31.16 Effective Cartier… to 31.24 Meromorphic functions and…
Section31.16 Effective Cartier divisors on Noetherian schemes#
Section 31.16 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0B3Q. 13 tags here are carried by 21 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0AYL, a lemma
Tag 0AYL in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.isRegularSection_iff_forall_associatedPoint_notMem_maximalSmul, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularSectionAssociatedPoints.lean, line 255.
Stacks Project, Tag 0AYL. Let
Xbe a locally Noetherian scheme,Lan invertible𝒪_X-module ands ∈ Γ(X, L). Thensis a regular section if and only ifsdoes not vanish at any associated point ofX, i.e. its germ at every associated point avoids𝔪_x L_x.
theorem isRegularSection_iff_forall_associatedPoint_notMem_maximalSmul
[AlgebraicGeometry.IsLocallyNoetherian X] (L : X.Modules)
[AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj X.ringCatSheaf.property L]
(s : L.sections) :
AlgebraicGeometry.IsRegularSection X.presheaf
(structureSheafRing X.toRingedSpace).property s ↔
∀ x ∈ schemeAssociatedPoints X,
(L.presheaf.Γgerm x).hom (s.eval (op ⊤)) ∉ Stacks.ModuleStalk.maximalSmul L x
Tag 0AG8, a lemma
Tag 0AG8 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.isLocallyPrincipal_of_stalk_isPrincipal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartierStalk/Stalkwise.lean, line 255.
Stacks Project, Tag 0AG8. A closed subscheme of a locally Noetherian scheme is locally principal if its ideal is principal in the local ring at each point of the subscheme.
Outside the support the ideal of the local ring is the unit ideal, so the hypothesis is only about points of the subscheme; at each point principality then spreads to an affine neighbourhood by
Stacks.Divisors.exists_affineOpens_isPrincipal_of_stalk_isPrincipal.The companion
Stacks.Divisors.isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_stalk_isPrincipal_nonZeroDivisorupgrades the conclusion to an effective Cartier divisor when the stalk generators are nonzerodivisors.
theorem isLocallyPrincipal_of_stalk_isPrincipal {X : Scheme.{u}} [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : ∀ x : X, x ∈ I.support → (IdealSheafData.stalk I x).IsPrincipal) :
IsLocallyPrincipal I
Stacks.Divisors.isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_stalk_isPrincipal_nonZeroDivisor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartierStalk/StalkwiseRegular.lean, line 161. References: EGA IV (21.2.12), “special case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0AG8. A closed subscheme of a locally Noetherian scheme is an effective Cartier divisor if its ideal is generated by a single nonzerodivisor in the local ring at each point of the subscheme.
theorem isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_stalk_isPrincipal_nonZeroDivisor {X : Scheme.{u}}
[IsLocallyNoetherian X] (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : ∀ x : X, x ∈ I.support → ∃ g ∈ nonZeroDivisors (X.presheaf.stalk x),
IdealSheafData.stalk I x = Ideal.span {g}) :
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I
Stacks.Divisors.isLocallyPrincipal_of_forall_stalk, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/StalkLocallyPrincipal.lean, line 281. The attribute's comment: “(1)”.
If the stalk of the ideal sheaf at every point of the closed subscheme can be generated by one element, the subscheme is locally principal.
theorem isLocallyPrincipal_of_forall_stalk [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(hst : ∀ x ∈ I.supportSet, ∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (hxU : x ∈ (U : Set X)),
(Ideal.map (X.presheaf.germ U.1 x hxU).hom (I.ideal U)).IsPrincipal) :
IsLocallyPrincipal I
Stacks.Divisors.isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_forall_stalk, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/StalkLocallyPrincipal.lean, line 298. The attribute's comment: “(2)”.
If the stalk of the ideal sheaf at every point of the closed subscheme can be generated by a single nonzerodivisor, the subscheme is an effective Cartier divisor.
theorem isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_forall_stalk [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(hst : ∀ x ∈ I.supportSet, ∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (hxU : x ∈ (U : Set X)),
∃ ξ ∈ nonZeroDivisors (X.presheaf.stalk x),
Ideal.map (X.presheaf.germ U.1 x hxU).hom (I.ideal U) = Ideal.span {ξ}) :
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I
Tag 0BCN, a lemma
Tag 0BCN in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.ringKrullDim_stalk_le_one_of_isLocallyPrincipal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/Codimension.lean, line 185. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”.
A component of a locally principal closed subscheme has codimension at most one.
theorem ringKrullDim_stalk_le_one_of_isLocallyPrincipal
{X : Scheme.{u}} [IsLocallyNoetherian X] (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsLocallyPrincipal I)
(ξ : I.subscheme)
(hξ : ∃ Z : irreducibleComponents I.subscheme, IsGenericPoint ξ (Z : Set I.subscheme)) :
ringKrullDim (X.presheaf.stalk (I.subschemeι ξ)) ≤ 1
AlgebraicGeometry.ringKrullDim_stalk_eq_one_of_isEffectiveCartierDivisor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/Codimension.lean, line 204. The attribute's comment: “part (2)”.
A component of an effective Cartier divisor has codimension exactly one.
theorem ringKrullDim_stalk_eq_one_of_isEffectiveCartierDivisor
{X : Scheme.{u}} [IsLocallyNoetherian X] (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I)
(ξ : I.subscheme)
(hξ : ∃ Z : irreducibleComponents I.subscheme, IsGenericPoint ξ (Z : Set I.subscheme)) :
ringKrullDim (X.presheaf.stalk (I.subschemeι ξ)) = 1
Tag 0AG9, a lemma
Tag 0AG9 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isDiscreteValuationRing_stalk_genericPoint, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/DiscreteValuation.lean, line 39. References: EGA IV (3.4.6), “partial”.
Let
Xbe a locally Noetherian scheme andD ⊆ Xan integral closed subscheme which is an effective Cartier divisor. The local ring ofXat the generic point ofDis a discrete valuation ring; in particular it is a domain.
theorem isDiscreteValuationRing_stalk_genericPoint {X : Scheme.{u}} [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(I : X.IdealSheafData) [IsIntegral I.subscheme] (hI : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I) :
∃ _ : IsDomain (X.presheaf.stalk (I.subschemeι (_root_.genericPoint I.subscheme))),
IsDiscreteValuationRing
(X.presheaf.stalk (I.subschemeι (_root_.genericPoint I.subscheme)))
Tag 0B3R, a lemma
Tag 0B3R in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isEffectiveCartierDivisor_hasPropertySk, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/SerreCondition.lean, line 174.
An effective Cartier divisor of an
(Sₖ)locally Noetherian scheme is(Sₖ₋₁)fork ≥ 1.
theorem isEffectiveCartierDivisor_hasPropertySk
{X : Scheme.{u}} [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(I : X.IdealSheafData) (hI : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I)
(k : ℕ) (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hX : HasPropertySk X k) :
@HasPropertySk I.subscheme
(LocallyOfFiniteType.isLocallyNoetherian I.subschemeι) (k - 1)
Tag 0B3S, a lemma
Tag 0B3S in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isNormal_effectiveCartierDivisor_hasPropertySk_one, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/SerreCondition.lean, line 283. References: EGA IV (21.7.3), “normal ⇒ (S_1)”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0B3S. An effective Cartier divisor on a locally Noetherian normal scheme satisfies Serre's condition
(S₁): the scheme satisfies(S₂)by Serre's criterion, and Tag 0B3R drops the index by one.
theorem isNormal_effectiveCartierDivisor_hasPropertySk_one (X : Scheme.{u})
[IsLocallyNoetherian X] [IsNormal X] (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I) :
letI : IsLocallyNoetherian I.subscheme :=
LocallyOfFiniteType.isLocallyNoetherian I.subschemeι
HasPropertySk I.subscheme 1
Tag 0AGA, a lemma
Tag 0AGA in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_codimension_one_of_uniqueFactorizationMonoid, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/CodimensionOne.lean, line 175. References: EGA IV (21.7.4), “c) => a'')”; EGA IV (21.6.9), “(ii) c) ⇒ b)”.
A codimension-one integral closed subscheme is an effective Cartier divisor when the ambient local rings along it are UFDs.
theorem isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_codimension_one_of_uniqueFactorizationMonoid
{X : Scheme.{u}} [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(I : X.IdealSheafData) [IsIntegral I.subscheme]
(hcodim : codimension (IrreducibleCloseds.closureSingleton
(I.subschemeι (_root_.genericPoint I.subscheme))) = 1)
(hUFD : ∀ x : X, x ∈ I.support →
UniqueFactorizationMonoid (X.presheaf.stalk x)) :
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I
Tag 0AGB, a lemma
Tag 0AGB in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_agree_off_codimension_two, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/CartierPart.lean, line 1086. The attribute's comment: “cartier_part”.
The Cartier part of a closed subscheme supported, up to codimension two, on integral effective Cartier divisors.
theorem exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_agree_off_codimension_two
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsNoetherian X] (Z : X.IdealSheafData)
{ι : Type v} (D : ι → X.IdealSheafData) (Z' : Closeds X)
(hD : ∀ i, IsIntegral (D i).subscheme ∧
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor (D i))
(hZ' : ∀ x : X, x ∈ (Z' : Set X) →
(2 : ℕ∞) ≤ codimension (IrreducibleCloseds.closureSingleton x))
(hcover : (Z.support : Set X) ⊆
(Z' : Set X) ∪ ⋃ i, ((D i).support : Set X)) :
∃ a : ι →₀ ℕ,
let E : X.IdealSheafData := a.prod fun i n => (D i) ^ n
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor E ∧
Z ≤ E ∧
∃ U : X.Opens,
E.comap U.ι = Z.comap U.ι ∧
∀ x : X, x ∈ (Z.support : Set X) → x ∉ (U : Set X) →
(2 : ℕ∞) ≤ codimension (IrreducibleCloseds.closureSingleton x)
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_integral_effectiveCartierDivisors_cover, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/DivisorCover.lean, line 87. The attribute's comment: “supply_divisors”.
A nowhere dense closed subscheme of a Noetherian scheme with factorial local rings along it, or of a regular scheme, is covered by integral effective Cartier divisors up to a closed subset of codimension at least two.
theorem exists_integral_effectiveCartierDivisors_cover
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsNoetherian X] (Z : X.IdealSheafData)
(hZ : IsNowhereDense (Z.support : Set X))
(h : (∀ x : X, x ∈ Z.support →
UniqueFactorizationMonoid (X.presheaf.stalk x)) ∨ IsRegular X) :
∃ (D : Set X.IdealSheafData) (Z' : Closeds X),
(∀ I ∈ D, IsIntegral I.subscheme ∧
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I) ∧
(∀ x : X, x ∈ (Z' : Set X) →
(2 : ℕ∞) ≤ codimension (IrreducibleCloseds.closureSingleton x)) ∧
(Z.support : Set X) ⊆ (Z' : Set X) ∪ ⋃ I ∈ D, (I.support : Set X)
Tag 0BXH, a lemma
Tag 0BXH in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_codimension_one, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/NoEmbeddedPoints.lean, line 317. References: EGA IV (21.6.9), “(ii) c) ⇒ b)”.
A codimension-one closed subscheme with no embedded points is an effective Cartier divisor when the ambient local rings along it are UFDs, or the ambient scheme is regular.
theorem isEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_codimension_one
{X : Scheme.{u}} [IsNoetherian X] (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hno : HasNoEmbeddedPoints I.subscheme)
(hcodim : ∀ Z ∈ irreducibleComponents I.subscheme,
∀ x : I.subscheme, IsGenericPoint x Z →
codimension (IrreducibleCloseds.closureSingleton (I.subschemeι x)) = 1)
(hlocal : (∀ x : X, x ∈ I.support →
UniqueFactorizationMonoid (X.presheaf.stalk x)) ∨ IsRegular X) :
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I
Tag 0BXI, a lemma
Tag 0BXI in the Stacks Project.
Ideal.isPrincipal_of_noEmbeddedAssociatedPrimes_of_minimalPrimes_height_eq_one, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PrincipalIdeals.lean, line 138. References: EGA IV (21.12.9), “special case”.
An ideal of pure height one with no embedded primes in a Noetherian UFD is principal.
theorem isPrincipal_of_noEmbeddedAssociatedPrimes_of_minimalPrimes_height_eq_one
{R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [IsNoetherianRing R]
[UniqueFactorizationMonoid R] (I : Ideal R)
(hI : HasNoEmbeddedAssociatedPrimes (R ⧸ I) (R ⧸ I))
(hheight : ∀ p ∈ I.minimalPrimes, p.height = 1) :
I.IsPrincipal
Tag 0BCP, a lemma
Tag 0BCP in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_finsupp_eq_prod_of_support_cover, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/Decomposition.lean, line 221. The attribute's comment: “decomposition”.
Let
Xbe a Noetherian scheme andDan effective Cartier divisor onXwhose points are covered by a familyDᵢof integral effective Cartier divisors. ThenDis a finite nonnegative combination of theDᵢ: there is a finitely supporteda : ι →₀ ℕwithℐ_D = Π ℐ_{Dᵢ}^{aᵢ}.
theorem exists_finsupp_eq_prod_of_support_cover
{X : Scheme.{u}} [IsNoetherian X] (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I)
{ι : Type v} (D : ι → X.IdealSheafData)
(hD : ∀ i, IsIntegral (D i).subscheme ∧ IsEffectiveCartierDivisor (D i))
(hcover : ∀ x ∈ I.supportSet, ∃ i, x ∈ (D i).supportSet) :
∃ a : ι →₀ ℕ, I = a.prod fun i n => D i ^ n
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_integral_effectiveCartierDivisors_cover_supportSet, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/Decomposition.lean, line 260. The attribute's comment: “existence of the covering divisors”.
Let
Xbe a Noetherian scheme andDan effective Cartier divisor onX. If the local rings ofXat the points ofDare unique factorization domains — in particular ifXis regular — then there is a family of integral effective Cartier divisors covering the points ofD.
theorem exists_integral_effectiveCartierDivisors_cover_supportSet
{X : Scheme.{u}} [IsNoetherian X] (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I)
(h : (∀ x : X, x ∈ I.supportSet → UniqueFactorizationMonoid (X.presheaf.stalk x)) ∨
IsRegular X) :
∃ S : Set X.IdealSheafData,
(∀ J ∈ S, IsIntegral J.subscheme ∧ IsEffectiveCartierDivisor J) ∧
(∀ x ∈ I.supportSet, ∃ J ∈ S, x ∈ J.supportSet)
Tag 0AYM, a lemma
Tag 0AYM in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.InvertibleSheafGeneral.exists_effectiveCartierDivisors_tensor_invertibleSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/InvertibleSheafGeneral.lean, line 211.
Stacks Project, Tag 0AYM, the general clause. On a Noetherian scheme
Xcarrying an ample invertible moduleℒ, every invertible𝒪_X-module𝒩is the sheaf𝒪_X(D - D')of a difference of two effective Cartier divisors, andDandD'may both be chosen disjoint from any prescribed finite subsetEofX.
𝒩 ≅ 𝒪_X(D - D') = 𝒪_X(D) ⊗ 𝒪_X(D')^{⊗ -1}is stated here in the equivalent multiplicative form𝒩 ⊗ 𝒪_X(D') ≅ 𝒪_X(D); see the module documentation. The caseD' = ∅forXquasi-affine isAlgebraicGeometry.exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_invertibleSheaf_of_isQuasiAffine.
theorem exists_effectiveCartierDivisors_tensor_invertibleSheaf [IsNoetherian X] (L : X.Modules)
[IsInvertibleModule X L] (hL : IsAmple X L) (N : X.Modules) [IsInvertibleModule X N]
{E : Set X} (hE : E.Finite) :
∃ D D' : X.IdealSheafData,
Stacks.Divisors.IsEffectiveCartierDivisor D ∧
Stacks.Divisors.IsEffectiveCartierDivisor D' ∧
Disjoint E D.supportSet ∧ Disjoint E D'.supportSet ∧
Nonempty ((N ⊗ Stacks.Divisors.invertibleSheaf' D' : X.Modules) ≅
Stacks.Divisors.invertibleSheaf' D)
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_invertibleSheaf_of_isQuasiAffine, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/QuasiAffineInvertibleSheaf.lean, line 151. The attribute's comment: “quasi-affine case with empty negative divisor”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0AYM, the quasi-affine clause. On a Noetherian quasi-affine scheme every invertible
𝒪_X-module𝒩is isomorphic to the invertible sheaf𝒪_X(D)of an effective Cartier divisorD, andDmay be chosen disjoint from any prescribed finite subsetEofX. This is the caseD' = ∅of the general statement𝒩 ≅ 𝒪_X(D - D').
theorem exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_invertibleSheaf_of_isQuasiAffine
[IsNoetherian X] [X.IsQuasiAffine] (N : X.Modules)
[SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj X.ringCatSheaf.property N]
{E : Set X} (hE : E.Finite) :
∃ D : X.IdealSheafData,
Stacks.Divisors.IsEffectiveCartierDivisor D ∧
Disjoint E D.supportSet ∧
Nonempty (N ≅ Stacks.Divisors.invertibleSheaf' D)
Tag 0B3T, a lemma
Tag 0B3T in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_reflexiveHull_exteriorPower_iso_tensor_cartier, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/DeterminantTwistBoundDivisorQuotient.lean, line 63. The attribute's comment: “bounded Cartier twist”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0B3T. In a right-exact sequence of coherent modules of generic rank
ron an integral regular scheme of dimension at most two, whose quotient is the direct image of a module of ranksfinite locally free on an integral effective Cartier divisorD, the determinant line bundles of the first two terms differ by at mostmin s rcopies ofD.The cokernel of the stalk map at the generic point of
Disκ ^ sbyAlgebraicGeometry.linearEquiv_quotient_range_stalkHom_fin, which is the one hypothesis ofAlgebraicGeometry.exists_pow_le_min_tensorIso_detMap_of_isEffectiveCartierDivisorstill open. Local Noetherianness, all the proof needs, comes from regularity.
theorem exists_reflexiveHull_exteriorPower_iso_tensor_cartier (X : Scheme.{u})
[IsIntegral X] (hX : AlgebraicGeometry.IsRegular X)
(hXdim : topologicalKrullDim X ≤ 2)
(D : X.IdealSheafData) (hD : Stacks.Divisors.IsEffectiveCartierDivisor D)
[IsIntegral D.subscheme]
(G : D.subscheme.Modules) (s : ℕ)
[SheafOfModules.IsFiniteLocallyFreeOfRank.{u, u, u} G s]
(S : ShortComplex X.Modules) [S.X₁.IsCoherent] [S.X₂.IsCoherent]
(hS : S.Exact) [Epi S.g]
(hquot : S.X₃ ≅ (Scheme.Modules.pushforward D.subschemeι).obj G)
(r : ℕ) (U : X.Opens) (hU : ∃ x : X, x ∈ U)
[SheafOfModules.IsFiniteLocallyFreeOfRank.{u, u, u} (S.X₁.over U) r]
[SheafOfModules.IsFiniteLocallyFreeOfRank.{u, u, u} (S.X₂.over U) r] :
∃ k : ℕ, k ≤ min s r ∧ Nonempty ((((Stacks.SheafOfModules.Tensor.sheafTensor
⟨X.sheaf.obj, Presheaf.isSheaf_of_isSheaf_comp _ (X.sheaf.obj) (forget₂ CommRingCat RingCat)
(X.ringCatSheaf.property)⟩).obj ((Stacks.Divisors.invertibleSheaf' (D ^ k)))).obj
((reflexiveHull (exteriorPower S.X₁ (r : ℤ))))) ≅
reflexiveHull (exteriorPower S.X₂ (r : ℤ)))
AlgebraicGeometry.isInvertible_reflexiveHull_exteriorPower_of_genericRank, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Reflexive/DeterminantInvertible.lean, line 323. The attribute's comment: “invertibility of the determinant line bundles”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0B3T. The reflexive hull
(⋀^r F)^∨∨of the top exterior power of a coherent module of generic rankron an integral regular scheme of dimension at most two is a line bundle.Generic rank
ris finite local freeness of rankrofFon the slice site over a nonempty openU. The hull is coherent and reflexive, hence finite locally free by Tag 0B3N, and on the irreducible space of an integral scheme its fibre rank is constant; overUthe exterior power⋀^r Fis finite locally free of rankbinom(r, r) = 1with free stalks, and the hull preserves the fibre rank there, so that constant is one.
theorem isInvertible_reflexiveHull_exteriorPower_of_genericRank
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsIntegral X] (hX : AlgebraicGeometry.IsRegular X)
(hXdim : topologicalKrullDim X ≤ 2)
(F : X.Modules) [F.IsCoherent] (r : ℕ) (U : X.Opens) (hU : ∃ x : X, x ∈ U)
[SheafOfModules.IsFiniteLocallyFreeOfRank.{u, u, u} (F.over U) r] :
Stacks.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj (structureSheaf X.sheaf).property
(Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.ReflexiveModules.reflexiveHull
(Scheme.Modules.exteriorPower F r))
Sources
Section31.17 Complements of affine opens#
Section 31.17 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BCQ. 6 tags here are carried by 9 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BCR, a lemma
Tag 0BCR in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.isAffineOpen_puncturedSpectrum_iff_krullDimLE_one, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/PuncturedSpectrumAffineCriterion.lean, line 358. References: EGA IV (21.12.9), “special case”.
The punctured spectrum of a Noetherian local ring is affine if and only if the ring has Krull dimension at most one.
theorem isAffineOpen_puncturedSpectrum_iff_krullDimLE_one :
IsAffineOpen (puncturedSpectrum A) ↔ Ring.KrullDimLE 1 A
Tag 0BCU, a lemma
Tag 0BCU in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.krullDimLE_one_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpenImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/PuncturedSpectrumAffineCriterion.lean, line 435. The attribute's comment: “dimension bound”. References: EGA IV (21.12.7), “codimension ≤ 1”; SGA 6 II (2.2.6), “dim ≤ 1 at maximal pts”; SGA 2 V (3.4).
Let
Ube an open subscheme of a locally Noetherian schemeXwhose inclusion is affine. At the generic pointξof an irreducible component ofX ∖ Uthe local ring has Krull dimension at most one.Pulling
Uback alongSpec 𝒪_{X,ξ} → Xgives the punctured spectrum of𝒪_{X,ξ}, which is affine because the inclusion ofUis; so Tag 0BCR applies.
theorem krullDimLE_one_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpenImmersion
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(U : X.Opens) [IsAffineHom U.ι]
{Z : Set ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hZ : Z ∈ irreducibleComponents ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ))
{ξ : ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hξ : IsGenericPoint ξ Z) :
Ring.KrullDimLE 1 (X.presheaf.stalk (ξ : X))
Stacks.Divisors.ringKrullDim_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpenImmersion_eq_one, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/PuncturedSpectrumAffineCriterion.lean, line 503. The attribute's comment: “equality in the closure”. References: EGA IV (21.12.7), “codimension = 1 if dense”; SGA 6 II (2.2.6), “dim = 1 case”.
