Conjecture relating two… to Prime-th recurrence with…

TheoremConjecture relating two characterizations of a set of integers.#

Informal Statement: For an integer \(k \ge 2\), the following are equivalent:

  1. The greatest common divisor of the binomial coefficients \(\binom{2k}{k}, \binom{3k}{k}, \dots, \binom{(k+1)k}{k} = 1\).

  2. Writing prime factorization of \(k\) as \(k = \prod p_i^{e_i}\), and let \(P = \max_i p_i^{e_i}\), one has \(k / P > P\).

This conjecture asserts that the sequence defined by 1. is obtained by taking 1 off each number in the sequence defined by 2.

References: - A80170 - A51283

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/80170.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 solved. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA80170.gcdCondition_iff_primePowerCondition

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/guodk/formal-conjectures/blob/0720658844d76a50d48e4baa152eef14d4462907/FormalConjectures/OEIS/80170.lean#L1823.

Conjecture: The gcd condition is equivalent to the prime power condition. This has been conjectured by Ralf Stephan.

Both the natural-language proof and its Lean 4 formalization were carried out by the KLMM MechMath Agent Team; see the formal_proof attribute.

References: - Ralf Stephan, Prove or Disprove. 100 Conjectures from the OEIS, 2004, Conjecture 17 (arXiv:math/0409509) - Dakai Guo et al., A Greatest Common Divisor Criterion of Certain Binomial Coefficients, 2026 (arXiv:2606.22997)

theorem gcdCondition_iff_primePowerCondition (k : ℕ) (hk : 2 ≤ k) :
    A k ↔ B (k + 1)

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/80170.lean, line 91.

Sources

TheoremDenominator of \(\sum_{k=1}^n k^{\mu(k)}\)#

The sequence \(a(n)\) is the denominator of \(\sum_{k=1}^n k^{\mu(k)}\), where \(\mu\) is the Möbius function.

References: - A080326

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/80326.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA80326.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

Conjecture: \(a(n) = \text{primorial}(n)\) for infinitely many \(n\).

theorem conjecture : {n : ℕ | a n = primorial n}.Infinite

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/80326.lean, line 75.

Sources

TheoremPrimes of the form 2^n + 2^i + 1#

There are infinite primes of the form \(2^n + 2^i + 1\), with \(0 < i < n\). See Wagstaff (2001) where this conjecture is posed.

References: - A81091 - Samuel S. Wagstaff, Jr., Prime Numbers with a fixed number of one bits or zero bits in their binary representation, Exp. Math. vol. 10, issue 2 (2001) 267.

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/81091.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA81091.conjectureA81091

Open: stated without proof.

Conjecture (A81091): There are infinite primes of the form \(2^n + 2^i + 1\), with \(0 < i < n\).

theorem conjectureA81091 :
    Set.Infinite {p : ℕ | A p}

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/81091.lean, line 64.

Sources

TheoremSmallest palindrome with exactly \(n\) divisors#

The sequence \(a(n)\) is the smallest palindromic number with exactly \(n\) divisors, or \(0\) if no such number exists.

References: - A083753

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/83753.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 4 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA83753.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

There are no palindromic numbers greater than 1 which are the fifth or higher power of a natural number.

theorem conjecture (m k : ℕ) (hm : 1 < m) (hpal : IsDecimalPalindrome m) (hk : 5 ≤ k) :
    ¬ ∃ x : ℕ, m = x ^ k

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/83753.lean, line 94.

Sources

TheoremSmallest prime \(p\) such that \(p + n\) is an \(n\)-th power#

Smallest prime \(p\) such that \(p + n\) is an \(n\)-th power, or \(0\) if no such number exists. That is, the smallest prime of the form \(k^n - n\).

References: - A084046

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/84046.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 solved. It also has 4 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA84046.conjecture

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/epoch-research/LeanOpenProblems-results/blob/f02efd9a8c5fc6a735d2a90c33e24f7278ce0ffc/runs/oeis-full-50usd-oai-jajpvieznaevpoyg/a084046_conjecture_0/Submission/Spec.lean#L17.

Conjecture: if a(k) = 0 then k is an even square.

This is false for \(k = 27\). Every candidate \(x^{27} - 27\) factors as \((x^9 - 3)(x^{18} + 3x^9 + 9)\), so \(a(27) = 0\), but \(27\) is not an even square.

theorem conjecture : ¬ ∀ k : ℕ, a k = 0 → ∃ m : ℕ, k = (2 * m) ^ 2

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/84046.lean, line 112.

