z; see the "what is assumed" section of the module documentation.
theorem isNormal_and_isNagata_and_isProper
(hNagata : HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS X.obj (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsNagataScheme T))
(hproperBlowup : IsProper B S hS N.proj.hom) :
IsAlgebraicSpace B S hS N.space.obj ∧
HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS N.space.obj
(fun T : Scheme.{u} => _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.IsNormal T) ∧
HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS N.space.obj (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsNagataScheme T) ∧
IsProper B S hS N.hom.hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizedBlowupAtClosedPoint.isNormal_and_isNagata_and_isProper_of_isNagata, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupAtClosedPointProper.lean, line 133.
Stacks 0BHK. If
Xis Nagata, then the normalized blowing up ofXat a closed pointzis a normal Nagata algebraic space proper overX.Spelled out: for every normalized blowing up
X'' ⟶ X' ⟶ XofXatz(Stacks 0BHJ),X''is an algebraic space overS, it is normal, it is Nagata, and the compositeX'' ⟶ Xis proper. The only hypothesis is thatXis Nagata.The proof is the source's. The blowing up
X' ⟶ Xis proper,AlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizedBlowupAtClosedPoint.isProper_proj(Stacks 085Z,Xbeing locally Noetherian); henceX'is Nagata (Stacks 0BAU), the normalizationX'' ⟶ X'is finite (Stacks 0BB5), hence proper (Stacks 04NZ), and the composite is proper (Stacks 04XY);X''is normal by Stacks 0BB4 and Nagata by Stacks 0BAU again.
theorem isNormal_and_isNagata_and_isProper_of_isNagata
(hNagata : HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS X.obj (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsNagataScheme T)) :
IsAlgebraicSpace B S hS N.space.obj ∧
HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS N.space.obj
(fun T : Scheme.{u} => _root_.AlgebraicGeometry.IsNormal T) ∧
HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS N.space.obj (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsNagataScheme T) ∧
IsProper B S hS N.hom.hom
Tag 0BHL, a lemma
Tag 0BHL in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizedBlowupFactorization, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 427. The attribute's comment: “the condition asserted on both sides of the equivalence: a factorization of the given morphism as a finite sequence of normalized blowings up at closed points lying over the given set of points. The equivalence itself is not proved: its proof is the argument of Tag 0BHF, which this library does carry, together with a comparison of a normalization with an étale base change of it, which it does not.”.
A factorization of
f : Y ⟶ Xas a sequence of normalized blowings up at closed points lying over the set of pointsT ⊆ |X|: a tower
Zₘ ⟶ Zₘ₋₁ ⟶ … ⟶ Z₁ ⟶ Z₀ = Xof normalized blowings up at closed points, all of whose centres lie over
T, together with an identification ofYwith its topZₘunder whichfis the compositeZₘ ⟶ X.This is the condition on both sides of Stacks 0BHL, taken there with
T = {x₁, …, xₙ}for the morphism toXand withT = {uᵢ}for the morphism to theith étale neighborhood.
structure NormalizedBlowupFactorization (B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (S : Scheme.{u})
(hS : B.Contains S) {X Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS} (T : Set (points B S hS X.obj))
(f : Y ⟶ X)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.GlobalNormalizedBlowupFactorization, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 526. The attribute's comment: “the left-hand side of the equivalence: the factorization of the morphism to X by normalized blowings up at closed points lying over {x₁, …, xₙ}”.
Stacks 0BHL, the condition on the morphism to
X:f : Y ⟶ Xfactors as
Y = Zₘ ⟶ Zₘ₋₁ ⟶ … ⟶ Z₁ ⟶ Z₀ = Xwhere each
Z_{j+1} ⟶ Z_jis the normalized blowing up ofZ_jat a closed pointz_jlying over{x₁, …, xₙ}.
abbrev GlobalNormalizedBlowupFactorization {Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS} (f : Y ⟶ D.space)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.LocalNormalizedBlowupFactorization, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupsAtClosedPoints.lean, line 538. The attribute's comment: “the right-hand side of the equivalence: the factorization of the morphism to the i-th elementary étale neighborhood by normalized blowings up at closed points lying over uᵢ”.
Stacks 0BHL, the condition on the morphism to the
ith étale neighborhood:gᵢ : Yᵢ ⟶ Uᵢfactors as
Yᵢ = Z_{i, mᵢ} ⟶ … ⟶ Z_{i, 1} ⟶ Z_{i, 0} = Uᵢwhere each
Z_{i, j+1} ⟶ Z_{i, j}is the normalized blowing up ofZ_{i, j}at a closed point lying overuᵢ.
abbrev LocalNormalizedBlowupFactorization (i : Fin n) {Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS}
(g : Y ⟶ D.neighborhoodSpace i)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.nonempty_globalNormalizedBlowupFactorization_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupsAtClosedPointsEquivalence.lean, line 249. The attribute's comment: “corrected (erratum): with X normal; false as written without it, the normalized blowup normalizes the whole space (counterexamples to both directions in the module documentation); otherwise the full statement, under the source's hypotheses”.