With the hypotheses of
Stacks.Divisors.krullDimLE_one_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpenImmersion, ifUis dense orξlies in the closure ofU, then the local ring atξhas dimension exactly one.Some point of
Uspecializes toξ, so it is a point ofSpec 𝒪_{X,ξ}other than the closed point; hence the dimension is positive.
theorem ringKrullDim_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpenImmersion_eq_one
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(U : X.Opens) [IsAffineHom U.ι]
{Z : Set ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hZ : Z ∈ irreducibleComponents ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ))
{ξ : ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hξ : IsGenericPoint ξ Z)
(hξU : Dense (U : Set X) ∨ (ξ : X) ∈ closure (U : Set X)) :
ringKrullDim (X.presheaf.stalk (ξ : X)) = 1
Tag 0BCV, a lemma
Tag 0BCV in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.PuncturedSpectrum.krullDimLE_one_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpen, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/PuncturedSpectrum/SeparatedComplement.lean, line 71. The attribute's comment: “dimension bound”. References: EGA IV (21.12.7), “dim ≤ 1, U affine open”; SGA 2 V (3.4); SGA 6 II (2.2.6), “X sep, U affine; dim≤1”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BCV. The local ring at the generic point of an irreducible component of the complement of an affine open in a separated locally Noetherian scheme has Krull dimension at most one.
theorem krullDimLE_one_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpen
(X : Scheme.{u}) [Scheme.IsSeparated X] [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(U : X.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U)
{Z : Set ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hZ : Z ∈ irreducibleComponents ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ))
{ξ : ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hξ : IsGenericPoint ξ Z) :
Ring.KrullDimLE 1 (X.presheaf.stalk (ξ : X))
Stacks.PuncturedSpectrum.ringKrullDim_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpen_eq_one, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/PuncturedSpectrum/SeparatedComplement.lean, line 85. The attribute's comment: “equality in the closure”. References: EGA IV (21.12.7), “dim = 1, U affine open”; SGA 6 II (2.2.6), “X sep, U affine; dim=1”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BCV. Under the hypotheses of the dimension bound, the local ring has dimension one when the affine open is dense or the generic point is in its closure.
theorem ringKrullDim_stalk_at_genericPoint_compl_affineOpen_eq_one
(X : Scheme.{u}) [Scheme.IsSeparated X] [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(U : X.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U)
{Z : Set ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hZ : Z ∈ irreducibleComponents ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ))
{ξ : ↑((U : Set X)ᶜ)} (hξ : IsGenericPoint ξ Z)
(hξU : Dense (U : Set X) ∨ (ξ : X) ∈ closure (U : Set X)) :
ringKrullDim (X.presheaf.stalk (ξ : X)) = 1
Tag 0BCW, a lemma
Tag 0BCW in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_compl_affineOpen, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/AffineComplement.lean, line 107. The attribute's comment: “the separated case, where the diagonal is affine”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0EGJ. The complement of a dense affine open in a Noetherian scheme with affine diagonal is the support of an effective Cartier divisor if its local rings along the complement are UFDs.
theorem exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_compl_affineOpen
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsNoetherian X]
[IsAffineHom (pullback.diagonal (terminal.from X))]
(U : X.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U) (hDense : Dense (U : Set X))
(hUFD : ∀ x : X, x ∉ U → UniqueFactorizationMonoid (X.presheaf.stalk x)) :
∃ I : X.IdealSheafData,
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I ∧
(I.support : Set X) = (U : Set X)ᶜ
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_compl_affineOpen_of_isSeparated, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/SeparatedAffineComplement.lean, line 54.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BCW. Let
Xbe a Noetherian separated scheme andU ⊆ Xa dense affine open whose complement meets only points with factorial local rings. Then there is an effective Cartier divisorD ⊆ XwithU = X ∖ D.
theorem exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_compl_affineOpen_of_isSeparated
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsNoetherian X] [Scheme.IsSeparated X]
(U : X.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U) (hdense : Dense (U : Set X))
(hUFD : ∀ x : X, x ∉ U → UniqueFactorizationMonoid (X.presheaf.stalk x)) :
∃ I : X.IdealSheafData,
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I ∧ (U : Set X) = (I.support : Set X)ᶜ
Tag 0EGJ, a lemma
Tag 0EGJ in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_compl_affineOpen, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/AffineComplement.lean, line 107.
Stacks Project, Tag 0EGJ. The complement of a dense affine open in a Noetherian scheme with affine diagonal is the support of an effective Cartier divisor if its local rings along the complement are UFDs.
theorem exists_effectiveCartierDivisor_compl_affineOpen
(X : Scheme.{u}) [IsNoetherian X]
[IsAffineHom (pullback.diagonal (terminal.from X))]
(U : X.Opens) (hU : IsAffineOpen U) (hDense : Dense (U : Set X))
(hUFD : ∀ x : X, x ∉ U → UniqueFactorizationMonoid (X.presheaf.stalk x)) :
∃ I : X.IdealSheafData,
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I ∧
(I.support : Set X) = (U : Set X)ᶜ
Tag 0GML, a lemma
Tag 0GML in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_isAmpleFamily_of_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/AmpleFamilyRegular.lean, line 187. References: SGA 6 II (2.2.7.1), “more general”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0GML. A quasi-compact regular scheme whose diagonal is affine has an ample family of invertible modules.
The family is
{𝒪_X(D x)}indexed by the points ofX, whereD xis the effective Cartier divisor whose support is the complement of a dense affine open aroundx, supplied by Tag 0EGJ; the required section of𝒪_X(D x)is the canonical section1_{D x}, whose nonvanishing locus is exactly that affine open.
theorem exists_isAmpleFamily_of_isRegular (X : Scheme.{u}) [CompactSpace X]
[IsAffineHom (pullback.diagonal (terminal.from X))] (hX : IsRegular X) :
∃ (I : Type u) (L : I → X.Modules), X.IsAmpleFamily L
Sources
Section31.18 Norms#
Section 31.18 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0BCX. 11 tags here are carried by 22 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0BCX, the section
Tag 0BCX in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Norm.MorphismNorm, a structure in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/FiniteLocallyFree/Norm.lean, line 125. The attribute's comment: “norm of degree d”.
Stacks Project, Section 0BCX. A norm of degree
dfor a morphism of schemes: a multiplicative map of sheaves preserving pointwise vanishing whose value on a function pulled back from the target is itsd-th power.
structure MorphismNorm {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (d : ℕ) extends MorphismNormMap f
Tag 0BUT, a lemma
Tag 0BUT in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isTrivial_restrict_preimage_of_isFinite, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/FiniteTrivialize/TargetCover.lean, line 188.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BUT, written with
Stacks.SheafOfModules.IsTrivial: for a finite morphismf : X ⟶ Y, an invertible𝒪_X-moduleLand a pointyofY, there is an open neighbourhoodVofyover whichLbecomes trivial on the inverse image.
theorem exists_isTrivial_restrict_preimage_of_isFinite {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsFinite f] (L : X.Modules)
[IsInvertible X.presheaf (structureSheafRing X.toRingedSpace).property L] (y : Y) :
∃ V : Y.Opens, y ∈ V ∧
IsTrivial (f ⁻¹ᵁ V).toScheme.presheaf
(structureSheafRing (f ⁻¹ᵁ V).toScheme.toRingedSpace).property
(L.restrict (f ⁻¹ᵁ V).ι)
Tag 0BCY, a lemma
Tag 0BCY in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.hasNormPullbackPower_normPicardData, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/PullbackPower.lean, line 270. The attribute's comment: “the pullback-power formula”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BCY, the pullback--power clause: the homomorphism of Picard groups induced by a norm of degree
dcarries the class off^*𝒩to the class of𝒩^{⊗ d}, for every invertible𝒪_Y-module𝒩.Together with
Stacks.Divisors.exists_normPicardAddMonoidHom, which is the tag's other clause, this completes Tag 0BCY.
theorem hasNormPullbackPower_normPicardData (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite g] (e : ℕ)
(M : MorphismNorm g e) :
HasNormPullbackPower g e (normPicardData g e M).picardMap
Stacks.Divisors.exists_normPicardAddMonoidHom, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/TensorAdditive.lean, line 335. The attribute's comment: “the homomorphism of abelian groups”.
The norm descends to a homomorphism of Picard groups.
theorem exists_normPicardAddMonoidHom (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f] {d : ℕ}
(N : MorphismNorm f d) :
∃ F : X.picardGroup →+ Y.picardGroup,
∀ (L : X.Modules) (hL : IsInvertible X.presheaf (structureSheaf X.sheaf).property L),
F (picardClass X.presheaf (structureSheaf X.sheaf).property L hL) =
picardClass Y.presheaf (structureSheaf Y.sheaf).property
(normInvertible f N.toMorphismNormMap L)
(isInvertible_normInvertible f N.toMorphismNormMap L
(hasTrivializingTargetCover_of_isFinite_of_isInvertible f L hL))
Tag 0BCZ, a lemma
Tag 0BCZ in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.normMap, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/Map.lean, line 571. The attribute's comment: “the norm map”.
The norm of a map of invertible modules. A norm
Nof degreedon functions along a finite morphismf : X ⟶ Ycarries a mapφ : L ⟶ L'of invertible𝒪_X-modules to a map of the norms ofLandL'.
noncomputable def normMap :
normInvertible f N.toMorphismNormMap L ⟶ normInvertible f N.toMorphismNormMap L'
Stacks.Divisors.normMap_generator, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/Map.lean, line 582. The attribute's comment: “local generator formula”.
In local frames the norm map is multiplication by the norm of the coefficient. If
φcarries a framesofLoverf ⁻¹ᵁ Utoatimes a frametofL'there, then the norm ofφcarries the normed frame ofstoN(a)times the normed frame oft. This pins the norm map down rather than merely asserting that some map with the right vanishing locus exists.
theorem normMap_generator (U : Y.Opens)
(s : GeneratorSections X.toRingedSpace L (f ⁻¹ᵁ U))
(t : GeneratorSections X.toRingedSpace L' (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)) (a : Γ(X, f ⁻¹ᵁ U))
(ha : φ.val.app (op (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)) s.val =
@SMul.smul ((structureSheaf X.sheaf).obj.obj (op (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)))
(L'.val.obj (op (f ⁻¹ᵁ U))) _ a t.val) :
(normMap f N L L' φ).val.app (op U)
(normGenerator f N.toMorphismNormMap L
(hasTrivializingTargetCover_of_isInvertible f L) U s).val =
@SMul.smul ((structureSheaf Y.sheaf).obj.obj (op U))
((normInvertible f N.toMorphismNormMap L').val.obj (op U)) _ (N.app U a)
(normGenerator f N.toMorphismNormMap L'
(hasTrivializingTargetCover_of_isInvertible f L') U t).val
Stacks.Divisors.normMap_zeroAt_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/Map.lean, line 603. The attribute's comment: “vanishing locus”.
The norm map vanishes at
yexactly when the original map vanishes at some point of the fibre overy: the vanishing locus of the norm ofφis the image of the vanishing locus ofφ.
theorem normMap_zeroAt_iff (y : Y) :
zeroAt (normInvertible f N.toMorphismNormMap L) (normInvertible f N.toMorphismNormMap L')
(normMap f N L L' φ) y ↔
∃ x : X, f x = y ∧ zeroAt L L' φ x
Tag 0BD0, a lemma
Tag 0BD0 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isAmple_of_morphismNorm, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormAmple/Basic.lean, line 95.
Let
f : X ⟶ Ybe a finite morphism of schemes admitting a norm of degreed ≥ 1. IfXhas an ample invertible sheaf, then so hasY.
theorem exists_isAmple_of_morphismNorm (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f] {d : ℕ} (hd : 1 ≤ d)
(N : MorphismNorm f d) (L : X.Modules)
[AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.presheaf
(structureSheafRing X.toRingedSpace).property L]
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Modules.IsAmple X L) :
∃ (M : Y.Modules) (hM : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible Y.presheaf
(structureSheafRing Y.toRingedSpace).property M),
@AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Modules.IsAmple Y M hM
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isAmple_of_hasNormOfDegree, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/Ample.lean, line 467.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD0. Let
f : X ⟶ Ybe a finite morphism of schemes carrying a norm of positive degree. IfXhas an ample invertible𝒪_X-module then so doesY: the norm of a sufficiently high tensor power of the given one.Positivity of the degree is used exactly once, to see that
fis surjective; the rest isStacks.Divisors.exists_isAmple_of_morphismNormMap.
theorem exists_isAmple_of_hasNormOfDegree (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f] (L : X.Modules)
[IsInvertibleModule X L] (hL : Stacks.Ample.IsAmple X L) {d : ℕ} (hd : 0 < d)
(hN : HasNormOfDegree f d) :
∃ (M : Y.Modules) (hM : IsInvertibleModule Y M), @Stacks.Ample.IsAmple Y M hM
Tag 0BD1, a lemma
Tag 0BD1 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.isQuasiAffine_of_isFinite_of_hasNormOfDegree, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Norm/QuasiAffine.lean, line 144.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD1. The target of a finite morphism carrying a norm of positive degree is quasi-affine as soon as its source is.
theorem isQuasiAffine_of_isFinite_of_hasNormOfDegree (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f]
[Scheme.IsQuasiAffine X] {d : ℕ} (hd : 0 < d) (hN : HasNormOfDegree f d) :
Scheme.IsQuasiAffine Y
Stacks.Divisors.isQuasiAffine_of_morphismNorm, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormQuasiAffine/Basic.lean, line 46.
Let
f : X ⟶ Ybe a finite morphism of schemes admitting a norm of degreed ≥ 1. IfXis quasi-affine, then so isY.
public theorem isQuasiAffine_of_morphismNorm (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f] {d : ℕ} (hd : 1 ≤ d)
(N : MorphismNorm f d) [X.IsQuasiAffine] : Y.IsQuasiAffine
Tag 0BD2, a lemma
Tag 0BD2 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.finiteLocallyFreeNorm, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Norm/Basic.lean, line 409. The attribute's comment: “the canonical norm”. References: EGA II (6.5.1), “special case”; SGA 3 V (4.1.1), “more general”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD2. The canonical determinant norm constructed in the proof, for an arbitrary finite locally free morphism, including varying and zero rank.
Its defining property is
finiteLocallyFreeNorm_app_affine_eq_projectiveNorm: on an affine open of the target it is the determinant of multiplication. Taken with the two fields ofDeterminantNorm— the determinant formula on affine opens where the algebra is free, and the power law at constant rank — this pins the norm down.
noncomputable def finiteLocallyFreeNorm {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFree f] : DeterminantNorm f
Stacks.Divisors.finiteLocallyFreeNormOfRank, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Norm/Basic.lean, line 454. The attribute's comment: “the norm of positive constant degree”. References: EGA II (6.5.1), “special case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD2. At positive constant rank
d, the canonical determinant norm is a norm of degreedin the sense of the Norms section.
noncomputable def finiteLocallyFreeNormOfRank {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (d : ℕ)
[Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFreeOfRank f d] (_hd : 0 < d) :
{N : MorphismNorm f d // IsDeterminantNorm N.toMorphismNormMap}
Stacks.Divisors.finiteLocallyFreeNorm_baseChange, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormBaseChange/Basic.lean, line 64. The attribute's comment: “compatibility with arbitrary base change”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD2. Formation of the canonical determinant norm commutes with arbitrary base change, even when the rank is not constant: around a cartesian square the base change
f'of a finite locally free morphismfis again finite locally free, and the norm of a section of the structure sheaf pulled back around the square is the pullback of its norm.
theorem finiteLocallyFreeNorm_baseChange
{X Y X' Y' : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (f' : X' ⟶ Y')
(g' : X' ⟶ X) (g : Y' ⟶ Y)
[Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFree f]
(sq : IsPullback g' f' f g) :
∃ h' : Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFree f',
letI := h'
∀ (U : Y.Opens) (s : Γ(X, f ⁻¹ᵁ U)),
(finiteLocallyFreeNorm f').app (g ⁻¹ᵁ U)
(g'.appLE (f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (f' ⁻¹ᵁ (g ⁻¹ᵁ U)) (by
intro x hx
change f (g' x) ∈ U
rw [← Scheme.Hom.comp_apply, sq.w, Scheme.Hom.comp_apply]
exact hx) s) =
g.app U ((finiteLocallyFreeNorm f).app U s)
Stacks.Divisors.finiteLocallyFreeNormOfRank_baseChange, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormBaseChange/Rank.lean, line 58. The attribute's comment: “compatibility of the degree-d norm with arbitrary base change”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD2. At positive constant rank, arbitrary base change preserves the specified degree and the norm on sections: around a cartesian square the base change
f'of a morphismfthat is finite locally free of rankdis again finite locally free of rankd, and the degree-dnorm of a section of the structure sheaf pulled back around the square is the pullback of its degree-dnorm.
theorem finiteLocallyFreeNormOfRank_baseChange
{X Y X' Y' : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (f' : X' ⟶ Y')
(g' : X' ⟶ X) (g : Y' ⟶ Y) (d : ℕ)
[Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFreeOfRank f d] (hd : 0 < d)
(sq : IsPullback g' f' f g) :
∃ h' : Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFreeOfRank f' d,
letI := h'
∀ (U : Y.Opens) (s : Γ(X, f ⁻¹ᵁ U)),
(finiteLocallyFreeNormOfRank f' d hd).1.app (g ⁻¹ᵁ U)
(g'.appLE (f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (f' ⁻¹ᵁ (g ⁻¹ᵁ U)) (by
intro x hx
change f (g' x) ∈ U
rw [← Scheme.Hom.comp_apply, sq.w, Scheme.Hom.comp_apply]
exact hx) s) =
g.app U ((finiteLocallyFreeNormOfRank f d hd).1.app U s)
Tag 0BD3, a lemma
Tag 0BD3 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.exists_norm_of_finite_surjective_of_normal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Norm/FunctionFieldDegree.lean, line 551.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD3. A finite surjective morphism of integral schemes with normal target carries a norm of the function-field extension degree.
theorem exists_norm_of_finite_surjective_of_normal
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f] [Surjective f]
[IsIntegral X] [IsIntegral Y] [IsNormal Y] :
∃ φ : Y.functionField →+* X.functionField,
(∀ (U : Y.Opens) [Nonempty U] [Nonempty (f ⁻¹ᵁ U)]
(s : Γ(Y, U)),
φ (Y.germToFunctionField U s) =
X.germToFunctionField (f ⁻¹ᵁ U) (f.app U s)) ∧
(letI : Algebra Y.functionField X.functionField := φ.toAlgebra
HasNormOfDegree f (Module.finrank Y.functionField X.functionField))
Tag 0BDZ, a lemma
Tag 0BDZ in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.exists_normOfDegree_reduction, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Norm/Reduction.lean, line 201.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BDZ. On a Noetherian scheme in prime characteristic
pa sufficiently high Frobenius power supplies a norm of degree a positive power ofpfor the canonical morphism from the reduction.
theorem exists_normOfDegree_reduction (X : Scheme.{u}) [IsNoetherian X]
(p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime) (hchar : (p : Γ(X, ⊤)) = 0) :
∃ e : ℕ, 0 < e ∧
HasNormOfDegree (Scheme.IdealSheafData.vanishingIdeal (⊤ : Closeds X)).subschemeι
(p ^ e)
Tag 0BD4, a proposition
Tag 0BD4 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isAmple_of_isFiniteLocallyFree, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/Ample.lean, line 482. The attribute's comment: “finite_locally_free_case”. References: EGA II (6.6.1), “absolute, loc free case”; EGA II (6.6.2), “locally free case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD4, case (1). A finite locally free, finite surjective morphism descends the existence of an ample invertible module. The canonical determinant norm of [Stacks, Tag 0BD2] is available at varying rank, and no constant degree is needed: the degree is what Tag 0BD0 uses to get surjectivity, and here surjectivity is a hypothesis.
theorem exists_isAmple_of_isFiniteLocallyFree (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f] [Surjective f]
[Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFree f] (L : X.Modules) [IsInvertibleModule X L]
(hL : Stacks.Ample.IsAmple X L) :
∃ (M : Y.Modules) (hM : IsInvertibleModule Y M), @Stacks.Ample.IsAmple Y M hM
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isAmple_of_isAmple_reduction_char_p, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/Ample.lean, line 494. The attribute's comment: “reduction_characteristic_p_case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD4, case (3). On a Noetherian scheme of prime characteristic
p, an ample invertible module on the reduction descends to an ample invertible module on the scheme: a Frobenius power supplies a norm of degree a positive power ofpfor the canonical morphism from the reduction ([Stacks, Tag 0BDZ]).
theorem exists_isAmple_of_isAmple_reduction_char_p (Y : Scheme.{u}) [IsNoetherian Y] (p : ℕ)
(hp : p.Prime) (hchar : (p : Γ(Y, ⊤)) = 0)
(L : (Scheme.IdealSheafData.vanishingIdeal (⊤ : Closeds Y)).subscheme.Modules)
[IsInvertibleModule (Scheme.IdealSheafData.vanishingIdeal (⊤ : Closeds Y)).subscheme L]
(hL : Stacks.Ample.IsAmple
(Scheme.IdealSheafData.vanishingIdeal (⊤ : Closeds Y)).subscheme L) :
∃ (M : Y.Modules) (hM : IsInvertibleModule Y M), @Stacks.Ample.IsAmple Y M hM
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isAmple_of_isIntegral_isNormal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/NormInvertible/Ample.lean, line 511. The attribute's comment: “integral_normal_case”. References: EGA II (6.6.1), “absolute, Y normal”; EGA II (6.6.2), “Y integral normal”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD4, case (2). A finite surjective morphism onto an integral normal scheme descends the existence of an ample invertible module. The source is replaced by an irreducible component dominating the target, viewed as a reduced closed subscheme; that component is integral, so [Stacks, Tag 0BD3] supplies a norm of the function-field degree.
theorem exists_isAmple_of_isIntegral_isNormal {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsFinite f]
[Surjective f] [IsIntegral Y] [IsNormal Y] (L : X.Modules) [IsInvertibleModule X L]
(hL : Stacks.Ample.IsAmple X L) :
∃ (M : Y.Modules) (hM : IsInvertibleModule Y M), @Stacks.Ample.IsAmple Y M hM
Tag 0BD5, a lemma
Tag 0BD5 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.isQuasiAffine_of_isFinite_surjective_of_isNormal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Norm/QuasiAffineFiniteSurjective.lean, line 132. The attribute's comment: “integral normal target case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD5, case (2). Quasi-affineness descends along a finite surjective morphism onto an integral normal scheme.
theorem isQuasiAffine_of_isFinite_surjective_of_isNormal {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsFinite f] [Surjective f] [IsIntegral Y] [IsNormal Y] [Scheme.IsQuasiAffine X] :
Scheme.IsQuasiAffine Y
Stacks.Divisors.isQuasiAffine_of_isFiniteLocallyFree_surjective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Norm/QuasiAffineFiniteSurjective.lean, line 176. The attribute's comment: “finite locally free case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0BD5, case (1). Quasi-affineness descends along a finite locally free surjective morphism.
theorem isQuasiAffine_of_isFiniteLocallyFree_surjective {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsFinite f] [Surjective f] [Morphisms.IsFiniteLocallyFree f] [Scheme.IsQuasiAffine X] :
Scheme.IsQuasiAffine Y
Sources
Section31.19 Relative effective Cartier divisors#
Section 31.19 of the Stacks Project, Tag 056P. 9 tags here are carried by 18 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 056Q, a lemma
Tag 056Q in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isEffectiveCartierDivisor_comap_pullback, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/BaseChangeDivisor.lean, line 123. References: EGA IV (21.15.9), “partial”.