Sources

TheoremSmallest \(r\) such that (concatenation of \(n\), \(r\) times) \(\cdot 10 + 1\) is prime#

\(a(n)\) is the smallest \(r\) where (concatenation of \(n\), \(r\) times with itself) \(\cdot 10 + 1\) is a prime, or \(0\) if no such number exists. The number resulting from concatenating \(n\), \(r\) times, is \(n \cdot \sum_{i=0}^{r-1} (10^d)^i\), where \(d\) is the number of digits of \(n\).

References: - A086766

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/86766.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 3 research or textbook statements: 3 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA86766.conjecture1

Open: stated without proof.

What is the smallest integer \(m > 1\) such that \(a(10^m)\) is nonzero? - Farideh Firoozbakht, Jan 07 2015

theorem conjecture1 :
    conjecture1.answer =
      if h : ∃ m, 1 < m ∧ a (10 ^ m) ≠ 0 then
        some (sInf {m | 1 < m ∧ a (10 ^ m) ≠ 0})
      else
        none

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/86766.lean, line 149.

OeisA86766.conjecture2

Open: stated without proof.

Conjecture: If \(n\) is not of the form \(10^m\) then \(a(n)\) is nonzero. - Farideh Firoozbakht, Jan 07 2015

theorem conjecture2 (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) (h : ∀ m : ℕ, n ≠ 10 ^ m) : a n ≠ 0

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/86766.lean, line 163.

OeisA86766.conjecture3

Open: stated without proof.

What is the smallest odd prime \(p\) such that \((10^{p^2}-1)/(10^p-1)\) is a prime number (and \(a(10^{p-1})\) could be nonzero)? - Farideh Firoozbakht, Jan 07 2015

theorem conjecture3 :
    conjecture3.answer =
      if h : ∃ p, p.Prime ∧ 2 < p ∧ ((10 ^ (p ^ 2) - 1) / (10 ^ p - 1)).Prime then
        some (sInf {p | p.Prime ∧ 2 < p ∧ ((10 ^ (p ^ 2) - 1) / (10 ^ p - 1)).Prime})
      else
        none

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/86766.lean, line 175.

Sources

TheoremBinary representation of primes that divide a number, in decimal#

The value \(a(n)\) is given by

\[ a(n) = \sum_{p \mid n, p \text{ prime}} 2^{\pi(p) - 1} \]

where \(\pi(p) = \mathrm{primeCounting}(p)\) gives the 1-based index of the prime \(p\).

References: - A087207

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/87207.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA87207.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

Starting at any \(n\) and iterating the map \(n \mapsto a(n)\), we will always reach \(0\). - Antti Karttunen, Jun 18,20 2017

theorem conjecture (n : ℕ) : ∃ k : ℕ, (a^[k]) n = 0

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/87207.lean, line 65.

Sources

TheoremExpansion of \((1 - x)/(1 - 2 x + 3 x^2)\)#

This sequence is the expansion of \((1 - x)/(1 - 2 x + 3 x^2)\) in powers of \(x\). It satisfies the linear recurrence relation \(a(n) = 2 a(n-1) - 3 a(n-2)\) for \(n \ge 2\), with initial values \(a(0)=1\) and \(a(1)=1\).

References: - A087455

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/87455.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA87455.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

It is an open question whether or not this sequence satisfies Benford's law [Berger-Hill, 2017; Arno Berger, email, Jan 06 2017]. - N. J. A. Sloane, Feb 08 2017

theorem conjecture : SatisfiesBenford a

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory, 60 Probability theory and stochastic processes. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/87455.lean, line 81.

Sources

TheoremSmallest prime formed by concatenation \(n, n-1, \dots, n-k\)#

\(a(n)\) is the smallest prime which has the form of the concatenation \(n, n-1, n-2, \dots, n-k\) for some \(k < n\), or \(0\) if no such prime exists.

References: - A087571

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/87571.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA87571.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

Conjecture: There are infinitely many composite numbers \(n\) such that \(a(n)\) is nonzero.

theorem conjecture (M : ℕ) : ∃ n > M, 1 < n ∧ ¬ n.Prime ∧ a n ≠ 0

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/87571.lean, line 75.

Sources

TheoremConjectures associated with A087719#

Define \(\varsigma(n)\) the smallest prime factor of \(n\) (Nat.minFac). Let \(a_n\) be the least number such that the count of numbers \(k \le a_n\) with \(k > \varsigma(k)^n\) exceeds the count of numbers with \(k \le \varsigma(k)^n\).

The conjecture states that \(a_n = 3^n + 3 \cdot 2^n + 6\) for \(n \ge 1\).

References: - A087719

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/87719.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 2 research or textbook statements: 2 textbook results. It also has 3 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA87719.a_exists

Textbook result, stated without proof.