Stacks 0BHL, for normal
X. LetX, xᵢ, Uᵢ ⟶ X, uᵢbe as in Stacks 0BHA and letf : Y ⟶ Xcorrespond togᵢ : Yᵢ ⟶ Uᵢunder the functorFof Stacks 0BHA. Assume thatXsatisfies the equivalent conditions of Stacks 0BB1 and thatXis normal. Thenffactors asY = Zₘ ⟶ … ⟶ Z₁ ⟶ Z₀ = Xwith eachZ_{j+1} ⟶ Z_jthe normalized blowing up ofZ_jat a closed point over{x₁, …, xₙ}if and only if eachgᵢfactors asYᵢ = Z_{i, mᵢ} ⟶ … ⟶ Z_{i, 0} = Uᵢwith each step the normalized blowing up at a closed point overuᵢ.The normality of
Xis not in the source, but the statement is false without it; see the module documentation for a counterexample to each direction.
theorem nonempty_globalNormalizedBlowupFactorization_iff
(hXfin : HasLocallyFiniteIrreducibleComponents B S hS D.space.obj)
(hXn : Space.IsNormal B S hS D.space.obj) (M : D.modificationsAwayFromPoints)
(N : ∀ i, D.modificationsAt i) (e : D.restrictionFunctor.obj M ≅ N) :
Nonempty (D.GlobalNormalizedBlowupFactorization (ObjectProperty.homMk M.obj.hom :
(⟨M.obj.left, M.property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶ D.space)) ↔
∀ i, Nonempty (D.LocalNormalizedBlowupFactorization i (ObjectProperty.homMk (N i).obj.hom :
(⟨(N i).obj.left, (N i).property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶
D.neighborhoodSpace i))
Stacks.Examples.NormalizedBlowupsNotEtaleLocal.not_stacks0BHL, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Examples/Spaces/NormalizedBlowupsNotEtaleLocal.lean, line 555. The attribute's comment: “refutation of the published statement: false without X normal; at X = Spec(Z/36Z), two closed points with non-reduced local rings, g₁ the normalized blowing up of U₁ at u₁ and g₂ = id are sequences of normalized blowings up, but the f corresponding to them is not, a nonempty sequence having a normal source and the empty one being an isomorphism”.
Stacks 0BHL is false as published. The source asserts, for every scheme
S, every decent algebraic spaceXoverSsatisfying the equivalent conditions of Stacks 0BB1, every choice of pairwise distinct closed pointsx₁, …, xₙand elementary étale neighbourhoods(Uᵢ, uᵢ) ⟶ (X, xᵢ)as in Stacks 0BHA, and everyf : Y ⟶ Xcorresponding togᵢ : Yᵢ ⟶ Uᵢunder the functorFof Stacks 0BHA, thatfis a sequence of normalized blowings up at closed points over{x₁, …, xₙ}if and only if eachgᵢis one at closed points overuᵢ. This is the negation of that assertion, with exactly its hypotheses;exists_counterexampleis a counterexample to the "if" direction.The statement holds once
Xis normal: this isnonempty_globalNormalizedBlowupFactorization_iffin the namespaceAlgebraicGeometry.Space.ClosedPointNeighborhoods.
theorem not_stacks0BHL :
¬ ∀ (B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (S : Scheme.{u}) (hS : B.Contains S) (n : ℕ)
(D : ClosedPointNeighborhoods B S hS n)
(_ : HasLocallyFiniteIrreducibleComponents B S hS D.space.obj)
(M : D.modificationsAwayFromPoints) (N : ∀ i, D.modificationsAt i)
(_ : D.restrictionFunctor.obj M ≅ N),
Nonempty (D.GlobalNormalizedBlowupFactorization (ObjectProperty.homMk M.obj.hom :
(⟨M.obj.left, M.property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶ D.space)) ↔
∀ i, Nonempty (D.LocalNormalizedBlowupFactorization i
(ObjectProperty.homMk (N i).obj.hom :
(⟨(N i).obj.left, (N i).property.1⟩ : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) ⟶
D.neighborhoodSpace i))
Tag 0BHM, a lemma
Tag 0BHM in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_normalizedBlowUpChain_dominating, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SurfaceTransfer/DominatingNormalizedBlowups.lean, line 167.
Stacks 0BHM. Let
Sbe a scheme, letXbe a Noetherian Nagata algebraic space overSwithdim(X) = 2, and letf : Y ⟶ Xbe a proper birational morphism. Then there is a commutative diagramX_n ⟶ X_{n-1} ⟶ … ⟶ X_1 ⟶ X_0 | | v v Y ------------------------> Xwhere
X_0 ⟶ Xis the normalization andX_{i+1} ⟶ X_iis the normalized blowing up ofX_iat a closed point: a sequenceNormalizedBlowUpChain B S hS X A gwith topA = X_nand compositeg : X_n ⟶ X, andh : X_n ⟶ Ywithh ≫ f = g.Being Noetherian is Stacks 03EA (quasi-compact, quasi-separated, locally Noetherian), Nagata is the étale-local property of Stacks 03E6,
dim(X)is Stacks 04N6, properness is Stacks 04XU, and birationality is Stacks 0ACV, which is defined for decent spaces with finitely many irreducible components; those witnesses are carried existentially, being consequences of the Noetherian hypothesis and of properness rather than extra assumptions.
theorem exists_normalizedBlowUpChain_dominating {X Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS}
(hXN : IsNoetherian B S hS B.contains_terminal X.obj)
(hXnag : HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS X.obj (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsNagataScheme T))
(hXdim : dimension B S hS X.obj X.property = 2) (f : Y ⟶ X)
(hf : IsProper B S hS f.hom)
(hbir : ∃ (hDY : IsDecentSpace B S hS Y.obj) (hDX : IsDecentSpace B S hS X.obj)
(hCY : (irreducibleComponents (points B S hS Y.obj)).Finite)
(hCX : (irreducibleComponents (points B S hS X.obj)).Finite),
IsBirational B S hS Y.property X.property hDY hDX hCY hCX f.hom) :
∃ (A : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (g : A ⟶ X) (h : A ⟶ Y),
NormalizedBlowUpChain B S hS X A g ∧ h ≫ f = g
Sources
Section89.6 Base change to the completion#
Section 89.6 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BHN. 3 tags here are carried by 5 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BHP, a lemma
Tag 0BHP in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_adicCompletion_ringEquiv_henselianLocalRing_completionSpace, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/HenselianCompletionBaseChange.lean, line 210.