A relative effective Cartier divisor stays effective Cartier under arbitrary base change.
theorem isEffectiveCartierDivisor_comap_pullback {X S S' : Scheme.{u}}
(f : X ⟶ S) (g : S' ⟶ S) (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor I)
[Flat (I.subschemeι ≫ f)] :
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor
(I.comap (pullback.snd g f))
Tag 062T, a definition
Tag 062T in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Picard/RelativeEffectiveCartier.lean, line 46.
Stacks Project, Tag 062T. A closed subscheme of
Xis a relative effective Cartier divisor overSwhen it is an effective Cartier divisor onXand its structure morphism toSis flat.
abbrev IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor {X S : Scheme.{u}}
(f : X ⟶ S) (I : X.IdealSheafData) : Prop
Tag 0B8U, a lemma
Tag 0B8U in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_mul, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/RelativeSum.lean, line 204.
Stacks Project, Tag 0B8U. The sum of two relative effective Cartier divisors on
XoverSis a relative effective Cartier divisor overS.
theorem isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_mul {X S : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S)
(I J : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f I)
(hJ : IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f J) :
IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f (I * J)
Tag 0B8V, a lemma
Tag 0B8V in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_mul_eq, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/EffectiveCartier/RelativeDifference.lean, line 288.
Stacks Project, Tag 0B8V. An effective Cartier divisor which is the difference of two relative effective Cartier divisors is itself relative.
theorem isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_mul_eq
{X S : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S) (D₁ D₂ E : X.IdealSheafData)
(hD₁ : IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f D₁)
(hD₂ : IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f D₂)
(hE : IsEffectiveCartierDivisor E)
(h : D₂ = D₁ * E) :
IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f E
Tag 062U, a lemma
Tag 062U in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isFlatAt_of_relativeEffectiveCartierDivisor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatAtDivisor.lean, line 185.
Stacks Project, Tag 062U. The ambient morphism is flat at a point of a relative effective Cartier divisor whose ambient local ring is Noetherian.
theorem isFlatAt_of_relativeEffectiveCartierDivisor
{X S : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S) (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f I)
(x : X) (hx : x ∈ I.supportSet)
(hNoetherian : IsNoetherianRing (X.presheaf.stalk x)) :
IsFlatAt f.toLRSHom.toShHom x
Tag 062V, a lemma
Tag 062V in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.exists_open_flat_of_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatNeighbourhood.lean, line 538.
A relative effective Cartier divisor lies in an open subscheme on which the ambient morphism is flat, provided that morphism is locally of finite presentation.
theorem exists_open_flat_of_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor
{X S : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S) (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : Stacks.Divisors.IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f I)
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] :
∃ U : X.Opens, I.supportSet ⊆ (U : Set X) ∧ Flat (U.ι ≫ f)
Tag 062W, a lemma
Tag 062W in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.flat_of_flat_off_relativeEffectiveCartierDivisor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatOffDivisor.lean, line 214.
A morphism flat away from a relative effective Cartier divisor is flat.
theorem flat_of_flat_off_relativeEffectiveCartierDivisor
{X S : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S) (I : X.IdealSheafData)
(hI : IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f I)
(hf : ∀ x : X, x ∉ I.supportSet →
IsFlatAt f.toLRSHom.toShHom x) :
Flat f
Tag 062X, an example
Tag 062X in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.NonflatAmbient.not_flat_ambientRing, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/NonflatAmbientExample.lean, line 149. The attribute's comment: “ambient ring not flat”.
The ring
Bis not flat overk[t].
theorem not_flat_ambientRing : ¬ RingHom.Flat (baseMap k)
AlgebraicGeometry.NonflatAmbient.quotientByX_equiv_polynomial, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/NonflatAmbientExample.lean, line 436. The attribute's comment: “quotient by x”.
The quotient
B / xBis isomorphic tok[t]by a ring isomorphism carrying the class oftto the coordinate and constants to constants.
theorem quotientByX_equiv_polynomial :
∃ e : (ambientRing k ⧸ Ideal.span {x k}) ≃+* Polynomial k,
e (Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {x k}) (t k)) = Polynomial.X ∧
∀ a : k,
e (Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {x k})
(algebraMap k (ambientRing k) a)) = Polynomial.C a
AlgebraicGeometry.NonflatAmbient.quotientByX_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/NonflatAmbientExample.lean, line 508. The attribute's comment: “quotient by x flat”.
The quotient
B / xBis flat overk[t].
theorem quotientByX_flat :
RingHom.Flat
((Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {x k})).comp (baseMap k))
AlgebraicGeometry.NonflatAmbient.x_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/NonflatAmbientExample.lean, line 531. The attribute's comment: “x nonzerodivisor”.
The element
xis a nonzerodivisor ofB.
theorem x_isRegular : IsRegular (x k)
AlgebraicGeometry.NonflatAmbient.divisor_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/NonflatAmbientExample.lean, line 593. The attribute's comment: “relative effective Cartier divisor”.
The closed subscheme of
Spec Bcut out byxis a relative effective Cartier divisor overSpec k[t].
theorem divisor_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor :
Stacks.Divisors.IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor
(Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom (baseMap k))) (divisor k)
AlgebraicGeometry.NonflatAmbient.no_flat_neighbourhood, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/NonflatAmbientExample.lean, line 717. The attribute's comment: “no flat neighbourhood”.
No open subscheme of
Spec Bcontaining the divisor is flat overSpec k[t].
theorem no_flat_neighbourhood
(U : (Spec (.of (ambientRing k))).Opens)
(hU : (divisor k).supportSet ⊆ (U : Set (Spec (.of (ambientRing k))))) :
¬ Flat (U.ι ≫ Spec.map (CommRingCat.ofHom (baseMap k)))
Tag 062Y, a lemma
Tag 062Y in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_containing, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/ContainingDivisorFibre.lean, line 313. The attribute's comment: “local_containing_divisor”.
Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe flat and locally of finite presentation, letZbe a closed subscheme ofXand letxbe a point ofZwhose fibre overf xis an effective Cartier divisor in a neighbourhood ofx. Then there is an open neighbourhoodUofxcarrying a relative effective Cartier divisorDoverSwithZ ∩ U ⊆ DandZ_{f x} ∩ U = D_{f x}.
theorem exists_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_containing (f : X ⟶ S) [Flat f]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (Z : X.IdealSheafData) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ Z.support)
(hfib : ∃ N : (f.fiber (f x)).Opens, f.asFiber x ∈ N ∧
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor ((Z.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).comap N.ι)) :
∃ (U : X.Opens) (_ : x ∈ U) (D : U.toScheme.IdealSheafData),
IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor (U.ι ≫ f) D ∧ D ≤ Z.comap U.ι ∧
(Z.comap U.ι).comap ((U.ι ≫ f).fiberι (f x)) =
D.comap ((U.ι ≫ f).fiberι (f x))
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_flat_of_finitePresentation, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatCartierFibre.lean, line 296. The attribute's comment: “flat_finitely_presented_case”.
Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe flat and locally of finite presentation, letZbe a closed subscheme ofXof finite presentation overXand letxbe a point ofZat whichZis flat overSand whose fibre overf xis an effective Cartier divisor in a neighbourhood ofx. ThenZrestricts to a relative effective Cartier divisor overSon an affine open neighbourhood ofx.
theorem exists_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_flat_of_finitePresentation (f : X ⟶ S)
[Flat f] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (Z : X.IdealSheafData)
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation Z.subschemeι] (x : X) (hx : x ∈ Z.support)
(hfib : ∃ V : (f.fiber (f x)).Opens, f.asFiber x ∈ V ∧
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor ((Z.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).comap V.ι))
(hflat : ((Z.subschemeι ≫ f).stalkMap (⟨x, hx⟩ : Z.subscheme)).hom.Flat) :
∃ V : X.Opens, x ∈ V ∧ IsAffineOpen V ∧
IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor (V.ι ≫ f) (Z.comap V.ι)
Stacks.Divisors.isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_flat_of_fibres, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatCartierFibre.lean, line 313. The attribute's comment: “flat_fibres_global_case”. References: EGA IV (21.15.3.3), “converse”.
A closed subscheme of a scheme flat and locally of finite presentation over
S, itself flat and locally of finite presentation overS, all of whose fibres are effective Cartier divisors, is a relative effective Cartier divisor overS.
theorem isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_flat_of_fibres (f : X ⟶ S) [Flat f]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (Z : X.IdealSheafData) [Flat (Z.subschemeι ≫ f)]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation (Z.subschemeι ≫ f)]
(hfib : ∀ s : S, IsEffectiveCartierDivisor (Z.comap (f.fiberι s))) :
IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f Z
Stacks.Divisors.exists_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_ideal_isPrincipal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/LocallyPrincipalFibre.lean, line 393. The attribute's comment: “locally_principal_case”.
Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe flat and locally of finite presentation, letZbe a closed subscheme ofXand letxbe a point ofZwhose fibre overf xis an effective Cartier divisor in a neighbourhood ofx. If the ideal ofZis principal on some affine open neighbourhood ofx, thenZrestricts to a relative effective Cartier divisor overSon an affine open neighbourhood ofx.
theorem exists_isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_ideal_isPrincipal (f : X ⟶ S) [Flat f]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (Z : X.IdealSheafData) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ Z.support)
(hprin : ∃ U : X.affineOpens, x ∈ (U : X.Opens) ∧ (Z.ideal U).IsPrincipal)
(hfib : ∃ V : (f.fiber (f x)).Opens, f.asFiber x ∈ V ∧
IsEffectiveCartierDivisor ((Z.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).comap V.ι)) :
∃ V : X.Opens, x ∈ V ∧ IsAffineOpen V ∧
IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor (V.ι ≫ f) (Z.comap V.ι)
Stacks.Divisors.isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_isLocallyPrincipal_of_fibres, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/LocallyPrincipalFibre.lean, line 411. The attribute's comment: “locally_principal_global_case”. References: EGA IV (21.15.3.3), “forward direction”.
A locally principal closed subscheme of a scheme flat and locally of finite presentation over
S, all of whose fibres are effective Cartier divisors, is a relative effective Cartier divisor overS.
theorem isRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor_of_isLocallyPrincipal_of_fibres (f : X ⟶ S) [Flat f]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (Z : X.IdealSheafData) (hZ : IsLocallyPrincipal Z)
(hfib : ∀ s : S, IsEffectiveCartierDivisor (Z.comap (f.fiberι s))) :
IsRelativeEffectiveCartierDivisor f Z
Sources
Section31.20 The normal cone of an immersion#
Section 31.20 of the Stacks Project, Tag 062Z. 8 tags here are carried by 20 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier) and 1 registered declaration, quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0630, a definition
Tag 0630 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Conormal.conormalAlgebra, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ConormalAlgebra/Immersion.lean, line 543. The attribute's comment: “the conormal algebra”. References: EGA IV (16.1.2), “Gr_•(f), immersions”.
The conormal algebra of an immersion, together with its local associated-graded quotient presentations.
noncomputable def conormalAlgebra {Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
ConormalAlgebraData i
Tag 0631, an equation
Tag 0631 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Conormal.conormalAlgebra, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/ConormalAlgebra/Immersion.lean, line 543. The attribute's comment: “its degree-n piece: i_* C_{Z/X, n} = I^n/I^{n+1}”. References: EGA IV (16.1.2), “Gr_•(f), immersions”.
The conormal algebra of an immersion, together with its local associated-graded quotient presentations.
noncomputable def conormalAlgebra {Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
ConormalAlgebraData i
Tag 0632, an equation
Tag 0632 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Conormal.conormalDegreeOneHom_isIso, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Conormal/DegreeOne.lean, line 464. The attribute's comment: “degree one: the conormal algebra in degree one is the conormal sheaf”.
[Stacks, Tag 0632]: the conormal algebra in degree one is the conormal sheaf. The canonical morphism
𝒞_{Z/X} ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,1}is an isomorphism.This is the degree-one assertion of the canonical surjection
Sym^*(𝒞_{Z/X}) ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,*}: the identification of the degree-one piece of the conormal algebra with the conormal sheaf, which is what makes that surjection an isomorphism in degree one.
theorem conormalDegreeOneHom_isIso (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
IsIso (conormalDegreeOneHom i)
Stacks.Conormal.conormalDegreeOneIso, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Conormal/DegreeOne.lean, line 478. The attribute's comment: “degree one: the identification as an isomorphism”.
[Stacks, Tag 0632]: the degree-one identification
𝒞_{Z/X} ≅ 𝒞_{Z/X,1}.
noncomputable def conormalDegreeOneIso (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
conormalSheaf i ≅ (conormalAlgebra i).algebra.piece 1
Stacks.Conormal.conormalSymmetricHom, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/SymmetricQuotient.lean, line 241. The attribute's comment: “the canonical map Sym(C_{Z/X}) → C_{Z/X,} of graded algebras”. References: EGA 0 (19.5.2), “more general”; EGA 0 (22.1.1), “more general”; EGA IV (17.12.1).
Stacks Project, Tag 0632. The canonical map
Sym*(𝒞_{Z/X}) ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,*}of graded𝒪_Z-algebras, the unital homomorphism which is the identity on degree-one generators.
def conormalSymmetricHom (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
SheafOfModules.GradedAlgebra.UnitalHom (conormalSymmetricAlgebra i)
(conormalAlgebra i).algebra
Stacks.Conormal.conormalSymmetricHom_unique, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/SymmetricQuotient.lean, line 260. The attribute's comment: “uniqueness of the canonical map Sym(C_{Z/X}) → C_{Z/X,}”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0632. A unital homomorphism which is the identity on degree-one generators is the canonical map, so the canonical map is well defined.
theorem conormalSymmetricHom_unique (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
{g : SheafOfModules.GradedAlgebra.UnitalHom (conormalSymmetricAlgebra i)
(conormalAlgebra i).algebra}
(hg : Scheme.Modules.symmetricAlgebraGen Z ((conormalAlgebra i).algebra.piece 1) ≫
g.app 1 = 𝟙 ((conormalAlgebra i).algebra.piece 1)) :
g = conormalSymmetricHom i
Stacks.Conormal.isIso_conormalSymmetricHom_app_one, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/SymmetricQuotient.lean, line 276. The attribute's comment: “the canonical map Sym(C_{Z/X}) → C_{Z/X,} is an isomorphism in degree 1”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0632. The canonical map
Sym*(𝒞_{Z/X}) ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,*}is an isomorphism in degree one. The degree-one generator𝒞_{Z/X} ⟶ Sym¹(𝒞_{Z/X})is an isomorphism, and the canonical map is the identity on it.
theorem isIso_conormalSymmetricHom_app_one (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
IsIso ((conormalSymmetricHom i).app 1)
Stacks.Conormal.isIso_conormalSymmetricHom_app_zero, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/SymmetricQuotient.lean, line 408. The attribute's comment: “the canonical map Sym(C_{Z/X}) → C_{Z/X,} is an isomorphism in degree 0”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0632. The canonical map
Sym*(𝒞_{Z/X}) ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,*}is an isomorphism in degree zero. It is a monomorphism because both degree-zero pieces are generated by their graded units, freely on the source and without torsion on the target, and an epimorphism because on an affine closed-immersion chart every degree-zero section of the target is a multiple of the unit.
theorem isIso_conormalSymmetricHom_app_zero (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
IsIso ((conormalSymmetricHom i).app 0)
Stacks.Conormal.epi_conormalSymmetricHom_app, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/SymmetricQuotient.lean, line 521. The attribute's comment: “the canonical map Sym(C_{Z/X}) → C_{Z/X,} is surjective”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0632. The canonical map
Sym*(𝒞_{Z/X}) ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,*}is surjective: an epimorphism of sheaves of modules in every degree. In a negative degree the target vanishes, and in a nonnegative degree the map is locally surjective, because over an affine closed-immersion chartℐⁿ/ℐⁿ⁺¹is generated by products ofnsections ofℐ.
theorem epi_conormalSymmetricHom_app (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] (n : ℤ) :
Epi ((conormalSymmetricHom i).app n)
Tag 0633, a lemma
Tag 0633 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Conormal.conormalAlgebra_identifications, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/ConormalInverseImage.lean, line 311. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”.
Let
i : Z ⟶ Xbe an immersion andU ⊆ Xan open subscheme such thati(Z) ⊆ Uis a closed subset ofU; letℐ ⊆ 𝒪_Ube the quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of the closed subschemei(Z) ⊂ U. Then𝒞_{Z/X,*} = i^*(⨁_{n ≥ 0} ℐⁿ) = i^{-1}(⨁_{n ≥ 0} ℐⁿ/ℐⁿ⁺¹): * the conormal algebra is isomorphic toi^*(⨁ₙ ℐⁿ)as sheaves of graded𝒪_Z-algebras, the isomorphism carrying the unit to the unit; * the topological inverse imagei^{-1}(⨁ₙ ℐⁿ/ℐⁿ⁺¹), a sheaf of gradedi^{-1}𝒪_U-algebras, is isomorphic to the conormal algebra read overi^{-1}𝒪_Ualong the structure mapi^{-1}𝒪_U ⟶ 𝒪_Z, as sheaves of graded algebras, the isomorphism carrying the unit to the unit.The isomorphisms are
Stacks.Conormal.conormalIsoReesPullbackandStacks.Conormal.inverseImageGrIsoConormal.
theorem conormalAlgebra_identifications :
(∃ e : (conormalAlgebra i).algebra ≅ openReesPullback i U hsub, ∀ W : Z.Opens,
(e.hom.app 0).val.app (op W) ((conormalAlgebra i).algebra.one.eval (op W)) =
(openReesPullback i U hsub).one.eval (op W)) ∧
(∃ e : inverseImageGradedAlgebra (openLift i U hsub).base (U.toScheme).sheaf
(grGradedAlgebra (openIdeal i U hsub)) ≅
SheafOfModules.GradedAlgebra.scalarRestrict (openStructureMap i U hsub)
(conormalAlgebra i).algebra, ∀ W : Z.Opens,
(e.hom.app 0).val.app (op W)
((inverseImageGradedAlgebra (openLift i U hsub).base (U.toScheme).sheaf
(grGradedAlgebra (openIdeal i U hsub))).one.eval (op W)) =
(conormalAlgebra i).algebra.one.eval (op W))
AlgebraicGeometry.affineSectionsEquiv, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/ConormalSections.lean, line 183. The attribute's comment: “conormal_algebra_affine_sections”.
The homogeneous sections of the conormal algebra on an affine closed-immersion chart are canonically the quotients
I^n/I^(n+1), compatibly with multiplication, unit, and scalars.
noncomputable def affineSectionsEquiv {Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X)
[IsImmersion i] (U : X.affineOpens)
(hU : IsClosedImmersion (i.resLE U.1 (i ⁻¹ᵁ U.1) le_rfl)) :
AffineSectionsEquiv i U hU
AlgebraicGeometry.conormalAlgebra_on_closed_open, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/ConormalSections.lean, line 543. The attribute's comment: “conormal_algebra_on_closed_open”.
Both canonical identifications of the conormal algebra on an open where the immersion is closed.
noncomputable def conormalAlgebra_on_closed_open
{Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(U : X.Opens)
(hU : IsClosed (Set.range (i.resLE U (i ⁻¹ᵁ U) le_rfl))) :
ClosedOpenIdentifications i U
Tag 0634, a lemma
Tag 0634 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.conormalAlgebraHom, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/Functoriality/ConormalAlgebraHom.lean, line 603.
Stacks Project, Tag 0634. The unique morphism of conormal graded algebras over a commutative square of immersions is induced on every affine closed-immersion chart by the ring map on ideal-power quotients.
noncomputable def conormalAlgebraHom {Z X Z' X' : Scheme.{u}}
(i : Z ⟶ X) (i' : Z' ⟶ X') (f : Z ⟶ Z') (g : X ⟶ X')
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion i'] (comm : f ≫ i' = i ≫ g) :
CanonicalConormalAlgebraHom i i' f g
Tag 0635, a lemma
Tag 0635 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.conormalAlgebraMap_epi, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/BaseChange.lean, line 834. The attribute's comment: “surjectivity”.
The canonical map on each homogeneous piece of the conormal algebra is locally surjective for a cartesian square of immersions.
theorem conormalAlgebraMap_epi {Z X Z' X' : Scheme.{u}}
(i : Z ⟶ X) (i' : Z' ⟶ X') (f : Z ⟶ Z') (g : X ⟶ X')
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion i'] (sq : IsPullback i f g i') (n : ℤ) :
Epi ((canonicalPullbackHom i i' f g sq.w.symm).hom n)
AlgebraicGeometry.conormalAlgebraMap_isIso_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/BaseChange.lean, line 1152. The attribute's comment: “flat isomorphism”.
Under flat base change the canonical map on every homogeneous piece is an isomorphism.
theorem conormalAlgebraMap_isIso_of_flat {Z X Z' X' : Scheme.{u}}
(i : Z ⟶ X) (i' : Z' ⟶ X') (f : Z ⟶ Z') (g : X ⟶ X')
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion i'] [Flat g]
(sq : IsPullback i f g i') (n : ℤ) :
IsIso ((canonicalPullbackHom i i' f g sq.w.symm).hom n)
Tag 0636, a definition
Tag 0636 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Conormal.normalBundle, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/NormalBundle.lean, line 112. The attribute's comment: “the normal bundle N_ZX = Spec_Z(Sym(C_{Z/X}))”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0636. The normal bundle
N_ZX = Spec_Z(Sym(𝒞_{Z/X}))of an immersioni : Z ⟶ X: the relative spectrum overZof the symmetric algebra on the conormal sheaf𝒞_{Z/X} = 𝒞_{Z/X,1}, that is, the vector bundle of Tag 01M2 associated to𝒞_{Z/X}.
def normalBundle : Scheme.{u}
Stacks.Conormal.normalBundleVectorBundle, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/NormalBundle.lean, line 145. The attribute's comment: “N_ZX is a vector bundle over Z in the sense of 062M”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0636.
N_ZXis a vector bundle overZin the sense of Tag 062M: it is the vector bundle𝐕(𝒞_{Z/X})of Tag 01M2 attached to the conormal sheaf, the relative spectrum ofSym(𝒞_{Z/X})graded by the symmetric powersSymⁿ(𝒞_{Z/X}).
def normalBundleVectorBundle : VectorBundle Z
Stacks.Conormal.normalConeCone, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/NormalBundle.lean, line 216. The attribute's comment: “C_ZX is a cone over Z in the sense of 062R”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0636.