There exists m such that countExceeding n m > countNotExceeding n m.

theorem a_exists (n : ℕ) : ∃ m, countExceeding n m > countNotExceeding n m

Category textbook; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/87719.lean, line 49.

OeisA87719.a_formula

Textbook result, stated without proof. A Lean proof is at https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/7a286754f623759d69a3dd18f482c53c1d70959b/FormalConjectures/OEIS/87719.lean#L640.

We have the following formula: \(a(n) = 3^n + 3 * 2^n + 6\) for \(n \geq 1\).

theorem a_formula {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≥ 1) : a n = 3 ^ n + 3 * 2 ^ n + 6

Category textbook; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/87719.lean, line 84.

Sources

TheoremNumber of pairs of twin primes between \(n^2\) and \((n+1)^2\)#

\(a(n)\) is the number of pairs of twin primes between \(n^2\) and \((n+1)^2\). This counts the number of primes \(p\) such that \(p\) and \(p+2\) are both prime, and the entire twin prime pair \((p, p+2)\) lies strictly between \(n^2\) and \((n+1)^2\). That is, \(n^2 < p\) and \(p + 2 < (n+1)^2\).

References: - A091591

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/91591.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA91591.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

It is conjectured that \(a(n)>0\) for all \(n>122\). Proving this would also prove Legendre's conjecture that there is a prime between \(n^2\) and \((n+1)^2\). - T. D. Noe, Feb 28 2007

theorem conjecture :
    ∀ n : ℕ, n > 122 → a n > 0

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/91591.lean, line 65.

Sources

TheoremPrimality and primitive root property from divisibility \(n \mid (a(n-1) + 2^{n-2})\)#

\(a(n) = \frac{2^{n-1}}{n!} \prod_{k=1}^{n-1} (2^k-1)\). The sequence \(a(n)\) is composed of natural numbers, thus we define it as a function \(\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}\).

References: - A091669 - arxiv/2605.22763 Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search by George Tsoukalas et al.

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/91669.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 solved. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA91669.prime_and_primitive_root_of_dvd

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/mo271/formal-conjectures/blob/a32396489dcb8f86c3549b93aa358ac6a10a3a1f/FormalConjectures/OEIS/91669.wip.lean#L250.

Conjecture (for \(n > 2\)): if \(n \mid a(n-1) + 2^{n-2}\), then \(n\) is a prime with primitive root 2 (A001122). - Amiram Eldar and Thomas Ordowski, Jan 19 2020

A formal proof has been found with the methods described in arxiv/2605.22763.

theorem prime_and_primitive_root_of_dvd (n : ℕ) (hn : n > 2) : n ∣ (a (n - 1) + 2 ^ (n - 2)) →
    Nat.Prime n ∧ IsPrimitiveRoot (2 : ZMod n) (Nat.totient n)

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/91669.lean, line 84.

Sources

TheoremTug of war score between prime gap increases and decreases#

Score at stage \(n\) in "tug of war" between prime gap increases vs. prime gap decreases: start with score \(= 0\) at \(n = 1\) and at stage \(k > 1\), increase (resp. decrease) the score by \(1\) if the \(k\)-th prime gap is greater (resp. less) than the previous prime gap.

References: - A092243

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/92243.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 5 research or textbook statements: 5 open. It also has 4 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA92243.conjecture1

Open: stated without proof.

Is the score \(a(n) > 0\) for some \(n > 250000\)?

theorem conjecture1 : ∃ n > 250000, a n > 0

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/92243.lean, line 88.

OeisA92243.conjecture2

Open: stated without proof.

Is the score \(a(n)\) bounded from below?

theorem conjecture2 : ∃ B : ℤ, ∀ n : ℕ, B ≤ a n

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/92243.lean, line 94.

OeisA92243.conjecture3

Open: stated without proof.

Is the score \(a(n)\) bounded from above?

theorem conjecture3 : ∃ B : ℤ, ∀ n : ℕ, a n ≤ B

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/92243.lean, line 100.

OeisA92243.conjecture4

Open: stated without proof.

Is the score \(a(n) > 0\) for infinitely many values of \(n\)?

theorem conjecture4 : Set.Infinite {n : ℕ | a n > 0}

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/92243.lean, line 106.

OeisA92243.conjecture5

Open: stated without proof.

Is the score \(a(n) < 0\) for infinitely many values of \(n\)?

theorem conjecture5 : Set.Infinite {n : ℕ | a n < 0}

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/92243.lean, line 112.