Let
(A, 𝔪)be a local ring with finitely generated maximal ideal, letXbe a decent algebraic space overSpec Aand letY = X ×_{Spec A} Spec A^be its base change to the𝔪-adic completion ofA. For a pointqofYwhose imagepinXlies over the closed point ofSpec A, the canonical local homomorphism𝒪^h_{X,p} ⟶ 𝒪^h_{Y,q}— the one compatible with the local rings of a pair of corresponding elementary étale neighborhoods — induces an isomorphism on𝔪-adic completions.
theorem exists_adicCompletion_ringEquiv_henselianLocalRing_completionSpace
(hfg : (IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A).FG)
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hXdec : IsDecentSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(q : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f))
(p : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hp : pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f)
(completionProjection A B hA hAc f) q = p)
(hclosed : pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (Over.mk (𝟙 (B.obj hA)))
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA X f p) =
(⟨IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A, inferInstance⟩ : PrimeSpectrum A)) :
letI hY := isAlgebraicSpace_completionSpace A B hA hAc f hX
letI hYdec := isDecentSpace_completionSpace A B hA hAc f hX hXdec
letI := isLocalRing_henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA hX hXdec p
letI := isLocalRing_henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA hY hYdec q
∃ φ : (henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA X hX p hXdec : Type (u + 1)) →+*
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f) hY q hYdec :
Type (u + 1)),
IsLocalHom φ ∧
(∃ (E : ElementaryEtaleNeighborhood B (Spec (.of A)) hA X hX p)
(N : ElementaryEtaleNeighborhood B (Spec (.of A)) hA
(completionSpace A B hA hAc f) hY q)
(j : N.scheme ⟶ E.scheme) (hj : j.left.1 N.point = E.point),
yoneda.map j ≫ E.toSpace = N.toSpace ≫ completionProjection A B hA hAc f ∧
φ.comp (stalkToHenselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA X hX p hXdec E) =
(stalkToHenselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f) hY q
hYdec N).comp
((E.scheme.left.1.presheaf.stalkCongr (Inseparable.of_eq hj.symm)).hom ≫
j.left.1.stalkMap N.point).hom) ∧
∃ e : AdicCompletion (IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA X hX p hXdec : Type (u + 1)))
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA X hX p hXdec : Type (u + 1)) ≃+*
AdicCompletion (IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f) hY q hYdec :
Type (u + 1)))
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f) hY q hYdec :
Type (u + 1)),
e.toRingHom.comp (algebraMap _ _) = (algebraMap _ _).comp φ
Tag 0BHQ, a lemma
Tag 0BHQ in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isRegularLocalRing_henselianLocalRing_of_completion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularCompletionBaseChange.lean, line 97. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”.
Stacks 0BHQ, part (1). Let
(A, 𝔪)be a Noetherian local ring, letXbe a decent algebraic space locally of finite type overSpec Aand letY = X ×_{Spec A} Spec A^be its base change to the𝔪-adic completion. If the henselian local ring ofYat a pointyis regular, then so is the henselian local ring ofXat the image ofy.
theorem isRegularLocalRing_henselianLocalRing_of_completion
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hXdec : IsDecentSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hf : IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f)
(y : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f))
(hy : IsRegularLocalRing
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f)
(isAlgebraicSpace_completionSpace A B hA hAc f hX) y
(isDecentSpace_completionSpace A B hA hAc f hX hXdec) : Type (u + 1))) :
IsRegularLocalRing
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA X hX
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f)
(completionProjection A B hA hAc f) y) hXdec : Type (u + 1))
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isRegularLocalRing_henselianLocalRing_completion_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularCompletionClosedFibre.lean, line 151. The attribute's comment: “part (2)”.
Let
(A, 𝔪)be a Noetherian local ring, letXbe a decent algebraic space locally of finite type overSpec Aand letY = X ×_{Spec A} Spec A^be its base change to the𝔪-adic completion. At a pointyofYlying over the closed point ofSpec A^, the henselian local ring ofYatyis regular if and only if the henselian local ring ofXat the image ofyis regular.
theorem isRegularLocalRing_henselianLocalRing_completion_iff
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hXdec : IsDecentSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hf : IsLocallyOfFiniteType B (Spec (.of A)) hA f)
(y : points B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f))
(hy : pointsToScheme B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionBase A B hA hAc)
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f)
(pullback.snd f (completionBaseMap A B hA hAc)) y) =
(⟨IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal (AdicCompletion (IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A) A),
inferInstance⟩ :
PrimeSpectrum (AdicCompletion (IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A) A))) :
IsRegularLocalRing
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f)
(isAlgebraicSpace_completionSpace A B hA hAc f hX) y
(isDecentSpace_completionSpace A B hA hAc f hX hXdec) : Type (u + 1)) ↔
IsRegularLocalRing
(henselianLocalRing B (Spec (.of A)) hA X hX
(pointsMap B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f)
(completionProjection A B hA hAc f) y) hXdec : Type (u + 1))
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.hasEtaleLocalProperty_isRegular_completionSpace_iff_of_isProper, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularCompletionProper.lean, line 220. The attribute's comment: “part (3)”.