C_ZXis a cone overZin the sense of Tag 062R: it is affine overZ, and the homogeneous pieces𝒞_{Z/X,n}of the conormal algebra decompose the direct image of its structure sheaf — uniquely over every open, locally surjectively, and multiplicatively — with the degree-zero piece the structure sheaf ofZ.
def normalConeCone : AbstractCone Z
Declarations registered for the tag:
Stacks.Conormal.normalCone, declared in the repository, registered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/NormalBundle.lean, line 253 (StacksFrontier): “the normal cone C_ZX = Spec_Z(C_{Z/X,*})”.
Tag 0637, an equation
Tag 0637 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Conormal.normalConeToNormalBundle, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/NormalConeInNormalBundle.lean, line 241. The attribute's comment: “the canonical surjection of graded algebras defines a morphism C_ZX → N_ZX”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0637. The canonical morphism
C_ZX ⟶ N_ZXfrom the normal cone to the normal bundle of an immersion, defined by the canonical mapSym*(𝒞_{Z/X}) ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,*}of graded algebras of Tag 0632: it is the morphism of relative spectra attached to that map of algebra sheaves, andStacks.Conormal.ι_normalConeToNormalBundleis its characterising property.
def normalConeToNormalBundle :
normalCone i ⟶ Scheme.Modules.vectorBundle Z (conormalSheafDegreeOne i)
Stacks.Conormal.normalConeToNormalBundle_toBase, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/NormalCone/NormalConeInNormalBundle.lean, line 250. The attribute's comment: “the morphism C_ZX → N_ZX is a morphism over Z”.
Stacks Project, Tag 0637. The canonical morphism
C_ZX ⟶ N_ZXis a morphism of schemes overZ: it carries the projection of the normal bundle to the projection of the normal cone.
theorem normalConeToNormalBundle_toBase :
normalConeToNormalBundle i ≫
Scheme.Modules.vectorBundleToBase Z (conormalSheafDegreeOne i) =
normalConeToBase i
Sources
Section31.21 Regular ideal sheaves#
Section 31.21 of the Stacks Project, Tag 067M. 11 tags here are carried by 31 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier) and 1 registered declaration, quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 0639, an equation
Tag 0639 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.regularSequenceMultiplication, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/RegularIdealSheaves.lean, line 330.
Stacks Project, Tag 0639. Multiplication by
f ionO_X/(f₀, …, f_{i-1}), for an arbitrary ringed space.
public noncomputable def regularSequenceMultiplication
(X : RingedSpace.{u, v}) {n : ℕ}
(f : Fin n → X.presheaf.obj (op (⊤ : Opens X))) (i : Fin n) :
RegularSequenceMultiplicationData X f i
Tag 063A, an equation
Tag 063A in the Stacks Project.
Declarations registered for the tag:
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.SeqKoszul.sheafComplex, declared in the repository, registered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/QuasiRegular/SectionKoszulComplex.lean, line 22 (StacksFrontier): “the notationK_•(O_X, f_•)of the section on regular ideal sheaves: the Koszul complex of Modules, Definition 17.24.2 (Tag 062L) for the structure sheaf of a ringed space and a finite family of its global sections.”.
Tag 063B, an equation
Tag 063B in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiRegular.quasiRegularMap, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/QuasiRegular/Basic.lean, line 500.
The canonical morphism of sheaves
(O_X / J)[T₁, ..., Tᵣ] ⟶ ⨁ d, J^d / J^(d+1)associated to global sectionsf₁, ..., fᵣ, sendingTᵢtofᵢ mod J².
noncomputable def quasiRegularMap (X : RingedSpace.{u}) {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → X.presheaf.obj (op (⊤ : Opens X))) : QuasiRegularMapData X f
Tag 063C, a lemma
Tag 063C in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.SeqKoszul.isH1RegularSequence_of_isKoszulRegularSequence, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Koszul/Sheaf/Regular.lean, line 77. The attribute's comment: “Koszul-regular implies H₁-regular”. References: EGA IV (19.5.1), “b) => b')”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063C. A Koszul-regular sequence is
H₁-regular: degree1is one of the positive degrees in which the Koszul complex of a Koszul-regular sequence is acyclic.
theorem isH1RegularSequence_of_isKoszulRegularSequence
(h : IsKoszulRegularSequence X f) : IsH1RegularSequence X f
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularSequence_of_regularSequence, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Implications.lean, line 205. The attribute's comment: “regular implies Koszul-regular”. References: EGA IV (19.5.1), “a) => b)”.
A regular sequence of global sections of the structure sheaf is a Koszul-regular sequence: if multiplication by
f ionO_X/(f₁, …, f_{i-1})is an injective map of sheaves for everyi, then the Koszul complexK_•(O_X, f_•)is acyclic in positive degrees.
theorem isKoszulRegularSequence_of_regularSequence {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → X.presheaf.obj (op (⊤ : Opens X)))
(hf : ∀ i : Fin r, Mono (regularSequenceMultiplication X f i).multiplication) :
SeqKoszul.IsKoszulRegularSequence X f
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isIso_quasiRegularMap_of_isH1RegularSequence, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Implications.lean, line 217. The attribute's comment: “H₁-regular implies quasi-regular”.
For an
H₁-regular sequence of global sections the quasi-regularity morphism of Stacks tag 063B is an isomorphism, i.e. the sequence is quasi-regular.
theorem isIso_quasiRegularMap_of_isH1RegularSequence {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → X.presheaf.obj (op (⊤ : Opens X)))
(h : SeqKoszul.IsH1RegularSequence X f) : IsIso (quasiRegularMap X f).hom
Tag 063D, a definition
Tag 063D in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Basic.lean, line 132. The attribute's comment: “part (4): quasi-regular ideal sheaf”. References: EGA IV (16.9.1), “quasi-regular”.
The local quasi-regularity condition of Stacks tag 063D, part (4). The ideal sheaf
Jis quasi-regular when, near every point of the support ofO_X / J, it is generated by a sequence whose sheaf quasi-regularity map of Stacks tag 063B is an isomorphism.
def IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf (X : RingedSpace.{u})
(J : (structureSheafModule X).Submodule) : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularIdealSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Regular.lean, line 134. The attribute's comment: “part (1): regular ideal sheaf”.
Stacks tag 063D, part (1). The ideal sheaf
Jis regular when, near every point of the support ofO_X/J, it is generated by a regular sequence of sections.
def IsRegularIdealSheaf (X : RingedSpace.{u}) (J : (structureSheafModule X).Submodule) : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Regular.lean, line 143. The attribute's comment: “part (2): Koszul-regular ideal sheaf”. References: SGA 6 VII (1.4), “regular ideal J”.
Stacks tag 063D, part (2). The ideal sheaf
Jis Koszul-regular when, near every point of the support ofO_X/J, it is generated by a sequence whose Koszul complex is acyclic in positive degrees.
def IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf (X : RingedSpace.{u})
(J : (structureSheafModule X).Submodule) : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsH1RegularIdealSheaf, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Regular.lean, line 153. The attribute's comment: “part (3): H₁-regular ideal sheaf”.
Stacks tag 063D, part (3). The ideal sheaf
JisH₁-regular when, near every point of the support ofO_X/J, it is generated by a sequence whose Koszul complex is exact in degree1.
def IsH1RegularIdealSheaf (X : RingedSpace.{u})
(J : (structureSheafModule X).Submodule) : Prop
Tag 063E, a lemma
Tag 063E in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_of_isRegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Implications.lean, line 238. The attribute's comment: “regular implies Koszul-regular”.
A regular ideal sheaf is Koszul-regular. One implication of Stacks tag 063E, between parts (1) and (2) of Stacks tag 063D.
theorem isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_of_isRegularIdealSheaf (h : IsRegularIdealSheaf X J) :
IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X J
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_of_isH1RegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Implications.lean, line 247. The attribute's comment: “H₁-regular implies quasi-regular”.
An
H₁-regular ideal sheaf is quasi-regular. One implication of Stacks tag 063E, between parts (3) and (4) of Stacks tag 063D.
theorem isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_of_isH1RegularIdealSheaf (h : IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X J) :
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X J
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Regular.lean, line 162. The attribute's comment: “Koszul-regular implies H₁-regular”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063E. A Koszul-regular ideal sheaf is
H₁-regular: the local witnesses are the same sequences, and degree1is a positive degree.
theorem IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularIdealSheaf {X : RingedSpace.{u}}
{J : (structureSheafModule X).Submodule} (h : IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X J) :
IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X J
Tag 063H, a lemma
Tag 063H in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_isGeneratedByOn_of_isFiniteType_of_le_sup_sq, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/QuasiRegular/StalkGenerators.lean, line 324. The attribute's comment: “the Nakayama and shrinking step of the proof only: sections of a finite-type J whose germs generate J_x/J_x² generate J near x. The characterization itself is Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.Conormal.isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_iff.”.
The Nakayama and shrinking step in the proof of Stacks tag 063H. Let
J ⊆ O_Xbe a sheaf of ideals of finite type on a locally ringed space and letxbe a point of the support ofO_X / J. Sectionsf₁, …, f_rofJover a neighbourhoodUofxwhose germs generateJ_xmoduloJ_x²generateJon a neighbourhood ofx.
theorem exists_isGeneratedByOn_of_isFiniteType_of_le_sup_sq
(hJ : SheafOfModules.IsFiniteType.{u, u, u} J.toSheafOfModules) {x : X}
(hne : stalkIdeal J x ≠ ⊤) {U : Opens X} (hxU : x ∈ U) {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (hf : ∀ i, f i ∈ J.obj (op U))
(hle : stalkIdeal J x
≤ Jid (germFamily X.toRingedSpace U f x hxU) ⊔ stalkIdeal J x ^ 2) :
∃ (V : Opens X) (_ : x ∈ V) (hVU : V ≤ U),
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J V
(fun i => X.presheaf.map (homOfLE hVU).op (f i))
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.Conormal.isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Characterization/IndependentGenerators.lean, line 747. The attribute's comment: “both directions of the characterization: quasi-regular iff of finite type, with finite locally free conormal sheaf and isomorphic symmetric-power-to-graded maps”. References: EGA IV (16.9.4); EGA IV (17.12.1), “more general”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063H. A sheaf of ideals is quasi-regular if and only if it is of finite type, has finite locally free conormal sheaf, and has isomorphic canonical symmetric-power-to-associated-graded maps in every degree.
public theorem isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_iff (X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u})
(J : (Stacks.RingedSpace.structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule) :
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J ↔
(J.toSheafOfModules.IsFiniteType ∧
AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsFiniteLocallyFree (conormalSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) ∧
∀ n : ℕ, IsIso (conormalSymmetricToGradedMap X.toRingedSpace J n))
Tag 067N, a lemma
Tag 067N in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_quasiRegular_generators_of_basis, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Generators.lean, line 421. The attribute's comment: “(1)”. References: EGA IV (16.9.5), “(b') => (a)”.
Stacks Project, Tag 067N, part (1). Let
Jbe a quasi-regular ideal sheaf on a locally ringed spaceX, letx ∈ Xand letf₁, …, f_r ∈ J_xbe germs whose classes form a basis of the cotangent fibreJ_x / 𝔪_x J_x. Then there is an open neighbourhoodUofxon which thef_iare the germs of sections ofJwhich form a quasi-regular sequence generatingJoverU.
theorem exists_quasiRegular_generators_of_basis (x : X) {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → Stacks.RingedSpace.stalkIdeal J x)
(b : Module.Basis (Fin r)
(X.presheaf.stalk x ⧸ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal (X.presheaf.stalk x))
(Stacks.RingedSpace.idealCotangentFiber J x))
(hf : ∀ i, b i = Submodule.Quotient.mk (f i))
(hJ : IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
∃ (U : Opens X) (hxU : x ∈ U) (fU : Fin r → J.obj (op U)),
(∀ i, X.presheaf.germ U x hxU (fU i).1 = (f i).1) ∧
IsIso (quasiRegularMap (X.toRingedSpace.restrict U.isOpenEmbedding)
(fun i => sectionOnRestriction X.toRingedSpace U (fU i).1)).hom ∧
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U (fun i => (fU i).1)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_h1Regular_generators_of_basis, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Generators.lean, line 449. The attribute's comment: “(2)”.
Stacks Project, Tag 067N, part (2). The
H₁-regular case: for anH₁-regular ideal sheaf the sections produced overUhave a Koszul complex which is germwise exact in degree1.
theorem exists_h1Regular_generators_of_basis (x : X) {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → Stacks.RingedSpace.stalkIdeal J x)
(b : Module.Basis (Fin r)
(X.presheaf.stalk x ⧸ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal (X.presheaf.stalk x))
(Stacks.RingedSpace.idealCotangentFiber J x))
(hf : ∀ i, b i = Submodule.Quotient.mk (f i))
(hJ : IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
∃ (U : Opens X) (hxU : x ∈ U) (fU : Fin r → J.obj (op U)),
(∀ i, X.presheaf.germ U x hxU (fU i).1 = (f i).1) ∧
IsKoszulSequenceExactOn X.toRingedSpace U (fun i => (fU i).1) (fun j => j = 1) ∧
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U (fun i => (fU i).1)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_koszulRegular_generators_of_basis, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Generators.lean, line 475. The attribute's comment: “(3)”.
Stacks Project, Tag 067N, part (3). The Koszul-regular case: for a Koszul-regular ideal sheaf the sections produced over
Uhave a Koszul complex which is germwise exact in every positive degree.
theorem exists_koszulRegular_generators_of_basis (x : X) {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → Stacks.RingedSpace.stalkIdeal J x)
(b : Module.Basis (Fin r)
(X.presheaf.stalk x ⧸ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal (X.presheaf.stalk x))
(Stacks.RingedSpace.idealCotangentFiber J x))
(hf : ∀ i, b i = Submodule.Quotient.mk (f i))
(hJ : IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
∃ (U : Opens X) (hxU : x ∈ U) (fU : Fin r → J.obj (op U)),
(∀ i, X.presheaf.germ U x hxU (fU i).1 = (f i).1) ∧
IsKoszulSequenceExactOn X.toRingedSpace U (fun i => (fU i).1) (fun j => 0 < j) ∧
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U (fun i => (fU i).1)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_koszulRegular_sections_of_basis, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/ConormalPermanence.lean, line 166. The attribute's comment: “part (3), with the local witness at x in place of Koszul-regularity of J, and assuming J_x is not the whole local ring”. References: SGA 6 VII (1.4), “1.4.2”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 067N] part (3). Let
Jbe an ideal subsheaf of the structure sheaf of a locally ringed space, generated on a neighbourhood ofxby a sequence that is Koszul-regular at every point. Then any lift of a basis of the cotangent fibreJ_x/𝔪_x J_xis realised on a neighbourhood ofxby sections that generateJand are Koszul-regular at every point.Koszul-regularity of a family on an open is taken germwise, which
isKoszulSequenceExactOn_iff_forall_germ_isKoszulRegularidentifies with exactness of its sheaf Koszul complex.Two departures from the source. The hypothesis is the local witness at
xthat Koszul-regularity ofJsupplies there, rather than Koszul-regularity ofJitself; that is weaker, so a caller with the source's hypothesis can supply it. AndJ_x ≠ 𝒪_{X,x}is assumed, which the source does not assume: in the excluded case the cotangent fibre is the residue field, sor = 1andf 0is a unit, and the source's conclusion holds there too.
theorem exists_koszulRegular_sections_of_basis {X : LocallyRingedSpace.{u}}
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule) (x : X) {r : ℕ}
(f : Fin r → stalkIdeal J x)
(b : Module.Basis (Fin r)
(X.presheaf.stalk x ⧸ IsLocalRing.maximalIdeal (X.presheaf.stalk x))
(idealCotangentFiber J x))
(hf : ∀ i, b i = Submodule.Quotient.mk (f i))
(hsupp : stalkIdeal J x ≠ ⊤)
(V : Opens X) (hxV : x ∈ V) {s : ℕ} (g : Fin s → X.presheaf.obj (op V))
(hgen : IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J V g)
(hK : ∀ (y : X) (hy : y ∈ V), Koszul.IsKoszulRegular (germFamily X.toRingedSpace V g y hy)) :
∃ (U : Opens X) (hxU : x ∈ U) (fU : Fin r → X.presheaf.obj (op U)),
(∀ i, X.presheaf.germ U x hxU (fU i) = (f i : X.presheaf.stalk x)) ∧
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U fU ∧
∀ (y : X) (hy : y ∈ U), Koszul.IsKoszulRegular (germFamily X.toRingedSpace U fU y hy)
Tag 063F, a lemma
Tag 063F in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isFiniteType_of_isRegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 373. The attribute's comment: “finite type for regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. A regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is of finite type.
theorem isFiniteType_of_isRegularIdealSheaf (hJ : IsRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsFiniteType
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasicoherent_of_isRegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 381. The attribute's comment: “quasi-coherence for regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. A regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is quasi-coherent.
theorem isQuasicoherent_of_isRegularIdealSheaf (hJ : IsRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsQuasicoherent
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isFiniteType_of_isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 387. The attribute's comment: “finite type for Koszul-regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. A Koszul-regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is of finite type.
theorem isFiniteType_of_isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf
(hJ : IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsFiniteType
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasicoherent_of_isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 396. The attribute's comment: “quasi-coherence for Koszul-regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. A Koszul-regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is quasi-coherent.
theorem isQuasicoherent_of_isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf
(hJ : IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsQuasicoherent
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isFiniteType_of_isH1RegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 403. The attribute's comment: “finite type for H₁-regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. An
H₁-regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is of finite type.
theorem isFiniteType_of_isH1RegularIdealSheaf (hJ : IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsFiniteType
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasicoherent_of_isH1RegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 411. The attribute's comment: “quasi-coherence for H₁-regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. An
H₁-regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is quasi-coherent.
theorem isQuasicoherent_of_isH1RegularIdealSheaf (hJ : IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsQuasicoherent
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isFiniteType_of_isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 417. The attribute's comment: “finite type for quasi-regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. A quasi-regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is of finite type.
theorem isFiniteType_of_isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf
(hJ : IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsFiniteType
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasicoherent_of_isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/RegularIdealSheafFiniteType.lean, line 426. The attribute's comment: “quasi-coherence for quasi-regular ideal sheaves”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063F. A quasi-regular ideal sheaf on a scheme is quasi-coherent.
theorem isQuasicoherent_of_isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf
(hJ : IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
J.toSheafOfModules.IsQuasicoherent
Tag 063G, a lemma
Tag 063G in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.H1RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularIdealSheaf_iff_affine, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/H1RegularIdealSheaf/Affine.lean, line 120. The attribute's comment: “h1_regular”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063G (
h1_regular). A sheaf of ideals on a scheme isH₁-regular if and only if, around each point of the support of its quotient, it is generated on an affine open by a sequence which isH₁-regular in the ring of sections of that open.
theorem isH1RegularIdealSheaf_iff_affine (X : Scheme.{u})
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule) :
IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J ↔
∀ x : X, x ∈ idealQuotientSupport X.toRingedSpace J →
∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (_hx : x ∈ (U : Set X)) (r : ℕ) (f : Fin r → Γ(X, U.1)),
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U.1 f ∧ Koszul.IsH1Regular f
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_iff_affine, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/KoszulRegularIdealSheaf/Stalkwise.lean, line 104. The attribute's comment: “koszul_regular”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063G (
koszul_regular). A sheaf of ideals on a scheme is Koszul-regular if and only if, around each point of the support of its quotient, it is generated on an affine open by a sequence which is Koszul-regular in the ring of sections of that open.
theorem isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_iff_affine (X : Scheme.{u})
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule) :
IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J ↔
∀ x : X, x ∈ idealQuotientSupport X.toRingedSpace J →
∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (_hx : x ∈ (U : Set X)) (r : ℕ) (f : Fin r → Γ(X, U.1)),
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U.1 f ∧ Koszul.IsKoszulRegular f
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_iff_exists_affine_generators, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/QuasiRegular.lean, line 148. The attribute's comment: “quasi_regular”.
A sheaf of ideals on a scheme is quasi-regular if and only if, around each point of the support of its quotient, it is generated on an affine open by a quasi-regular sequence in the ring of sections of that open.
theorem isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_iff_exists_affine_generators (X : Scheme.{u})
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule) :
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J ↔
∀ x : X, x ∈ idealQuotientSupport X.toRingedSpace J →
∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (_hx : x ∈ (U : Set X)) (r : ℕ)
(f : Fin r → X.toRingedSpace.presheaf.obj (op U.1)),
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U.1 f ∧
RingTheory.Sequence.IsQuasiRegular
(X.toRingedSpace.presheaf.obj (op U.1)) (List.ofFn f)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheafAffine.isRegularIdealSheaf_iff_exists_affine_generators, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheafAffine/Regular.lean, line 100. The attribute's comment: “regular”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063G (regular). A sheaf of ideals on a scheme is regular if and only if, around each point of the support of its quotient, it is generated on an affine open by a regular sequence in the ring of sections of that open.
theorem isRegularIdealSheaf_iff_exists_affine_generators (X : Scheme.{u})
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule) :
IsRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J ↔
∀ x : X, x ∈ idealQuotientSupport X.toRingedSpace J →
∃ (U : Opens X) (_hx : x ∈ U) (_hU : IsAffineOpen U) (r : ℕ)
(f : Fin r → X.presheaf.obj (op U)),
RingTheory.Sequence.IsRegular (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (List.ofFn f) ∧
IsGeneratedByOn X.toRingedSpace J U f
Tag 063I, a lemma
Tag 063I in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.regular_tfae, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularIdealSheaf/NoetherianEquivalence.lean, line 66. References: EGA IV (16.9.10); EGA IV (16.9.11); SGA 6 VII (1.4), “special case”.
