Twisting a weak central groupoid
Occasionally, an equational law is preserved under a “twist” operation in which one replaces the magma operation \(x \diamond y\) by \(x \diamond' y := Tx \diamond Uy\) for some automorphisms \(T,U\) of the magma \(G\) that satisfy additional relations. In the case of the weak central groupoid law (1), we see that
so if \(T\) is an automorphism of order \(5\) and \(U = T^{-1}\) (so that \(T^2 = U^3\)), we conclude that this twisted magma is also a weak central groupoid. This can be used to generate further counterexamples. For instance, let \(M_2\) be the order two weak central groupoid with carrier \({\mathbb F}_2\) and with the NAND operation \(x \diamond y := 1 - xy\); this can easily be verified to be a weak central groupoid. It does not have any nontrivial automorphisms, but its fifth power \(M_2^{\otimes 5}\) has a cyclic shift \(T\) of order \(5\): \(T( (x_i)_{i\in \mathbb{Z}/5\mathbb{Z}} ) = (x_{i+1})_{i \in \mathbb{Z}/5\mathbb{Z}}\). If we twist \(M_2^{\otimes 5}\) by \(T\) and \(T^{-1}\), we obtain a weak central groupoid \(M\) with carrier \({\mathbb F}_2^5\) and magma operation
In particular, if \(x = (x_i)_{i\in \mathbb{Z}/5\mathbb{Z}}\), then
and
which by the laws of boolean algebra simplify to
from which one can easily refute equation 151,
Informally, the reason for this is that equation 151 has a different semigroup twist symmetries: \(T^2 = 1, T = U^{-1}\) instead of \(T^5 = 1, T = U^{-1}\).
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.