Stacks 0BHQ, part (3). Let
(A, 𝔪)be a Noetherian local ring and letXbe a decent algebraic space proper overSpec A. ThenXis regular if and only if its base changeY = X ×_{Spec A} Spec A^to the𝔪-adic completion ofAis regular.
theorem hasEtaleLocalProperty_isRegular_completionSpace_iff_of_isProper
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hXdec : IsDecentSpace B (Spec (.of A)) hA X)
(hproper : IsProper B (Spec (.of A)) hA f) :
HasEtaleLocalProperty B (Spec (.of A)) hA X (fun T : Scheme.{u} ↦ IsRegular T) ↔
HasEtaleLocalProperty B (Spec (.of A)) hA (completionSpace A B hA hAc f)
(fun T : Scheme.{u} ↦ IsRegular T)
Tag 0BHR, a lemma
Tag 0BHR in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isFinite_normalization_of_isAnalyticallyUnramified, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizationSpaceConstruction.lean, line 322. References: SGA 3 XXV (4.2), “more general”.
Stacks 0BHR. Let
(A, 𝔪)be an analytically unramified Noetherian local ring and letFbe an algebraic space overSwhose structure morphism goes to an object of the site with underlying schemeSpec A. IfFis locally of finite type overAand its structure morphism is étale at every point of codimension zero, then the normalization morphismF^ν ⟶ FofFis a finite morphism of algebraic spaces.The normalization is the constructed one, neither assumed nor existentially quantified:
Fis locally of finite type over a Noetherian ring, so its étale scheme charts are locally Noetherian and satisfy the finiteness condition of Tag 0BB1, andAlgebraicGeometry.Space.normalizationDatais then the normalization ofF, unique up to a unique isomorphism overFbyAlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizationData.existsUnique_iso_hom. Finiteness of its normalization morphism isAlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizationData.isFinite_hom_of_isAnalyticallyUnramified, which is Stacks 0BG8 on a surjective étale chart followed by the étale-local characterisation of finiteness, condition (3) of Stacks 03ZQ.The base is a representable presheaf with an isomorphism of its underlying scheme onto
Spec A, which is the source's hypothesis with no identification of schemes imposed and with the base schemeSof the site left arbitrary.
theorem isFinite_normalization_of_isAnalyticallyUnramified {A : Type u} [CommRing A]
[IsNoetherianRing A] [IsLocalRing A] (hA : IsAnalyticallyUnramified A)
{F : (BigFppfOver B S hS)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u} (hF : IsAlgebraicSpace B S hS F)
{Z : BigFppfOver B S hS} (f : F ⟶ yoneda.obj Z)
(a : (BigFppfOver.toScheme B S hS).obj Z ⟶ Spec (.of A)) [IsIso a]
(hft : IsLocallyOfFiniteType B S hS f)
(het : ∀ x : points B S hS F, localRingDimension B S hS x = 0 → IsEtaleAt B S hS f x) :
IsFinite B S hS (normalizationData B S hS hF
(hasLocallyFiniteIrreducibleComponents_of_isLocallyOfFiniteType B S hS f a hft)).hom
Sources
Section89.7 Implied properties#
Section 89.7 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BHS. 2 tags here are carried by 11 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BHT, a lemma
Tag 0BHT in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isFinite_normalization_of_regular_alteration, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/NormalizationFiniteRegularAlteration.lean, line 486. The attribute's comment: “finiteness of the normalization. The source's Noetherian hypothesis on Y is used only as quasi-compactness of its point space and local Noetherianity of its etale charts; the quasi-separatedness that Stacks 03EA also asks for is unused, which is a strengthening. Integrality of Y is part of IsAlteration. The source's Step 1 -- etale localization to a Noetherian domain, which charts of an integral space do not permit -- and its appeal to Stacks 08AR are both replaced by Chow's lemma for spaces (Stacks 089J) over an affine chart, which reduces the finiteness to the degree-zero case of Stacks 02O6 for schemes; see the module docstring”.
Stacks 0BHT, finiteness of the normalization. Let
Ybe an integral algebraic space overSwhich is quasi-compact and whose étale scheme charts are locally Noetherian, and suppose there is an alterationf : X ⟶ YwithXregular. Then the normalization morphismY^ν ⟶ YofYis a finite morphism of algebraic spaces.The normalization is the constructed one, neither assumed nor existentially quantified: the étale scheme charts of
Yare locally Noetherian, so they satisfy the finiteness condition of Stacks 0BB1 by Stacks 0GMB, andAlgebraicGeometry.Space.normalizationDatais then the normalization ofY, unique up to a unique isomorphism overYbyAlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizationData.existsUnique_iso_hom.
theorem isFinite_normalization_of_regular_alteration
(f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : IsAlteration B S hS f)
(hXreg : HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T))
(hYqc : IsQuasiCompactSpace B S hS Y)
(hYnoeth : HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS Y (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsLocallyNoetherian T)) :
IsFinite B S hS (normalizationData B S hS hf.1
(hasLocallyFiniteIrreducibleComponents_of_isLocallyNoetherian B S hS Y hf.1 hYnoeth)).hom
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_isDenseOpenSubspace_hasEtaleLocalProperty_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularAlterationImpliedProperties.lean, line 203. The attribute's comment: “the regular dense open; the source's Noetherian hypothesis on Y and the finiteness of f over a nonempty open are unused, only reducedness of Y and properness and dominance of f, which is a strengthening. The source's Stacks 07NG enters as the space-level descent Stacks 06MK, whose engine on local rings is that same statement”.