Let
Xbe a locally Noetherian scheme, letJbe a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals and letxbe a point of the support ofO_X / J. The following are equivalent:
J_xis generated by a regular sequence inO_{X, x};J_xis generated by a Koszul-regular sequence inO_{X, x};J_xis generated by anH₁-regular sequence inO_{X, x};J_xis generated by a quasi-regular sequence inO_{X, x};- there is an affine neighbourhood
UofxwithJ(U)generated by a regular sequence;- there is an affine neighbourhood
UofxwithJ(U)generated by a Koszul-regular sequence;- there is an affine neighbourhood
UofxwithJ(U)generated by anH₁-regular sequence;- there is an affine neighbourhood
UofxwithJ(U)generated by a quasi-regular sequence;- there is a neighbourhood
Uofxon whichJis a regular ideal sheaf;- there is a neighbourhood
Uofxon whichJis a Koszul-regular ideal sheaf;- there is a neighbourhood
Uofxon whichJis anH₁-regular ideal sheaf;- there is a neighbourhood
Uofxon whichJis a quasi-regular ideal sheaf.
theorem regular_tfae [IsLocallyNoetherian X] (J : X.IdealSheafData) (x : X)
(hx : x ∈ J.support) :
List.TFAE
[∃ (s : ℕ) (g : Fin s → X.presheaf.stalk x),
stalkIdeal J x hx = Ideal.span (Set.range g) ∧
IsRegular (X.presheaf.stalk x) (List.ofFn g),
∃ (s : ℕ) (g : Fin s → X.presheaf.stalk x),
stalkIdeal J x hx = Ideal.span (Set.range g) ∧ Koszul.IsKoszulRegular g,
∃ (s : ℕ) (g : Fin s → X.presheaf.stalk x),
stalkIdeal J x hx = Ideal.span (Set.range g) ∧ Koszul.IsH1Regular g,
∃ (s : ℕ) (g : Fin s → X.presheaf.stalk x),
stalkIdeal J x hx = Ideal.span (Set.range g) ∧
IsQuasiRegular (X.presheaf.stalk x) (List.ofFn g),
∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (_ : x ∈ U.1) (s : ℕ) (f : Fin s → Γ(X, U.1)),
J.ideal U = Ideal.span (Set.range f) ∧ IsRegular Γ(X, U.1) (List.ofFn f),
∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (_ : x ∈ U.1) (s : ℕ) (f : Fin s → Γ(X, U.1)),
J.ideal U = Ideal.span (Set.range f) ∧ Koszul.IsKoszulRegular f,
∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (_ : x ∈ U.1) (s : ℕ) (f : Fin s → Γ(X, U.1)),
J.ideal U = Ideal.span (Set.range f) ∧ Koszul.IsH1Regular f,
∃ (U : X.affineOpens) (_ : x ∈ U.1) (s : ℕ) (f : Fin s → Γ(X, U.1)),
J.ideal U = Ideal.span (Set.range f) ∧ IsQuasiRegular Γ(X, U.1) (List.ofFn f),
∃ U : X.Opens, x ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (J.comap U.ι).subschemeι,
∃ U : X.Opens, x ∈ U ∧ IsKoszulRegularImmersion (J.comap U.ι).subschemeι,
∃ U : X.Opens, x ∈ U ∧ IsH1RegularImmersion (J.comap U.ι).subschemeι,
∃ U : X.Opens, x ∈ U ∧ IsQuasiRegularImmersion (J.comap U.ι).subschemeι]
Sources
Section31.22 Regular immersions#
Section 31.22 of the Stacks Project, Tag 0638. 12 tags here are carried by 55 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier), quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 063J, a definition
Tag 063J in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_iff_of_open, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/RegularOpenIndependence.lean, line 126. The attribute's comment: “part (1): independence of the chosen open”.
An immersion
i : Z ⟶ Xis regular if and only if, for one — equivalently any — open subschemeUofXthrough whichifactors as a closed immersionj : Z ⟶ U, the defining ideal ofjis a regular ideal sheaf onU.
theorem isRegularImmersion_iff_of_open {Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(U : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ U.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ U.ι = i) :
IsRegularImmersion i ↔
IsRegularIdealSheaf U.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(definingIdealOfHom j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularImmersion, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Immersion.lean, line 225. The attribute's comment: “part (1): regular immersion”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (1). The immersion
iis regular when the defining ideal sheaf of its canonical closed factor is a regular ideal sheaf.
def IsRegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsKoszulRegularImmersion, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Immersion.lean, line 232. The attribute's comment: “part (2): Koszul-regular immersion”. References: SGA 6 VII (1.4), “regular immersion”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (2). The immersion
iis Koszul-regular when the defining ideal sheaf of its canonical closed factor is a Koszul-regular ideal sheaf.
def IsKoszulRegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsH1RegularImmersion, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Immersion.lean, line 239. The attribute's comment: “part (3): H₁-regular immersion”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (3). The immersion
iisH₁-regular when the defining ideal sheaf of its canonical closed factor is anH₁-regular ideal sheaf.
def IsH1RegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsQuasiRegularImmersion, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Immersion.lean, line 246. The attribute's comment: “part (4): quasi-regular immersion”. References: EGA IV (16.9.2), “quasi-regular”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (4). The immersion
iis quasi-regular when the defining ideal sheaf of its canonical closed factor is a quasi-regular ideal sheaf.
def IsQuasiRegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_definingIdealOfHom_congr, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 925. The attribute's comment: “part (2): independence of the chosen open, for the restricted defining ideal”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (2): independence of the chosen open. For an immersion
i : Z ⟶ Xand two opens ofXin whichiis closed, the Koszul-regularity condition of Stacks tag 063D on the restriction of the defining ideal sheaf ofiis the same on both.
theorem isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_definingIdealOfHom_congr (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(V V' : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ V.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ V.ι = i)
(j' : Z ⟶ V'.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j'] (hij' : j' ≫ V'.ι = i) :
IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf V.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(restrictSubmodule V (definingIdealOfHom i)) ↔
IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf V'.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(restrictSubmodule V' (definingIdealOfHom i))
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularIdealSheaf_definingIdealOfHom_congr, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 937. The attribute's comment: “part (3): independence of the chosen open, for the restricted defining ideal”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (3): independence of the chosen open.
theorem isH1RegularIdealSheaf_definingIdealOfHom_congr (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(V V' : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ V.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ V.ι = i)
(j' : Z ⟶ V'.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j'] (hij' : j' ≫ V'.ι = i) :
IsH1RegularIdealSheaf V.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(restrictSubmodule V (definingIdealOfHom i)) ↔
IsH1RegularIdealSheaf V'.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(restrictSubmodule V' (definingIdealOfHom i))
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_definingIdealOfHom_congr, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 949. The attribute's comment: “part (4): independence of the chosen open, for the restricted defining ideal”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (4): independence of the chosen open.
theorem isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_definingIdealOfHom_congr (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(V V' : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ V.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ V.ι = i)
(j' : Z ⟶ V'.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j'] (hij' : j' ≫ V'.ι = i) :
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf V.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(restrictSubmodule V (definingIdealOfHom i)) ↔
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf V'.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(restrictSubmodule V' (definingIdealOfHom i))
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularImmersion_iff_of_open, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 1005. The attribute's comment: “part (2): independence of the chosen open”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (2): independence of the chosen open. An immersion is Koszul-regular exactly when the defining ideal sheaf of its closed factor through any open in which it is closed is a Koszul-regular ideal sheaf — not only the canonical one.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_iff_of_open (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(V : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ V.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ V.ι = i) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion i ↔
IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf V.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(definingIdealOfHom j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularImmersion_iff_of_open, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 1019. The attribute's comment: “part (3): independence of the chosen open”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (3): independence of the chosen open.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_iff_of_open (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(V : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ V.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ V.ι = i) :
IsH1RegularImmersion i ↔
IsH1RegularIdealSheaf V.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(definingIdealOfHom j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularImmersion_iff_of_open, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 1033. The attribute's comment: “part (4): independence of the chosen open”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (4): independence of the chosen open.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_iff_of_open (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(V : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ V.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ V.ι = i) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion i ↔
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf V.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(definingIdealOfHom j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularImmersion_resLE, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 1137. The attribute's comment: “part (2): stability under restricting the target to an open”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (2): Koszul-regularity survives restricting the target to an open. If
i : Z ⟶ Xis a Koszul-regular immersion then so is its restrictioni.resLE V (i ⁻¹ᵁ V) le_rfl : i ⁻¹ᵁ V ⟶ Vto any openV ⊆ X.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_resLE (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(h : IsKoszulRegularImmersion i) (V : X.Opens) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion (i.resLE V (i ⁻¹ᵁ V) le_rfl)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularImmersion_resLE, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 1154. The attribute's comment: “part (3): stability under restricting the target to an open”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (3):
H₁-regularity survives restricting the target to an open.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_resLE (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(h : IsH1RegularImmersion i) (V : X.Opens) :
IsH1RegularImmersion (i.resLE V (i ⁻¹ᵁ V) le_rfl)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularImmersion_resLE, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/Independence.lean, line 1171. The attribute's comment: “part (4): stability under restricting the target to an open”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (4): quasi-regularity survives restricting the target to an open.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_resLE (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(h : IsQuasiRegularImmersion i) (V : X.Opens) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion (i.resLE V (i ⁻¹ᵁ V) le_rfl)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_resLE, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/ZariskiLocal.lean, line 97. The attribute's comment: “part (2): gluing along an open cover of the target”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (2): Koszul-regularity glues along an open cover of the target. If every restriction
i.resLE (V k) (i ⁻¹ᵁ V k) le_rflof the immersioniover a member of an open coverVofXis a Koszul-regular immersion, then so isi.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_resLE
(h : ∀ k, IsKoszulRegularImmersion (i.resLE (V k) (i ⁻¹ᵁ V k) le_rfl)) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularImmersion_of_resLE, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/ZariskiLocal.lean, line 121. The attribute's comment: “part (3): gluing along an open cover of the target”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (3):
H₁-regularity glues along an open cover of the target.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_of_resLE
(h : ∀ k, IsH1RegularImmersion (i.resLE (V k) (i ⁻¹ᵁ V k) le_rfl)) :
IsH1RegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_resLE, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/ZariskiLocal.lean, line 145. The attribute's comment: “part (4): gluing along an open cover of the target”.
Stacks tag 063J, part (4): quasi-regularity glues along an open cover of the target.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_resLE
(h : ∀ k, IsQuasiRegularImmersion (i.resLE (V k) (i ⁻¹ᵁ V k) le_rfl)) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isQuasiRegularImmersion_iff_of_open, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/OpenIndependence.lean, line 582. The attribute's comment: “part (4): independence of the chosen open”.
An immersion
i : Z ⟶ Xis quasi-regular if and only if, for one — equivalently any — open subschemeUofXthrough whichifactors as a closed immersionj : Z ⟶ U, the defining ideal ofjis a quasi-regular ideal sheaf onU.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_iff_of_open {Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(U : X.Opens) (j : Z ⟶ U.toScheme) [IsClosedImmersion j] (hij : j ≫ U.ι = i) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion i ↔
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf U.toScheme.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace
(definingIdealOfHom j)
Tag 063K, a lemma
Tag 063K in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_isRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Implications.lean, line 262.
A regular immersion is Koszul-regular. The first implication of Stacks tag 063K, between parts (1) and (2) of Stacks tag 063J.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_isRegularImmersion (h : IsRegularImmersion i) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularImmersion_of_isKoszulRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Implications.lean, line 270.
A Koszul-regular immersion is
H₁-regular. The second implication of Stacks tag 063K, between parts (2) and (3) of Stacks tag 063J.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_of_isKoszulRegularImmersion (h : IsKoszulRegularImmersion i) :
IsH1RegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_isH1RegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Implications.lean, line 277.
An
H₁-regular immersion is quasi-regular. The third implication of Stacks tag 063K, between parts (3) and (4) of Stacks tag 063J.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_isH1RegularImmersion (h : IsH1RegularImmersion i) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion i
Tag 063L, a lemma
Tag 063L in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isRegularImmersion_iff_isKoszulRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/NoetherianRegularKoszul.lean, line 104. The attribute's comment: “regular iff Koszul-regular”.
Stacks tag 063L, parts (1) and (2). An immersion into a locally Noetherian scheme is regular if and only if it is Koszul-regular.
theorem isRegularImmersion_iff_isKoszulRegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[IsLocallyNoetherian X] :
IsRegularImmersion i ↔ IsKoszulRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularImmersion_iff_isH1RegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/NoetherianRegularKoszul.lean, line 131. The attribute's comment: “Koszul-regular iff H₁-regular”.
Stacks tag 063L, parts (2) and (3). An immersion into a locally Noetherian scheme is Koszul-regular if and only if it is
H₁-regular.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_iff_isH1RegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[IsLocallyNoetherian X] :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion i ↔ IsH1RegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularImmersion_iff_isQuasiRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/NoetherianRegularKoszul.lean, line 141. The attribute's comment: “H₁-regular iff quasi-regular”.
Stacks tag 063L, parts (3) and (4). An immersion into a locally Noetherian scheme is
H₁-regular if and only if it is quasi-regular.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_iff_isQuasiRegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[IsLocallyNoetherian X] :
IsH1RegularImmersion i ↔ IsQuasiRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.regularImmersion_tfae, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/NoetherianRegularKoszul.lean, line 153. The attribute's comment: “the four notions agree over a locally Noetherian base”. References: EGA IV (16.9.10); EGA IV (16.9.11), “more general”.
Stacks tag 063L. For an immersion into a locally Noetherian scheme the four notions of regularity — regular, Koszul-regular,
H₁-regular and quasi-regular — are equivalent.
theorem regularImmersion_tfae (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsLocallyNoetherian X] :
List.TFAE [IsRegularImmersion i, IsKoszulRegularImmersion i, IsH1RegularImmersion i,
IsQuasiRegularImmersion i]
Tag 067P, a lemma
Tag 067P in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularIdealSheaf/FlatBaseChange.lean, line 163. The attribute's comment: “regular”.
A regular immersion remains a regular immersion after base change along a flat morphism.
theorem isRegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat {Z X X' : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X) (g : X' ⟶ X)
[IsImmersion i] [Flat g] (hi : IsRegularImmersion i) :
IsRegularImmersion (pullback.snd i g)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isKoszulRegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularIdealSheaf/FlatBaseChange.lean, line 221. The attribute's comment: “koszul”.
A Koszul-regular immersion remains a Koszul-regular immersion after base change along a flat morphism.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat {Z X X' : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X)
(g : X' ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [Flat g] (hi : IsKoszulRegularImmersion i) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion (pullback.snd i g)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isH1RegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularIdealSheaf/FlatBaseChange.lean, line 275. The attribute's comment: “h1”.
A
H₁-regular immersion remains aH₁-regular immersion after base change along a flat morphism.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat {Z X X' : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X)
(g : X' ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [Flat g] (hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i) :
IsH1RegularImmersion (pullback.snd i g)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isQuasiRegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularIdealSheaf/FlatBaseChange.lean, line 333. The attribute's comment: “quasi”. References: EGA IV (19.1.5), “(ii)”.
A quasi-regular immersion remains a quasi-regular immersion after base change along a flat morphism.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_pullback_snd_of_flat {Z X X' : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X)
(g : X' ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [Flat g] (hi : IsQuasiRegularImmersion i) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion (pullback.snd i g)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_pullbackIdeal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/FlatBaseChange.lean, line 375. The attribute's comment: “part (2), ideal-sheaf level: the inverse image ideal sheaf h⁻¹J·O_{X'} of a Koszul-regular ideal sheaf along a morphism of locally ringed spaces with flat stalk maps is Koszul-regular”. References: SGA 6 VII (1.5), “flat base change, Koszul”.
Stacks tag 067P, part (2), at the level of ideal sheaves. The inverse image ideal sheaf of a Koszul-regular ideal sheaf along a morphism with flat stalk maps is Koszul-regular.
theorem isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_pullbackIdeal (hflat : HasFlatStalks h)
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule)
(hJ : IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X'.toRingedSpace (pullbackIdeal h J)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularIdealSheaf_pullbackIdeal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/FlatBaseChange.lean, line 386. The attribute's comment: “part (3), ideal-sheaf level: the inverse image ideal sheaf h⁻¹J·O_{X'} of an H₁-regular ideal sheaf along a morphism of locally ringed spaces with flat stalk maps is H₁-regular”. References: SGA 6 VII (1.5), “flat base change, H1”.
Stacks tag 067P, part (3), at the level of ideal sheaves. The inverse image ideal sheaf of an
H₁-regular ideal sheaf along a morphism with flat stalk maps isH₁-regular.
theorem isH1RegularIdealSheaf_pullbackIdeal (hflat : HasFlatStalks h)
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule)
(hJ : IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
IsH1RegularIdealSheaf X'.toRingedSpace (pullbackIdeal h J)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_pullbackIdeal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularIdealSheaf/FlatBaseChange.lean, line 397. The attribute's comment: “part (4), ideal-sheaf level: the inverse image ideal sheaf h⁻¹J·O_{X'} of a quasi-regular ideal sheaf along a morphism of locally ringed spaces with flat stalk maps is quasi-regular”. References: SGA 6 VII (1.5), “flat base change, quasi”.
Stacks tag 067P, part (4), at the level of ideal sheaves. The inverse image ideal sheaf of a quasi-regular ideal sheaf along a morphism with flat stalk maps is quasi-regular.
theorem isQuasiRegularIdealSheaf_pullbackIdeal (hflat : HasFlatStalks h)
(J : (structureSheafModule X.toRingedSpace).Submodule)
(hJ : IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace J) :
IsQuasiRegularIdealSheaf X'.toRingedSpace (pullbackIdeal h J)
Tag 063M, a lemma
Tag 063M in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isFiniteLocallyFree_universalConormalSheaf_of_isKoszulRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/LocalCompleteIntersection/UnramifiedConormal.lean, line 97. The attribute's comment: “condition (2) for a Koszul-regular immersion, for the conormal sheaf of Tag 04F4. Condition (1) is at RegularImmersion/FinitePresentation.lean; condition (2) does not need Tag 063H, and is proved at RegularImmersion/ConormalLocallyFree.lean by a route through Tags 063G, 08RK, 01R3, 00NX and 05JM that never uses 063H”.
The conormal sheaf of a Koszul-regular immersion of schemes, in the sense of Stacks 04F4, is finite locally free.
theorem isFiniteLocallyFree_universalConormalSheaf_of_isKoszulRegularImmersion
{Z P : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ P) [IsImmersion i] (hi : IsKoszulRegularImmersion i) :
SheafOfModules.IsFiniteLocallyFree.{u, u, u} (universalConormalSheaf i)
Stacks.Conormal.isQuasiRegularImmersion_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/ConormalQuasiRegularCriterion.lean, line 381. The attribute's comment: “the whole statement: an immersion is quasi-regular iff it is locally of finite presentation, its conormal sheaf is finite locally free, and the map of 0632 is an isomorphism”. References: EGA IV (16.9.8), “(i)”; EGA IV (17.12.1); EGA IV (19.1.3).
An immersion
i : Z ⟶ Xof schemes is quasi-regular if and only if (1) it is locally of finite presentation, (2) its conormal sheaf𝒞_{Z/X}is finite locally free, and (3) the canonical mapSym*(𝒞_{Z/X}) ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X,*}of [Stacks, Tag 0632] is an isomorphism in every degree.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_iff (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] :
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsQuasiRegularImmersion i ↔
LocallyOfFinitePresentation i ∧
AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsFiniteLocallyFree.{u, u, u} (conormalSheaf i) ∧
∀ n : ℤ, IsIso ((conormalSymmetricHom i).app n)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.locallyOfFinitePresentation_of_isQuasiRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/FinitePresentation.lean, line 103. The attribute's comment: “condition (1) of the statement, in the direction out of quasi-regularity: a quasi-regular immersion is locally of finite presentation. The whole iff is proved at Stacks.Conormal.isQuasiRegularImmersion_iff”. References: EGA IV (16.9.8), “(i), one direction”; EGA IV (16.9.9), “l.f.p. is necessary”; SGA 3 III (4.6.2), “more general”.
[Stacks, Tag 063M], condition (1) in the direction out of quasi-regularity. A quasi-regular immersion of schemes is locally of finite presentation.
The canonical closed factor
i.liftCoborderis locally of finite presentation by [Stacks, Tag 01TV], since the quasi-regular defining ideal sheaf is finitely generated over every affine open, and the remaining factori.coborderRange.ιis an open immersion.
theorem locallyOfFinitePresentation_of_isQuasiRegularImmersion (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(h : IsQuasiRegularImmersion i) : LocallyOfFinitePresentation i
Tag 063N, a lemma
Tag 063N in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.mono_conormalLeftMap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/ConormalSequence.lean, line 400. The attribute's comment: “exactness at the left term: for an H₁-regular immersion i the canonical map i^* 𝒞_{Y/X} ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X} is a monomorphism”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 063N]: the conormal sequence of an
H1-regular immersion is exact at its left-hand term. For immersionsZ --i--→ Y --j--→ XwithianH1-regular immersion, the canonical mapi^* C_{Y/X} ⟶ C_{Z/X}of [Stacks Project, Tag 01R4] is a monomorphism.
theorem mono_conormalLeftMap (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j]
(hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i) : Mono (conormalLeftMap i j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.conormalSequence_shortExact, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/ConormalSequence.lean, line 554. The attribute's comment: “exactness: the canonical sequence 0 ⟶ i^* 𝒞_{Y/X} ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X} ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/Y} ⟶ 0 of an H₁-regular immersion is short exact”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 063N]: the conormal sequence of an
H1-regular immersion is short exact. For immersionsZ --i--→ Y --j--→ XwithianH1-regular immersion, the canonical sequence0 ⟶ i^* C_{Y/X} ⟶ C_{Z/X} ⟶ C_{Z/Y} ⟶ 0of [Stacks Project, Tag 062S] is a short exact sequence ofO_Z-modules.Exactness in the middle and surjectivity on the right are [Stacks Project, Tag 062S]; what
H1-regularity ofiadds is injectivity on the left,Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.mono_conormalLeftMap.
theorem conormalSequence_shortExact (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j]
(hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i) : (conormalSequenceShortComplex i j).ShortExact
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.conormalSequence_locallySplit, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/ConormalSequence.lean, line 566. The attribute's comment: “local splitness: on a neighbourhood of every point of Z the canonical sequence of an H₁-regular immersion splits”. References: EGA IV (16.9.13), “more general”; EGA IV (19.1.5), “more general”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 063N]: the conormal sequence of an
H1-regular immersion is locally split. Every point ofZhas an open neighbourhood over which the short exact sequence0 ⟶ i^* C_{Y/X} ⟶ C_{Z/X} ⟶ C_{Z/Y} ⟶ 0splits, the restriction to an open being the slice restrictionSheafOfModules.over.
theorem conormalSequence_locallySplit (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j]
(hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i) (z : Z) :
∃ V : Z.Opens, z ∈ V ∧ Nonempty (((conormalSequenceShortComplex i j).map
(_root_.SheafOfModules.overFunctor
(structureSheafRing Z.toLocallyRingedSpace.toRingedSpace) V)).Splitting)
Tag 067Q, a lemma
Tag 067Q in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_comp, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/Composition.lean, line 155. The attribute's comment: “composition_regular”. References: EGA IV (19.1.5); SGA 6 VIII (1.1), “special case”.
The composite of two regular immersions of schemes is a regular immersion.
theorem isRegularImmersion_comp {Z Y X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[IsImmersion j] (hi : IsRegularImmersion i) (hj : IsRegularImmersion j) :
IsRegularImmersion (i ≫ j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isKoszulRegularImmersion_comp, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularImmersionComposition.lean, line 263. The attribute's comment: “composition_koszul_regular”. References: SGA 6 VII (1.7); SGA 6 VIII (1.1); SGA 6 VIII (1.3).