Sources

TheoremProduct of composite numbers in triangular intervals#

Product of all composite numbers between \(n(n-1)/2+1\) and \(n(n+1)/2\) (including boundaries), where \(n(n-1)/2 = \binom{n}{2}\) and \(n(n+1)/2 = \binom{n+1}{2}\).

References: - A093456

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/93456.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 solved. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA93456.conjecture

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/epoch-research/LeanOpenProblems-results/blob/f02efd9a8c5fc6a735d2a90c33e24f7278ce0ffc/runs/oeis-full-50usd-ant-j0j0g4uzligm1k41/oeis_93456_conjecture_0/Submission/Spec.lean#L109.

Conjecture: There are finitely many numbers such that \(a(n)\) is not \(\equiv 0 \pmod{a(n-1)}\). (Also mentioned in A093455.) In fact there are infinitely many such numbers.

theorem conjecture :
    ¬ Set.Finite {n : ℕ | 1 < n ∧ ¬ (a (n - 1) ∣ a n)}

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/93456.lean, line 65.

Sources

Theorem\(\gcd(\mathrm{numerator}(H_n), n!)\)#

\(a(n) = \gcd(\mathrm{A001008}(n), n!)\), where \(\mathrm{A001008}(n)\) is the numerator of the \(n\)-th harmonic number \(H_n = \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{i}\).

References: - A093818

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/93818.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA93818.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

Conjecture: Every odd prime occurs as a term in the sequence.

theorem conjecture (p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime) (hp_odd : p ≠ 2) : ∃ n > 0, a n = p

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/93818.lean, line 61.

Sources

TheoremRecurrence \(a(n) = (a(n-1) + a(n-2)) \pmod n\)#

\(a(0) = a(1) = 1\); \(a(n) = (a(n-1) + a(n-2)) \pmod n\).

References: - A096535

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/96535.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 open. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA96535.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

All numbers appear infinitely often, i.e., for every number \(k \ge 0\) and every frequency \(f > 0\) there is an index \(i\) such that \(a(i) = k\) is the \(f\)-th occurrence of \(k\) in the sequence. - Klaus Brockhaus, Aug 29 2006

theorem conjecture (k : ℕ) (N : ℕ) : ∃ i : ℕ, i > N ∧ a i = k

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/96535.lean, line 64.

Sources

TheoremCoefficients in a simultaneous approximation to two polylogarithms#

Coefficients in a simultaneous approximation to \(\operatorname{Li}_2(-1)\) and \(\operatorname{Li}_3(-1)\), given by \(a(n)=\sum_{i,j=0}^{n}\binom{n}{i}^2\binom{n}{j}^2\binom{n+i}{n}\binom{i+j}{i}\).

References: - A098275 - [Li26] Wentao Li, A proof of the OEIS A098275 conjecture, 2026.

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/98275.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 1 research or textbook statement: 1 solved. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA98275.conjecture_1

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/VictorLiwentao/lean-oeis-proofs/blob/0a23974e54b90afd1453ef02c27cf8f617bad940/LeanOeisProofs/NewProofs/A098275.lean#L166.

Conjecture 1: "Conjecture: \(a(n)\) is divisible by \(n+1\)." - F. Chapoton, Jan 28 2026.

Proved and formalized in Lean by Wentao Li, with AI assistance; see [Li26].

theorem conjecture_1 (n : ℕ) : n + 1 ∣ a n

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/98275.lean, line 66.

Sources

TheoremExpansion of g.f. \((1+x)(3+x)/(1+6x^2+x^4)\)#

This sequence is defined by the linear recurrence relation \(a(n) = -6 a(n-2) - a(n-4)\) for \(n \ge 4\), with initial values \(a(0)=3\), \(a(1)=4\), \(a(2)=-17\), \(a(3)=-24\).

References: - A100434

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 5 research or textbook statements: 3 solved and 2 textbook results. It also has 5 test statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA100434.a_even

Textbook result, proved here.

For all \(n \ge 0\), we have \(a(2n) = - c(2n+1)\).

theorem a_even (n : ℕ) : a (2 * n) = - c (2 * n + 1)

Category textbook; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean, line 109.

OeisA100434.a_odd

Textbook result, proved here.

For all \(n \ge 0\), we have \(a(2n+1) = d(2n+1)\).

theorem a_odd (n : ℕ) : a (2 * n + 1) = d (2 * n + 1)

Category textbook; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean, line 134.

OeisA100434.conjecture1

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/chy4pro/formal-conjectures/blob/32f88077a444b83741f1db6734390eebd3678ecf/FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean#L287.

Conjecture from Creighton Dement (A100434): Let the auxiliary sequences c, d, e, f, g, b be defined as specified. Then for all \(n \ge 0\), \(c(n) + d(n) = b(n)\).