Stacks 0BHT, the dense regular open. An integral algebraic space
YoverSadmitting an alterationf : X ⟶ Ywhose source is regular has a dense open subspace which is regular.
theorem exists_isDenseOpenSubspace_hasEtaleLocalProperty_isRegular (f : X ⟶ Y)
(hf : IsAlteration B S hS f)
(hXreg : HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T)) :
∃ V : Subfunctor Y, IsDenseOpenSubspace B S hS hf.1 V ∧
HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS V.toFunctor (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizationData.isFinite_hom_of_regular_alteration, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularAlterationImpliedProperties.lean, line 320. The attribute's comment: “finiteness of the normalization, for a REPRESENTABLE AFFINE target: the source's Step 1, etale localization to a Noetherian domain, is invalid for algebraic spaces -- charts of an integral space are reduced but not irreducible, so Stacks 0BH3 does not apply over them. Conditional on h02O6, the degree-zero case of Stacks 02O6 for algebraic spaces, which this library lacks; see the module docstring”.
Stacks 0BHT, finiteness of the normalization, for a target represented by an affine object of the site and conditional on the degree-zero case of Stacks 02O6. Let
Zbe an affine object of the site whose scheme is integral and locally Noetherian, letf : X ⟶ h_Zbe an alteration withXregular, and letDbe normalization data forh_Z. Then the normalization morphism ofDis finite.
theorem NormalizationData.isFinite_hom_of_regular_alteration {Z : BigFppfOver B S hS}
[IsAffine ((BigFppfOver.toScheme B S hS).obj Z)]
[_root_.AlgebraicGeometry.IsIntegral ((BigFppfOver.toScheme B S hS).obj Z)]
[IsLocallyNoetherian ((BigFppfOver.toScheme B S hS).obj Z)]
(f : X ⟶ yoneda.obj Z) (hf : IsAlteration B S hS f)
(hXreg : HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T))
(h02O6 : ∃ φ : Γ((BigFppfOver.toScheme B S hS).obj Z, ⊤) →+*
↥(RingCat.sectionsSubring
(structurePresheaf B S hS X ⋙ forget₂ CommRingCat.{u} RingCat.{u})),
Function.Injective φ ∧ φ.Finite)
(D : NormalizationData B S hS (yoneda.obj Z)) :
IsFinite B S hS D.hom
Tag 0BHU, a lemma
Tag 0BHU in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_isRegularRing_localizationAway_of_regular_spaceAlteration, an alias in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/LocalDomainSpaceAlteration.lean, line 164. The attribute's comment: “clause (1), regular after inverting one element”.
A Noetherian local domain admitting an alteration by a regular algebraic space is regular after inverting one nonzero element. The dense regular open of [Stacks, Tag 0BHT] at the representable target
Spec Acontains a nonempty basic openD(a)ofSpec A, andΓ(D(a)) = A_a.
public alias exists_isRegularRing_localizationAway_of_regular_spaceAlteration
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.module_finite_integralClosure_of_regular_spaceAlteration, an alias in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/LocalDomainSpaceAlteration.lean, line 172. The attribute's comment: “clause (2), finite integral closure”.
The integral closure of a Noetherian local domain admitting an alteration by a regular algebraic space is a finite module over it. The normalization of
Spec Ais finite by [Stacks, Tag 0BHT], and it is the spectrum of the integral closure ofAinFrac(A)([Stacks, Tag 035P]).
public alias module_finite_integralClosure_of_regular_spaceAlteration
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isNormalRing_adicCompletion_integralClosure_of_regular_spaceAlteration, an alias in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/LocalDomainSpaceAlteration.lean, line 182. The attribute's comment: “clause (3), normal completion of the integral closure”.
The completion of the integral closure is normal. With
C = Γ(X, 𝒪_X)andBthe integral closure ofAinFrac(A), the inclusionB ⊆ Cis a map of finiteA-algebras andBis a normal domain, so [Stacks, Tag 0BGH] reduces normality ofBˆto normality ofCˆ = Aˆ ⊗_A C, which is the global functions of the regular base changeX ×_{Spec A} Spec Aˆ([Stacks, Tag 073K], [Stacks, Tag 0BHQ]). Normality here isIsNormalRing, which for a finite algebra over a Noetherian local ring is normality of the completions at the maximal ideals.
public alias isNormalRing_adicCompletion_integralClosure_of_regular_spaceAlteration
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isRegularRing_genericFormalFibre_of_regular_spaceAlteration, an alias in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/LocalDomainSpaceAlteration.lean, line 191. The attribute's comment: “clause (4), regular generic formal fibre”.