Stacks tag 067Q, the Koszul-regular case. The composite of two Koszul-regular immersions of schemes is a Koszul-regular immersion.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_comp {Z Y X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X)
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] (hi : IsKoszulRegularImmersion i)
(hj : IsKoszulRegularImmersion j) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion (i ≫ j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isH1RegularImmersion_comp, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularImmersionComposition.lean, line 282. The attribute's comment: “composition_h1_regular”.
Stacks tag 067Q, the
H₁-regular case. The composite of twoH₁-regular immersions of schemes is anH₁-regular immersion.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_comp {Z Y X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[IsImmersion j] (hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i) (hj : IsH1RegularImmersion j) :
IsH1RegularImmersion (i ≫ j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isQuasiRegularImmersion_comp_of_isH1RegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Spaces/RegularImmersionComposition.lean, line 300. The attribute's comment: “composition_h1_quasi_regular”.
Stacks tag 067Q, the mixed case. The composite of an
H₁-regular immersion of schemes and a quasi-regular immersion of schemes is a quasi-regular immersion.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_comp_of_isH1RegularImmersion {Z Y X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ Y)
(j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] (hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i)
(hj : IsQuasiRegularImmersion j) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion (i ≫ j)
Tag 068Z, a lemma
Tag 068Z in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isH1RegularImmersion_of_comp_of_isSplitExactConormalSequence, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SplitConormalH1Regular.lean, line 427. The attribute's comment: “(2) H₁-regularity descends to the first immersion”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 068Z], part (2). For immersions
i : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xwithjlocally of finite presentation whose conormal sequence is exact and locally split,H₁-regularity ofi ≫ jdescends toi.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_of_comp_of_isSplitExactConormalSequence
(i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation j]
(hS : IsSplitExactConormalSequence i j) (hij : IsH1RegularImmersion (i ≫ j)) :
IsH1RegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_isSplitExactConormalSequence, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SplitConormalKoszulRegular.lean, line 473. The attribute's comment: “(3) Koszul-regularity of the first immersion”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 068Z], part (3). For immersions
i : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xwithjlocally of finite presentation whose conormal sequence is exact and locally split,iis Koszul-regular as soon as bothjandi ≫ jare.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_isSplitExactConormalSequence
(i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation j]
(hS : IsSplitExactConormalSequence i j) (hj : IsKoszulRegularImmersion j)
(hij : IsKoszulRegularImmersion (i ≫ j)) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_isSplitExactConormalSequence, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SplitConormalQuasiRegular.lean, line 454. The attribute's comment: “(1) quasi-regularity descends to the first immersion”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 068Z], part (1). For immersions
i : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xwithjlocally of finite presentation whose conormal sequence is exact and locally split, quasi-regularity ofi ≫ jdescends toi.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_isSplitExactConormalSequence
(i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation j]
(hS : IsSplitExactConormalSequence i j) (hij : IsQuasiRegularImmersion (i ≫ j)) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_of_comp, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/ConormalPermanence.lean, line 412. The attribute's comment: “part (3) for closed immersions: Koszul-regularity of j and of i ≫ j together with injectivity of the cotangent-fibre map I_x/𝔪_x I_x ⟶ J_x/𝔪_x J_x gives Koszul-regularity of i. That injectivity is a hypothesis here, not derived from exactness and local splitness of the conormal sequence”.
[Stacks Project, Tag 068Z] part (3) for closed immersions, from injectivity on cotangent fibres. Let
Z --i--→ Y --j--→ Xbe closed immersions with Koszul-regular defining ideal sheaves forjand fori ≫ j. If at every point ofZthe induced map of cotangent fibresI_x/𝔪_x I_x → J_x/𝔪_x J_xof the two defining ideals is injective, then the defining ideal sheaf ofiis Koszul-regular.Over an affine open
UofXaround the image of the point, local generatorsfof the ideal ofYextend to local generatorsf, gof the ideal ofZ, both Koszul-regular, and the images of thegunderjon sections generate the ideal ofZinYand are Koszul-regular by [Stacks Project, Tag 068M].
theorem isKoszulRegularIdealSheaf_of_comp (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X)
[IsClosedImmersion i] [IsClosedImmersion j]
(hinj : ∀ z : Z, Function.Injective (conormalFibreMap i j z))
(hj : IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace (definingIdealOfHom j))
(hij : IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf X.toRingedSpace (definingIdealOfHom (i ≫ j))) :
IsKoszulRegularIdealSheaf Y.toRingedSpace (definingIdealOfHom i)
Tag 0690, a lemma
Tag 0690 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_opens_isSplitExactConormalSequence_of_split, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/H1RegularSplitConormal.lean, line 146. The attribute's comment: “(2) => (3)”. References: EGA IV (19.1.5), “(iv)”; SGA 6 VII (4.2), “partial”.
Stacks tag 0690,
(2) ⇒ (3). Leti : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xbe immersions of schemes and letz : Z. Ifiandi ≫ jare regular immersions in a neighbourhood ofz, theni ≫ jis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofzand the conormal sequence0 ⟶ i^* 𝒞_{Y/X} ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/X} ⟶ 𝒞_{Z/Y} ⟶ 0is exact and locally split in a neighbourhood ofz.
theorem exists_opens_isSplitExactConormalSequence_of_split (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X)
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] (z : Z)
(hi : ∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i))
(hji : ∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j))) :
(∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j))) ∧
∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsSplitExactConormalSequence (W.ι ≫ i) j
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_opens_isRegularImmersion_of_factors_of_split, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/H1RegularSplitConormal.lean, line 172. The attribute's comment: “(2) => (1)”.
Stacks tag 0690,
(2) ⇒ (1). Leti : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xbe immersions of schemes withXlocally Noetherian and letz : Z. Ifiandi ≫ jare regular immersions in a neighbourhood ofz, theniis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofzandjis one in a neighbourhood ofi z.
theorem exists_opens_isRegularImmersion_of_factors_of_split (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X)
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] [IsLocallyNoetherian X] (z : Z)
(hi : ∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i))
(hji : ∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j))) :
(∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i)) ∧
∃ V : Y.Opens, i.base z ∈ V ∧ IsRegularImmersion (V.ι ≫ j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_opens_isSplitExactConormalSequence_of_factors, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/H1RegularSplitConormal.lean, line 201. The attribute's comment: “(1) => (3)”. References: EGA IV (19.1.5), “partial”; SGA 6 VII (4.2), “partial”; SGA 6 VIII (1.3), “clause (i), special case”.
Stacks tag 0690,
(1) ⇒ (3). Leti : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xbe immersions of schemes withXlocally Noetherian and letz : Z. Ifiis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofzandjis one in a neighbourhood ofi z, theni ≫ jis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofzand the conormal sequence of the pair is exact and locally split in a neighbourhood ofz.
theorem exists_opens_isSplitExactConormalSequence_of_factors (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X)
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j] [IsLocallyNoetherian X] (z : Z)
(hi : ∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i))
(hj : ∃ V : Y.Opens, i.base z ∈ V ∧ IsRegularImmersion (V.ι ≫ j)) :
(∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j))) ∧
∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsSplitExactConormalSequence (W.ι ≫ i) j
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.tfae_isRegularImmersion_near, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/H1RegularSplitConormal.lean, line 215.
Stacks tag 0690. For immersions
i : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ XwithXlocally Noetherian andz : Z, the following are equivalent: (1)iis a regular immersion nearzandjis one neari z; (2)iandi ≫ jare regular immersions nearz; (3)i ≫ jis a regular immersion nearzand the conormal sequence of the pair is exact and locally split nearz.
theorem tfae_isRegularImmersion_near (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion j]
[IsLocallyNoetherian X] (z : Z) :
List.TFAE
[(∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i)) ∧
∃ V : Y.Opens, i.base z ∈ V ∧ IsRegularImmersion (V.ι ≫ j),
(∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i)) ∧
∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j)),
(∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j))) ∧
∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsSplitExactConormalSequence (W.ι ≫ i) j]
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_opens_isRegularImmersion_of_split_near, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/NoetherianSplitConormal.lean, line 199. The attribute's comment: “(3) => (1)”.
Stacks tag 0690,
(3) ⇒ (1). Leti : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xbe immersions of schemes withXlocally Noetherian, letz : Zand lety = i z. Ifi ≫ jis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofzand the conormal sequence of the pair is exact and locally split in a neighbourhood ofz, theniis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofzandjis one in a neighbourhood ofy.
theorem exists_opens_isRegularImmersion_of_split_near (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[IsImmersion j] [IsLocallyNoetherian X] (z : Z)
(hji : ∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j)))
(hS : ∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsSplitExactConormalSequence (W.ι ≫ i) j) :
(∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i)) ∧
∃ V : Y.Opens, i.base z ∈ V ∧ IsRegularImmersion (V.ι ≫ j)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_opens_isRegularImmersion_comp_of_factors, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/NoetherianSplitConormal.lean, line 263. The attribute's comment: “(1) => (2)”.
Stacks tag 0690,
(1) ⇒ (2). Leti : Z ⟶ Yandj : Y ⟶ Xbe immersions of schemes withXlocally Noetherian and letz : Z. Ifiis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofzandjis one in a neighbourhood ofi z, theni ≫ jis a regular immersion in a neighbourhood ofz.
theorem exists_opens_isRegularImmersion_comp_of_factors (i : Z ⟶ Y) (j : Y ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[IsImmersion j] [IsLocallyNoetherian X] (z : Z)
(hi : ∃ W : Z.Opens, z ∈ W ∧ IsRegularImmersion (W.ι ≫ i))
(hj : ∃ V : Y.Opens, i.base z ∈ V ∧ IsRegularImmersion (V.ι ≫ j)) :
∃ U : Z.Opens, z ∈ U ∧ IsRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ (i ≫ j))
Tag 0691, a remark
Tag 0691 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.Examples.regular_immersion_not_permanent_in_middle, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/Examples/Scheme/RegularImmersionNotPermanentInMiddle.lean, line 710. The attribute's comment: “The counterexample of the remark for X = 𝐀¹_k, Y = Spec(k[x]/(x²)) and Z = Spec(k[x]/(x)) over an arbitrary field k, at the level of schemes throughout. The three immersions are the Spec of the quotient maps k[x] → k[x]/(x²) (that is j), k[x] → k[x]/(x) (that is j ∘ i, identified with the composite by Stacks.Examples.simpleOriginImmersion_comp_doubleOriginLineImmersion) and k[x]/(x²) → k[x]/(x) (that is i). The predicate is Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularImmersion, part (1) of Stacks tag 063J and the one whose variants the statements carrying Stacks tag 0690 compare; the in a neighbourhood of a point form in which Stacks tag 0690 states its three parts is Stacks.Examples.IsRegularImmersionAt, and the splitting condition of its part (3) is Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.IsSplitExactConormalSequence on a neighbourhood, the form in which the proved implications of Stacks tag 0690 state it. Both forms are delivered: regularity of j at every point of Y, of i ≫ j at every point of Z and of both globally, against the refutation of regularity of i at every point of Z and globally. All three parts of Stacks tag 0690 are refuted, each as a whole and at every point of Z: parts (1) and (2) through their common first half, part (3) through its second half, the splitting, since its first half holds here. That last refutation runs through the implication (3) ⇒ (1) of Stacks tag 0690, Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.exists_opens_isRegularImmersion_of_split_near, which is proved; nothing here rests on an unproved result. The three ideal-level statements are retained as the affine half to which that predicate reduces by Stacks tag 063G. No hypothesis is carried beyond k being a field.”.
Stacks tag 0691. Regularity of an immersion is not inherited by the middle term of a factorization. For
Z = Spec(k[x]/(x)) --i--→ Y = Spec(k[x]/(x²)) --j--→ X = 𝐀¹_k = Spec(k[x])the two outer immersionsjandj ∘ iare regular immersions — at every point of their sources and globally — while the middle one,i, is a regular immersion in no neighbourhood of any point ofZand in particular not globally, and the conormal sequence of the pair is exact and split in no neighbourhood of any point ofZ; at the level of ideals, the ideals ofYinXand ofZinXare each generated by a weakly regular sequence and the ideal ofZinYis generated by none. So each of the three parts of Stacks tag 0690 fails at every point ofZ— parts (1) and (2) through their common first half, regularity ofinear the point, and part (3) through its second half, the splitting, its first half being true — while "j ∘ iandjare regular immersions atzandy" holds, which is the content of the remark.
theorem regular_immersion_not_permanent_in_middle (k : Type*) [Field k] :
-- `j` is a regular immersion at every point of `Y`, and `j ∘ i` at every point of `Z`
(∀ y, IsRegularImmersionAt (doubleOriginLineImmersion k) y) ∧
(∀ z, IsRegularImmersionAt
(simpleOriginImmersion k ≫ doubleOriginLineImmersion k) z) ∧
-- while `i` is a regular immersion in no neighbourhood of any point of `Z`
(∀ z, ¬ IsRegularImmersionAt (simpleOriginImmersion k) z) ∧
-- and the conormal sequence is exact and split in no neighbourhood of any point of `Z`
(∀ z, ¬ ∃ W : (Spec (CommRingCat.of (SimpleOriginRing k))).Opens, z ∈ W ∧
IsSplitExactConormalSequence (W.ι ≫ simpleOriginImmersion k)
(doubleOriginLineImmersion k)) ∧
-- so that each of the three parts of Stacks tag 0690 fails at every point of `Z`
(∀ z, ¬ (IsRegularImmersionAt (simpleOriginImmersion k) z ∧
IsRegularImmersionAt (doubleOriginLineImmersion k) ((simpleOriginImmersion k).base z))) ∧
(∀ z, ¬ (IsRegularImmersionAt (simpleOriginImmersion k) z ∧
IsRegularImmersionAt (simpleOriginImmersion k ≫ doubleOriginLineImmersion k) z)) ∧
(∀ z, ¬ (IsRegularImmersionAt (simpleOriginImmersion k ≫ doubleOriginLineImmersion k) z ∧
∃ W : (Spec (CommRingCat.of (SimpleOriginRing k))).Opens, z ∈ W ∧
IsSplitExactConormalSequence (W.ι ≫ simpleOriginImmersion k)
(doubleOriginLineImmersion k))) ∧
-- the same three facts globally
RegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularImmersion (doubleOriginLineImmersion k) ∧
RegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularImmersion
(simpleOriginImmersion k ≫ doubleOriginLineImmersion k) ∧
¬ RegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularImmersion (simpleOriginImmersion k) ∧
-- and at the level of ideals, to which Stacks tag 063G reduces them
(∃ rs : List (Polynomial k),
Ideal.ofList rs = doubleOriginIdeal k ∧ IsWeaklyRegular (Polynomial k) rs) ∧
(∃ rs : List (Polynomial k),
Ideal.ofList rs = simpleOriginIdeal k ∧ IsWeaklyRegular (Polynomial k) rs) ∧
(¬ ∃ rs : List (DoubleOriginRing k),
Ideal.ofList rs = doubleOriginPointIdeal k ∧
IsWeaklyRegular (DoubleOriginRing k) rs)
Tag 0692, a lemma
Tag 0692 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.exists_smooth_surjective_regular_baseChange, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/KoszulRegularSmoothCover.lean, line 493.
Stacks Project, Tag 0692. A Koszul-regular closed immersion becomes a regular immersion after a surjective smooth base change of its target.
Both conditions are stated with the classes of Stacks tag 063J, parts (2) and (1):
RegularIdealSheaf.IsKoszulRegularImmersionandRegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularImmersion.
theorem exists_smooth_surjective_regular_baseChange {Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X)
[IsClosedImmersion i] (hi : RegularIdealSheaf.IsKoszulRegularImmersion i) :
∃ (X' : Scheme.{u}) (g : X' ⟶ X),
Surjective g ∧ Smooth g ∧
RegularIdealSheaf.IsRegularImmersion (pullback.snd i g)
Tag 0E9J, a lemma
Tag 0E9J in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isRegularImmersion_of_isRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/ImmersionOfRegularSchemes.lean, line 65. References: EGA IV (19.7.5), “more general”.
Stacks tag 0E9J. An immersion between regular schemes is a regular immersion.
theorem isRegularImmersion_of_isRegular {Z X : Scheme.{u}} (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(hZ : AlgebraicGeometry.IsRegular Z) (hX : AlgebraicGeometry.IsRegular X) :
IsRegularImmersion i
Sources
Section31.23 Relative regular immersions#
Section 31.23 of the Stacks Project, Tag 063P. 12 tags here are carried by 25 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier) and 1 registered declaration, quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 063R, a lemma
Tag 063R in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isQuasiRegularImmersion_baseChange_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/BaseChange.lean, line 369. The attribute's comment: “quasi_base_change”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063R, the quasi-regular half. A quasi-regular immersion whose source is flat over the base remains quasi-regular after any base change of the base scheme.
The
H₁-regular half of the tag isStacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isH1RegularImmersion_baseChange_of_flat, inStacksFrontier.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularImmersion.H1BaseChange.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_baseChange_of_flat {S X Z S' : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S)
(i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [Flat (i ≫ f)] (hi : IsQuasiRegularImmersion i) (g : S' ⟶ S) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion (pullback.fst (pullback.snd g f) i)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isH1RegularImmersion_baseChange_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/H1BaseChange.lean, line 185. The attribute's comment: “h1_base_change”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063R, the
H₁-regular half. AnH₁-regular immersion whose source is flat over the base remainsH₁-regular after any base change of the base scheme.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_baseChange_of_flat {S X Z S' : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S)
(i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [Flat (i ≫ f)] (hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i) (g : S' ⟶ S) :
IsH1RegularImmersion (pullback.fst (pullback.snd g f) i)
Tag 063S, a definition
Tag 063S in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.IsRelativeH1RegularImmersion, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/RelativeDefs.lean, line 49. The attribute's comment: “part (2): relative H₁-regular immersion”.
Part (2) of Stacks tag 063S. An immersion into a scheme over a base is a relative
H₁-regular immersion when the immersed scheme is flat over the base and the immersion isH₁-regular.
abbrev IsRelativeH1RegularImmersion {Z X S : Scheme.{u}}
(f : X ⟶ S) (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] : Prop
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/Basic.lean, line 84. The attribute's comment: “part (1): relative quasi-regular immersion”.
Part (1) of Stacks tag 063S. An immersion into a scheme over a base is a relative quasi-regular immersion when the immersed scheme is flat over the base and the immersion is quasi-regular.
abbrev IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion {Z X S : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S) (i : Z ⟶ X)
[IsImmersion i] : Prop
Tag 063T, a lemma
Tag 063T in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isFlatAt_of_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/RelativeFlatness.lean, line 377.
Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe a morphism of schemes andi : Z ⟶ Xa relative quasi-regular immersion overS. Thenfis flat at every point of the image ofiwhose local ring onXis Noetherian.
theorem isFlatAt_of_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion
{X S Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S) (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
(hi : IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion f i)
(x : X) (hx : x ∈ Set.range i.base)
(hNoetherian : IsNoetherianRing (X.presheaf.stalk x)) :
IsFlatAt f.toLRSHom.toShHom x
Tag 063U, a lemma
Tag 063U in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_baseChange_of_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/BaseChange.lean, line 385. The attribute's comment: “regularity after arbitrary base change”. References: EGA IV (19.2.4), “c') => b')”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063U, regularity after an arbitrary base change. A relative quasi-regular immersion into a scheme flat and locally of finite presentation over the base remains a regular immersion after any change of the base.
The base change is again a relative quasi-regular immersion over
S': its quasi-regularity is the quasi-regular half of Stacks tag 063R and the flatness of its source overS'isflat_comp_of_isPullback. Flatness and local finite presentation ofS' ×_S X ⟶ S'are base changes of those ofX ⟶ S. So the already-provedisRegularImmersion_of_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersionapplies overS'.
theorem isRegularImmersion_baseChange_of_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion {S X Z S' : Scheme.{u}}
(f : X ⟶ S) (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [Flat f] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation f]
(hi : IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion f i) (g : S' ⟶ S) :
IsRegularImmersion (pullback.fst (pullback.snd g f) i)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_of_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RegularImmersion/Relative.lean, line 216. The attribute's comment: “regularity of the immersion”. References: EGA IV (19.2.4), “c') => c)”.
A relative quasi-regular immersion into a scheme flat and locally of finite presentation over the base is a regular immersion.
theorem isRegularImmersion_of_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion {S X Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S)
(i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [Flat f] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation f]
(hi : IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion f i) : IsRegularImmersion i
Tag 0FUD, a remark
Tag 0FUD in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.isRegular_atPrime_baseChange_of_isQuasiRegular, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/QuasiRegularBaseChange.lean, line 91. The attribute's comment: “regularity at primes after base change”.
Let
A → Bbe flat and of finite presentation and letf₁, …, f_r ∈ Bbe a quasi-regular sequence whose quotient is flat overA. For anyA-algebraA'and any primeqofB' = B ⊗_A A'containing the base-changed sequence, that sequence is regular in the local ringB'_q.
theorem isRegular_atPrime_baseChange_of_isQuasiRegular
{A B A' : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
[CommRing A'] [Algebra A A'] [Module.Flat A B]
[Algebra.FinitePresentation A B] {r : ℕ} (f : Fin r → B)
(hflat : Module.Flat A (B ⧸ Ideal.span (Set.range f)))
(hf : IsQuasiRegular B (List.ofFn f))
(q : Ideal (B ⊗[A] A')) [q.IsPrime]
(hq : Ideal.span (Set.range (KoszulH1.fp (A := A) (A' := A') f)) ≤ q) :
IsRegular (Localization.AtPrime q)
((List.ofFn (KoszulH1.fp (A := A) (A' := A') f)).map
(algebraMap (B ⊗[A] A') (Localization.AtPrime q)))
Declarations registered for the tag:
Koszul.quasiRegular_and_h1Regular_baseChange_of_quotient_flat, declared in the repository, registered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/QuasiRegularBaseChange.lean, line 38 (StacksFrontier): “quasi-regularity and constant length after base change”.
Tag 063V, a lemma
Tag 063V in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.exists_open_flat_of_isRelativeH1RegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatNeighbourhood.lean, line 506. The attribute's comment: “part (1): flat open neighbourhood of a relative H₁-regular immersion”.
Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe locally of finite presentation and leti : Z ⟶ Xbe a relativeH₁-regular immersion overS. Then there is an open subscheme ofXcontaining the image ofZon whichfis flat.
theorem exists_open_flat_of_isRelativeH1RegularImmersion
{S X Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S) (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f]
(hi : AlgebraicGeometry.IsRelativeH1RegularImmersion f i) :
∃ U : X.Opens, Set.range i.base ⊆ (U : Set X) ∧ Flat (U.ι ≫ f)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_of_isRelativeH1RegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatNeighbourhoodRegularity.lean, line 115. The attribute's comment: “part (2): the immersion is regular”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063V, part (2): the immersion is regular. A relative
H₁-regular immersion into a scheme locally of finite presentation over the base is a regular immersion.
theorem isRegularImmersion_of_isRelativeH1RegularImmersion {S X Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S)
(i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation f]
(hi : AlgebraicGeometry.IsRelativeH1RegularImmersion f i) : IsRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_baseChange_of_isRelativeH1RegularImmersion, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/RegularImmersion/FlatNeighbourhoodRegularity.lean, line 126. The attribute's comment: “part (2): the immersion stays regular after any base change”.