Proof outline: strong two-step induction on the paired recurrences. The even/odd cases are coupled through closed identities between consecutive terms of the relevant pair of sequences (here \(c, d\)), and the induction step is discharged by rfl-level unfolding of the definitions plus linear arithmetic. (Numerically verified for \(n < 600\) before formalization.)

theorem conjecture1 (n : ℕ) : c n + d n = b n

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean, line 166.

OeisA100434.conjecture2

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/chy4pro/formal-conjectures/blob/32f88077a444b83741f1db6734390eebd3678ecf/FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean#L306.

Conjecture from Creighton Dement (A100434): Let the auxiliary sequences c, d, e, f, g, b be defined as specified. Then for all \(n \ge 0\), \(e(n) + f(n) = b(n)\).

Proof outline: strong two-step induction on the paired recurrences. The even/odd cases are coupled through closed identities between consecutive terms of the relevant pair of sequences (here \(e, f\)), and the induction step is discharged by rfl-level unfolding of the definitions plus linear arithmetic. (Numerically verified for \(n < 600\) before formalization.)

theorem conjecture2 (n : ℕ) : e n + f n = b n

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean, line 183.

OeisA100434.conjecture3

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/chy4pro/formal-conjectures/blob/32f88077a444b83741f1db6734390eebd3678ecf/FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean#L335.

Conjecture from Creighton Dement (A100434): Let the auxiliary sequences c, d, e, f, g, b be defined as specified. Then for all \(n \ge 0\), \(g(n) + a(n) = b(n)\).

Proof outline: strong two-step induction on the paired recurrences. The even/odd cases are coupled through closed identities between consecutive terms of the relevant pair of sequences (here \(g, a\)), and the induction step is discharged by rfl-level unfolding of the definitions plus linear arithmetic. (Numerically verified for \(n < 600\) before formalization.)

theorem conjecture3 (n : ℕ) : g n + a n = b n

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100434.lean, line 200.

Sources

TheoremConjectures associated with A100474#

\(a(1) = 1\); \(a(n)\) is the smallest integer such that \(a(n) + a(n-1)\) has the first \(n\) distinct prime factors not used before in this construction.

References: - A100474

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/100474.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 2 research or textbook statements: 1 open and 1 solved. It also has 5 test statements and 9 API statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA100474.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

After \(a(2) = 5\), is there another prime?

theorem conjecture : ∃ n > 2, (a n).Prime

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100474.lean, line 147.

OeisA100474.next_semiprime

Solved: stated here; a Lean proof is at https://github.com/KitaKen1/oeis-a100474-next-semiprime/blob/d7781751918e63fd1268b15525bf9554c92fdd4d/lean/OeisA100474NextSemiprimeFC.lean#L1285-L1288.

What is the next semiprime in the sequence after \(a(11)\)?

theorem next_semiprime :
    next_semiprime.answer =
      a (sInf {n : ℕ | 11 < n ∧ (a n).IsSemiprime})

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100474.lean, line 160.

Sources

TheoremPrime-th recurrence with reversal at each step#

\[a(n) = \operatorname{reversal}(p_{a(n-1)})\]

with \(a(0)=1\), where \(p_k\) is the \(k\)-th prime number.

References: - A100475

Quoted from FormalConjectures/OEIS/100475.lean in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind) at commit 2055e5ad, Apache-2.0, as are the docstrings and Lean statements below.

The file states 2 research or textbook statements: 1 open and 1 solved. It also has 5 test statements and 2 API statements, counted here but not shown.

OeisA100475.conjecture_with_zero

Proved here.

If zero is admitted as a starting value, then a start other than \(1\) does go into a loop: the sequence starting at zero is constant. This records the degenerate answer created by totalizing the one-based prime recurrence at index zero.

theorem conjecture_with_zero :
    ∃ x : ℕ, x ≠ 1 ∧ IsUltimatelyPeriodic (aStartAt x)

Category research solved; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100475.lean, line 113.

OeisA100475.conjecture

Open: stated without proof.

Starting at a positive value other than \(a(0) = 1\), does this sequence ever go into a loop?

The positivity hypothesis is required because the source recurrence uses the one-based prime index p₁ = 2; the x = 0 branch above is only an artifact of making aStartAt total on ℕ.

theorem conjecture :
    ∃ x : ℕ, 0 < x ∧ x ≠ 1 ∧ IsUltimatelyPeriodic (aStartAt x)

Category research open; AMS 11 Number theory. Declared in FormalConjectures/OEIS/100475.lean, line 126.

Sources

The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.

Download the complete graph data.