The generic formal fibre of a Noetherian local domain admitting an alteration by a regular algebraic space is regular. For an affine étale chart
VofXthrough the generic point the ringAˆ ⊗_A Γ(V, 𝒪_V)is regular by [Stacks, Tag 0BHQ], and the generic formal fibre is recovered by invertingA ∖ {0}and descending along the faithfully flatFrac(A)-algebraFrac(A) ⊗_A Γ(V, 𝒪_V)by [Stacks, Tag 07NG].
public alias isRegularRing_genericFormalFibre_of_regular_spaceAlteration
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_isRegularRing_localizationAway_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/RegularSpaceAlterationLocalDomain.lean, line 473. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”.
A Noetherian local domain admitting an alteration by a regular algebraic space is regular after inverting one nonzero element. The dense regular open of [Stacks, Tag 0BHT], read at the representable target
Spec AbyAlgebraicGeometry.Space.denseRegularOpenOfRegularAlteration, contains a nonempty basic openD(a)ofSpec A, andΓ(D(a)) = A_a.
public theorem exists_isRegularRing_localizationAway_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] [IsLocalRing A]
(B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (hA : B.Contains (Spec (.of A)))
(X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(g : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (Over.mk (𝟙 (B.obj hA))))
(hg : IsAlteration B (Spec (.of A)) hA g)
(hreg : HasEtaleLocalProperty B (Spec (.of A)) hA X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T)) :
∃ a : A, a ≠ 0 ∧ IsRegularRing (Localization.Away a)
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.module_finite_integralClosure_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/RegularSpaceAlterationLocalDomain.lean, line 505. The attribute's comment: “part (2)”.
The integral closure of a Noetherian local domain admitting an alteration by a regular algebraic space is a finite module over it. This is clause (2) of [Stacks, Tag 0BHU]:
Ais N-1 (IsN1).The alteration makes
Spec Aan integral algebraic space carrying a regular alteration, so [Stacks, Tag 0BHT] applies to it;Spec Ais its own affine surjective étale scheme chart, the identity being surjective and étale, and along that chartAlgebraicGeometry.Space.NormalizationData.isFinite_normalization_chart_of_regular_alterationgives that the normalization morphism of the schemeSpec Ais finite. By [Stacks, Tag 035P] that morphism is the spectrum map ofA ⟶ integralClosure A (Frac A), so the integral closure is a finiteA-module; that reading isAlgebraicGeometry.module_finite_integralClosure_of_isFinite_normalization, which takes the presenting ring of the scheme — hereAitself — rather than its ring of global sections.The source argues instead that
C = Γ(X, 𝒪_X)is a finiteA-module by [Stacks, Tag 08AR] and integrally closed, and that the integral closure embeds intoC; the route above replaces that by Chow's lemma for algebraic spaces over the chart and the degree-zero case of [Stacks, Tag 02O6] for schemes, which is how [Stacks, Tag 0BHT] is proved here.
public theorem module_finite_integralClosure_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] [IsLocalRing A]
(B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (hA : B.Contains (Spec (.of A)))
(X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(g : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (Over.mk (𝟙 (B.obj hA))))
(hg : IsAlteration B (Spec (.of A)) hA g)
(hreg : HasEtaleLocalProperty B (Spec (.of A)) hA X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T)) :
Module.Finite A ↥(integralClosure A (FractionRing A))
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isNormalRing_adicCompletion_integralClosure_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/RegularSpaceAlterationLocalDomain.lean, line 647. The attribute's comment: “part (3)”.
The completion of the integral closure of a Noetherian local domain admitting an alteration by a regular algebraic space is normal. This is part (3) of [Stacks, Tag 0BHU]. Let
Bbe the integral closure ofAinFrac(A)andC = Γ(X, 𝒪_X). ThenCis a finiteA-module and a normal domain containingA([Stacks, Tag 0BH3]), soB ⊆ C, andCˆ = Aˆ ⊗_A Cis normal byAlgebraicGeometry.Space.globalFunctions_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular; [Stacks, Tag 0BGH] gives normality ofBˆ. Normality isIsNormalRing: every localization at a prime is a normal domain, which for the finite algebraBˆover the complete localAˆis normality of the completions ofBat its maximal ideals.
public theorem isNormalRing_adicCompletion_integralClosure_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] [IsLocalRing A]
(B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (hA : B.Contains (Spec (.of A)))
(X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(g : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (Over.mk (𝟙 (B.obj hA))))
(hg : IsAlteration B (Spec (.of A)) hA g)
(hreg : HasEtaleLocalProperty B (Spec (.of A)) hA X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T)) :
IsNormalRing
(AdicCompletion
((IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A).map
(algebraMap A ↥(integralClosure A (FractionRing A))))
↥(integralClosure A (FractionRing A)))
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.isRegularRing_genericFormalFibre_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ResolutionOfSurfaces/ImpliedProperties/RegularSpaceAlterationLocalDomain.lean, line 694. The attribute's comment: “part (4)”. References: EGA IV (7.9.3), “special case”.