Stacks Project, Tag 063V, part (2): regularity after an arbitrary base change. A relative
H₁-regular immersion into a scheme locally of finite presentation over the base remains a regular immersion after any change of the base scheme.
theorem isRegularImmersion_baseChange_of_isRelativeH1RegularImmersion {S X Z S' : Scheme.{u}}
(f : X ⟶ S) (i : Z ⟶ X) [IsImmersion i] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation f]
(hi : AlgebraicGeometry.IsRelativeH1RegularImmersion f i) (g : S' ⟶ S) :
IsRegularImmersion (pullback.fst (pullback.snd g f) i)
Tag 063W, a lemma
Tag 063W in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.exists_mem_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_le_comap, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RelativeRegularImmersion/Containing.lean, line 638. The attribute's comment: “item (1): containing”.
Stacks tag 063W, item (1). Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe flat and locally of finite presentation, letTbe a closed subscheme ofXand letxbe a point ofTwhose fibre overf xis a quasi-regular immersion nearx. Then there is an openU ∋ xand a relative quasi-regular immersionZ ⊆ UoverSwithT ∩ U ⊆ ZandZ_s = T_s ∩ U_s.
theorem exists_mem_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_le_comap (f : X ⟶ S) [Flat f]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (T : X.IdealSheafData) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ T.support)
(hfib : ∃ V : (f.fiber (f x)).Opens, f.asFiber x ∈ V ∧ IsQuasiRegularImmersion
(((T.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).comap V.ι).subschemeι)) :
∃ (U : X.Opens) (_ : x ∈ U) (Z : U.toScheme.IdealSheafData),
IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ f) Z.subschemeι ∧ Z ≤ T.comap U.ι ∧
Z.comap ((f.fiberι (f x)).resLE U (f.fiberι (f x) ⁻¹ᵁ U) le_rfl)
= (T.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).comap (f.fiberι (f x) ⁻¹ᵁ U).ι
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.exists_mem_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_of_dim_eq, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RelativeRegularImmersion/EqualityEquationCount.lean, line 159. The attribute's comment: “item (3): equation count”.
Stacks tag 063W, item (3). Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe flat and locally of finite presentation, letTbe a closed subscheme ofXand letxbe a point ofTsuch that the fibre ofToverf xis a quasi-regular immersion on a neighbourhood ofx. Assume thatTis cut out on an affine open neighbourhood ofxbynequations, and thatnis the drop in local dimension from the fibreX_sto the fibreT_satx. Then there is an openU ∋ xon whichTitself is a relative quasi-regular immersion overS, and a regular immersion.
theorem exists_mem_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_of_dim_eq (f : X ⟶ S) [Flat f]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (T : X.IdealSheafData) (x : X) (hx : x ∈ T.support)
(hfib : ∃ V : (f.fiber (f x)).Opens, f.asFiber x ∈ V ∧ IsQuasiRegularImmersion
(((T.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).comap V.ι).subschemeι))
{n : ℕ} {U₀ : X.Opens} (hU₀ : IsAffineOpen U₀) (hxU₀ : x ∈ U₀) (g : Fin n → Γ(X, U₀))
(hg : T.ideal ⟨U₀, hU₀⟩ = Ideal.span (Set.range g))
(hdim : topologicalKrullDimAt (T.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).subscheme
⟨f.asFiber x, asFiber_mem_support_comap f T x hx⟩ + (n : WithBot ℕ∞)
= topologicalKrullDimAt (f.fiber (f x)) (f.asFiber x)) :
∃ U : X.Opens, x ∈ U ∧
IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ f) (T.comap U.ι).subschemeι ∧
IsRegularImmersion (T.comap U.ι).subschemeι
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.exists_mem_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_of_flatAt, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RelativeRegularImmersion/EqualityFlat.lean, line 71. The attribute's comment: “equality_flat”. References: EGA IV (19.2.4), “b) => c)”.
Stacks tag 063W, item (2). Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe flat and locally of finite presentation, letTbe a closed subscheme ofXwhose closed immersion intoXis locally of finite presentation, and letxbe a point ofTsuch that the fibre ofToverf xis a quasi-regular immersion on a neighbourhood ofxandTis flat overSatx. Then there is an openU ∋ xon whichTitself is a relative quasi-regular immersion overS, and a regular immersion.
theorem exists_mem_isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_of_flatAt {X S : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ S)
[Flat f] [LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (T : X.IdealSheafData)
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation T.subschemeι] (x : X) (hx : x ∈ T.support)
(hfib : ∃ V : (f.fiber (f x)).Opens, f.asFiber x ∈ V ∧
IsQuasiRegularImmersion (((T.comap (f.fiberι (f x))).comap V.ι).subschemeι))
(hflat : ((T.subschemeι ≫ f).stalkMap (⟨x, hx⟩ : T.subscheme)).hom.Flat) :
∃ U : X.Opens, x ∈ U ∧
IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion (U.ι ≫ f) (T.comap U.ι).subschemeι ∧
IsRegularImmersion (T.comap U.ι).subschemeι
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_subschemeι_of_forall_fiber, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RelativeRegularImmersion/Fibrewise.lean, line 82. The attribute's comment: “fibrewise criterion”.
The fibrewise criterion of Stacks tag 063W. Let
f : X ⟶ Sbe flat and locally of finite presentation and letTbe a closed subscheme ofXwhich is flat and locally of finite presentation overS. If every fibre ofTis a quasi-regular closed subscheme of the corresponding fibre ofX, thenTis a relative quasi-regular immersion overS.
theorem isRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion_subschemeι_of_forall_fiber (f : X ⟶ S) [Flat f]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation f] (T : X.IdealSheafData) [Flat (T.subschemeι ≫ f)]
[LocallyOfFinitePresentation (T.subschemeι ≫ f)]
(hfib : ∀ s : S, IsQuasiRegularImmersion (T.comap (f.fiberι s)).subschemeι) :
IsRelativeQuasiRegularImmersion f T.subschemeι
Tag 067R, a lemma
Tag 067R in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_of_smooth_section, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Relative/SmoothSection.lean, line 65. References: EGA IV (17.12.3), “necessity”; SGA 6 VII (1.10), “section case”; SGA 6 VII (4.2), “more general”; SGA 6 VIII (1.3), “more general”; SGA 6 VIII (2.4), “special case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 067R. A section
σof a smooth morphismf : X ⟶ Sof schemes is a regular immersion.
theorem isRegularImmersion_of_smooth_section (f : X ⟶ S) [Smooth f] (σ : S ⟶ X)
(hσ : σ ≫ f = 𝟙 S) :
letI : IsImmersion σ := isImmersion_of_comp_eq_id σ f hσ
IsRegularImmersion σ
Tag 067S, a lemma
Tag 067S in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SmoothPermanence.lean, line 81. The attribute's comment: “regular”.
Stacks 067S for regular immersions. If the composite of an immersion with a smooth morphism is regular, the immersion is regular.
theorem isRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth
(i : Y ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ S) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion (i ≫ f)] [Smooth f]
(hj : IsRegularImmersion (i ≫ f)) : IsRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SmoothPermanence.lean, line 103. The attribute's comment: “koszul_regular”.
Stacks 067S for Koszul-regular immersions. If the composite of an immersion with a smooth morphism is Koszul-regular, the immersion is Koszul-regular.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth
(i : Y ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ S) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion (i ≫ f)] [Smooth f]
(hj : IsKoszulRegularImmersion (i ≫ f)) : IsKoszulRegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SmoothPermanence.lean, line 130. The attribute's comment: “h1_regular”.
Stacks 067S for
H₁-regular immersions. If the composite of an immersion with a smooth morphism isH₁-regular, the immersion isH₁-regular.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth
(i : Y ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ S) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion (i ≫ f)] [Smooth f]
(hj : IsH1RegularImmersion (i ≫ f)) : IsH1RegularImmersion i
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SmoothPermanence.lean, line 147. The attribute's comment: “quasi_regular”.
Stacks 067S for quasi-regular immersions. If the composite of an immersion with a smooth morphism is quasi-regular, the immersion is quasi-regular.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_of_comp_of_smooth
(i : Y ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ S) [IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion (i ≫ f)] [Smooth f]
(hj : IsQuasiRegularImmersion (i ≫ f)) : IsQuasiRegularImmersion i
Tag 067T, a lemma
Tag 067T in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_of_syntomic_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RelativeRegularImmersion/SyntomicIntoSmooth.lean, line 82. References: SGA 6 VII (1.10), “more general”.
Stacks Project, Tag 067T. Let
i : Y ⟶ Xbe an immersion andf : X ⟶ Sa smooth morphism such that the structure morphismi ≫ fofYoverSis syntomic. Theniis a regular immersion.
theorem isRegularImmersion_of_syntomic_of_smooth [IsImmersion i] [Smooth f]
(h : Syntomic (i ≫ f)) : IsRegularImmersion i
Tag 067U, a lemma
Tag 067U in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularImmersion_of_smooth_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RelativeRegularImmersion/SyntomicIntoSmooth.lean, line 135. References: SGA 6 VII (1.10); SGA 1 II (4.16), “X smooth ⇒ i regular”; SGA 6 VIII (1.1), “more general”; SGA 6 VIII (1.3), “more general”; SGA 6 VIII (1.8), “partial, special case”; SGA 6 VIII (2.4), “special case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 067U. An immersion
i : Y ⟶ Xbetween two schemes smooth overSis a regular immersion. This is the case of Stacks tag 067T in which the structure morphism ofYis smooth, a smooth morphism being syntomic (Stacks tag 01VD).
theorem isRegularImmersion_of_smooth_of_smooth [IsImmersion i] [Smooth f] [Smooth (i ≫ f)] :
IsRegularImmersion i
Tag 0693, a lemma
Tag 0693 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isKoszulRegularImmersion_comp_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SmoothTargetPermanence.lean, line 481. The attribute's comment: “koszul_regular”.
Stacks tag 0693 for Koszul-regular immersions. In a commutative triangle
Y ⟶ X ⟶ SwithX ⟶ Ssmooth and bothY ⟶ XandY ⟶ Simmersions, the compositeY ⟶ Sof a Koszul-regular immersionY ⟶ Xis a Koszul-regular immersion.Koszul-regularity is local on the source, and near a point of
Ythe immersion intoXis pushed into a relative affine space𝔸ⁿ_Vover an affine openV ⊆ S. ShrinkingVto an affine openTover whichYis closed, the lifted coordinates of that chart define a sectionσof𝔸ⁿ_V ⟶ VoverTthrough which the chart factors, and Stacks tag 068Z for the retracted immersionσdescends Koszul-regularity toY ⟶ T.
theorem isKoszulRegularImmersion_comp_of_smooth (i : Y ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ S) [IsImmersion i]
[IsImmersion (i ≫ f)] [Smooth f] (hi : IsKoszulRegularImmersion i) :
IsKoszulRegularImmersion (i ≫ f)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isH1RegularImmersion_comp_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SmoothTargetPermanence.lean, line 549. The attribute's comment: “h1_regular”.
Stacks tag 0693 for
H₁-regular immersions. In a commutative triangleY ⟶ X ⟶ SwithX ⟶ Ssmooth and bothY ⟶ XandY ⟶ Simmersions, the compositeY ⟶ Sof anH₁-regular immersionY ⟶ Xis anH₁-regular immersion.
H₁-regularity is local on the source, and near a point ofYthe immersion intoXis pushed into a relative affine space𝔸ⁿ_Vover an affine openV ⊆ S. ShrinkingVto an affine openTover whichYis closed, the lifted coordinates of that chart define a sectionσof𝔸ⁿ_V ⟶ VoverTthrough which the chart factors, and Stacks tag 068Z for the retracted immersionσdescendsH₁-regularity toY ⟶ T.
theorem isH1RegularImmersion_comp_of_smooth (i : Y ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ S) [IsImmersion i]
[IsImmersion (i ≫ f)] [Smooth f] (hi : IsH1RegularImmersion i) :
IsH1RegularImmersion (i ≫ f)
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.RegularIdealSheaf.isQuasiRegularImmersion_comp_of_smooth, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MoreMorphisms/RegularImmersion/SmoothTargetQuasiRegular.lean, line 260. The attribute's comment: “quasi_regular”.
Smooth postcomposition. In a commutative triangle
Y ⟶ X ⟶ SwithX ⟶ Ssmooth and bothY ⟶ XandY ⟶ Simmersions, the compositeY ⟶ Sof a quasi-regular immersionY ⟶ Xis a quasi-regular immersion.
theorem isQuasiRegularImmersion_comp_of_smooth {Y X S : Scheme.{u}} (i : Y ⟶ X) (f : X ⟶ S)
[IsImmersion i] [IsImmersion (i ≫ f)] [Smooth f] (hi : IsQuasiRegularImmersion i) :
IsQuasiRegularImmersion (i ≫ f)
Sources
Section31.24 Meromorphic functions and sections#
Section 31.24 of the Stacks Project, Tag 01X1. 10 tags here are carried by 47 declarations of the repository (all in StacksFrontier) and 1 registered declaration, quoted below from AxiomMath/Stacks at commit 5ed82d14.
Tag 01X2, a definition
Tag 01X2 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.MeromorphicFunction, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/TotalQuotient.lean, line 70. The attribute's comment: “a meromorphic function”. References: EGA IV (20.1.3), “M(X)”.
A meromorphic function on a locally ringed space is a global section of its sheaf of meromorphic functions, the sheaf of total quotient rings of its structure sheaf.
abbrev MeromorphicFunction (O : TopCat.Sheaf CommRingCat.{u} X) : Type u
Declarations registered for the tag:
totalQuotientSheafregistered withadd_to_stacksin StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/TotalQuotient.lean, line 138 (StacksFrontier): “the sheaf of meromorphic functions”.
Tag 01X3, an example
Tag 01X3 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.NoChange.noChangeRing, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/NoChange.lean, line 71. The attribute's comment: “the ring”.
The ring
ℂ[x, {y_α}]/((x-α)y_α, y_α y_β).
abbrev noChangeRing
AlgebraicGeometry.NoChange.normalForm_bijective, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/NoChange.lean, line 479. The attribute's comment: “unique normal form”.
Every element of the example ring has a unique displayed normal form.
theorem normalForm_bijective : Function.Bijective normalForm
AlgebraicGeometry.NoChange.isUnit_of_isRegular_localizationAway, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/NoChange.lean, line 487. The attribute's comment: “nonzerodivisors on principal opens”.
On every principal open of
Spec A, a nonzerodivisor is a unit.
theorem isUnit_of_isRegular_localizationAway (f : noChangeRing)
(a : Localization.Away f) (ha : IsRegular a) : IsUnit a
AlgebraicGeometry.NoChange.isIso_toTotalQuotientSheaf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/NoChange.lean, line 676. The attribute's comment: “equality of sheaves”.
The canonical map from the structure sheaf of
Spec Ato its sheaf of meromorphic functions is an isomorphism.
theorem isIso_toTotalQuotientSheaf :
IsIso (Scheme.toTotalQuotientSheaf
(Spec (.of noChangeRing)))
Tag 01X4, a definition
Tag 01X4 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.meromorphicSectionSheaf, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/MeromorphicSections.lean, line 61. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”. References: EGA IV (20.1.3), “M_X(F)”.
The sheaf
K_X(F)of meromorphic sections ofF, obtained by extension of scalars fromOto its sheaf of total quotient rings.
noncomputable abbrev meromorphicSectionSheaf (O : TopCat.Sheaf CommRingCat.{u} X)
(F : SheafOfModules.{max u z} (Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (C := Opens X)
(J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) O)) :
SheafOfModules.{max u z} (Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (C := Opens X)
(J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) (totalQuotientSheaf (X := X) O))
AlgebraicGeometry.MeromorphicSection, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/MeromorphicSections.lean, line 75. The attribute's comment: “part (2)”. References: EGA IV (20.1.3), “M(X,F)”.
A meromorphic section of
Fis a global section ofK_X(F).
abbrev MeromorphicSection (O : TopCat.Sheaf CommRingCat.{u} X)
(F : SheafOfModules.{max u z} (Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (C := Opens X)
(J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) O))
Tag 02OT, a definition
Tag 02OT in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.PullbacksMeromorphicSections, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/Pullback.lean, line 105. References: EGA IV (20.1.11), “M_f = M_X condition”.
Pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined for
fwhen the pullback to every compatible pair of opens sends regular sections of the target structure sheaf to regular sections of the source structure sheaf.
noncomputable abbrev PullbacksMeromorphicSections
{X Y : LocallyRingedSpace.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop
Tag 02OU, a lemma
Tag 02OU in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_mapsTo_genericPoints, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PullbackCriteria.lean, line 86. The attribute's comment: “weakly_associated”.
If a morphism of schemes maps every weakly associated point of its source to the generic point of an irreducible component of its target, then pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined for the morphism.
lemma pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_mapsTo_genericPoints
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
(hf : Set.MapsTo f (Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X) (genericPoints Y)) :
PullbacksMeromorphicSections f.1
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_reduced, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PullbackCriteria.lean, line 127. The attribute's comment: “reduced_source”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02OU (reduced source). If a morphism from a reduced scheme sends every generic point of an irreducible component to a generic point of an irreducible component, then pullbacks of meromorphic functions along it are defined.
theorem pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_reduced {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsReduced X] (hf : Set.MapsTo f (genericPoints X) (genericPoints Y)) :
PullbacksMeromorphicSections f.toLRSHom
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_isIntegral, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PullbackCriteria.lean, line 137. The attribute's comment: “integral_source”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02OU (integral source). If the source of a morphism of schemes is integral and its generic point maps to a generic point of an irreducible component of the target, then pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined.
lemma pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_isIntegral
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIntegral X]
(h : f (genericPoint X) ∈ genericPoints Y) :
PullbacksMeromorphicSections f.toLRSHom
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_isDominant, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PullbackCriteria.lean, line 146. The attribute's comment: “dominant_integral”. References: EGA IV (21.4.5), “(iii), X,X' integral”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02OU. Pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined along a dominant morphism between integral schemes.
lemma pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_isDominant
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIntegral X] [IsIntegral Y] [IsDominant f] :
PullbacksMeromorphicSections f.toLRSHom
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_associatedPoints, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PullbackCriteria.lean, line 158. The attribute's comment: “associated_points”. References: EGA IV (21.4.5), “(ii), to generic points”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02OU (associated points). If every associated point of a locally Noetherian source scheme maps to the generic point of an irreducible component of the target, then pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined.
theorem pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_associatedPoints
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(h : ∀ x ∈ Stacks.Divisors.schemeAssociatedPoints X,
∃ Z ∈ irreducibleComponents Y, IsGenericPoint (f x) Z) :
PullbacksMeromorphicSections f.toLRSHom
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_noEmbeddedPoints, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PullbackCriteria.lean, line 175. The attribute's comment: “no_embedded_points”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02OU (no embedded points). If a morphism from a locally Noetherian scheme without embedded points sends every generic point of an irreducible component to a generic point of an irreducible component, then pullbacks of meromorphic functions along it are defined.
theorem pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_noEmbeddedPoints
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsLocallyNoetherian X]
(hX : AlgebraicGeometry.HasNoEmbeddedPoints X)
(hf : Set.MapsTo f (genericPoints X) (genericPoints Y)) :
PullbacksMeromorphicSections f.toLRSHom
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_flat, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/PullbackCriteria.lean, line 197. The attribute's comment: “flat”. References: EGA IV (21.4.5), “(i)”.
Pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined along a flat morphism of schemes.
theorem pullbacksMeromorphicSections_of_flat
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Flat f] :
PullbacksMeromorphicSections f.toLRSHom
Tag 0EMF, a lemma
Tag 0EMF in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.regularSectionGerms_eq_nonZeroDivisors_of_weaklyAssociatedPoints_subset_genericPoints, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/StalksWeaklyAssociated.lean, line 139. The attribute's comment: “regular_elements_in_stalks”.
If weakly associated points are generic points of irreducible components and quasi-compact opens have finitely many irreducible components, then the germs of regular sections at every point are exactly the nonzerodivisors in its local ring.
lemma regularSectionGerms_eq_nonZeroDivisors_of_weaklyAssociatedPoints_subset_genericPoints
(X : Scheme.{u})
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ (U : X.Opens), IsCompact (U : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents U).Finite)
(x : X) :
(⨆ (U : Opens X) (hx : x ∈ U),
((X.presheaf.submonoidPresheafOfStalk
(fun y ↦ nonZeroDivisors (X.presheaf.stalk y))).obj (Opposite.op U)).map
(X.presheaf.germ U x hx).hom) =
nonZeroDivisors (X.presheaf.stalk x)
AlgebraicGeometry.stalk_totalQuotientPresheaf_isFractionRing_of_weaklyAssociatedPoints_subset_genericPoints, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/StalksWeaklyAssociated.lean, line 183. The attribute's comment: “stalk_total_quotient_ring”.
If every weakly associated point of a scheme is a generic point of an irreducible component and every quasi-compact open has finitely many irreducible components, then the stalk of the presheaf of meromorphic functions at any point is the total quotient ring of the local ring.
lemma stalk_totalQuotientPresheaf_isFractionRing_of_weaklyAssociatedPoints_subset_genericPoints
(X : Scheme.{u})
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ (U : X.Opens), IsCompact (U : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents U).Finite)
(x : X) :
letI : Algebra (X.presheaf.stalk x) (X.presheaf.totalQuotientPresheaf.stalk x) :=
((TopCat.Presheaf.stalkFunctor CommRingCat x).map
X.presheaf.toTotalQuotientPresheaf).hom.toAlgebra
IsFractionRing (X.presheaf.stalk x) (X.presheaf.totalQuotientPresheaf.stalk x)
AlgebraicGeometry.stalk_totalQuotientSheaf_isFractionRing_of_weaklyAssociated, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Meromorphic/TotalQuotientSheafStalks.lean, line 85. The attribute's comment: “stalk_total_quotient_ring”.
If every weakly associated point of a scheme is a generic point of an irreducible component and every quasi-compact open has finitely many irreducible components, then the stalk
K_{X, x}of the sheaf of meromorphic functions at any point is the total quotient ring of the local ring𝒪_{X, x}.
lemma stalk_totalQuotientSheaf_isFractionRing_of_weaklyAssociated
(X : Scheme.{u})
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ (U : X.Opens), IsCompact (U : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents U).Finite)
(x : X) :
letI : Algebra (X.presheaf.stalk x) (X.totalQuotientSheaf.presheaf.stalk x) :=
((TopCat.Presheaf.stalkFunctor CommRingCat x).map
X.toTotalQuotientSheaf.hom).hom.toAlgebra
IsFractionRing (X.presheaf.stalk x) (X.totalQuotientSheaf.presheaf.stalk x)
AlgebraicGeometry.isIso_toGenericPointStalkProduct, a lemma in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicGenericPointDecomposition/Basic.lean, line 268. The attribute's comment: “generic_point_decomposition”.