The generic formal fibre of a Noetherian local domain admitting an alteration by a regular algebraic space is regular. For an affine étale chart
VofXthrough the generic point the ringAˆ ⊗_A Γ(V, 𝒪_V)is regular, and the generic formal fibre is recovered by invertingA ∖ {0}and descending along the faithfully flatFrac(A)-algebraFrac(A) ⊗_A Γ(V, 𝒪_V)by [Stacks, Tag 07NG]. Regularity of the completed base change of the chart is part (3) of [Stacks, Tag 0BHQ], applied throughAlgebraicGeometry.Space.exists_injective_isRegularRing_adicCompletion_tensorProduct.
public theorem isRegularRing_genericFormalFibre_of_isAlteration_of_isRegular
(A : Type u) [CommRing A] [IsDomain A] [IsNoetherianRing A] [IsLocalRing A]
(B : BigFppfSite.{u}) (hA : B.Contains (Spec (.of A)))
(X : (BigFppfOver B (Spec (.of A)) hA)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u)
(g : X ⟶ yoneda.obj (Over.mk (𝟙 (B.obj hA))))
(hg : IsAlteration B (Spec (.of A)) hA g)
(hreg : HasEtaleLocalProperty B (Spec (.of A)) hA X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T)) :
IsRegularRing ((AdicCompletion (IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal A) A) ⊗[A] (FractionRing A))
Sources
Section89.8 Resolution#
Section 89.8 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BHV. 3 tags here are carried by 3 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BHW, a definition
Tag 0BHW in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.IsResolutionOfSingularities, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ResolutionOfSingularities.lean, line 62.
A resolution of singularities of a Noetherian integral algebraic space
YoverSis a modificationf : X ⟶ Ywhose sourceXis regular.
abbrev IsResolutionOfSingularities {X Y : (BigFppfOver B S hS)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u}
(hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B S hS X) (hY : IsAlgebraicSpace B S hS Y)
(_hYnoeth : IsNoetherian B S hS hZ Y) (hYint : IsIntegralSpace B S hS Y)
(_hdecentX : IsDecentSpace B S hS X)
(_hdecentY : IsDecentSpace B S hS Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop
Tag 0BHX, a definition
Tag 0BHX in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.HasResolutionByNormalizedBlowUps, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/ResolutionByNormalizedBlowUps.lean, line 133.
Stacks 0BHX. A two-dimensional Noetherian integral algebraic space
YoverShas a resolution of singularities by normalized blowups when the normalization ofYcan be followed by finitely many normalizations of blowing ups at closed points, all of them proper overY, so as to reach a regular algebraic space.
abbrev HasResolutionByNormalizedBlowUps (Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS)
(_hYdim : dimension B S hS Y.obj Y.property = 2)
(_hYnoeth : IsNoetherian B S hS hZ Y.obj)
(_hYint : IsIntegralSpace B S hS Y.obj) : Prop
Tag 0BHY, a theorem
Tag 0BHY in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.Space.tfae_resolution_of_dimension_eq_two, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/SurfaceResolutionTheorem.lean, line 64.
Stacks 0BHY. For a two-dimensional integral Noetherian algebraic space
YoverS, the following are equivalent: (1) there is an alterationX ⟶ YwithXregular; (2)Yhas a resolution of singularities; (3)Yhas a resolution of singularities by normalized blowups; (4) the normalizationY^ν ⟶ Yis finite,Y^νhas finitely many singular points, and the completion of the henselian local ring ofY^νat each of them is normal.
theorem tfae_resolution_of_dimension_eq_two (hZ : B.Contains (⊤_ Scheme.{u}))
(Y : AlgebraicSpaces B S hS) (hYdim : dimension B S hS Y.obj Y.property = 2)
(hYnoeth : IsNoetherian B S hS hZ Y.obj) (hYint : IsIntegralSpace B S hS Y.obj) :
List.TFAE
[∃ (X : (BigFppfOver B S hS)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (f : X ⟶ Y.obj), IsAlteration B S hS f ∧
HasEtaleLocalProperty B S hS X (fun T : Scheme.{u} => IsRegular T),
∃ (X : (BigFppfOver B S hS)ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type u) (hX : IsAlgebraicSpace B S hS X)
(hdecentX : IsDecentSpace B S hS X) (f : X ⟶ Y.obj),
IsResolutionOfSingularities B S hS hZ hX Y.property hYnoeth hYint hdecentX
(hYint.isDecentSpace B S hS Y.obj) f,
HasResolutionByNormalizedBlowUps B S hS hZ Y hYdim hYnoeth hYint,
∀ D : NormalizationData B S hS Y.obj,
D.IsSurfaceResolutionCriterion Y.property (hYint.isDecentSpace B S hS Y.obj)]
Sources
Section89.9 Examples#
Section 89.9 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0AE8. 2 tags here are carried by 8 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0AE9, an example
Tag 0AE9 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Resolution.trinomial_irreducible, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/TrinomialHypersurface.lean, line 183. The attribute's comment: “irreducibility”.
The defining trinomial is irreducible for positive pairwise coprime exponents.
theorem trinomial_irreducible (k : Type u) [Field k]
(r s t : ℕ) (_hr : 0 < r) (_hs : 0 < s) (ht : 0 < t)
(hrs : r.Coprime s) (_hrt : r.Coprime t) (_hst : s.Coprime t) :
Irreducible (MvPolynomial.X (0 : Fin 3) ^ r +
MvPolynomial.X (1 : Fin 3) ^ s +
MvPolynomial.X (2 : Fin 3) ^ t : MvPolynomial (Fin 3) k)
Stacks.Resolution.trinomialRing_isDomain, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/TrinomialHypersurface.lean, line 201. The attribute's comment: “integrality”.
The trinomial hypersurface is integral.
theorem trinomialRing_isDomain (k : Type u) [Field k]
(r s t : ℕ) (hr : 0 < r) (hs : 0 < s) (ht : 0 < t)
(hrs : r.Coprime s) (hrt : r.Coprime t) (hst : s.Coprime t) :
IsDomain (trinomialRing k r s t)
Stacks.Resolution.trinomialRing_z_isPrime, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/TrinomialHypersurface.lean, line 263. The attribute's comment: “the prime element z”.
The image of
zgenerates a prime ideal in the hypersurface ring.
theorem trinomialRing_z_isPrime (k : Type u) [Field k]
(r s t : ℕ) (_hr : 0 < r) (_hs : 0 < s) (ht : 0 < t)
(hrs : r.Coprime s) :
(Ideal.span ({Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (MvPolynomial.X (2 : Fin 3))} :
Set (trinomialRing k r s t))).IsPrime
Stacks.Resolution.trinomialRing_localization_equiv, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/TrinomialHypersurface.lean, line 421. The attribute's comment: “localized polynomial presentation”.
When
t = 1 + e r s, localization atzis the localization of a polynomial ring inx',y'at-((x') ^ r + (y') ^ s), with the stated coordinate formulas.
theorem trinomialRing_localization_equiv (k : Type u) [Field k]
(r s e : ℕ) :
∃ φ : Localization.Away
(Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (MvPolynomial.X (2 : Fin 3)) :
trinomialRing k r s (1 + e * r * s)) ≃ₐ[k]
Localization.Away (-(MvPolynomial.X (0 : Fin 2) ^ r +
MvPolynomial.X (1 : Fin 2) ^ s) : MvPolynomial (Fin 2) k),
φ (algebraMap (trinomialRing k r s (1 + e * r * s)) _
(Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (MvPolynomial.X (0 : Fin 3)))) =
algebraMap (MvPolynomial (Fin 2) k) _
(MvPolynomial.X (0 : Fin 2) *
(-(MvPolynomial.X (0 : Fin 2) ^ r +
MvPolynomial.X (1 : Fin 2) ^ s)) ^ (e * s)) ∧
φ (algebraMap (trinomialRing k r s (1 + e * r * s)) _
(Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (MvPolynomial.X (1 : Fin 3)))) =
algebraMap (MvPolynomial (Fin 2) k) _
(MvPolynomial.X (1 : Fin 2) *
(-(MvPolynomial.X (0 : Fin 2) ^ r +
MvPolynomial.X (1 : Fin 2) ^ s)) ^ (e * r)) ∧
φ (algebraMap (trinomialRing k r s (1 + e * r * s)) _
(Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (MvPolynomial.X (2 : Fin 3)))) =
algebraMap (MvPolynomial (Fin 2) k) _
(-(MvPolynomial.X (0 : Fin 2) ^ r +
MvPolynomial.X (1 : Fin 2) ^ s))
Stacks.Resolution.trinomialRing_localization_uniqueFactorizationMonoid, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/TrinomialHypersurface.lean, line 491. The attribute's comment: “factorial localization”.
In the explicit presentation, inverting
zgives a unique factorization monoid.
theorem trinomialRing_localization_uniqueFactorizationMonoid (k : Type u) [Field k]
(r s e : ℕ) :
UniqueFactorizationMonoid
(Localization.Away
(Ideal.Quotient.mk _ (MvPolynomial.X (2 : Fin 3)) :
trinomialRing k r s (1 + e * r * s)))
Stacks.Resolution.trinomialRing_uniqueFactorizationMonoid, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Simplicial/TrinomialHypersurface.lean, line 710. The attribute's comment: “unique factorization”.
The trinomial hypersurface is a unique factorization domain.
theorem trinomialRing_uniqueFactorizationMonoid (k : Type u) [Field k]
(r s t : ℕ) (hr : 0 < r) (hs : 0 < s) (ht : 0 < t)
(hrs : r.Coprime s) (hrt : r.Coprime t) (hst : s.Coprime t) :
UniqueFactorizationMonoid (trinomialRing k r s t)
Tag 0AEA, an example
Tag 0AEA in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.MvPowerSeries.Brieskorn.not_uniqueFactorizationMonoid_brieskornHypersurface, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/BrieskornHypersurface.lean, line 963. The attribute's comment: “the general nonfactoriality assertion”.
Apart from the
E₈triple(2, 3, 5), a Brieskorn hypersurface with ordered, pairwise coprime exponents greater than one is not factorial.
public theorem not_uniqueFactorizationMonoid_brieskornHypersurface
{r s t : ℕ} (hr : 1 < r) (hrs : r < s) (hst : s < t)
(hrs' : Nat.Coprime r s) (hrt' : Nat.Coprime r t) (hst' : Nat.Coprime s t)
(hE8 : ¬ (r = 2 ∧ s = 3 ∧ t = 5)) :
¬ UniqueFactorizationMonoid (BrieskornHypersurface r s t)
Stacks.MvPowerSeries.Brieskorn.not_uniqueFactorizationMonoid_brieskornHypersurface_two_five_seven, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/RingTheory/MvPowerSeries/BrieskornHypersurface.lean, line 973. The attribute's comment: “the explicit (2, 5, 7) example”.
The hypersurface
ℂ⟦x,y,z⟧/(x²+y⁵+z⁷)is not factorial.
public theorem not_uniqueFactorizationMonoid_brieskornHypersurface_two_five_seven :
¬ UniqueFactorizationMonoid (BrieskornHypersurface 2 5 7)
Sources
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.