The comparison map of sheaves of rings is an isomorphism: it is so on stalks, because the presheaf-level comparison is bijective on the affine opens and the sheafification unit is an isomorphism on stalks.
lemma isIso_toGenericPointStalkProduct
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ V : X.Opens, IsCompact (V : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents V).Finite) :
IsIso (toGenericPointStalkProduct X)
AlgebraicGeometry.meromorphicFunctions_iso_product_genericPointStalks, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicGenericPointDecomposition/Basic.lean, line 363. The attribute's comment: “generic_point_decomposition”.
Stacks 0EMF. The
𝒪_X-module of meromorphic functions is the product of the pushed-forward structure sheaves of the local schemes at the generic points of the irreducible components, for a scheme whose weakly associated points are generic points of irreducible components and whose quasi-compact opens have finitely many irreducible components.
theorem meromorphicFunctions_iso_product_genericPointStalks
(X : Scheme.{u})
(hassoc : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ U : X.Opens, IsCompact (U : Set X) →
(irreducibleComponents U).Finite) :
Nonempty (meromorphicFunctions X ≅
∏ᶜ fun η : genericPoints X ↦ genericPointStalkModule X η)
AlgebraicGeometry.meromorphicFunctions_iso_coproduct_genericPointStalks, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicGenericPointDecomposition/Coproduct.lean, line 247. The attribute's comment: “generic_point_decomposition”.
Stacks 0EMF, displayed direct-sum decomposition. For a scheme whose weakly associated points are generic points of irreducible components and whose quasi-compact opens have finitely many irreducible components, the
𝒪_X-module of meromorphic functions is the direct sum over the generic points of the irreducible components of the pushed-forward structure sheaves of the spectra of the local rings there.
theorem meromorphicFunctions_iso_coproduct_genericPointStalks (X : Scheme.{u})
(hassoc : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ U : X.Opens, IsCompact (U : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents U).Finite) :
Nonempty (meromorphicFunctions X ≅
∐ fun η : genericPoints X ↦ genericPointStalkModule X η)
AlgebraicGeometry.isLocalization_totalQuotientSheaf_obj, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicGenericPointDecomposition/Globalization.lean, line 185. The attribute's comment: “part (5)”.
Part (5) of [Stacks, Tag 0EMF]. On an affine open
Uof a scheme whose weakly associated points are generic points of irreducible components and whose quasi-compact opens have finitely many irreducible components, the sectionsK_X(U)of the sheaf of meromorphic functions — not only those of the presheaf — are the total quotient ring ofΓ(X, U), that is, its localization at its nonzerodivisors.
theorem isLocalization_totalQuotientSheaf_obj
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ V : X.Opens, IsCompact (V : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents V).Finite)
{U : X.Opens} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) :
letI : Algebra Γ(X, U) (X.totalQuotientSheaf.obj.obj (op U)) :=
(X.toTotalQuotientSheaf.hom.app (op U)).hom.toAlgebra
IsLocalization (nonZeroDivisors Γ(X, U)) (X.totalQuotientSheaf.obj.obj (op U))
AlgebraicGeometry.nonempty_meromorphicSections_iso_pi_genericPointStalkModuleOf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicGenericPointDecomposition/Globalization.lean, line 624. The attribute's comment: “part (2), product”.
Part (2) of [Stacks, Tag 0EMF], the product decomposition. For a quasi-coherent module
Fon a scheme whose weakly associated points are generic points of irreducible components and whose quasi-compact opens have finitely many irreducible components, the sheafK_X(F)of meromorphic sections ofFis the product over the generic points of the irreducible components of the generic-point contributions.
theorem nonempty_meromorphicSections_iso_pi_genericPointStalkModuleOf
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ V : X.Opens, IsCompact (V : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents V).Finite)
(F : X.Modules) [F.IsQuasicoherent] :
Nonempty (meromorphicSections X F ≅
∏ᶜ fun η : genericPoints X ↦ genericPointStalkModuleOf X F η)
AlgebraicGeometry.nonempty_meromorphicSections_iso_sigma_genericPointStalkModuleOf, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicGenericPointDecomposition/Globalization.lean, line 636. The attribute's comment: “part (2), direct sum”.
Part (2) of [Stacks, Tag 0EMF], the direct-sum decomposition. The family of generic-point contributions is locally finite, so the product of the previous theorem is also their direct sum.
theorem nonempty_meromorphicSections_iso_sigma_genericPointStalkModuleOf
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ V : X.Opens, IsCompact (V : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents V).Finite)
(F : X.Modules) [F.IsQuasicoherent] :
Nonempty (meromorphicSections X F ≅
∐ fun η : genericPoints X ↦ genericPointStalkModuleOf X F η)
AlgebraicGeometry.meromorphicSections_isQuasicoherent_of_genericHypotheses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicGenericPointDecomposition/Globalization.lean, line 649. The attribute's comment: “part (2), quasi-coherence”.
Part (2) of [Stacks, Tag 0EMF], quasi-coherence. The sheaf
K_X(F)of meromorphic sections of a quasi-coherent moduleFis quasi-coherent, being the product of the generic-point contributions.
theorem meromorphicSections_isQuasicoherent_of_genericHypotheses
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ V : X.Opens, IsCompact (V : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents V).Finite)
(F : X.Modules) [F.IsQuasicoherent] :
(meromorphicSections X F).IsQuasicoherent
Stacks.AlgebraicGeometry.MeromorphicQuasicoherent.meromorphicFunctions_isQuasicoherent_of_genericHypotheses, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/MeromorphicQuasicoherent/Criteria.lean, line 60. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”.
Part (1) of [Stacks, Tag 0EMF]. On a scheme whose weakly associated points are generic points of irreducible components and whose quasi-compact opens have finitely many irreducible components, the sheaf of meromorphic functions is quasi-coherent: it is then the product of the generic-point contributions, and that product is quasi-coherent.
theorem meromorphicFunctions_isQuasicoherent_of_genericHypotheses {X : Scheme.{u}}
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfin : ∀ U : X.Opens, IsCompact (U : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents (U : Set X)).Finite) :
(meromorphicFunctions X).IsQuasicoherent
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_commRing_rationalFunctions_ringEquiv_totalQuotientSheaf_top, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/RationalFunctions/Meromorphic.lean, line 608. The attribute's comment: “part (6)”. References: EGA I (7.1.3), “special case”.
Part (6) of [Stacks, Tag 0EMF], with the commutative ring structure on the rational functions constructed rather than assumed: it is transported from the global sections of the sheaf of total quotient rings along the bijection, and every section on a dense open set is a ring homomorphism to it, which is the characterization of [Stacks, Tag 01RU].
theorem exists_commRing_rationalFunctions_ringEquiv_totalQuotientSheaf_top (X : Scheme.{u})
(hass : Stacks.Divisors.schemeWeaklyAssociatedPoints X ⊆ genericPoints X)
(hfinite : ∀ V : X.Opens, IsCompact (V : Set X) → (irreducibleComponents V).Finite) :
∃ _ : CommRing X.rationalFunctions,
(∀ (U : X.Opens) (hU : Dense (U : Set X)),
∃ ψ : Γ(X, U) →+* X.rationalFunctions,
∀ s, ψ s = X.rationalFunctionOfSection U hU s) ∧
Nonempty (X.rationalFunctions ≃+* X.totalQuotientSheaf.presheaf.obj (op ⊤))
Tag 02OX, a definition
Tag 02OX in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.IsRegularMeromorphicSection, an abbrev in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/MeromorphicSections.lean, line 83. References: EGA IV (20.1.8), “regular section defn”.
A meromorphic section is regular if its induced map from the total quotient sheaf to the meromorphic section sheaf is injective.
noncomputable abbrev IsRegularMeromorphicSection (O : TopCat.Sheaf CommRingCat.{u} X)
(L : SheafOfModules.{u} (Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (C := Opens X)
(J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) O))
(s : MeromorphicSection O L) : Prop
Tag 02OY, a lemma
Tag 02OY in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.pullbackMeromorphicSection, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/SectionPullback.lean, line 216. The attribute's comment: “part (1)”. References: EGA IV (20.1.11), “mero section pullback”.
The canonical pullback map on meromorphic sections. When pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined for
f, a meromorphic section of a sheaf of𝒪_Y-modulesFpulls back to a meromorphic section off^* F: apply the morphism𝒦_Y(F) ⟶ f_* 𝒦_X(f^* F)and read the resulting global section over the whole ofX.
noncomputable def pullbackMeromorphicSection (s : MeromorphicSection Y.sheaf F) :
MeromorphicSection X.sheaf
((RingedSpaceModuleAdjunction.modulePullback f.toShHom).obj F)
AlgebraicGeometry.isRegularMeromorphicSection_pullbackMeromorphicSection_of_isInvertible, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/SectionPullbackRegularGeneral.lean, line 49. The attribute's comment: “part (2)”.
Stacks 02OY part (2). Let
f : X ⟶ Ybe a morphism of locally ringed spaces for which pullbacks of meromorphic functions are defined and letLbe an invertible𝒪_Y-module. The pullback of a regular meromorphic section ofLis a regular meromorphic section off^* L.
theorem isRegularMeromorphicSection_pullbackMeromorphicSection_of_isInvertible
{X Y : LocallyRingedSpace.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (hf : PullbacksMeromorphicSections f)
(L : SheafOfModules.{u} Y.ringCatSheaf)
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible Y.presheaf Y.ringCatSheaf.property L)
(s : MeromorphicSection Y.sheaf L) (hs : IsRegularMeromorphicSection Y.sheaf L s) :
IsRegularMeromorphicSection X.sheaf
((RingedSpaceModuleAdjunction.modulePullback f.toShHom).obj L)
(pullbackMeromorphicSection f hf L s)
Tag 02P0, a lemma
Tag 02P0 in the Stacks Project.
Stacks.DenominatorIdeal.denominatorIdeal_sections, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorIdeal/Basic.lean, line 117. The attribute's comment: “the denominator rule”.
A section of the structure sheaf is a denominator of the meromorphic section
sexactly when its product withsis a section ofL.
theorem denominatorIdeal_sections (U : Opens X)
(f : (SheafOfModules.unit (O X)).val.obj (op U)) :
(∃ d : (denominatorIdeal X L s).val.obj (op U),
(denominatorIdealι X L s).val.app (op U) d = f) ↔
(∃ t : L.val.obj (op U),
(sectionMap X L s).val.app (op U) f =
(toK X L).val.app (op U) t)
Stacks.DenominatorIdeal.denominatorIdeal_section_mono, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorIdeal/Basic.lean, line 167. The attribute's comment: “multiplication is injective”.
Multiplication by a regular meromorphic section embeds its denominator ideal in
L.
theorem denominatorIdeal_section_mono (hs : IsRegularMeromorphicSection X.sheaf L s) :
Mono (denominatorIdealMul X L s)
Stacks.DenominatorIdealInvertible.denominatorIdeal_inclusion_mono, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorIdealInvertible/Basic.lean, line 140. The attribute's comment: “inclusion is injective”.
The denominator ideal of a meromorphic section of an invertible sheaf embeds in the structure sheaf. Stacks Tag 02P0, "inclusion is injective".
theorem denominatorIdeal_inclusion_mono (s : MeromorphicSection.{u, u} X.sheaf L)
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.presheaf (O X).property L) :
Mono (denominatorIdealι X L s)
Stacks.DenominatorIdealQcoh.denominatorIdeal_isQuasicoherent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorIdealQcoh/Basic.lean, line 276. The attribute's comment: “quasi-coherence”. References: EGA IV (20.2.14), “special case”.
The denominator ideal of a meromorphic section of an invertible sheaf is quasi-coherent.
Around every point there is an affine open
Von which the denominator ideal is the colon ideal(b Γ(X, V) : a)for a nonzerodivisorband a numeratora, and the colon ideal commutes with localization, so the sections over each basic open ofVare the localization of the sections overV. Those affine opens coverX, and quasi-coherence is detected by that condition on the members of a cover.
theorem denominatorIdeal_isQuasicoherent
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.presheaf (O X).property L) :
(denominatorIdeal X L s).IsQuasicoherent
Stacks.DenominatorIdealQcoh.denominatorIdealData_ideal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorIdealQcoh/IdealData.lean, line 189. The attribute's comment: “affine denominator ideal”.
On each affine open the ideal-sheaf data are exactly the denominators.
Scheme.IdealSheafData.ofIdealsis a supremum and in general shrinks the family of ideals it is applied to; it does not here, because quasi-coherence of the denominator ideal makes that family compatible with passage to a basic open, so it is already an ideal sheaf.
theorem denominatorIdealData_ideal
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.presheaf (O X).property L)
(U : X.affineOpens) :
(denominatorIdealData X L s).ideal U =
((denominatorIdealι X L s).val.app (op U.1)).hom.range
Stacks.DenominatorIdealQcoh.denominatorIdealData_support_isNowhereDense, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorIdealQcoh/IdealData.lean, line 204. The attribute's comment: “support of the denominator ideal”.
The closed support of the denominator ideal is nowhere dense.
Around every point of every open set there is an affine open carrying a nonzerodivisor
bwhich is a denominator ofs, so(b) ⊆ Ithere and the support is contained inV(b), which has empty interior. Shrinking freely is legitimate because the nowhere-density argument runs on an affine open of its own choosing inside the interior of the support.
theorem denominatorIdealData_support_isNowhereDense
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.presheaf (O X).property L) :
IsNowhereDense ((denominatorIdealData X L s).support : Set X)
Stacks.DenominatorCokernel.denominatorIdeal_inclusion_support, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorLocalRatio/Cokernels.lean, line 189. The attribute's comment: “support of the first cokernel”.
The cokernel of the inclusion of the denominator ideal in the structure sheaf is supported on a closed nowhere dense subset.
theorem denominatorIdeal_inclusion_support
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.presheaf (O X).property L) :
∃ T : Set X, IsClosed T ∧ IsNowhereDense T ∧
(asModuleSheaf X (cokernel (denominatorIdealι X L s))).supp ⊆ T
Stacks.DenominatorCokernel.denominatorIdeal_section_support, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/DenominatorLocalRatio/MulCokernel.lean, line 112. The attribute's comment: “support of the second cokernel”.
The cokernel of multiplication by a regular meromorphic section of an invertible sheaf is supported on a closed nowhere dense subset. Stacks Tag 02P0, "support of the second cokernel".
theorem denominatorIdeal_section_support
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.presheaf (O X).property L)
(hs : IsRegularMeromorphicSection X.sheaf L s) :
∃ T : Set X, IsClosed T ∧ IsNowhereDense T ∧
(asModuleSheaf X (cokernel (denominatorIdealMul X L s))).supp ⊆ T
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_denominatorIdeal_inclusion_app_eq_iff, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/DenominatorRule.lean, line 93. The attribute's comment: “the denominator rule”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, the denominator rule. A section
fof𝒪_XoverVlies in the ideal of denominators of a meromorphic sectionsofLexactly whenf sis a section ofLoverV; here "lies in the ideal" means thatfis the image of a section of the fibre product under the ideal inclusion, and "f sis a section ofL" means thatf sis the image of a section ofLunder the canonical mapL ⟶ K_X(L).
theorem exists_denominatorIdeal_inclusion_app_eq_iff
(L : SheafOfModules.{u}
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf))
(s : MeromorphicSection X.sheaf L) (V : Opens X)
(f : (SheafOfModules.unit
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf)).val.obj
(op V)) :
(∃ d : (denominatorIdeal X L s).val.obj (op V),
(denominatorIdealι X L s).val.app (op V) d = f) ↔
(∃ t : L.val.obj (op V),
(meromorphicSectionMul X L s).val.app (op V) f =
(toMeromorphicSectionSheafAsModule X L).val.app (op V) t)
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdeal_section_mono, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/Denominators.lean, line 241. The attribute's comment: “multiplication is injective”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, injectivity of multiplication by the section. For a regular meromorphic section
sofL, multiplication bysembeds the ideal of denominators ofsinL.
theorem denominatorIdeal_section_mono
(L : SheafOfModules.{u}
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf))
(s : MeromorphicSection X.sheaf L)
(_hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf).property
L)
(hs : IsRegularMeromorphicSection X.sheaf L s) :
Mono (denominatorIdealMul X L s)
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdeal_inclusion_mono, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/DenominatorsInclusion.lean, line 473. The attribute's comment: “inclusion is injective”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, injectivity of the ideal inclusion. For an invertible sheaf of modules
Land a meromorphic sectionsofL, the ideal of denominators ofsembeds in the structure sheaf.
theorem denominatorIdeal_inclusion_mono
(L : SheafOfModules.{u}
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf))
(s : MeromorphicSection X.sheaf L)
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf).property
L) :
Mono (denominatorIdealι X L s)
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdealData_ideal, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Meromorphic/DenominatorIdealData.lean, line 228. The attribute's comment: “affine denominator ideal”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, the affine denominator ideal. For an invertible sheaf of modules
Land a meromorphic sectionsofL, the component ofAlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdealDataat an affine openUis exactly the range of the inclusion of the ideal of denominators on sections overU: assembling the ideal sheaf from those ranges byAlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.IdealSheafData.ofIdealsdoes not shrink any of them.
theorem denominatorIdealData_ideal
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf).property
L)
(U : X.affineOpens) :
(denominatorIdealData X L s).ideal U =
((denominatorIdealι X L s).val.app (op U.1)).hom.range
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdealData_support_isNowhereDense, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Meromorphic/DenominatorIdealData.lean, line 256. The attribute's comment: “support of the denominator ideal”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, the support of the ideal of denominators. For an invertible sheaf of modules
Land a meromorphic sectionsofL, the support ofAlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdealDatais a nowhere dense subset ofX.It is contained in the complement of the union, over the points of
X, of the part of the affine neighbourhood produced byAlgebraicGeometry.exists_isAffineOpen_nhds_isNowhereDense_denominatoron which the denominatorbfound there is invertible: on an affine open inside such a set the ideal inclusion is surjective on sections, so byAlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdealData_idealthe component of the ideal sheaf there is the unit ideal and its zero locus contains no point of that open. The union is dense because the vanishing locus of a nonzerodivisor on an affine open is nowhere dense, so its complement is nowhere dense.
theorem denominatorIdealData_support_isNowhereDense
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf).property
L) :
IsNowhereDense ((denominatorIdealData X L s).support : Set X)
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdeal_isQuasicoherent, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Meromorphic/DenominatorQuasicoherent.lean, line 411. The attribute's comment: “quasi-coherence”. References: EGA IV (20.2.14), “special case”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, quasi-coherence of the ideal of denominators. For an invertible sheaf of modules
Land a meromorphic sectionsofL, the ideal of denominators ofsis a quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals.Quasi-coherence is checked by the localization criterion on the affine opens contained in the neighbourhoods of
AlgebraicGeometry.exists_isAffineOpen_nhds_denominator_numerator_isUnit, which coverX. There the sections of the ideal are cut out by the colon conditionf · a ∈ (b)ofAlgebraicGeometry.exists_denominatorIdeal_inclusion_app_eq_iff_mul_eq_of_le, and a colon condition localizes byAlgebraicGeometry.isLocalizedModule_restrictₗ_of_colon. Regularity ofsis not used: the source assumes it throughout Tag 02P0, but of its conclusions only injectivity of multiplication bysand the support of that map's cokernel need it.
theorem denominatorIdeal_isQuasicoherent
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf).property
L) :
(denominatorIdeal X L s).IsQuasicoherent
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdeal_inclusion_support, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Meromorphic/DenominatorSupport.lean, line 350. The attribute's comment: “support of the first cokernel”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, the support of the first cokernel. For an invertible sheaf of modules
Land a meromorphic sectionsofL, the cokernel of the inclusion of the ideal of denominators ofsin the structure sheaf is supported on a closed nowhere dense subset.The set is the complement of the union, over the points of
X, of the part of the affine neighbourhood produced byAlgebraicGeometry.exists_isAffineOpen_nhds_isNowhereDense_denominatoron which the denominatorbfound there is invertible. On each such open set the whole structure sheaf consists of denominators, becauseblies in the ideal and is a unit, so the cokernel has no sections there; and the union is dense because the vanishing locus of a nonzerodivisor on an affine open is nowhere dense.
theorem denominatorIdeal_inclusion_support
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf).property
L) :
∃ T : Set X, IsClosed T ∧ IsNowhereDense T ∧
(⟨(cokernel (denominatorIdealι X L s)).val,
(cokernel (denominatorIdealι X L s)).isSheaf⟩ :
RingedSpace.ModuleSheaf.{u} X.toRingedSpace).supp ⊆ T
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdeal_section_support, a theorem in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Meromorphic/DenominatorSupport.lean, line 580. The attribute's comment: “support of the second cokernel”.
Stacks Project, Tag 02P0, the support of the second cokernel. For an invertible sheaf of modules
Land a regular meromorphic sectionsofL, the cokernel of multiplication byson the ideal of denominators ofsis supported on a closed nowhere dense subset.The set is the complement of the union, over the points of
X, of the part of the affine neighbourhood produced byAlgebraicGeometry.exists_isAffineOpen_nhds_denominator_numeratoron which the numeratorafound there is invertible. On each such open set every section ofLisd · sfor a denominatord, becauseLis generated bygandb · s = a · gwithaa unit; and the union is dense becauseais a nonzerodivisor (AlgebraicGeometry.numerator_mem_nonZeroDivisors, which is where regularity ofsenters) and the vanishing locus of a nonzerodivisor on an affine open is nowhere dense.
theorem denominatorIdeal_section_support
(hL : AlgebraicGeometry.SheafOfModules.IsInvertible X.sheaf.obj
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf).property
L)
(hs : IsRegularMeromorphicSection X.sheaf L s) :
∃ T : Set X, IsClosed T ∧ IsNowhereDense T ∧
(⟨(cokernel (denominatorIdealMul X L s)).val,
(cokernel (denominatorIdealMul X L s)).isSheaf⟩ :
RingedSpace.ModuleSheaf.{u} X.toRingedSpace).supp ⊆ T
Tag 02P1, a definition
Tag 02P1 in the Stacks Project.
AlgebraicGeometry.denominatorIdeal, a def in StacksFrontier (drafted, not yet reviewed), declared in StacksFrontier/AlgebraicGeometry/Divisors/Meromorphic/Denominators.lean, line 190. The attribute's comment: “the ideal sheaf of denominators of s”. References: EGA IV (20.2.14), “definition”.
The sheaf of denominators of a meromorphic section, as the fibre product of the structure sheaf and
LoverK_X(L). Its sections overVare the pairs(f, t)withf s = tinK_X(L)(V), so the image of its first projection is{f ∈ 𝒪_X(V) | f s ∈ L(V)}.
def denominatorIdeal
(L : SheafOfModules.{u}
(Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X) X.sheaf))
(s : MeromorphicSection X.sheaf L) :
SheafOfModules.{u} (Stacks.Sheaves.Differentials.ringSheaf (J := Opens.grothendieckTopology X)
X.sheaf)
Sources
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.